Indications and efficacy of conversion from tacrolimus- to sirolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric patients who underwent liver transplantation for unresectable hepatoblastoma

Surgical management of liver tumors

Two percent of pediatric malignancies arise primarily in the liver; roughly 60% of these cancers are hepatoblastoma (HB). Despite the rarity of these cases, international collaborative efforts have led to the consistent histological classification and staging systems, which facilitate ongoing clinical trials. Other primary liver malignancies seen in children include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with or without underlying liver disease, fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC), undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL), and hepatocellular neoplasm not otherwise specified (HCN-NOS). This review describes principles of surgical management of malignant pediatric primary liver tumors, within the context of comprehensive multidisciplinary care.

Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive medications play a crucial role in determining both organ and patient survival following liver transplantation (LT). Typically, immunosuppressive protocols for pediatric LT patients rely on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). While inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in adult recipients of liver allografts, such as improved renal function post-LT, their application in pediatric liver transplant recipients is a subject of debate due to uncertain efficacy and potential adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

This review evaluates the potential roles of mTOR inhibitors in the context of pediatric LT patients.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol for conduct and reporting. Databases until 31 August 2023 were searched using specific terms and keywords. All clinical studies focusing on mTOR inhibitors in pediatric LT were included.

RESULTS

Out of 888 identified articles, 30 studies, involving 386 children who had undergone liver transplantation and received mTOR-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens, met the inclusion criteria. The beneficial impacts of switching from a CNI to an mTOR inhibitor or adding an mTOR inhibitor to CNI-reduced immunosuppression in LT pediatric patients with impaired kidney function are controversial, and high-powered clinical studies are need. It appears that enhancing immunosuppression by adding an mTOR inhibitor to CNI is helpful for pediatric LT recipients who are experiencing refractory acute rejection or chronic rejection. mTOR-inhibitor-containing regimens failed to reduce the occurrence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) among children with LT that may be due to concomitant high CNI concentration among studied patients. The effectiveness of mTOR inhibitors in treating PTLD remains uncertain; however, in patients with PTLD who are at high risk of rejection, mTOR inhibitors may be administered. Conversion to or the addition of mTOR inhibitors to maintenance immunosuppression seems to be suitable for pediatric patients who received a transplant due to hepatic malignancies such as hepatoblastoma or hepatocellular carcinoma or for those with post-transplant primary or recurrent malignancies. Switching to an mTOR inhibitor may improve some CNI-related adverse effects such as gingival hyperplasia, neurotoxicity, nephropathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or thrombotic microangiopathy.

CONCLUSION

Although the exact role of mTOR inhibitors among pediatric patients who have received a liver transplant needs further study, two algorithms are presented in this review to guide conversion from CNIs to mTOR inhibitors or the addition of mTOR inhibitor to a CNI-minimization immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric patients who may benefit from this class of drugs. This review mainly consisted of retrospective studies with inadequate sample sizes and lacked a control group, which represents the main limitation of this study.

Immunosuppression in liver transplant oncology: position paper of the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT)

Liver transplant oncology (TO) represents an area of increasing clinical and scientific interest including a heterogeneous group of clinical-pathological settings. Immunosuppressive management after LT is a key factor relevantly impacting result. However, disease-related guidance is still lacking, and many open questions remain in the field. Based on such a substantial lack of solid evidences, the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT) (a working group including representatives of all national transplant centers), unprecedently promoted a methodologically sound consensus conference on the topic, based on the GRADE approach. The group final recommendations are herein presented and commented. The 18 PICOs and Statements and their levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are reported and grouped into seven areas: (1) risk stratification by histopathological and bio-molecular parameters and role of mTORi post-LT; (2) steroids and HCC recurrence; (3) management of immunosuppression when HCC recurs after LT; (4) mTORi monotherapy; (5) machine perfusion and HCC recurrence after LT; (6) physiopathology of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immunosuppression, the role of inflammation; (7) immunotherapy in liver transplanted patients. The interest in mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), for steroid avoidance and the need for a reduction to CNI exposure emerged from the consensus process. A selected list of unmet needs prompting further investigations have also been developed. The so far heterogeneous and granular approach to immunosuppression in oncologic patients deserves greater efforts for a more standardized therapeutic response to the different clinical scenarios. This consensus process makes a first unprecedented step in this direction, to be developed on a larger scale.

Critical elements of pediatric liver cancer surgery

The appropriate management of pediatric liver malignancies, primarily hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma, requires an in depth understanding of contemporary preoperative risk stratification, experience with advanced hepatobiliary surgery, and a good relationship with one's local or regional liver transplant center. While chemotherapy regimens have become more effective, operative indications more well-defined, and overall survival improved, the complexity of liver surgery in small children provides ample opportunity for protocol violation, inadequate resection, and iatrogenic morbidity. These guidelines represent the distillation of contemporary literature and expert opinion as a means to provide a framework for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making for the pediatric surgeon.

Precision sirolimus dosing in children: The potential for model-informed dosing and novel drug monitoring

The mTOR inhibitor sirolimus is prescribed to treat children with varying diseases, ranging from vascular anomalies to sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis to transplantation (solid organ or hematopoietic cell). Precision dosing of sirolimus using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sirolimus concentrations in whole blood drawn at the trough (before the next dose) time-point is the current standard of care. For sirolimus, trough concentrations are only modestly correlated with the area under the curve, with R 2 values ranging from 0.52 to 0.84. Thus, it should not be surprising, even with the use of sirolimus TDM, that patients treated with sirolimus have variable pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and effectiveness. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) will be beneficial and should be implemented. The data do not suggest dried blood spots point-of-care sampling of sirolimus concentrations for precision dosing of sirolimus. Future research on precision dosing of sirolimus should focus on pharmacogenomic and pharmacometabolomic tools to predict sirolimus pharmacokinetics and wearables for point-of-care quantitation and MIPD.

Long-Term Outcome Following Liver Transplantation for Primary Hepatic Tumors-A Single Centre Observational Study over 40 Years

The incidence of pediatric liver tumors in general has been rising over the last years and so is the number of children undergoing liver transplantation for this indication. To contribute to the ongoing improvement of pre- and post-transplant care, we aim to describe outcome and risk factors in our patient cohort. We have compared characteristics and outcome for patients transplanted for hepatoblastoma to other liver malignancies in our center between 1983 and 2022 and analysed influential factors on tumor recurrence and mortality using nominal logistic regression analysis. Of 39 children (16 f) who had transplants for liver malignancy, 31 were diagnosed with hepatoblastoma. The proportion of malignant tumors in the transplant cohort rose from 1.9% (1983-1992) to 9.1% in the current decade (p < 0.0001). Hepatoblastoma patients were transplanted at a younger age and were more likely to have tumor extent beyond the liver. Post-transplant bile flow impairment requiring intervention was significantly higher compared to our total cohort (48 vs. 24%, p > 0.0001). Hearing loss was a common side effect of ototoxic chemotherapy in hepatoblastoma patients (48%). The most common maintenance immunosuppression were mTor-inhibitors. Risk factors for tumor recurrence in patients with hepatoblastoma were higher AFP before transplant (AFP_pre-LTX), a low ratio of AFP_max to AFP_pre-LTX and salvage transplantation. Liver malignancies represent a rising number of indications for liver transplantation in childhood. Primary tumor resection can spare a liver transplant with all its long-term complications, but in case of tumor recurrence, transplantation might have inferior outcome. The rate of acute biopsy-proven rejections and biliary complications in comparison to our total transplant cohort needs further investigations.

Liver Transplant Oncology: Towards Dynamic Tumor-Biology-Oriented Patient Selection

While liver transplantation was initially considered as a curative treatment modality only for hepatocellular carcinoma, the indication has been increasingly extended to other tumor entities over recent years, most recently to the treatment of non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Although oncologic outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) are consistently good, organ shortage forces stringent selection of suitable candidates. Dynamic criteria based on tumor biology fulfill the prerequisite of an individual oncological prediction better than traditional morphometric criteria based on tumor burden. The availability of specific (neo-)adjuvant therapies and customized modern immunosuppression may further contribute to favorable post-transplantation outcomes on the one hand and simultaneously open the path to LT as a curative option for advanced stages of tumor patients. Herein, we provide an overview of the oncological LT indications, the selection process, and expected oncological outcome after LT.

Liver Transplantation in Malignancies: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review on Oncological Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation (LT) is today's standard treatment for both end-stage liver disease and tumors; however, suitable grafts for LT are a scarce resource and outcome after LT is highly dependent on its underlying indication. Thus, patients must be carefully selected to optimize the number of life years gained per graft. This comprehensive and systematic review critically reflects the most recently published oncological outcome data after LT in malignancies based on the preoperative radiological findings.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to detect preferentially most recent high-volume series or large database analysis on oncological outcomes after LT for both primary liver cancer and liver metastases between January 1, 2019, and November 14, 2020. A comprehensive review on the radiological assessment of the reviewed liver malignancies is included and its preoperative value for an outcome-driven indication reflected.

RESULTS

Twenty most recent high-volume or relevant studies including a total number of 2,521 patients were identified including 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, and 1 publications on oncological outcome after LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, hepatic epitheloid hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma, and both metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and colorectal cancer, respectively. The overall survival is comparable to patients without tumors if patients with malignancies are well selected for LT; however, this is highly dependent on tumor entity, tumor stage, and both neoadjuvant and concomitant treatment.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

LT is a promising option for better survival in patients with malignant liver tumors in selected patients; however, the indication must be critically discussed prior to LT in every single case in the context of organ shortage.