C1q-binding DSA and allograft outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Non-invasive biomarkers of acute rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation: New targets and strategies

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for pediatric end-stage renal disease. However, pediatric recipients face unique challenges due to their prolonged need for kidney function to accommodate growth and development. The continual changes in the immune microenvironment during childhood development and the heightened risk of complications from long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs. The overwhelming majority of children may require more than one kidney transplant in their lifetime. Acute rejection (AR) stands as the primary cause of kidney transplant failure in children. While pathologic biopsy remains the "gold standard" for diagnosing renal rejection, its invasive nature raises concerns regarding potential functional impairment and the psychological impact on children due to repeated procedures. In this review, we outline the current research status of novel biomarkers associated with AR in urine and blood after pediatric kidney transplantation. These biomarkers exhibit superior diagnostic and prognostic performance compared to conventional ones, with the added advantages of being less invasive and highly reproducible for long-term graft monitoring. We also integrate the limitations of these novel biomarkers and propose a refined monitoring model to optimize the management of AR in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, largely related to chronic rejection. Creatinine is a late marker of renal injury, and more sensitive, early markers of allograft injury are an active area of current research.

METHODS

This is an educational review summarizing existing strategies for monitoring for rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We summarize supporting currently available clinical tests, including surveillance biopsy, donor specific antibodies, and donor-derived cell free DNA, as well as the potential limitations of these studies. In addition, we review the current avenues of active research, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and torque tenovirus levels.

CONCLUSION

Advancing the use of noninvasive immune monitoring will depend on well-designed multicenter trials that include patients with stable graft function, include biopsy results on all patients, and can demonstrate both association with a patient-relevant clinical endpoint such as graft survival or change in glomerular filtration rate and a potential timepoint for intervention.

Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal

Introduction

Several studies have investigated the impact of circulating complement-activating anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) on organ transplant outcomes. However, a critical appraisal of these studies and a demonstration of the prognostic value of complement-activating status over anti-HLA DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal evaluating the role of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on allograft outcomes in different solid organ transplants. We included studies through Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase since inception of databases till May 05, 2023. We evaluated allograft loss as the primary outcome, and allograft rejection as the secondary outcome. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots to assess risk of bias and used bias adjustment methods when appropriate. We performed multiple subgroup analyses to account for sources of heterogeneity and studied the added value of complement assays over anti-HLA DSA MFI level.

Results

In total, 52 studies were included in the final meta-analysis (11,035 patients). Complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were associated with an increased risk of allograft loss (HR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.29, p<0.001; I²=46.2%), and allograft rejection (HR 4.98; 95% CI 2.96-8.36, p<0.01; I²=70.9%). These results remained significant after adjustment for potential sources of bias and across multiple subgroup analyses. After adjusting on pan-IgG anti-HLA DSA defined by the MFI levels, complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of allograft loss.

Discussion

We demonstrated in this systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal the significant deleterious impact and the independent prognostic value of circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on solid organ transplant risk of allograft loss and rejection.

Donor specific antibody surveillance among pediatric kidney transplant programs: A report from the improving renal outcome collaborative

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the preferred treatment for children with end-stage kidney disease. Recent advances in immunosuppression and advances in donor specific antibody (DSA) testing have resulted in prolonged allograft survival; however, standardized approaches for surveillance DSA monitoring and management of de novo (dn) DSA are widely variable among pediatric KT programs.

METHODS

Pediatric transplant nephrologists in the multi-center Improving Renal Outcomes Collaborative (IROC) participated in a voluntary, web-based survey between 2019 and 2020. Centers provided information pertaining to frequency and timing of routine DSA surveillance and theoretical management of dnDSA development in the setting of stable graft function.

RESULTS

29/30 IROC centers responded to the survey. Among the participating centers, screening for DSA occurs, on average, every 3 months for the first 12 months post-transplant. Antibody mean fluorescent intensity and trend most frequently directed changes in patient management. Increased creatinine above baseline was reported by all centers as an indication for DSA assessment outside of routine surveillance testing. 24/29 centers would continue to monitor DSA and/or intensify immunosuppression after detection of antibodies in the setting of stable graft function. In addition to enhanced monitoring, 10/29 centers reported performing an allograft biopsy upon detection of dnDSA, even in the setting of stable graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive report is the largest reported survey of pediatric transplant nephrologist practice patterns on this topic and provides a reference for monitoring dnDSA in the pediatric kidney transplant population.

The impact of preformed and de novo HLA-DP antibodies in renal transplantation, a meta-analysis

The impact of preformed and de novo HLA-DP antibodies after renal transplantation remains controversial and unclear. To address the clinical relevance of HLA-DP antibodies on the outcomes in renal transplantation, we performed a random effect model meta-analysis through a systematic review from inception to December 31, 2021. The outcome was graft loss or acute rejection. Finally five articles were identified as our inclusion criteria. The study which reported 1166 patients included in the final meta-analysis of de novo HLA-DP antibodies after transplantation showed an increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.6-8.10, P = 0.002, I²  = 52%). In the subgroup study, we established that patients with HLA-DP DSA after renal transplantation had a 8.85-fold increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection compared with patients without HLA-DP DSA (p = 0.003).While as for HLA-DP NDSA after renal transplantation, 2.73-fold increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection compared with patients without HLA-DP antibodies (p = 0.04). Besides, the studies which reported 487 patients included in the final meta-analysis of preformed HLA-DP antibodies did not show an increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 0.79-26.16, P = 0.09, I²  = 57%). The results of our meta-analysis suggested that de novo HLA-DP antibodies especially de novo HLA-DP DSA had a significant deleterious impact on the renal transplant risk of graft loss or acute rejection, while preformed HLA-DP antibodies had a no significant deleterious impact on the risk. The routine detection of HLA-DP antibodies after renal transplantation seems to be very important and may be as one of noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.

Challenges of Diagnosing Antibody-Mediated Rejection: The Role of Invasive and Non-Invasive Biomarkers

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment modality for end-stage kidney disease, leading to improvement in a patient’s quality and quantity of life. With significant improvements in short-term outcomes, prolonging long-term allograft and patient survival remain ongoing challenges. The ability to monitor allograft function, immune tolerance and predict rejection accurately would enable personalization and better prognostication during post-transplant care. Though kidney biopsy remains the backbone of transplant diagnostics, emerging biomarkers can help detecting kidney allograft injury early enough to prevent permanent damage and detect injury before it is clinically apparent. In this review, we summarize the recent biomarkers that have shown promise in the prediction of acute rejection with a focus on antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation.