1
|
Sgrò A, Cambridge WA, McLean KA, Drake TM, Camilleri-Brennan J, Knight SR, Pius R, Wu DA, Wigmore SJ, Harrison EM. Is socioeconomic deprivation associated with worse quality of life, anxiety and depression in liver transplant recipients? A cross-sectional study in a national transplantation programme. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070422. [PMID: 37558450 PMCID: PMC10414121 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify whether socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), anxiety and depression following liver transplantation. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Liver transplant recipients within a national transplantation programme. METHODS Participants completed the condition-specific 'Short Form of Liver Disease Quality of Life' Questionnaire, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The aggregate HR-QoL Score (range 0-100) was derived, and multivariable linear regression was performed based on sociodemographic and clinical variables to estimate its independent association with Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles. The GAD-7 Questionnaire and PHQ-9 were used to screen respondents for anxiety and depression, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate their independent association with SIMD quintiles. RESULTS Some 331 patients completed the questionnaires. Quintiles were equally distributed in the cohort, with no significant differences observed in underlying patient characteristics. Following multivariable adjustment, greater socioeconomic deprivation was associated with lower post-transplantation HR-QoL scores, with a difference of 9.7 points (95% CI: 4.6 to 14.9, p<0.001) between the most and least deprived quintiles. Recipients living in areas of least deprivation were less likely to suffer from anxiety (OR 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.28, p=0.003) or depression (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.56, p=0.009). CONCLUSION Despite the highly selected nature of liver transplant recipients, those living in the most deprived areas have a significantly lower HR-QoL and are more likely to suffer from anxiety and depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Sgrò
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - William A Cambridge
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kenneth A McLean
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas M Drake
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Riinu Pius
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Diana A Wu
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Stephen J Wigmore
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ewen M Harrison
- Centre for Medical Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rasmussen SK, Lemoine CP, Superina R, Sayed B, Goldaracena N, Soltys KA, Griesemer A, Dick A, Angelis M, Chin LT, Florman S, Ganoza A, Lyer K, Kang SM, Magliocca J, Squires J, Eisenberg E, Bray D, Tunno J, Reyes JD, Mazariegos GV. State of pediatric liver transplantation in the United States and achieving zero wait list mortality with ideal outcomes: A statement from the Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplant Surgeon's Working Group. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27 Suppl 1:e14283. [PMID: 36468324 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplant is a life-saving therapy that can restore quality life for several pediatric liver diseases. However, it is not available to all children who need one. Expertise in medical and surgical management is heterogeneous, and allocation policies are not optimally serving children. Technical variant grafts from both living and deceased donors are underutilized. METHODS Several national efforts in pediatric liver transplant to improve access to and outcomes from liver transplant for children have been instituted and include adjustments to allocation policies, UNOS-sponsored collaborative improvement projects, and the emergence of national learning networks to study ongoing challenges in the field the Surgical Working group of the Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation (SNEPT) discusses key issues and proposes potential solutions to eliminate the persistent wait list mortality that pediatric patients face. RESULTS A discussion of the factors impacting pediatric patients' access to liver transplant is undertaken, along with a proposal of several measures to ensure equitable access to life-saving liver transplant. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric liver transplant wait list mortality can and should be eliminated. Several measures, including collaborative efforts among centers, could be leveraged to acheive this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara K Rasmussen
- Department of Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Caroline P Lemoine
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Riccardo Superina
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Blayne Sayed
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kyle A Soltys
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam Griesemer
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andre Dick
- Department of Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - L Thomas Chin
- Advent Health Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Sander Florman
- Mt Sinai Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Armando Ganoza
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kishore Lyer
- Mt Sinai Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sang-Mo Kang
- Mt Sinai Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph Magliocca
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - James Squires
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth Eisenberg
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Patient and Family Voice Committee, Starzl Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Bray
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Patient and Family Voice Committee, Starzl Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John Tunno
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jorge D Reyes
- Department of Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - George V Mazariegos
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morenz A, Perkins J, Dick A, Young B, Ng YH. Reexamining the Impact of Insurance Type on Kidney Transplant Waitlist Status and Posttransplantation Outcomes in the United States After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1442. [PMID: 36743233 PMCID: PMC9891441 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Insurance type, a marker of socioeconomic status, has been associated with poor access to kidney transplant (KT) and worse KT outcomes before the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the revised Kidney Allocation System (KAS). In this study, we assessed if insurance type remained a risk marker for worse waitlist and transplant outcomes after ACA and KAS. Methods Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we assessed insurance type of waitlisted candidates pre- (2008-2014) versus post- (2014-2021) KAS/ACA using chi-square tests. Next, we performed a competing risk analysis to study the effect of private versus public (Medicare, Medicaid, or government-sponsored) insurance on waitlist outcomes and a Cox survival analysis to study posttransplant outcomes while controlling for candidate, and recipient and donor variables, respectively. Results The proportion of overall KT candidates insured by Medicaid increased from pre-KAS/ACA to post-KAS/ACA (from 12 667 [7.3%] to 21 768 [8.8%], P < 0.0001). However, KT candidates with public insurance were more likely to have died or become too sick for KT (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.33, confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.36) or to receive a deceased donor KT (SHR = 1.57, CI, 1.54-1.60) but less likely to receive a living donor KT (SHR = 0.87, CI, 0.85-0.89). Post-KT, KT recipients with public insurance had greater risk of mortality (relative risks = 1.22, CI, 1.15-1.31) and allograft failure (relative risks = 1.10, CI, 1.03-1.29). Conclusions Although the implementation of ACA marginally increased the proportion of waitlisted candidates with Medicaid, publicly insured KT candidates remained at greater risk of being removed from the waitlist, had lower probability of living donor kidney transplantation, and had greater probability of dying post-KT and allograft failure. Concerted efforts to address factors contributing to these inequities in future studies are needed, with the goal of achieving equity in KT for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Morenz
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - James Perkins
- Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory (CBATL), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - André Dick
- Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory (CBATL), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Bessie Young
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Yue-Harn Ng
- Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory (CBATL), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ebel NH, Lai JC, Bucuvalas JC, Wadhwani SI. A review of racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1520-1528. [PMID: 35188708 PMCID: PMC9949889 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Equity is a core principle in both pediatrics and solid organ transplantation. Health inequities, specifically across race, socioeconomic position, or geography, reflect a moral failure. Ethical principles of prudential life span, maximin principle, and fair innings argue for allocation priority to children related to the number of life years gained, equal access to transplant, and equal opportunity for ideal posttransplant outcomes. Iterative policy changes have aimed to narrow these disparities to achieve pediatric transplant equity. These policy changes have focused on modifying pediatric priority for organ allocation to eliminate mortality on the pediatric transplant waiting list. Yet disparities remain in pediatric liver transplantation at all time points: from access to referral for transplantation, likelihood of living donor transplantation, use of exception narratives, waitlist mortality, and inequitable posttransplant outcomes. Black children are less likely to be petitioned for exception scores, have higher waitlist mortality, are less likely to be the recipient of a living donor transplant, and have worse posttransplant outcomes compared with White children. Children living in the most socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods have worse posttransplant outcomes. Children living farther from a transplant center have higher waitlist mortality. Herein we review the current knowledge of these racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities for these children. To achieve equity, stakeholder engagement is required at all levels from providers and health delivery systems, learning networks, institutions, and society. Future initiatives must be swift, bold, and effective with the tripartite mission to inform policy changes, improve health care delivery, and optimize resource allocation to provide equitable transplant access, waitlist survival, and posttransplant outcomes for all children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle H Ebel
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University Stanford California USA Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & NutritionDepartment of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA Division of Pediatric HepatologyDepartment of Pediatrics Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of PediatricsUniversity of CaliforniaSan Francisco California USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Düken ME, Zengin M, Yayan EH. The effect of perceived social support on the psychosocial status of parents whose child had liver transplantation. J Pediatr Nurs 2022; 66:e130-e136. [PMID: 35527086 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to describe parental psychosocial outcomes following paediatric liver transplantation and the relationship between parental psychosocial outcomes and social support. METHOD This is a correlational, descriptive study conducted between April 2021 and October 2021 in the paediatric hepatology polyclinics of the liver transplantation institute of a university hospital. The SPSS 25 and AMOS 23 package programmes were used to perform data analyses. RESULTS Data analysis revealed that the parents' social support level was low (44.6 ± 14.8), while their levels of trait anxiety (51.5 ± 4.8) and loneliness (48.5 ± 5.4) were high, and their depression level was moderate (26.4 ± 5.8). Established structural equation modelling demonstrated that the social support parents received had a significant effect on their levels of loneliness (β = -0.88; p < 0.001), trait anxiety (β = -0.37; p < 0.001), and depression (β = -0.44; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The authors conclude that in parents of children who have had a liver transplant, increased levels of perceived social support result in decreased levels of anxiety, loneliness, and depression. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The authors recommend that healthcare professionals can contribute to reducing the anxiety, loneliness and depression in parents of paediatric liver transplant recipients by strengthening their social support systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Emin Düken
- Department of Child Health and Diseases Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
| | - Mürşide Zengin
- Department of Child Health and Diseases Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Turkey.
| | - Emriye Hilal Yayan
- Department of Child Health and Diseases Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|