Surgical technique and the long-term outcomes of pediatric living donor domino liver transplantation from patients with maple syrup urine disease

Living Donor Whole and Partial Liver Grafts, Deceased Donor Whole Liver and SPLIT: Outcome Comparison

BACKGROUND

Currently, graft options for pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) include whole (WL) and partial (P) grafts, in the form of either deceased donor transplantation (DD) or living donor liver transplantation (LD). WL transplants from LD are commonly referred to as domino LT. The objective of this manuscript is to compare the outcomes of PLT performed with each of the available graft options.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2022. The variables included data on the recipients' preoperative clinical status, intraoperative technical aspects, post-operative complications, and survival studies. There were 4 groups: SPLIT (17), DD-WL (55), LD-WL (824), and LD-P (22).

RESULTS

The median age and BW of the recipients was smaller in SPLIT, LD-P, and LD-WL compared to DDT-WL groups. HVOO (HR 15.87, 95% CI 1.89-133.06, P = 0.01), retransplantation (HR 7.94, 95% CI 2.63-24.02, P < 0.01), and malignancies (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.29-7.37, P = 0.01) were independently associated with decreased patient survival. HAT (HR 27.54, 95% CI 10.44-72.68, P < 0.01) and malignancies (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.10-5.34, P = 0.03) increased the risk of graft loss. The overall survival in this series was 91.4% (mean follow-up of 74.3 months). Patient and graft survival were not different among groups.

CONCLUSION

HAT and malignancies were associated with reduced graft survival. Whole liver from living donors with MSUD presented 100% patient survival at 120 months. Even without statistical differences in survival among the studied groups, LD-P and LD-WL recipients presented a trend towards better outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

LEVEL III.

Evaluation of living donors for hereditary liver disease (siblings, heterozygotes)

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is recognised as an alternative treatment modality to reduce waiting list mortality and expand the donor pool. Over recent decades, there have been an increasing number of reports on the use of LT and specifically LDLT for familial hereditary liver diseases. There are marginal indications and contraindications that should be considered for a living donor in paediatric parental LDLT. No mortality or morbidity related to recurrence of metabolic diseases has been observed with heterozygous donors, except for certain relevant cases, such as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, protein C deficiency, hypercholesterolemia, protoporphyria, and Alagille syndrome, while donor human leukocyte antigen homozygosity also poses a risk. It is not always essential to perform preoperative genetic assays for possible heterozygous carriers; however, genetic and enzymatic assays must hereafter be included in the parental donor selection criteria in the aforementioned circumstances.

Recent advances in surgical strategies and liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma

Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common malignant liver tumor in children. Although the development of treatment strategies with advances in chemotherapy has greatly improved the prognosis of HB, surgical resection and liver transplantation still play a vital role in the treatment of HB. In recent years, technological innovations have led to the development of new surgical approaches for HB. In this review, we describe the latest research on the surgical management of HB, including new imaging technologies, minimally invasive approaches, and the application of associating liver partition portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. We also discuss the current role of liver transplantation, use of ante-situm or ex-situ liver resection with auto-transplantation, and management of metastatic HB.