Noise concerns of residents living in close proximity to hydraulic fracturing sites in Southwest Pennsylvania

Health Symptoms and Proximity to Active Multi-Well Unconventional Oil and Gas Development Sites in the City and County of Broomfield, Colorado

City and County of Broomfield (CCOB) residents reported over 500 health concerns between January 2020 and December 2021. Our objective was to determine if CCOB residents living within 1 mile of multi-well unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD) sites reported more frequent health symptoms than residents living > 2 miles away. We invited 3993 randomly selected households to participate in a health survey. We applied linear regression to test associations between distance to UOGD and summed Likert scores for health symptom categories. After covariate adjustment, respondents living within 1 mile of one of CCOB's UOGD sites tended to report higher frequencies of upper respiratory, lower respiratory, gastrointestinal and acute symptoms than respondents living more than 2 miles from the sites, with the largest differences for upper respiratory and acute symptoms. For upper respiratory and acute symptoms, scores differed by 0.81 (95% CI: 0.06, 2.58) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.004, 1.99), respectively. Scores for adults most concerned about air pollution, noise and odors trended higher within 1 mile for all symptom categories, while scores among adults least concerned trended lower. Scores trended higher for lower respiratory, gastrointestinal and acute symptoms in children living within 2 miles of UOGD, after covariate adjustment. We did not observe any difference in the frequency of symptoms reported in unadjusted results. Additional study is necessary to understand relationships between proximity to UOGD and health symptoms.

Contaminación físico química en zonas de fracking

A pesar del consenso científico hacia la necesidad de limitar el calentamiento global, la urgencia por la provisión autónoma de recursos energéticos ha llevado a muchos Estados a autorizar proyectos que aplican técnicas no convencionales de extracción de combustibles fósiles, como es el caso de la perforación horizontal y la fracturación hidráulica de esquisto de gran volumen. Aunque son pocos los estudios que presentan evidencias concluyentes, estas técnicas son acusadas de acarrear peligros al ambiente y la salud de las personas que trabajan y habitan zonas de fracking, de tal manera que los Estados están ante la disyuntiva de extender algunos años la autonomía energética exprimiendo hasta el final sus reversas de gas natural y petróleo, o buscar algún equilibrio con el planeta moviéndose hacia fuentes energéticas más sostenibles. A partir de la revisión de trabajos que presentan evidencias de contaminación física y química y otros impactos al ambiente en zonas donde se ha desarrollado la técnica del fracking, se presenta un panorama de riesgos para las personas que habitan cerca de plataformas de extracción y los peligros de desarrollar proyectos de fracking en zonas climáticas tropicales.

Flaring from Unconventional Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas

BACKGROUND

Prior studies suggest exposure to oil and gas development (OGD) adversely affects birth outcomes, but no studies have examined flaring-the open combustion of natural gas-from OGD.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether residential proximity to flaring from OGD was associated with shorter gestation and reduced fetal growth in the Eagle Ford Shale of south Texas.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative birth records from 2012 to 2015 (N = 23,487 ) and satellite observations of flaring activity during pregnancy within 5 km of maternal residence. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to estimate associations between four outcomes (preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, continuous gestational age, and term birthweight) and exposure to a low (1-9) or high (≥ 10 ) number of nightly flare events, as compared with no exposure, while controlling for known maternal risk factors. We also examined associations with the number of oil and gas wells within 5 km using data from DrillingInfo (now Enverus).

RESULTS

Exposure to a high number of nightly flare events was associated with a 50% higher odds of preterm birth [odds ratio (OR) = 1.50 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.83)] and shorter gestation [mean difference = - 1.9 (95% CI: - 2.8 , - 0.9 ) d] compared with no exposure. Effect estimates were slightly reduced after adjustment for the number of wells within 5 km . In stratified models these associations were present only among Hispanic women. Flaring and fetal growth outcomes were not significantly associated. Women exposed to a high number of wells (fourth quartile, ≥ 27 ) vs. no wells within 5 km had a higher odds of preterm birth [OR = 1.31 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.49)], shorter gestation [- 1.3 (95% CI: - 1.9 , - 0.8 ) d], and lower average birthweight [- 19.4 (95% CI: - 36.7 , - 2.0 ) g].

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests exposure to flaring from OGD is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Our findings need to be confirmed in other populations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6394.

Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Polluting industries are more likely to be located in low-income communities of color who also experience greater social stressors that may make them more vulnerable than others to the health impacts of toxic chemical exposures. We describe recent developments in assessing pollutant exposures and health threats posed by industrial facilities using or releasing synthetic chemicals to nearby communities in the U.S.

RECENT FINDINGS

More people are living near oil and gas development due to the expansion of unconventional extraction techniques as well as near industrial animal operations, both with suggestive evidence of increased exposure to hazardous pollutants and adverse health effects. Legacy contamination continues to adversely impact a new generation of residents in fenceline communities, with recent studies documenting exposures to toxic metals and poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Researchers are also giving consideration to acute exposures resulting from inadvertent industrial chemical releases, including those resulting from extreme weather events linked to climate change. Natural experiments of industrial closures or cleanups provide compelling evidence that exposures from industry harm the health of nearby residents. New and legacy industries, coupled with climate change, present unique health risks to communities living near industry due to the release of toxic chemicals. Cumulative impacts from multiple stressors faced by environmental justice communities may amplify these adverse effects.