Short-term chemical pretreatment cannot replace curettage in photodynamic therapy

Home- vs clinic-based daylight photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) for actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has become one of the most effective treatments for the resolution of actinic keratosis (AK) of Olsen grade 1 and 2. Generally, PDT it is carried out in a clinic setting, which involves the patient's and their caregivers commuting to the hospital as well as a significant use of resources to carry it out within the clinic setting.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of a home-based treatment of AK with DL-PDT with the BF-200 ALA gel compared to a clinic-based setting.

METHODS

The study was performed as a randomized, single-center, non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. 9 patients received one clinic-based DL-PDT (group 1) and 11 patients received one session of home-based DL-PDT (group 2). The primary endpoints were the mean AK clearance per patient and the total AK lesion clearance rate 12 weeks after treatment. The secondary endpoints were the number of remaining AKs and new AKs appearing in the treatment field 12 weeks after one PDT session. The pain during and 24 h after PDT as well as the local skin reactions were also assessed.

RESULTS

The overall reduction of AK lesions per patient was similar in both groups with one PDT session. An overall AK clearance per patient of 10 ± 4.33 for group 1 versus 9.73 ± 2.9 for group 2 without statistically significant differences (p = 0.868). Regarding the clearance rate, although it was slightly higher in group 2 (71.58 ± 22.51 vs 82.1 ± 11.13), the analysis did not show statistically significant differences. The mild pain recorded during the treatment course and the mild local skin reactions were similar in both groups. Patient satisfaction was high for both groups without statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Self-performed home-based DL-PDT with BF-200 ALA gel is as effective as the one performed in a clinic-based setting, with a comparable safety profile, high levels of patient satisfaction and with advantages for the patients and their caregivers that can enhance patient´s adherence to the treatment.

Keratolytics can replace curettage in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis on the face/scalp: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) photodynamic therapy (PDT) is commonly used for field treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs). In standard natural daylight PDT (n-DL-PDT) the first step, after the application of chemical solar filter, is removal of crusts and scales by curettage, followed by the application of MAL cream. Some patients experience intense pain during curettage and stinging after application of the photosensitizer to just curettaged skin.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether n-DL-PDT without curettage, but preceded by application of keratolytics, would maintain a similar efficacy, based on clinical, dermoscopic, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) assessments, safety and patient satisfaction as standard n-DL-PDT with curettage.

METHODS

Forty patients with multiple AKs on the face and/or scalp were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized into two groups of treatment as follows: (i) MAL n-DL-PDT without previous curettage, preceded by skin preparation at home with keratolytics (30% urea cream, twice a day for 7 days; -Cur group) and (ii) MAL n-DL-PDT preceded by skin preparation at the hospital with curettage (+Cur group).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine participants completed the study. Four hundred and twenty-one AKs in -Cur group and 337 AKs in +Cur group were treated. The mean reduction in the number of AK lesions 3 months after the treatment was 10.7 (-54.7%) in the -Cur and 10.4 (-58.7%) in the +Cur group. We found that the differences in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction comparing the two treatment regimens were not statistically significant. The pain score reported during and after daylight exposure was similar and low in both groups. Moreover, no unexpected adverse events occurred during the trial period.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, curettage is not necessary to obtain the full treatment effect of n-DL-PDT. We experienced in a real-life setting that n-DL-PDT protocol could be changed by replacing curettage with keratolytics.

Combined versus conventional photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) for actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has become one of the most effective therapies for the treatment of actinic keratosis, allowing the removal of more than one lesion in a single session. However, the pain sustained by the patient during treatment and local skin reactions can limit its use.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of combined PDT (daylight PDT followed by conventional PDT) vs conventional PDT 12 weeks after treatment.

METHODS

The study was performed as a randomized, single-center, non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. A total of 51 patients with grade I and II AKs on the scalp or face were randomized. Twenty-five patients received one session of combined PDT (combPDT), and 26 patients received one session of conventional PDT (cPDT). The primary endpoint was the reduction of AKs, 12 weeks after treatment. The secondary endpoint was the reduction in pain and local skin reaction.

RESULTS

The reduction rate of grade I and II AKs was similar in combPDT and cPDT, showing no statistically significant differences between both groups, 76.67% vs 86.63% [P = .094] and 80.48% vs 83.08% [P = .679], respectively. However, pain was significantly lower in the combPDT group (2.56 vs 5, P < .01), as were local skin reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

CombPDT has proven to be as effective as cPDT for the treatment of grade I and II AKs located on the scalp and face. Furthermore, combPDT has been shown to be considerably more tolerable than cPDT, causing only mild local skin reactions.

Thermo-Mechanical Fractional Injury Enhances Skin Surface- and Epidermis- Protoporphyrin IX Fluorescence: Comparison of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in Cream and Gel Vehicles

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Thermo-mechanical fractional injury (TMFI) impacts the skin barrier and may increase cutaneous drug uptake. This study investigated the potential of TMFI in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) cream and gel formulations to enhance Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence at the skin surface and in the skin.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

In healthy volunteers (n = 12) a total of 144 test areas were demarcated on the upper back. Test areas were randomized to (i) TMFI (6 milliseconds, 400 µm at a single pass) or no pretreatment and (ii) 20% ALA in cream or gel formulations. Skin surface PpIX fluorescence was quantified by PpIX fluorescence photography and photometry in 30-minute intervals until 3 hours. PpIX fluorescence microscopy quantified separate PpIX fluorescence in the epidermis, and in superficial-, mid-, and deep- dermis from punch biopsies sampled after 3 hours of ALA incubation. Local skin reactions (LSR) and pain intensities (numerical rating scale 0-10) were evaluated immediately, at 3 hours and 14 days after the intervention.

RESULTS

TMFI exposure before photosensitizer application significantly increased skin surface PpIX fluorescence, both for ALA cream (TMFI-ALA-cream 7848 arbitrary units [AU] vs. ALA-cream 5441 AU, 3 hours, P < 0.001) and ALA gel (TMFI + ALA-gel 4591 AU vs. ALA-gel 3723 AU, 3 hours, P < 0.001). The TMFI-mediated increase in PpIX fluorescence was similar for ALA-cream and -gel formulations (P = 0.470) at the skin surface. In the epidermis, PpIX fluorescence intensities increased from combination treatment with TMFI and ALA-cream (TMFI + ALA-cream 421 AU vs. ALA-cream 293 AU, P = 0.034) but not from combination with TMFI and ALA-gel (TMI + ALA-gel 264 AU vs. ALA-gel 261 AU, P = 0.791). Dermal fluorescence intensities (superficial-, mid-, or deep dermis) were unaffected by TMFI pretreatment in both ALA-cream and ALA-gel exposed skin (P = 0.339). ALA-cream generally induced higher PpIX fluorescence intensities than ALA-gel (skin surface P < 0.001 and epidermis P < 0.03). TMFI induced low pain intensities (median 3) and mild LSR that were resolved at 14 days follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Given the present study design, TMFI, in combination with the standardized application of 20% ALA cream and gel formulations, significantly enhanced skin surface PpIX fluorescence compared to no pretreatment. Additionally, TMFI increased epidermal PpIX fluorescence combined with 20% ALA cream vehicle. Thus, TMFI pretreatment and formulation characteristics exert influence on PpIX fluorescence intensities in normal skin. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate in photodynamic therapy of non-aggressive basal cell carcinomas: A non-sponsored, randomized, prospective and double-blinded trial

BACKGROUND

In the photodynamic therapy (PDT) of non-aggressive basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200ALA) has shown non-inferior efficacy when compared with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL), a widely used photosensitizer. Hexyl aminolevulinate (HAL) is an interesting alternative photosensitizer. To our knowledge, this is the first study using HAL-PDT in the treatment of BCCs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the histological clearance, tolerability (pain and post-treatment reaction) and cosmetic outcome of MAL, BF-200 ALA and low-concentration HAL in the PDT of non-aggressive BCCs.

METHODS

Ninety-eight histologically verified non-aggressive BCCs met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 95 lesions completed the study. The lesions were randomized to receive LED-PDT in two repeated treatments with MAL, BF-200 ALA or HAL. Efficacy was assessed both clinically and confirmed histologically at three months by blinded observers. Furthermore, cosmetic outcome, pain, post-treatment reactions fluorescence and photobleaching were evaluated.

RESULTS

According to intention-to-treat analyses, the histologically confirmed lesion clearance was 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79.9-98.3) for MAL, 90.9% (95% CI = 76.4-96.9) for BF-200 ALA and 87.9% (95% CI = 72.7-95.2) for HAL, with no differences between the arms (P = 0.84). There were no differences between the arms as regards pain, post-treatment reactions or cosmetic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy with low-concentration HAL and BF-200 ALA has a similar efficacy, tolerability and cosmetic outcome compared to MAL. HAL is an interesting new option in dermatological PDT, since good efficacy is achieved with a low concentration.

Smartphone fluorescence imager for quantitative dosimetry of protoporphyrin-IX-based photodynamic therapy in skin

Significance: While clinical treatment of actinic keratosis by photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely practiced, there is a well-known variability in response, primarily caused by heterogeneous accumulation of the photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) between patients and between lesions, but measurement of this is rarely done. Aim: Develop a smartphone-based fluorescence imager for simple quantitative photography of the lesions and their PpIX levels that can be used in a new clinical workflow to guide the reliability of aminolevulinic acid (ALA) application for improved lesion clearance. Approach: The smartphone fluorescence imager uses an iPhone and a custom iOS application for image acquisition, a 3D-printed base for measurement standardization, an emission filter for PpIX fluorescence isolation, and a 405-nm LED ring for optical excitation. System performance was tested to ensure measurement reproducibility and the ability to capture photosensitizer accumulation and photobleaching in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Results: PpIX fluorescence signal from tissue-simulating phantoms showed linear sensitivity in the 0.01 to 2.0 μM range. Murine studies with Ameluz® aminolevulinic acid (ALA) gel and initial human testing with Levulan® ALA cream verified that in-vivo imaging was feasible, including that PpIX production over 1 h is easily captured and that photobleaching from the light treatment could be quantified. Conclusions: The presented device is the first quantitative wide-field fluorescence imaging system for PDT dosimetry designed for clinical skin use and for maximal ease of translation into clinical workflow. The results lay the foundation for using the system in clinical studies to establish treatment thresholds for the individualization of PDT treatment.

Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with amino-5-laevulinate nanoemulsion versus methyl-5-aminolaevulinate for actinic keratosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis. 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) and methyl-5-aminolevulinate (MAL) are both prodrugs for the treatment of actinic keratosis with photodynamic therapy. A comparison of the efficacy and safety between the drugs is critical for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if photodynamic therapy in combination with BF-200 ALA is superior to photodynamic therapy with MAL for actinic keratosis.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the combination of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA and with MAL. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE databases were searched to select eligible randomized controlled trials. Our search was conducted on April 1, 2019, and included the search terms "5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion or BF-200 ALA", "methyl-5-aminolevulinate or methyl aminolaevulinate" and "actnic keratosis". Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to estimate the risk of bias.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis consisted of 5988 actinic keratosis lesions in five eligible randomized controlled trials, with a total of 2953 actinic keratosis lesions treated with BF-200 ALA and 3035 actinic keratosis lesions treated with MAL. BF-200 ALA in combination with photodynamic therapy showed significantly higher overall complete clearance rates (RR: 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, p = 0.01) and 3 month complete clearance rates (RR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.12, p < 0.00001) compared to MAL. A subgroup analysis was performed for photodynamic therapy combined with BF-200 ALA, revealing increased complete clearance rates of grade II-III lesions in comparison with MAL (RR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.46, p = 0.01). Compared with MAL, the pooled relative risk for the meta-analysis for recurrence was 0.67 (95% CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.01) at 12 month after BF-200 ALA treatment.

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA has a 9% better chance of complete clearance at 3 months and a 24% better chance of grade II-III lesions after treatment than with MAL for patients with actinic keratosis.

Photodynamic therapy for skin cancer: How to enhance drug penetration?

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) induced by protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) has been widely used in dermatological practices such as treatment of skin cancers. Clearance rate depends on different factors such as light irradiation, skin oxygenation and drug penetration. The poor penetration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) with topical application is limited and restrains the production of PpIX which could restrict PDT outcomes. This review will focus on techniques already used to enhance drug penetration in human skin, and will present their results, advantages, and drawbacks. Chemical and physical pretreatments will be discussed. Chemical pre-treatments comprise of drug formulation modification, use of agents that modify the heme cycle, enhance PpIX formation, and the combination of differentiation-promoting agent prior to PDT. On the other hand, physical pretreatments affect the skin barrier by creating holes in the skin or by removing stratum corneum. To promote drug penetration, iontophoresis and temperature modulation are interesting alternative methods. Cellular mechanisms enrolled during chemical or physical pretreatments have been investigated in order to understand how 5-ALA penetrates the skin, why it is preferentially metabolized in PpIX in tumour cells, and how it could be accumulated in deeper skin layers. The objective of this review is to compare clinical trials that use innovative technology to conventional PDT treatment. Most of these pretreatments present good or even better clinical outcomes than usual PDT.

A randomized split-scalp study comparing calcipotriol-assisted methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) with conventional MAL-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an approved treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). To enhance the efficacy of PDT for AKs, physical and chemical pretreatments have been suggested.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of topical calcipotriol (CAL) before methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL)-PDT for AKs of the scalp vs. conventional MAL-PDT in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

METHODS

Twenty patients with multiple AKs on the scalp were randomized to receive conventional MAL-PDT with previous curettage on one side of the scalp and CAL-assisted MAL-PDT once a day for 15 days before illumination on the other side. After 3 months, patients were evaluated for clearance of AKs, side-effects and histopathology before and after the procedure. Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence was measured before and after illumination on both sides.

RESULTS

All 20 patients completed the study. Overall AK clearance rates were 92·1% and 82·0% for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT, respectively (P < 0·001). Grade 1 AKs showed similar response rates for both sides (P = 0·055). However, grade II AKs showed more improvement on the CAL-PDT side (90%) than on the MAL-PDT side (63%) (P < 0·001). Before illumination, PpIX fluorescence intensity was higher on the CAL-assisted side (P = 0·048). The treatment was more painful on the CAL-PDT side, although well tolerated. The mean visual analogue scale score was 5·4 ± 1·4 on the CAL-PDT side and 4·0 ± 0·69 on the conventional MAL-PDT side (P = 0·001). Side-effects such as erythema (P = 0·019), oedema (P = 0·002) and crusts (P < 0·001) were more pronounced on the CAL-assisted side. Histopathological analyses were obtained from five patients and both sides showed improved keratinocyte atypia following PDT, with slightly more improvement on the CAL-assisted side.

CONCLUSIONS

CAL-assisted PDT proved to be safe and more effective than conventional MAL-PDT for the treatment of AKs on the scalp. CAL pretreatment increased PpIX accumulation within the skin and may have enhanced the efficacy in this first human trial.

The background and philosophy behind daylight photodynamic therapy

Conventional photodynamic therapy (PDT) is associated with side effects, primarily related to the waiting time between pretreatment with application of photosensitizer and illumination. Pain during illumination is a major issue for the patients and options for effective pain relief are limited. Post-treatment inflammation can often be severe and cause inconvenient down-time for the patients and their employers. To avoid the problems of pain and patients crowding in the clinic we eliminated red light treatment of high PpIX concentration and introduced illumination in daylight which may be performed at home. We also investigated if protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) could be activated continuously during its formation which might reduce pain and inflammation. Continuous activation of PpIX during its formation turned out to minimize pain as single PpIX molecules are activated continuously without accumulation of PpIX in the skin. PpIX molecules are formed in the mitochondria and the photodynamic effect only takes place in the mitochondria when continuously activated. This results primarily in apoptosis with little inflammation. Continuous activation of PpIX can be obtained by performing photodynamic therapy in daylight, as well as with daylight-emitting light sources of appropriate wavelengths. Use of daylight prevents the patients from crowding in the clinic. Daylight-PDT completely fulfils the purpose of minimizing pain and inflammation, as well as limiting the strain on the clinic treating the patients.

Protoporphyrin IX formation after application of methyl aminolevulinate on the face and scalp with and without prior curettage

BACKGROUND

Pulse photodynamic therapy (PDT) is carried out as classical PDT except that methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) is removed after 30 min. Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) accumulation becomes lower after 3 h in pulse-PDT than in classical PDT, but pulse-PDT still has full treatment effect on actinic keratosis (AK). The present study aimed to investigate when PpIX formation in classical PDT without curettage reaches the PpIX level in pulse-PDT with curettage in the skin of the face and scalp.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with AKs in the face and scalp were included in this pilot study. Each patient had two fields randomly allocated to two different regimes: (i) continuing MAL incubation without prior curettage (-Cur) and (ii) 30 min MAL incubation after curettage (+Cur). The PpIX level in each field was measured with a hand-held fluorescence photometer every 30 min for 6 h after MAL application. No illumination was performed.

RESULTS

The median PpIX level in the +Cur field after 3 h was 22 arbitrary units (AU), which represents the amount of PpIX that could have been photobleached after pulse-PDT with maximal treatment effect. After 3 h the median PpIX level in the -Cur field was 20 AU, which was not significantly different from the level in the +Cur field (p = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose PDT without curettage as follows: 3 h of MAL incubation and subsequently sufficient illumination. The treatment effect of this regime should be tested to verify if curettage of the face and scalp area may be omitted in PDT.

A review of BF-200 ALA for the photodynamic treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis

BF-200 ALA is a combination of a nanoscale-lipid vesicle formulation and the prodrug 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). The nanoemulsion stabilizes the prodrug and enhances its penetration through the stratum corneum. It has shown excellent therapeutic results in both lesion and field-directed photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis (AK). AK is an early form of epidermal neoplasia and a precursor of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. It is characterized by the combination of visible neoplastic lesions and surrounding tissue also harboring tumorigenic UV-induced mutations: a concept called field cancerization. A selective, field-directed treatment is ideal to meet the requirements of field change. Here, we review the clinical data on BF-200 ALA for AK along with a summary of molecular mechanisms and future perspectives.