Effects of respiratory phases on the processing of emotional and non-emotional visual stimuli

Respiratory modulation of beta corticomuscular coherence in isometric hand movements

Respiration is a fundamental physiological function in humans, often synchronized with movement to enhance performance and efficiency. Recent studies have underscored the modulatory effects of respiratory rhythms on brain oscillations and various behavioral responses, including sensorimotor processes. In light of this connection, our study aimed to investigate the influence of different respiratory patterns on beta corticomuscular coherence (CMC) during isometric hand flexion and extension. Utilizing electroencephalogram (EEG) and surface electromyography (sEMG), we examined three breathing conditions: normal breathing, deep inspiration, and deep expiration. Two experimental protocols were employed: the first experiment required participants to simultaneously breathe and exert force, while the other involved maintaining a constant force while varying breathing patterns. The results revealed that deep inspiration significantly enhanced beta CMC during respiration-synchronized tasks, whereas normal breathing resulted in higher CMC compared to deep respiration during sustained force exertion. In the second experiment, beta CMC was cyclically modulated by respiratory phase across all breathing conditions. The difference in the outcomes from the two protocols demonstrated a task-specific modulation of respiration on motor control. Overall, these findings indicate the complex dynamics of respiration-related effects on corticomuscular neural communication and provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underpinning the coupling between respiration and motor function.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10245-x.

Effects of cardiac and respiratory phases on auditory evoked potentials

Brain-body interactions play a crucial role in the perceptual and cognitive processing of external stimuli. Previous research has examined how cardiac phases (systole, diastole) and respiratory phases (inhalation, exhalation) influence various psychological functions, though findings on their impact on auditory processing remain inconsistent. This study investigated whether cardiac and respiratory phases affect auditory ERP components, specifically N1 and P2. To control for cardiac-related artifacts, pure tones (70 dB) and silent stimuli (0 dB) were presented in alternating, randomized intervals, and ERP difference waveforms were computed by subtracting waveforms elicited by silent stimuli from those elicited by tones. Two experiments were conducted with different participants: watching a video while ignoring the tones (Experiment 1) or pressing a button as quickly as possible in response to the tones while watching the video (Experiment 2). Results showed no significant differences in N1 amplitude between cardiac or respiratory phases. P2 amplitude was significantly larger at diastole than systole, although the effect size was small (dz = 0.26). For respiratory phases, P2 amplitude was greater during exhalation than inhalation when participants ignored the tones (dz = 0.35), but this effect disappeared when they attended to the tones. These findings suggest that visceral afferent signals may influence auditory processing by modulating attentional resource allocation across different cardiac and respiratory phases.

Auditory mismatch negativity is larger during exhalation than inhalation

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that internal signals from the body can modulate the processing of external stimuli. This study investigated whether respiratory phases influence auditory deviance detection by recording mismatch negativity (MMN) responses of event-related brain potentials.

METHODS

By reanalyzing the data from a previous study examining the effect of cardiac phases on MMN (Li et al, 2024), we calculated the amplitude of MMN elicited by intensity-deviant stimuli separately for inhalation and exhalation phases in the participants (N = 37).

RESULTS

Results showed that the MMN amplitude was significantly larger during exhalation than inhalation. One possible explanation for this amplitude difference is a greater focus on internal bodily processes during exhalation than inhalation.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence that respiratory phases influence the auditory processing of external events.

The timing of sleep spindles is modulated by the respiratory cycle in humans

OBJECTIVE

Coupling of sleep spindles with cortical slow waves and hippocampus sharp-waves ripples is crucial for sleep-related memory consolidation. Recent literature evidenced that nasal respiration modulates neural activity in large-scale brain networks. In rodents, this respiratory drive strongly varies according to vigilance states. Whether sleep oscillations are also respiration-modulated in humans remains open. In this work, we investigated the influence of breathing on sleep spindles during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep in humans.

METHODS

Full night polysomnography of twenty healthy participants were analysed. Spindles and slow waves were automatically detected during N2 and N3 stages. Spindle-related sigma power as well as spindle and slow wave events were analysed according to the respiratory phase.

RESULTS

We found a significant coupling between both slow and fast spindles and the respiration cycle, with enhanced sigma activity and occurrence probability of spindles during the middle part of the expiration phase. A different coupling was observed for slow waves negative peaks which were rather distributed around the two respiration phase transitions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that breathing cycle influences the dynamics of brain activity during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep.

SIGNIFICANCE

This coupling may enable sleep spindles to synchronize with other sleep oscillations and facilitate information transfer between distributed brain networks.

Interoceptive signals shape the earliest markers and neural pathway to awareness at the visual threshold

Variations in interoceptive signals from the baroreceptors (BRs) across the cardiac and respiratory cycle can modulate cortical excitability and so affect awareness. It remains debated at what stages of processing they affect awareness-related event-related potentials (ERPs) in different sensory modalities. We investigated the influence of the cardiac (systole/diastole) and the respiratory (inhalation/exhalation) phase on awareness-related ERPs. Subjects discriminated visual threshold stimuli while their electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and respiration were simultaneously recorded. We compared ERPs and their intracranial generators for stimuli classified correctly with and without awareness as a function of the cardiac and respiratory phase. Cyclic variations of interoceptive signals from the BRs modulated both the earliest electrophysiological markers and the trajectory of brain activity when subjects became aware of the stimuli: an early sensory component (P1) was the earliest marker of awareness for low (diastole/inhalation) and a perceptual component (visual awareness negativity) for high (systole/exhalation) BR activity, indicating that BR signals interfere with the sensory processing of the visual input. Likewise, activity spread from the primary visceral cortex (posterior insula) to posterior parietal cortices during high and from associative interoceptive centers (anterior insula) to the prefrontal cortex during low BR activity. Consciousness is thereby resolved in cognitive/associative regions when BR is low and in perceptual centers when it is high. Our results suggest that cyclic fluctuations of BR signaling affect both the earliest markers of awareness and the brain processes underlying conscious awareness.

Effects of the cardiac cycle on auditory processing: A preregistered study on mismatch negativity

The systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle are known to affect perception and cognition differently. Higher order processing tends to be facilitated at systole, whereas sensory processing of external stimuli tends to be impaired at systole compared to diastole. The current study aims to examine whether the cardiac cycle affects auditory deviance detection, as reflected in the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event-related brain potential (ERP). We recorded the intensity deviance response to deviant tones (70 dB) presented among standard tones (60 or 80 dB, depending on blocks) and calculated the MMN by subtracting standard ERP waveforms from deviant ERP waveforms. We also assessed intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes by subtracting ERPs elicited by soft standard tones (60 dB) from ERPs elicited by loud standard tones (80 dB). These subtraction methods were used to eliminate phase-locked cardiac-related electric artifacts that overlap auditory ERPs. The endogenous MMN was expected to be larger at systole, reflecting the facilitation of memory-based auditory deviance detection, whereas the exogenous N1 and P2 would be smaller at systole, reflecting impaired exteroceptive sensory processing. However, after the elimination of cardiac-related artifacts, there were no significant differences between systole and diastole in any ERP components. The intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes were not obvious in either cardiac phase, probably because of the short interstimulus intervals. The lack of a cardiac phase effect on MMN amplitude suggests that preattentive auditory processing may not be affected by bodily signals from the heart.

Phase-locked breathing does not affect episodic visual recognition memory but does shape its corresponding ERPs

Recent studies have indicated that breathing shapes the underlying oscillatory brain activity critical for episodic memory, potentially impacting memory performance. However, the literature has presented conflicting results, with some studies suggesting that nasal inhalation enhances visual memory performance, while others have failed to observe any significant effects. Furthermore, the specific influence of breathing route (nasal vs. mouth) and the precise phase of the respiratory cycle during which stimuli are presented have remained elusive. To address this, we employed a visual recognition memory (VRM) and electroencephalography paradigm in which stimuli presentation was phase-locked to either inhalation or exhalation onset, using a within-subject design where participants performed the memory task while engaging in separate sessions of nose and mouth breathing. We show that neither breathing route nor breathing phase has a significant impact on VRM performance as measured by d-prime, with the data supporting the null hypothesis. However, we did find an effect of breathing phase on response bias, with participants adopting a more conservative decision criterion during exhalation. Moreover, we found that breathing phase during memory encoding shaped the late parietal effect (LPE) amplitude, while the Frontal Negative Component (FN400) and LPE during recognition were less impacted. While our study demonstrates that breathing does not shape VRM performance, it shows that it influences brain activity, reinforcing the importance of further research to elucidate the extent of respiratory influence on perception, cognition, and behavior.