COPD Assessment Test for measurement of health status in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A cross-sectional study

Health-related quality of life and health state utility value in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with high mortality, heavy economic burden, limited treatment options and poor prognosis, and seriously affects the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and life expectancy of patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis of HRQoL and health state utility value (HSUV) in IPF patients and the instruments used in this assessment aimed to provide information sources and data support for the future research on IPF HRQoL and HSUV.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting the HRQoL or HSUV of IPF patients, with the retrieval time from the establishment of each database to April 2024. After two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, pooled analysis was performed on the measurement tools adopted in more than two studies. Subgroup analysis was employed to explore the source of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was used to assess the robustness of the results. Funnel-plot directed evaluation combined with Egger's test quantitative evaluation was conducted to detect publication bias.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies were ultimately included, covering eighteen measurement tools. The literature quality was generally excellent. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) were the most common instruments, among which the EQ-5D included the HSUV and the visual analog scale (VAS). The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the pooled SGRQ total score was 45.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.10-49.47), the mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79), the total EQ-5D VAS score was 66.88 (95% CI: 63.75-70.01), and the pooled SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) score were 36.70 (95% CI: 32.98-40.41) and 48.99 (95% CI: 47.44-50.55), respectively. The total KBILD score was 58.31 (95% CI: 55.43-61.19), the IPF specific version of the SGRQ (SGRQ-I) was 40.38 (95% CI: 28.81-51.96) and the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score was 16.09 (95% CI: 15.45-16.74). The pooled result of the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (USCD-SOBQ) was 45.05 (95% CI: 41.56-48.55). The results of other instruments, such as the tool to assess quality of life in IPF (ATAQ-IPF), the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment 100 (WHOQoL-100) and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) were similar to those of the above measurement tools. Regretfully, subgroup analyses did not identify the source of heterogeneity, but sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness of our results. Except for the SGRQ total, our results showed little possibility of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL in IPF patients is generally poor, and all domains are severely affected. With the aggravation of disease, HRQoL and HSUV shows a relatively downward trend, and income level is also an important factor affecting HRQoL and HSUV. At present, the published studies on IPF HRQoL and HSUV have applied many measurement tools with high interstudy heterogeneity, and future research on the optimal disease measurement tools should be strengthened. Our study provides high-quality comprehensive evidence for IPF HRQoL and HSUV, which can be used to guide clinical and economic evaluation in the future.

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the COPD Assessment Test in fibrotic interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (FILD) have impaired health status. The simple questionnaire in the COPD assessment test (CAT) has been validated for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), but no or limited data exist for patients with FILD as a whole. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability, repeatability and responsiveness of the CAT, and estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patients with FILD.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review of 358 consecutive patients with FILD including 131 with IPF, who underwent clinical assessment over 6-12 month intervals. We assessed the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the CAT. MCID was estimated using distribution methods and anchor methods with mean change and regression models.

RESULTS

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.898) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.865) for the CAT score was acceptable. A cross-sectional study showed constructive validity. Changes in the CAT over 6-12 months were significantly associated with change in anchors including physiological function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea regardless of IPF diagnosis. The estimated MCIDs of the CAT for the deterioration and improvement directions were at least +5 and at least -3 points, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAT is a reliable, responsive and clinically relevant instrument for assessing health status in patients with FILD.

Cohort study to evaluate prognostic factors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients introduced to oxygen therapy

While high-level evidence is lacking, numerous retrospective studies have depicted the value of supplemental oxygen in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases, and its use should be encouraged where necessary. The clinical course and survival of patients with IPF who have been introduced to oxygen therapy is still not fully understood. The objective of this study was to clarify overall survival, factors associated with prognosis, and causes of death in IPF patients after the start of oxygen therapy. This is a prospective cohort multicenter study, enrolling patients with IPF who started oxygen therapy at 19 hospitals with expertise in interstitial lung disease. Baseline clinical data at the start of oxygen therapy and 3-year follow-up data including death and cause of death were assessed. Factors associated with prognosis were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses. One hundred forty-seven eligible patients, of whom 86 (59%) were prescribed ambulatory oxygen therapy and 61 (41%) were prescribed long-term oxygen therapy, were recruited. Of them, 111 died (76%) during a median follow-up of 479 days. The median survival from the start of oxygen therapy was 537 ± 74 days. In the univariable analysis, low body mass index (BMI), low forced vital capacity (FVC), low diffusion capacity (DLCO), resting hypoxemia, short 6 min-walk distance, and high COPD assessment test (CAT) score were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Multivariable analysis revealed low BMI, low FVC, low DLCO, low minimum SpO2 on 6MWT, and high CAT score were independent factors for poor prognosis. The overall survival of IPF patients after starting oxygen therapy is about 1.5 years. In addition to pulmonary function tests, 6MWT and patient reported outcomes can be used to predict prognosis more accurately.Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000009322.

Long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by worsening dyspnoea and exercise intolerance.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a long-term pulmonary rehabilitation improve exercise tolerance in patients with IPF treated with standard antifibrotic drugs, which are expected to reduce disease progression?

METHODS

This open-label randomised controlled trial was performed at 19 institutions. Stable patients receiving nintedanib were randomised into pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups (1:1). The pulmonary rehabilitation group underwent initial rehabilitation which included twice-weekly sessions of monitored exercise training for 12 weeks, followed by an at-home rehabilitation programme for 40 weeks. The control group received usual care only, without pulmonary rehabilitation. Both groups continued to receive nintedanib. The primary and main secondary outcomes were change in 6 min walking distance (6MWD) and change in endurance time (using cycle ergometry) at week 52.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were randomised into pulmonary rehabilitation (n=45) and control (n=43) groups. Changes in 6MWD were -33 m (95% CI -65 to -1) and -53 m (95% CI -86 to -21) in the pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (mean difference, 21 m (95% CI -25 to 66), p=0.38). Changes in endurance time were significantly better in the pulmonary rehabilitation (64 s, 95% CI -42.3 to 171)) than in the control (-123 s (95% CI -232 to -13)) group (mean difference, 187 s (95% CI 34 to 153), p=0.019).

INTERPRETATION

Although pulmonary rehabilitation in patients taking nintedanib did not improve 6MWD in the long term, it led to prolonged improvement in endurance time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000026376.

Changes in patient-reported outcomes in patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrotic interstitial lung disease and progressive pulmonary fibrosis

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) captures different aspects of the fibrotic interstitial lung disease (FILD) evaluation from the patient's perspective. However, little is known about how HRQoL changes in patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) FILD, especially in those with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). The aim of this study is to clarify whether HRQoL deteriorates in patients with non-IPF FILD and to evaluate the differences in the changes in HRQoL between those with and without PPF.

Methods

We collected data from consecutive patients with non-IPF FILD and compared annual changes in HRQoL over 2 years between patients with PPF and those without. The St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD assessment test (CAT) were used to assess HRQoL. Changes in the SGRQ and CAT scores for 24 months from baseline were evaluated with a mixed-effect model for repeated measures.

Results

A total of 396 patients with non-IPF FILD were reviewed. The median age was 65 years and 202 were male (51.0%). The median SGRQ and CAT scores were 29.6 and 11, respectively. Eighty-six (21.7%) showed PPF. Both SGRQ and CAT scores were significantly deteriorated in patients with PPF compared to those without PPF (p < 0.01 for both). Clinically important deterioration in the SGRQ and CAT scores were observed in 40.0 and 35.7% of patients with PPF and 11.7 and 16.7% of those without, respectively. PPF was significantly associated with clinically important deterioration in the SGRQ score (odds ratio 5.04; 95%CI, 2.61-9.76, p < 0.01) and CAT score (odds ratio 2.78; 95%CI, 1.27-6.06, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The SGRQ and CAT scores were significantly deteriorated in patients with non-IPF FILD and PPF. Considering an evaluation of HRQoL would be needed when assessing PPF.

Diagnostic delay in IPF impacts progression-free survival, quality of life and hospitalisation rates

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is often delayed up to several years. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the diagnostic delay on progression-free survival, quality of life and hospitalisation rates.

METHODS

A total of 264 incident patients with IPF were included immediately after their diagnosis and followed for up to 5 years, with regular collection of clinical data, quality-of-life questionnaires and assessment of disease progression. Hospitalisation data were extracted from electronic patient records. Analyses were performed on the entire cohort and strata according to forced vital capacity (FVC) at diagnosis.

RESULTS

A long diagnostic delay (>1 year) was associated with worse progression-free survival compared with a short diagnostic delay (<1 year) (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.46, p=0.004) especially in patients with mild disease at the time of diagnosis (FVC>80% predicted). Mean total scores of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), a derived IPF-specific version of the SGRQ and the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT) were consistently higher in patients with long diagnostic delays, indicating worse quality of life. Mean hospitalisation rates were higher during the first year after diagnosis (Incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 3.28, 95% CI: 1.35 to 8.55, p=0.01) and during the entire follow-up (IRR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.02, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

A diagnostic delay of more than 1 year negatively impacts progression-free survival, quality of life and hospitalisation rates in patients with IPF. These findings highlight the importance of an early diagnosis for proper management of IPF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02755441.

Adverse Effects, Smoking, Alcohol Consumption and Quality of Life During Long-Term Oxygen Therapy: A Nationwide Study

Rationale

Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is prescribed for at least 15 hours per day and often used by patients for several years, but knowledge is limited regarding adverse effects, risk exposures, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) among those treated.

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of adverse effects, smoking, and alcohol consumption and their relations to HrQoL among patients treated with LTOT.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey of a randomized sample of adults with ongoing LTOT in the Swedish National Registry for Respiratory Failure (Swedevox). Patient characteristics and the prevalence of 26 prespecified adverse effects, smoking, and alcohol consumption, were compared between respondents with better and worse HrQoL on the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test.

Results

A total of 151 respondents were included (mean age, 74.7 yr [standard deviation, 8.6 yr]; 58.9% women; median LTOT duration, 2.2 yr [interquartile range, 1.0–3.8 yr]). Characteristics upon starting LTOT were similar between respondents and nonrespondents. Active smoking was very rare (n = 4, 2.6%). For alcohol use, 67.2% of participants reported no consumption during an average week, whereas risk use was reported by 25.8% of men and 16.9% of women. The most prevalent adverse effects were reduced mobility or physical activity (70.9%), dry mouth (69.5%), congestion or nasal drip (61.6%), increased tiredness (57.0%), and dry nose (53.0%). Patients with higher numbers of total and systemic adverse effects experienced worse HrQoL, whereas no associations were found for smoking status or alcohol consumption. The majority (54.8%) of adverse effects were untreated and unreported to health professionals.

Conclusions

Adverse effects are common among patients with LTOT and are associated with worse HrQoL. As the majority of adverse effects had not been discussed or treated, structured assessment and management of risk exposures and adverse effects is warranted.

Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio is a surrogate marker for sarcopenia in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The serum creatinine/cystatin C (Cr/CysC) ratio has attracted attention as a marker for sarcopenia, but has not been studied in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study aimed to confirm the utility of the serum Cr/CysC ratio in predicting sarcopenia and investigate its clinical relevance.

METHODS

This cross-sectional pilot study prospectively enrolled patients with stable IPF. IPF was diagnosed through multidisciplinary discussions according to the 2018 international guidelines, and sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the 2019 consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT), and King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) questionnaire. The associations between serum Cr/CysC ratio and the presence of sarcopenia and other clinical parameters, including PROs scores, were examined.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 49 Japanese patients with IPF with a mean age of 73.0 ± 7.7 years and a mean percentage of predicted forced vital capacity of 80.4 ± 15.5%. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 18 patients (36.7%), and the serum Cr/CysC ratio was 0.86 [0.76-0.94] (median [interquartile range]). The receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for the detection of sarcopenia according to the serum Cr/CysC showed that the area under the curve, optimal cutoff value, specificity, and sensitivity were 0.85, 0.88, 0.65, and 0.94, respectively. Sarcopenia was identified in 13% of patients with a high serum Cr/CysC ratio (≥ 0.88) and 60% of patients with a low serum Cr/CysC ratio (< 0.88) (P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the serum Cr/CysC ratio was an independent predictive marker of worse PROs evaluated using mMRC (P < 0.05), CAT (P < 0.05), and K-BILD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the serum Cr/CysC ratio may be a surrogate marker of sarcopenia in patients with IPF. Furthermore, it is important to pay attention to the serum Cr/CysC ratio because a lower serum Cr/CysC ratio is associated with worse PROs. Further studies are required to validate these observations to determine whether the Cr/CysC ratio can be used to detect sarcopenia in patients with IPF.

The prognostic value of the COPD Assessment Test in fibrotic interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) has been studied as a measure of health status in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue disease. However, its prognostic value is unknown. The present study explored the association between CAT score and mortality in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (FILD), including IPF and other forms of ILD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 501 consecutive patients with FILD who underwent clinical assessment, including pulmonary function test and CAT. The association between CAT score and 3-year mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis, Kaplan-Meier plots, and the log-rank test for trend. To handle missing data, the imputed method was used.

RESULTS

The patients' median age was 68 years, and 320 were male (63.9%). Regarding CAT severity, 203 patients had a low impact level (score <10), 195 had a medium level (10-20), 80 had a high level (21-30), and 23 had a very high level (31-40). During the 3-year study period, 118 patients died. After adjusting for age, sex, forced vital capacity, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, IPF diagnosis, and usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on high-resolution computed tomography, the CAT score was significantly associated with 3-year mortality (hazard ratio in increments of 10 points: 1.458, 95% confidence interval 1.161-1.830; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with high and very high impact levels had twofold and threefold higher mortality risk than those with low levels, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CAT has prognostic value in FILD.

Protocol for long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation under nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation causes short-term improvement in exercise capacity, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, long-term maintenance of the improvement is difficult. Nintedanib, an antifibrotic drug, has been shown to delay the worsening of pulmonary function in IPF. Therefore, the concomitant use of nintedanib with pulmonary rehabilitation is anticipated to contribute to the long-term maintenance of the pulmonary rehabilitation effects. The long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation under nintedanib treatment in IPF (FITNESS) study is a multicenter, randomised, prospective, parallel-group, open-label trial.

Methods

The study will enrol 84 patients with IPF who have been treated with nintedanib. Patients in the pulmonary rehabilitation group will receive a programmed short-term induction pulmonary rehabilitation programme, followed by a maintenance home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme, while patients in the control group will receive usual outpatient care. Patients in both groups will continue to receive nintedanib treatment throughout the study period. The primary end-point of the study is to compare the change in the 6-min walk distance from the baseline to 12 months between the pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups. The main secondary end-point is endurance exercise time, measured using a bicycle ergometer.

Discussion

FITNESS is the first randomised controlled study to evaluate the long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in IPF treated with nintedanib. This study will address the hypothesis that concomitant use of nintedanib contributes to the maintenance of long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation, thus leading to a comprehensive therapeutic approach of "nintedanib and pulmonary rehabilitation" in the antifibrotic era.

Patient-centered Outcomes Research in Interstitial Lung Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: In the past two decades, many advances have been made to our understanding of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the way we approach its treatment. Despite this, many questions remain unanswered, particularly those related to how the disease and its therapies impact outcomes that are most important to patients. There is currently a lack of guidance on how to best define and incorporate these patient-centered outcomes in ILD research. Objectives: To summarize the current state of patient-centered outcomes research in ILD, identify gaps in knowledge and research, and highlight opportunities and methods for future patient-centered research agendas in ILD. Methods: An international interdisciplinary group of experts was assembled. The group identified top patient-centered outcomes in ILD, reviewed available literature for each outcome, highlighted important discoveries and knowledge gaps, and formulated research recommendations. Results: The committee identified seven themes around patient-centered outcomes as the focus of the statement. After a review of the literature and expert committee discussion, we developed 28 research recommendations. Conclusions: Patient-centered outcomes are key to ascertaining whether and how ILD and interventions used to treat it affect the way patients feel and function in their daily lives. Ample opportunities exist to conduct additional work dedicated to elevating and incorporating patient-centered outcomes in ILD research.

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barthel Index Dyspnea Among Patients with Respiratory Diseases

Purpose

Japan has only a few respiratory disease-specific activity of daily living scales that are accepted outside of Japan, and they are not widely used. The Barthel Index dyspnea (BI-d), an improved version of the Barthel Index (BI), may be popular in Japan. The purpose of this study was to develop the Japanese version of BI-d (J-BI-d) and investigate its reliability and validity.

Patients and Methods

The J-BI-d was developed using the basic guidelines for scale translation. The study included patients with chronic respiratory disease, receiving outpatient care at two centers between January 2019 and February 2020. Scores on the J-BI-d, modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC scale), BI, respiratory function tests, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test were measured. To verify the test-retest reliability, the J-BI-d was re-administered, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was obtained. Internal consistency was verified by Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, and criterion-related validity was verified through a correlation analysis of the J-BI-d with mMRC scale and 6MWD test. Divergent validity was verified through correlation analysis between the J-BI-d and BI.

Results

Data for 57 participants (mean age 74.4 ± 8.3 years) were analyzed, and reliability testing was performed with 42 of them. The mean time to retest was 8.1 ± 3.0 days, and the ICC (2, 1) was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.62-0.85), indicating high reliability. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.81, indicating high internal consistency. Correlation coefficients of the J-BI-d with 6MWD test (r = -0.46, p < 0.01) and mMRC scale (ρ = 0.76, p < 0.01) indicated high criterion-related validity. The J-BI-d and BI had a weak negative correlation (r = -0.29, p < 0.05), indicating high divergent validity.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate high reliability and appropriate validity of the J-BI-d in patients with chronic respiratory disease.

R-Scale for Pulmonary Fibrosis (PF): a simple, visual tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life

RATIONALE

Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) experience impaired health related quality of life (HRQoL). Several tools have been developed to objectively assess HRQoL in this patient population, but none are in use in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a rapid, specific tool that can be used for patients with IPF during routine clinic visits.

METHODS

A novel and simple 5-item numerical rating scale (NRS) was developed and compared with two other previously validated tools. 100 consecutive patients with IPF managed at the center for ILD, were recruited to complete the R-Scale-PF, the Kings Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD), and the EuroQol 5-Dimensional 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L) in addition to pulmonary function and 6-min walk tests.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All 100 patients successfully completed the three HRQoL tools with 53 completing them again at follow up visits. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α 0.825) with minimal floor/ceiling effect. Concurrent validity of the R-Scale-PF was moderate to high compared with the K-BILD (r=-0.713) and the EQ-5D-5 L (r=-0.665). Concurrent validity was moderate with physiologic measures (forced vital capacity, r=-0.307, 6-min walk distance, r=-0.383). The R-Scale-PF demonstrated good known-groups validity when comparing scores across stages of disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The R-Scale-PF correlates well with the K-BILD and EQ-5D-5 L. It is hoped that this novel simple NRS tool subject to validation in patients from other centers will provide the opportunity to objectively measure HRQoL in routine clinical practice for patients with IPF.

Health-related quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most common forms of interstitial lung disease presenting in persons 50 years and older. Through a comprehensive review of available studies, we aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people living with IPF and the instruments used in this assessment.Searches were conducted up to May, 2020. Quality appraisal and data extraction were performed using pre-designed forms. Narrative synthesis approach was used to report results of the systematic review and a random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed, and a trim and fill method was used to assess publication bias.The review included 134 studies. The most used instruments to measure HRQoL were St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Short Form 36 (SF36) and EuroQoL (EQ5D). Standardised mean scores (95% confidence interval) for these instruments were as follows: SGRQ total score: 44.72 (42.21-47.22); SF36 physical component score (PCS): 37.00 (34.74-39.26) SF36 mental component score (MCS): 50.18 (48.41-51.95); King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire total score: 58.38 (55.26-61.51); and EQ5D utility: 0.73 (0.68-0.79). Analysis of standardised means for both SGRQ and SF36 demonstrated worse scores in physical health domains as compared to mental health domains.This systematic review confirms that IPF negatively affected HRQoL, mostly impacting the physical health domains. This study also demonstrated that a diverse number of instruments are used to evaluate HRQoL. In view of this diversity, a standardised approach to measurement of HRQoL for IPF is important to ensure that comparisons made are reliable.

Functional parameters of small airways can guide bronchodilator use in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may present comorbid obstructive lung diseases with small airway dysfunction (SAD). Existing guidelines suggest that inhaled bronchodilators should be used if the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the 1st second and forced vital capacity (FEV₁/FVC) < 0.7 in IPF. However, most IPF patients have FEV₁/FVC > 0.7 even with coexisting emphysema. We retrospectively enrolled IPF patients who were registered at our outpatient clinic. At baseline, 63 patients completed computed tomography (CT) scans, lung function measurements, and symptom questionnaires. Among these patients, 54 (85.71%) underwent antifibrotic treatment and 38 (60.32%) underwent long-acting bronchodilator treatment. The median FEV₁/FVC was 0.86. Not all patients treated with bronchodilators showed significant changes in lung function. IPF patients with SAD, determined by IOS parameters, showed significant improvement in FEV₁, FEF_25–75%, and symptom scores after bronchodilator treatment. Bronchodilator efficacy was not observed in patients without SAD. CT-confirmed emphysema was seen in 34.92% of patients. There were no changes in lung function or symptom scores after bronchodilator treatment in patients with emphysema. In conclusion, FEV₁/FVC cannot reflect the airflow limitation in IPF. Emphysema in IPF is not a deciding factor in whether patients should receive bronchodilator treatment. IOS parameters may be useful to guide bronchodilator therapy in patients with IPF coexisting with SAD.

Ability of the COPD Assessment Test to evaluate the lung‐specific quality of life in systemic sclerosis‐associated interstitial lung disease

Introduction

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is utilised to evaluate the treatment outcome regarding the health status in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, the ability of the CAT to evaluate the lung‐specific quality of life in systemic sclerosis‐associated interstitial lung disease (SSc‐ILD) is not established. Therefore, we investigated whether CAT scores can be used to evaluate SSc‐ILD as they are for IIP.

Methods

A total of 150 patients with IIP or SSc‐ILD who were evaluated by the CAT were retrospectively assigned to this study. Clinical data at the visit for the CAT were analysed.

Results

The forced vital capacity and distance walked during the 6‐minute walk test (6MWD) were significantly correlated with the CAT score for SSc‐ILD and IIP, and the CAT scores were similarly distributed in SSc‐ILD and IIP. The CAT score of SSc‐ILD patients was negatively affected by pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not by corticosteroids, which affected it in IIP patients. CAT scores of patients with either disease receiving home oxygen therapy were poor. In multiple regression analysis, pulmonary arterial hypertension and 6MWD were independent predictors for the CAT score in patients with SSc‐ILD, while corticosteroid administration was selected as an independent factor in patients with IIP.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the CAT can be applied to evaluate the lung‐specific quality of life in SSc‐ILD similar to IIP regarding the pulmonary function, but it should be noted that pulmonary arterial hypertension in SSc‐ILD influences the CAT score.

Improvement in Subjective Symptoms and Tolerability in Response to Nintedanib Treatment in Elderly Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

The efficacy of nintedanib treatment in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was demonstrated in phase III trials. However, there is limited data on the significance of nintedanib in elderly patients aged ≥75 years. We have retrospectively evaluated 54 newly nintedanib-treated patients including 32 elderly individuals. Potential changes in modified medical research council (mMRC) grade and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) assessment test (CAT) score, as well as in forced vital capacity (FVC) were obtained 6 months before, at the time of, and 6 and 12 months after initiation of nintedanib treatment. Significant differences were observed in CAT scores between 6 months before treatment and baseline (p < 0.001), and between baseline and 6 months (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p < 0.001) after treatment. If subjective improvement is defined as an improvement in mMRC grade or CAT score by 1 or 3 points, respectively, 25 patients (46.3%) have significantly improved after 6 months of treatment. Out of these, all have improved in CAT score. The tolerability of nintedanib was similar in elderly and younger patients. These findings suggest that CAT scores could be useful in the subjective assessment during nintedanib treatment, and that nintedanib is safe and efficient for the treatment of the elderly population.

What Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Caregivers Want: Filling the Gaps With Patient Reported Outcomes and Experience Measures

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive disease, with a high mortality within the first 3-5 years from diagnosis and a poor quality of life mainly because of the burden of symptoms, such as dyspnea and cough, occurring usually many months before the diagnosis. Although available antifibrotic therapies slow down disease progression, they have no impact on quality of life. Moreover, health care around idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients is often "disease-centered" and relies on clinical surrogate outcomes that are poorly related to patients' quality of life and disease experience. Therefore, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have several unmet needs in all domains of health that they wish to see recognized and addressed in the context of the treatment of their disease and its complications. In this review, we summarize the care pathway from the patients' perspective, identifying current gaps in care, education, support, and communication among patients with IPF, their caregivers, and care teams during the patient journey. The role of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), PRO measures (PROMs), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in their care is discussed, as well as the need of disease-specific PROs, PROMs, and PREMs.

Validation of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) is a validated measure of HRQL, but no previous studies have focused on the validity of K-BILD in IPF. Moreover, the relationship between K-BILD and dyspnoea or the 6-min walk test (6MWT) has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to validate K-BILD in the largest cohort of patients with IPF to date and assess how K-BILD correlates to dyspnoea and 6MWT.

Methods

Firstly, K-BILD was translated into Danish using validated translation procedures. Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. At baseline, patients completed K-BILD, the IPF-specific version of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) Short Form-36, and pulmonary function tests and 6MWT were performed. After 14 days, K-BILD and Global Rating of Change Scales were completed. Internal consistency, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and known groups validity were assessed. Analyses were also performed in subgroups of patients with different time since diagnosis.

Results

At baseline, 150 patients with IPF completed the questionnaires, and 139 patients completed the questionnaires after 14 days. K-BILD had a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). The concurrent validity was strong compared to SOBQ (r = − 0.66) and moderate compared to 6MWT (r = 0.43). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.91) and a Bland Altman plot demonstrated a good reliability. K-BILD was also able to discriminate between patients with different stages of disease (p < 0.002, Δscore > 7.4) and most results were comparable in patients with different time since diagnosis.

Conclusion

K-BILD is a valid and reliable instrument in patients with IPF and in patients with different time since diagnosis. To a major extent, K-BILD scores reflected the impact of dyspnoea on HRQL and the impact of physical functional capacity measured by the 6MWT to a moderate degree. Compared to PFTs alone, K-BILD provides additional information on the burden of living with IPF, and importantly, K-BILD is simple to implement in both research and clinical contexts.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.org (NCT02818712) on 30 June 2016.

Validation of the Swedish Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) in outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease

Introduction

Breathlessness is a cardinal symptom in cardiorespiratory disease. An instrument for measuring different aspects of breathlessness was recently developed, the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP). This study aimed to validate the MDP in terms of the underlying factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity in Swedish outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease.

Methods

Outpatients with stable cardiorespiratory disease and breathlessness in daily life were recruited. Factor structure of MDP was analysed using confirmatory factor analysis; internal consistency was analysed using Cronbach's alpha; and test-retest reliability was analysed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for patients with unchanged breathlessness between assessments (baseline, after 30-90 min and 2 weeks). Concurrent validity was evaluated using correlations with validated scales of breathlessness, anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life.

Results

In total, 182 outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease and breathlessness in daily life were included; 53.3% were women; main diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (24.7%), asthma (21.4%), heart failure (19.2%) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (18.7%). The MDP total, immediate perception and emotional response scores, and individual item scores showed expected factor structure and acceptable measurement properties: internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, range 0.80-0.93); test-retest reliability at 30-90 min and 2 weeks (ICC, range 0.67-0.91); and concurrent validity. There was no evidence of a learning effect. Findings were similar between diagnoses.

Discussion

MDP is a valid instrument for multidimensional measurement of breathlessness in Swedish outpatients across cardiorespiratory diseases.

Clinical Features of Patients with Bronchiectasis with Comorbid Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China

Background

The prevalence of bronchiectasis with comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is rising, which causes extremely high risk of exacerbation and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the differences in clinicopathological manifestations, immune function, and inflammation in bronchiectasis patients with comorbid COPD vs. patients who only have COPD.

Material/Methods

Clinicopathological characteristics, including common potentially pathogenic microorganisms, lung function, immune function, and inflammation were assessed in bronchiectasis patients with comorbid COPD and in patients who only had COPD.

Results

Compared to patients who only had COPD, patients with bronchiectasis with comorbid COPD had a higher positive rate of sputum bacteria (45.27% vs. 28.03%, P<0.01). Among them, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) accounted for 25.19% in COPD (4.37%) (P<0.01). Likewise, patients with bronchiectasis with comorbid COPD had worse lung function, worse COPD assessment test scores, and worse Modified Medical Research Council scores. Moreover, compared with COPD only cases, patients with bronchiectasis with comorbid COPD had higher levels of white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) (all P<0.05). Interestingly, the expression levels of Treg in patients with bronchiectasis with comorbid COPD were lower than in patients with COPD only (P<0.05). Th17 and Th17/Treg levels were higher (P<0.05). Furthermore, remarkable increased level of IL17 and IL-6 and decreased level of IL-10 and TGF-β were observed in the bronchiectasis combined COPD than in pure COPD (All P<0.05).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that P. aeruginosa is the main pathogen of bacterial infection in bronchiectasis patients with comorbid COPD. These patients have more serious clinical manifestations and immune imbalance, which should be considered when providing clinical treatment.

Validation of the IPF-specific version of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

Background

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). To measure HRQL, an IPF-specific version of the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) was developed, but not sufficiently validated. This study aimed to assess the validity (i.a. known-groups validity and concurrent validity) and test-retest reliability of SGRQ-I in IPF patients with different disease durations.

Methods

Patients with IPF were consecutively recruited and completed SGRQ, SGRQ-I, King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD), University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) along with pulmonary function tests and a 6-min walk test (6MWT) at baseline. After two weeks, SGRQ-I and Global Rating of Change Scales (GRCS) were completed.

Results

At baseline and after two weeks, 150 and 134 patients completed the questionnaires, respectively. The internal consistency of SGRQ-I was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). Good concurrent validity was demonstrated by high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.97), Bland-Altman plots and moderate to strong correlations to K-BILD, SOBQ and SF-36 (r = − 0.46 to 0.80). High ICC (0.92) and a Bland-Altman plot indicated good test-retest reliability. SGRQ-I was good at discriminating between patients with different stages of disease (Δscore > 18.1, effect sizes > 0.10). Validity was similar across groups of different disease duration.

Conclusions

SGRQ-I proved to be valid at distinguishing between different disease severities, valid compared to other HRQL instruments, applicable across different disease durations and reliable upon repetition. SGRQ-I is a valid option for measuring HRQL in patients with IPF.

Trial registration

The study was registered at clinicaltrials.org (NCT02818712) on 15 June 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1169-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Validation of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic disease with high morbidity and mortality. A reliable and manageable questionnaire that assesses patients' quality of life is needed to help to improve the content of clinical consultations. The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) is used in clinical practice; therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate correlations among the CAT, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and clinical parameters among patients diagnosed with IPF. Methods: A retrospective cohort design was employed in which 87 patients diagnosed with IPF who were receiving treatment at an outpatient clinic were included. Results: The CAT was found to be significantly correlated with SGRQ (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CAT was significantly correlated with all of the included physiological variables. Conclusions: This add to support the validity of the COPD Assessment test (CAT) as a measure of symptoms in patients with IPF which in clinical practice in combination with dialogue between healthcare professionals and the patient, can help to improve the content of a clinical consultation.

The Burden of Illness of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Comprehensive Evidence Review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a debilitating condition with significant morbidity and poor survival. Since 2010, there has been increased activity in the development of treatments that aim to delay progression of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

Our study involves a comprehensive review of the literature for evidence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs, and an assessment of the burden of illness of the condition.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify economic evaluations and HRQoL studies. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and MEDLINE In Process for relevant studies from database origins to April 2017. Alongside the presentation of the study characteristics and the available evidence, we carried out a qualitative comparison using reference population estimates for HRQoL and national health expenditure for costs.

RESULTS

Our search identified a total of 3241 records. After removing duplicates and not relevant articles, we analysed 124 publications referring to 88 studies published between 2000 and 2017. Sixty studies were HRQoL and 28 were studies on costs or HCRU. We observed an exponential growth of publications in the last 3-5 years, with the majority of the studies conducted in Europe and North America. Among the HRQoL studies, and despite regional differences, there was some agreement between estimates on the absolute and relative level of HRQoL for patients with IPF compared with the general population. Regarding costs, after adjustments for the cost years and currency, the suggested annual per capita cost of patients with IPF in North America was estimated around US$20,000, 2.5-3.5 times higher than the national healthcare expenditure. Additionally, studies that analysed patients with IPF alongside a matched control cohort suggested a significant increase in resource use and cost.

CONCLUSION

The reviewed evidence indicates that IPF has considerable impact on HRQoL, relative to the general population levels. Furthermore, in studies of cost and resource use, most estimates of the burden were consistent in suggesting an excess cost for patients with IPF compared with a control cohort or the national health expenditure. This confirms IPF as a growing threat for public health worldwide, with considerable impact to the patients and healthcare providers.

Performance of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in various chronic respiratory diseases. Few studies have assessed the performance of the SGRQ in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). We aimed to examine the SGRQ's performance characteristics and generate data to support its reliability and validity in patients with CTD-ILD.

METHODS

We used data from 193 CTD-ILD patients evaluated at Tosei General Hospital from May 2007 to July 2016 to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the SGRQ.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64.2 years and 122 (63.2%) were women. There were no significant differences in SGRQ scores between any of the CTD groups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.905) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.873) for the SGRQ total score were excellent. At baseline, SGRQ total score was significantly associated with clinically meaningful measures of physiological function, exercise capacity and dyspnoea. Change in SGRQ total score over 6 months was also associated with change in other measures. Cox proportional hazards models showed that higher baseline SGRQ total score was a significant predictor of mortality. The estimated minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ total score was 4-13 points.

CONCLUSION

These data support the validity and reliability of SGRQ as a sensitive measure for capturing HRQoL in patients with CTD-ILD.

Integrating Patient Perspectives into Personalized Medicine in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and ultimately fatal disease which has a major impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). Except for lung transplantation, there is no curative treatment option. Fortunately, two disease-modifying drugs that slow down disease decline were recently approved. Though this is a major step forward, these drugs do not halt or reverse the disease, nor convincingly improve health-related QOL. In daily practice, disease behavior and response to therapy greatly vary among patients. It is assumed that this is related to the multiple biological pathways and complex interactions between genetic, molecular, and environmental factors that are involved in the pathogenesis of IPF. Recently, research in IPF has therefore started to focus on developing targeted therapy through identifying genetic risk factors and biomarkers. In this rapidly evolving field of personalized medicine, patient factors such as lifestyle, comorbidities, preferences, and experiences with medication should not be overlooked. This review describes recent insights and methods on how to integrate patient perspectives into personalized medicine. Furthermore, it provides an overview of the most used patient-reported outcome measures in IPF, to facilitate choices for both researchers and clinicians when incorporating the patient voice in their research and care. To enhance truly personalized treatment in IPF, biology should be combined with patient perspectives.

Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: living well

Progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are characterised by major reductions in quality of life and survival and have similarities to certain malignancies. However, palliative care expertise is conspicuously inaccessible to many patients with ILD. Unmet patient and caregiver needs include effective pharmacological and psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life throughout the disease course, sensitive advanced care planning, and timely patient-centred end-of-life care. The incorrect perception that palliative care is synonymous with end-of-life care, with no role earlier in the course of ILD, has created a culture of neglect. Interventions that aim to improve life expectancy are often prioritised without rigorous assessment of the individual's health and psychosocial needs, thereby inadvertently reducing quality of life. As in malignant disorders, radical interventions to slow disease progression and palliative measures to improve quality of life should both be prioritised. Efficient patient-centred models of palliative care must be validated, taking into account religious and cultural differences, as well as variability of resources. Effective implementation of palliative care for ILD will require multidisciplinary participation from clinicians, specialist nurses, psychologists, social workers, and, in some countries, non-governmental faith and community-based organisations with access to palliative care expertise.