Choosing the right mask for your Asian patient with sleep apnoea: A randomized, crossover trial of CPAP interfaces

Current treatment strategies in managing side effects associated with domiciliary positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for patients with sleep disordered breathing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sleep disordered breathing is commonly treated with positive airway pressure therapy. Positive airway pressure therapy is delivered via a tight-fitting mask with common side effects including: leak, ineffective treatment, residual sleep disordered breathing, eye irritation, nasal congestion, pressure ulcers and poor concordance with therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the effectiveness of current treatment strategies for managing side effects associated with positive airway pressure therapy. Five databases were searched and 10,809 articles were screened, with 36 articles included in the review. Studies investigated: dressings, nasal spray/douche, chin straps, heated humidification and interfaces. No intervention either improved or detrimentally affected: positive airway pressure concordance, Epworth Sleepiness Score, residual apnoea hypopnea index or interface leak. The review was limited by study heterogeneity, particularly for outcome measures. Additionally, patient demographics were not reported, making it difficult to apply the findings to a broad clinical population. This review highlights the paucity of evidence supporting treatment strategies to manage side effects of positive airway pressure therapy.

Anatomical Basis of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Repeated obstruction and closure of the upper airway, sporadic hypoxic episodes, and sympathetic activity are symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Obstructive sleep apnoea is due to a combination of altered upper airway structure and muscular function, a low arousal threshold and increased loop gain. Although recurrent upper airway (UA) collapse during sleep is the most frequent clinical hallmark of OSA, the exact cause of this collapse is unknown. Furthermore, while continuous positive airway pressure aids in the management of OSA, many patients find it intolerable. As a result, a better knowledge of the causes of OSA may result in more effective treatments. We did a review of randomized controlled trials that were done in this regard in the last 10 years and whose full-text version is available on the PubMed database. A total of 20 articles were finalized for review after applying our criteria. The articles have proposed different theories regarding the anatomical basis responsible for obstructive sleep apnoea. The theories proposed by different studies in the last decade include reduced genioglossus and hypoglossal nerve activity, the pharyngeal muscles' failure to keep the airway open or tighten it, tonsils and adenoid hypertrophy, an oversensitive ventilatory control system and low respiratory arousal threshold, mandibular position, pharyngeal muscles' high sympathetic drive, cephalometric alterations such as mandibular and hyoid bone position and the length of the soft palate, obesity, and neck fat and fluid re-distribution in the body, from the lower to the upper parts while reclining. Given the diverse etiological characteristics of OSA patients and to increase our knowledge of the condition, additional study into this group is required. Filling any knowledge gaps that may exist in the anatomical basis of the onset of OSA is the main objective of this review paper.

Nasal pillow vs. standard nasal mask for treatment of OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of nasal pillows with standard nasal masks in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

A digitalized search was carried out in four different databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and CENTRAL using relevant keywords along with a manual search in relevant journals. All comparative studies comparing outcomes of using a nasal pillow with the use of standard nasal masks for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with OSA were included. The qualitative analysis was carried out by tabulating the demographic data. The quantitative data were subjected to meta-analysis. The quality of comparative studies (both retrospective and prospective cohorts) was evaluated using New-castle Ottawa scale (NOS).

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies (eight prospective and six retrospective) were included in the review. Of them, five studies were randomized and were of cross-over study design. No significant differences were observed in achieved CPAP and residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) levels between the nasal pillow and nasal mask with SMD - 0.05 95% CI [- 0.18, 0.09], p = 0.50 and SMD - 0.13 95% CI [- 0.28, 0.03], p = 0.12, respectively. However, nasal pillow usage was associated with better CPAP adherence with a difference of only + 0.29 min/night as compared to a standard nasal mask, with SMD 0.29 95% CI [0.07, 0.50], p = 0.009.

CONCLUSION

Nasal pillow and standard nasal mask were equally effective in terms of residual AHI level and achieved similar therapeutic CPAP pressures. However, the difference in CPAP adherence between groups, though statistically significant, is of questionable clinical significance.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Therapieadhärenz drei Monate nach Einleitung einer nichtinvasiven CPAP-Therapie bei 1078 Patienten mit obstruktiver Schlafapnoe (OSA)

Einleitung Die nächtliche kontinuierliche positive Überdruckatmung (CPAP) gilt als therapeutischer Goldstandard einer obstruktiven Schlafapnoe (OSA). Die CPAP-Therapie stellt zumeist eine Dauertherapie mit geringen Nebenwirkungen dar. Trotzdem ist die Therapietreue unbefriedigend. In dieser Arbeit wurden die Therapietreue betrachtet und typische Probleme katalogisiert.

Methode 1078 OSA-Patienten wurden nach diagnostischer Polygrafie (PG) oder Polysomnografie (PSG) auf eine CPAP-Therapie eingestellt. Die Therapietreue wurde nach 3 Monaten nachverfolgt. Folgende Therapieadhärenz-Gruppen wurden festgelegt: 1. gute CPAP-Einstellung und Nutzung, 2. CPAP-Abbruch nach anfänglicher Nutzung, 3. mangelnde CPAP-Nutzung wegen Nebenwirkungen, 4. Abbruch aufgrund fehlender Motivation/geringem Leidensdruck, 5. Masken-Unverträglichkeit, 6. CPAP-Versagen aufgrund fehlenden Therapieeffekts, 7. Umstellung auf anderes Beatmungsverfahren, 8. keine Kontrolle erfolgt.

Ergebnisse Von 1078 CPAP-Patienten erschienen 830 Patienten (77 %) zur Therapiekontrolle. Hiervon waren 450 Patienten (54,2%) in Gruppe 1, 216 Patienten (26%) in Gruppe 2, 71 Patienten (8,5%) in Gruppe 3, 35 Patienten (4,2%) in Gruppe 4, 14 Patienten (1,7%) in Gruppe 5, 3 Patienten (0,4 %) in Gruppe 6 und 41 Patienten (4,9%) in Gruppe 7. Ein geringer obstruktiver Ereignisindex, niedriger CPAP-Druck und tendenziell auch ein geringer Epworth-Sleepiness-Score waren Prädiktoren für CPAP-Versagen. Für die Therapietreue konnten keine signifikanten Prädiktoren dargestellt werden.

Diskussion Eine effektive Therapienutzung von 54% nach 3 Monaten ist ein suboptimales Ergebnis. Prädiktoren für CPAP-Versagen waren Parameter, die vor Therapie auf geringen Leidensdruck der Patienten deuteten. Trotz großer Patientenkohorte konnten keine signifikanten CPAP-Adhärenz-Prädiktoren durch anthropometrische oder PSG-Daten dargestellt werden. Vielmehr könnten Erfahrungen in den ersten Therapietagen ausschlaggebend sein. CPAP-Geräte bieten Komforteinstellungen, die kenntnisgerecht auf den Patienten individualisiert werden müssen. Eine große Auswahl an unterschiedlichen Maskenformen erfordert Erfahrung und Training bei der patientenorientierten Maskenanpassung. Eine 3-monatige Wiedervorstellung erscheint zu lang, um Therapieprobleme zeitnah mit dem Patienten zu besprechen. Telemedizinische Möglichkeiten oder kurzfristige telefonische Beratungsoptionen sollten in Betracht gezogen werden.

In search of a better CPAP interface: A network meta-analysis comparing nasal masks, nasal pillows and oronasal masks

Until now, no study has directly network meta-analysed the impact of nasal masks, nasal pillows and oronasal masks on continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. This study aimed to meta-analyse the impact of three kinds of nasal interfaces with both network meta-analysis and pairwise comparison. PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to December 2020 for studies that compared the three types of nasal interfaces for treating obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure. The outcomes were residual apnea-hypopnea index, continuous positive airway pressure, and nightly average usage. The network meta-analysis was conducted using multivariate random-effects in a frequentist framework where three interfaces were ranked with the surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities. The pairwise comparison was conducted using random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty-nine articles comprising 6378 participants were included. The pairwise comparison showed both nasal masks and nasal pillows were associated with lower residual apnea-hypopnea index, lower continuous positive airway pressure, and higher continuous positive airway pressure adherence compared with oronasal masks. The surface under the cumulative ranking confirmed that nasal masks were associated with the lowest residual apnea-hypopnea index and highest adherence, while pillows were associated with the lowest continuous positive airway pressure. The meta-regression identified that lower pretreatment apnea-hypopnea index and continuous positive airway pressure determined during continuous positive airway pressure titration (versus determined during continuous positive airway pressure therapy) was associated with lower continuous positive airway pressure with nasal masks and nasal pillows. In conclusion, compared with oronasal masks, nasal masks and nasal pillows are better interfaces, especially in patients with lower pretreatment apnea-hypopnea index and those with the therapeutic pressure determined during continuous positive airway pressure titration.

Brazilian Thoracic Association Consensus on Sleep-disordered Breathing

Sleep is essential for the proper functioning of all individuals. Sleep-disordered breathing can occur at any age and is a common reason for medical visits. The objective of this consensus is to update knowledge about the main causes of sleep-disordered breathing in adult and pediatric populations, with an emphasis on obstructive sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea is an extremely prevalent but often underdiagnosed disease. It is often accompanied by comorbidities, notably cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive disorders, which have a significant impact on quality of life and mortality rates. Therefore, to create this consensus, the Sleep-Disordered Breathing Department of the Brazilian Thoracic Association brought together 14 experts with recognized, proven experience in sleep-disordered breathing.

Multidimensional assessment and cluster analysis for OSA phenotyping

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a heterogeneous disease with varying phenotype. A cluster analysis based on multidimensional disease characteristics, including symptom, anthropometry, polysomnography (PSG), and craniofacial morphology, in combination with auto-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration response and comorbidity profiles was performed within a well-characterized cohort of patients with OSA, with the aim to refine current phenotypic expressions of OSA with clinical implications.

METHODS

Two hundred and ninety-one subjects with a new diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA, referred for auto-CPAP titration to the sleep center were included for analysis. In-laboratory PSG and craniofacial computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed, followed by an auto-CPAP titration. The symptom of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was assessed by Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS).

RESULTS

Three patient phenotypes, corresponding to the "normal weight, non-sleepy and moderate OSA", the "obese, non-sleepy and severe OSA" and "obese, sleepy, very severe OSA with craniofacial limitation" were identified. Among the PSG parameters, only N3% and mean pulse oxygen saturation (SPO₂) were found to be associated with ESS, and they only explain small fraction of the variation (R²=0.136). Neck circumference and craniofacial limitation were associated the more severe phenotype, which had higher prevalence of hypertension, metabolic syndrome, greater diurnal blood gas abnormalities and worse PAP titration response.

CONCLUSIONS

Three OSA phenotypes were identified according to multiple aspect of clinical features in patients with moderate to severe OSA, which differed in prevalence of hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diurnal blood gas parameters and CPAP titration response. Self-reported EDS was not related with the severity of sleep breathing disturbance, and craniofacial limitation was associated the more severe phenotype. These findings highlight the necessity of integrate multiple disease characters into phenotyping to achieve better understanding of the clinical pictures of OSA.

Analysis of risk factors for air leakage in auto-titrating positive airway pressure users: a single-center study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Because air leakage from masks is known as a common cause of low adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy, we analyzed the risk factors for air leakage related to parameters associated with auto-titrating positive airway pressure, polysomnography, InBody Test, and rhinomanometry.

METHODS

Usage data and medical records of 120 auto-titrating positive airway pressure users were reviewed retrospectively. All patients used a nasal or pillow mask and were carefully monitored at scheduled follow-ups.

RESULTS

Use of a pillow mask, sex (male), age, and abdominal fat percentage were significantly associated with high average air leakage. The higher the auto-titrating positive airway pressure average and mean pressure, the more likely patients exhibited high rates of air leakage. The percentage of patients with high average air leakage increased over time (up to 6 months of follow-up).

CONCLUSIONS

Older male patients using a pillow mask and those with a high abdominal fat percentage and high auto-titrating positive airway pressure may require close follow-up and continuous monitoring for air leakage. Because air leakage from a mask can change over time, mask-sealing capacity should be reassessed and masks should be changed regularly.

CITATION

Kang YJ, Cho J-H, Park C-S. Analysis of risk factors for air leakage in auto-titrating positive airway pressure users: a single-center study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):75-88.

[Adherence to CPAP Three Months after Starting Therapy in 1078 Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)]

INTRODUCTION

 Nocturnal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The CPAP therapy is a long-term treatment but does come with few possible side effects. The adherence to the therapy is frequently suboptimal. In this paper, adherence to therapy was assessed and typical problems were classified.

METHODS

 1078 OSA patients received CPAP therapy after a diagnostic polygraphy (PG) or polysomnography (PSG). Adherence to therapy was followed up three months after treatment induction. The following therapy adherence groups were defined: 1. correctly calibrated CPAP and good adherence, 2. CPAP non-acceptance, after initial use, 3. CPAP intolerance use due to side effects, 4. discontinuation due to lack of motivation/low rates of symptoms. 5. mask intolerance, 6. CPAP failure due to a lack of perceived treatment effect, 7. Change to another non-invasive ventilation method, 8. No control carried out.

RESULTS

 Out of 1078 OSA patients a therapy control was performed in 830 patients (77 %). Of these, 450 patients (54.2 %) were placed in group 1, 216 patients (26 %) in group 2, 71 patients (8.5 %) in group 3, 35 patients (4.2 %) in group 4, 14 patients (1.7 %) in group 5, 3 patients (0.4 %) in group 6 and 41 patients (4.9 %) in group 7. A mild obstructive index, low CPAP pressure and, as a trend, a low Epworth- Sleepiness score were predictors of CPAP failure. No significant predictors could be shown for adherence to therapy.

DISCUSSION

 An effective treatment use of 54 % after 3 months is a suboptimal result. Predictors of CPAP failure were parameters that indicated that the patient was less symptomatic prior to therapy. Despite a large patient cohort, neither anthropometric nor PSG-data provided any significant CPAP adherence predictors. Rather, experiences in the first nights of use could be decisive. CPAP devices offer comfort settings that have to be personalised to patients' needs and wants. A large selection of different mask shapes requires experience and training in patient-centred mask fitting. A three-month follow-up appointment seems too long to discuss therapy problems with the patient in a timely manner. Telemedical options or short-term telephone appointments should be considered.

The Importance of Mask Selection on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Outcomes for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the major treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The American Thoracic Society organized a workshop to discuss the importance of mask selection for OSA treatment with CPAP. In this workshop report, we summarize available evidence about the breathing route during nasal and oronasal CPAP and the importance of nasal symptoms for CPAP outcomes. We explore the mechanisms of air leaks during CPAP treatment and possible alternatives for leak control. The impact of nasal and oronasal CPAP on adherence, residual apnea-hypopnea index, unintentional leaks, and pressure requirements are also compared. Finally, recommendations for patient and partner involvement in mask selection are presented, and future directions to promote personalized mask selection are discussed.

Summary and Update on Behavioral Interventions for Improving Adherence with Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Adults

Continuous positive airway pressure (PAP) is still the most efficacious treatment for obstructive sleep apnea when used effectively. Since the availability of PAP 39 years ago there have been considerable technological advances, such as quieter, lighter and smaller machines with better humidification. However, adherence to treatment is still a major problem. This article reviews studies published on behavioral interventions aimed at improving the uptake and maintenance of PAP treatment (January 2016-February 2020). It discusses underlying factors in the poor uptake and discontinuation of treatment and the role of qualitative research to better understand the perspective of the patients.

Mask side-effects in long-term CPAP-patients impact adherence and sleepiness: the InterfaceVent real-life study

Background

For some patients, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) remains an uncomfortable therapy despite the constant development of technological innovations. To date, no real life study has investigated the relationship between mask related side-effects (MRSEs) and CPAP-non-adherence (defined as < 4 h/day) or residual-excessive-sleepiness (RES, Epworth-Sleepiness-Scale (ESS) score ≥ 11) in the long-term.

Methods

The InterfaceVent-CPAP study is a prospective real-life cross-sectional study conducted in an apneic adult cohort undergoing at least 3 months of CPAP with unrestricted mask-access (34 different masks). MRSEs were evaluated using visual-analogue-scales, CPAP-data using CPAP-software, sleepiness using ESS.

Results

1484 patients were included in the analysis (72.2% male, median age 67 years (IQ_25–75: 60–74), initial Apnea–Hypopnea-Index (AHI) of 39 (31–56)/h, residual AHI_flow was 1.9 (0.9–4) events/h), CPAP-treatment lasted 4.4 (2.0–9.7) years, CPAP-usage was 6.8 (5.5–7.8) h/day, the prevalence of CPAP-non-adherence was 8.6%, and the prevalence of RES was 16.17%. Leak-related side-effects were the most prevalent side-effects (patient-reported leaks concerned 75.4% of responders and had no correlation with CPAP-reported-leaks). Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluating explanatory-variable (demographic data, device/mask data and MRSEs) effects on variables-of-interest (CPAP-non-adherence and RES), indicated for patient-MRSEs significant associations between: (i) CPAP-non-adherence and dry-mouth (p = 0.004); (ii) RES and patient-reported leaks (p = 0.007), noisy mask (p < 0.001), dry nose (p < 0.001) and harness pain (p = 0.043).

Conclusion

In long-term CPAP-treated patients, leak-related side-effects remain the most prevalent side-effects, but patient-reported leaks cannot be predicted by CPAP-reported-leaks. Patient-MRSEs can be independently associated with CPAP-non-adherence and RES, thus implying a complementary role for MRSE questionnaires alongside CPAP-device-reported-data for patient monitoring.

Trial registration InterfaceVent is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03013283).

Nasal versus oronasal mask in patients under auto-adjusting continuous positive airway pressure titration: a real-life study

PURPOSE

Mask type (nasal versus oronasal) can affect the optimal pressure required to correct the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) subjects treated with CPAP. Our objective was to evaluate if mask type influenced CPAP titration outcomes in OSA patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of individuals with a baseline AHI ≥ 15.0/h, who received an auto-adjusting CPAP titrating device (S9 AutoSet ResMed^®) in a sleep-lab setting. The mask type oronasal (OM) or nasal (NM) was always selected by the patients. Optimal pressure requirements, leak, and residual AHI were compared based on mask type.

RESULTS

Overall, 436 patients were included: 283 with NM (64.9%) and 153 with OM (35.1%). At baseline, NM and OM cohorts had similar AHI (p = 0.160). Patients allocated to the OM cohort had a higher 95th percentile pressure, a higher 95th percentile leak, and a higher residual AHI than those with a NM: pressure requirement: 12.9 cm H₂O (IQR: 10.6-15.0) versus 10.7 cm H₂O (IQR: 9.2-12.3); leak: 21.6 L/min (IQR: 9.6-37.2) versus 9.6 L/min (IQR: 3.6-19.2); and residual AHI: 4.9/h (IQR: 2.4-10.2) versus 2.2/h (IQR: 1.0-4.4), respectively (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP mask type based on individual preferences exerts profound effects on optimal CPAP pressures and efficacy. Patients titrated with OM showed higher pressure requirements, had higher a leak, and higher residual AHI when compared to NM, which may adversely impact treatment adherence and other health outcomes.

Transmission of Oral Pressure Compromises Oronasal CPAP Efficacy in the Treatment of OSA

BACKGROUND

An oronasal mask is frequently used to treat OSA. In contrast to nasal CPAP, the effectiveness of oronasal CPAP varies by unknown mechanisms. We hypothesized that oral breathing and pressure transmission through the mouth compromises oronasal CPAP efficacy.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with OSA, well adapted to oronasal CPAP, were monitored by full polysomnography, pharyngeal pressure catheter, and nasoendoscope. Patients slept with low doses of midazolam, using an oronasal mask with sealed nasal and oral compartments. CPAP was titrated during administration by the oronasal and nasal routes, and was then reduced to induce stable flow limitation and abruptly switched to the alternate route. In addition, tape sealing the mouth was used to block pressure transmission to the oral cavity.

RESULTS

Best titrated CPAP was significantly higher by the oronasal route rather than the nasal route (P = .005), and patients with > 25% oral breathing (n = 5) failed to achieve stable breathing during oronasal CPAP. During stable flow limitation, inspiratory peak flow was lower, driving pressure was higher, upper airway inspiratory resistance was higher, and retropalatal and retroglossal area were smaller by the oronasal rather than nasal route (P < .05 for all comparisons). Differences were observed even among patients with no oral flow and were abolished when tape sealing the mouth was used (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral breathing and transmission of positive pressure through the mouth compromise oronasal CPAP.