Valproic acid and sleep apnoea: A disproportionality signal from the WHO pharmacovigilance database

A multidisciplinary approach to the home management of continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: beyond usual care pathways (a narrative review)

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic condition that is growing in prevalence, associated with important comorbidities, and has several different phenotypes. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard OSA treatment, but its effectiveness relies on consistent adherence, which can often be difficult to maintain. This narrative review discusses current challenges in the care pathways for CPAP therapy management in OSA, including fragmented care/lack of continuity, inadequate management of comorbidities, suboptimal implementation of digital medicine solutions, and existing reimbursement paradigms. Key tasks to be shared between the appropriate healthcare professionals and providers include technical CPAP follow-up (adherence, effectiveness, alert management), management of comorbidities, and multimodal non-invasive monitoring. What this looks like and who provides the different aspects of care should vary by OSA phenotype, ranging from simple follow-up in primary care (uncomplicated OSA with good CPAP adherence) to multidisciplinary specialist management (high-risk OSA with comorbidities), with regular reassessment to ensure continued alignment with the chosen care plan. In addition to better defining these pathways, how they are reimbursed also needs to be addressed. We suggest that there should be a multidisciplinary approach to symptom reduction and adherence, longitudinal assessment of patient-reported outcomes, and a focus on long-term cardiometabolic health as part of managing CPAP-treated patients with OSA. Facilitated by the appropriate use of digital technologies, these approaches should lead to more personalized care and greater patient engagement, resulting in better long-term adherence and treatment effectiveness. The ultimate goal should be to do better for less.

Insights, recommendations, and research priorities for central sleep apnea: report from an expert panel

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is commonly encountered among patients with sleep-disordered breathing; however, its clinical consequences are less well-characterized. The senior author (A.M.) therefore convened an expert panel to discuss the common presentations of CSA, as well as challenges and knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and management of CSA. The panel identified several key research priorities essential for advancing our understanding of the disorder. Within the diagnostic realm, panel members discussed the utility of multinight assessments and importance of the development and validation of novel metrics and automated assessments for differentiating central vs obstructive hypopneas, such that their impact on clinical outcomes and management may be better evaluated. The panel also discussed the current therapeutic landscape for the management of CSA and agreed that therapies should primarily aim to alleviate sleep-related symptoms, after optimizing treatment to address the underlying cause. Most importantly, the panel concluded that there is a need to further investigate the clinical consequences of CSA, as well as the implications of therapy on clinical outcomes, particularly among those who are asymptomatic. Future research should focus on endo-phenotyping central events for a better mechanistic understanding of the disease, validating novel diagnostic methods for implementation in routine clinical practice, as well as the use of combination therapy and comparative effectiveness trials in elucidating the most efficacious interventions for managing CSA.

CITATION

Kundel V, Ahn A, Arzt M, et al. Insights, recommendations, and research priorities for central sleep apnea: report from an expert panel. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(2):405-416.