Long-term follow-up after intrapleural tPA/DNase therapy for pleural infection

Expert Review on Nonsurgical Management of Parapneumonic Effusion: Advances, Controversies, and New Directions

Parapneumonic effusion and empyema are rising in incidence worldwide, particularly in association with comorbidities in an aging population. Also driving this change is the widespread uptake of pneumococcal vaccines, leading to the emergence of nonvaccine-type pneumococci and other bacteria. Early treatment with systemic antibiotics is essential but should be guided by local microbial guidelines and antimicrobial resistance patterns due to significant geographical variation. Thoracic ultrasound has emerged as a leading imaging technique in parapneumonic effusion, enabling physicians to characterize effusions, assess the underlying parenchyma, and safely guide pleural procedures. Drainage decisions remain based on longstanding criteria including the size of the effusion and fluid gram stain and biochemistry results. Small-bore chest drains appear to be as effective as large bore and are adequate for the delivery of intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET), which is now supported by a large body of evidence. The IET dosing regimen used in the UK Multicenter Sepsis Trial -2 has the most evidence available but data surrounding alternative dosing, concurrent and once-daily instillations, and novel fibrinolytic agents are promising. Prognostic scores used in pneumonia (e.g., CURB-65) tend to underestimate mortality in parapneumonic effusion/empyema. Scores specifically based on pleural infection have been developed but require validation in prospective cohorts.

Alteplase Dose Assessment for Pleural infection Therapy (ADAPT) Study-2: Use of 2.5 mg alteplase as a starting intrapleural dose

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator/deoxyribonuclease (tPA/DNase) therapy is increasingly used in pleural infection. Bleeding risks and costs associated with tPA remain the clinical concerns. Our dose de-escalation series aims to establish the lowest effective dosing regimen for tPA/DNase. This study assesses the intrapleural use of 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase for pleural infection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pleural infection treated with a starting regime of 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase were included from two centres in Australia and UK. Escalation of tPA dose was permitted if clinical response was inadequate.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (mean age 61.0 years) received intrapleural 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase. Most (88.4%) were treated successfully and discharged from hospital without surgery by 90 days. Patients received a median of 5 [interquartile range [IQR] = 3-6] doses of tPA/DNase. Total amount of tPA used per patient was 12.5 mg [median, IQR = 7.5-15.0]. Seventeen patients required dose escalation of tPA; most (n = 12) for attempted drainage of distant non-communicating locule(s). Treatment success was corroborated by clearance of pleural opacities on radiographs (from median 27.0% [IQR = 17.1-44.5] to 11.0% [IQR = 6.4-23.3] of hemithorax, p < 0.0001), increased pleural fluid drainage (1.98 L [median, IQR = 1.38-2.68] over 72 h following commencement of tPA/DNase) and reduction of serum C-reactive protein level (by 45.0% [IQR = 39.3-77.0] from baseline at day 5, p < 0.0001). Two patients required surgery. Six patients with significant comorbidities (e.g., advanced cancer) had ongoing infection when palliated and died. Two patients experienced self-limiting pleural bleeding and received blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

A starting intrapleural regime of 2.5 mg tPA/5 mg DNase, with up-titration if needed, can be effective and deserves further exploration.