1
|
Tobiano G, Roberts S, Muir R, Jerofke-Owen T, Ting C, Thorning S, Heyland DK, Marshall AP. Patient-mediated interventions in hospital: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:418-441. [PMID: 36408930 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To describe the characteristics of hospital-based, patient-mediated interventions and their impact on patient, clinician and organization outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Health literature databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE) were searched in August 2021. Backward and forward citation searching was conducted. REVIEW METHODS Studies investigating patient-mediated interventions, targeted at adult hospitalized patients were eligible. Data were extracted related to study and intervention characteristics. Narrative synthesis was used to understand intervention impact on patient, clinician and organization outcomes (as per a framework). Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. RESULTS Thirty-three studies, reporting 18 interventions, were included. Twelve interventions prompted patients to report health information about their own health/needs/concerns and six interventions encouraged patients to provide feedback about clinical practice. Across all interventions, there was evidence that patients used patient-mediated interventions and that they may improve patient communication. Healthcare professional outcomes were mixed for actual/intended use, acceptability and usefulness of interventions; yet there was some evidence of healthcare professional behaviour change. Interventions that encouraged patients to report health information about their own health/needs/concerns appeared more successful than other types of interventions. CONCLUSIONS There is some evidence that hospital-based patient-mediated interventions may influence patient communication and healthcare professional behaviour. Patient-mediated interventions that encourage patients to report patient data before a clinical encounter may be more impactful than interventions that encourage patient feedback during or post-encounter. IMPACT To date, most patient-mediated intervention research has been conducted in primary care settings; we uncovered the types of patient-mediated interventions that have been trialled in hospitals. We found that patient communication and healthcare professional behaviour may be influenced by these patient-mediated interventions. Future researchers could explore the suitability and effectiveness of a wider range of hospital-based patient-mediated interventions. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION There was no funding to remunerate a patient/member of the public for this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Tobiano
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,NHMRC CRE in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shelley Roberts
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel Muir
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Christine Ting
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah Thorning
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daren K Heyland
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verkerk EW, Rake EA, Braat DDM, Nelen WLDM, Aarts JWM, Kremer JAM. The Tell me tool: The development and feasibility of a tool for person-centred infertility care. Health Expect 2022; 25:1081-1093. [PMID: 35218288 PMCID: PMC9122469 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An important—and often missing—element of person‐centred care is the inclusion of individual patients' values and preferences. This is challenging but especially important for high‐burden fertility treatments. We describe the development of a clinical tool that aims to facilitate the delivery of person‐centred fertility care by giving insight into the patients' values and preferences. Methods We developed the Tell me tool following the three principles of user‐centred design: (1) early and continual focus on users; (2) iterative design; (3) measurement of user behaviour. Accordingly, our methods consisted of three phases: (1) conducting semi‐structured interviews with 18 couples undergoing fertility treatment, followed by a consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders; (2) performing seven iterative improvement rounds; (3) testing the feasibility of the tool in 10 couples. Results The Tell me tool consists of a ranking assignment of 13 themes and two open‐ended questions. These themes relate to the couples' wellbeing and experience of the treatment, such as mental health and shared decision making. The open‐ended questions ask them to write down what matters most to them. The field test showed variation between the individual patients' answers. The tool proved to highlight what is important to the individual patient and gives insight into patients' personal contexts. Conclusions We developed a tool that gives insight into the values and preferences of the individual patient. The tool seems feasible for facilitating person‐centred fertility care. Patient or Public Contribution The tool was developed with a user‐centred design that strongly involved patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva W Verkerk
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ester A Rake
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Didi D M Braat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Willianne L D M Nelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W M Aarts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan A M Kremer
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Belle E, Huisman‐De Waal G, Vermeulen H, Heinen M. Feasibility and early effectiveness of the Tell-us Card communication tool to increase in-hospital patient participation: a cluster randomised controlled pilot study. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 35:911-922. [PMID: 32964468 PMCID: PMC8451905 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient participation is fundamental to nursing care and has beneficial effects on patient outcomes. However, it is not well embedded yet and little is known on how nurses could effectively stimulate patient participation in hospital care. The Tell-us Card is a communication tool for inviting patients to talk about their preferences and needs, and to increase patient participation in daily care. OBJECTIVES To assess feasibility and early effectiveness of the Tell-us Card communication tool for enhanced patient participation during hospitalisation. DESIGN AND METHOD A pilot cluster randomised controlled study design was used including four nursing wards. Effectiveness was measured with the Individualized Care Scale (ICS) and the Quality from the Patients' Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. Linear mixed model analysis was used for analysis. Feasibility was assessed with an evaluative questionnaire for patients and nurses and by reviewing the content of Tell-us Cards using the Fundamentals of Care Framework (FOCF) for analysis. Ethical approval was attained. RESULTS Data of 265 patients showed a significant increase at one intervention ward on the ICS (effect size 0.61, p = 0.02) and most ICS subscales. No effect was visible on the QPP. The majority of patients regarded the intervention as beneficial; nurses however experienced barriers with incorporating the Tell-us Card into daily care. Analysis of the Tell-us Card content showed many elements of the FOCF being mentioned, with most patients indicating psychosocial needs like being involved and informed. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study showed a positive early effect of the Tell-us Card communication tool on patient participation, although integration in daily nursing care appeared to be complex and an optimal fit has not yet been reached. Patients were positive about the intervention and wrote meaningful issues on the Tell-us Cards. More research is needed on how to incorporate patient participation effectively in complex hospital care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise van Belle
- Radboud Institute for Health SciencesIQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Department of CardiologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Getty Huisman‐De Waal
- Radboud Institute for Health SciencesIQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Hester Vermeulen
- Radboud Institute for Health SciencesIQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Faculty of Health and Social StudiesHAN University of Applied SciencesNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Maud Heinen
- Radboud Institute for Health SciencesIQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|