Impact of the person-centred intervention guided self-determination across healthcare settings-An integrated review

Improved self-management of type 1 diabetes in young women: Experiences of Guided Self-Determination-Young: A qualitative interview study

AIMS

Young women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have higher risks of diabetes complications and report higher diabetes distress and lower quality of life than men with T1D. Their experiences of self-management and need for support have received little attention, and targeted interventions are lacking. The aim of this qualitative interview study was to explore the experiences of young women with T1D after participating in an intervention with the person-centred reflection and problem-solving model Guided Self-Determination-Young (GSD-Y), with a focus on self-management and support in daily diabetes care.

METHODS

A qualitative interview study was performed in a paediatric and an adult diabetes outpatient clinic in Sweden. After participating in an intervention with GSD-Y, 12 women (15-20 years) with T1D were selected and interviewed individually. The interviews were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed an overarching theme: 'A person-centred approach facilitated deeper reflection on both an individual and a relational level', and two main categories: 'The process initiated within the individual', and 'The process initiated together with the health care provider'. The women experienced increased knowledge of, and increased ability to manage diabetes. They also experienced a new type of relationship with the health care provider, including exchange of in-depth information beyond glucose levels, which appeared to increase their ability to receive support.

CONCLUSIONS

The GSD-Y model provided tools to explore and clarify the individual needs of young women with T1D, which supported diabetes self-management. Person-centred care was enabled when the women became engaged as active partners in diabetes health care.

Guided self-determination for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Patients' experiences of a nurse-led person-centred intervention

PURPOSE

Guided self-determination is an empowering person-centred approach that has proven useful in empowering different patient groups but has not yet been tested in lung cancer patients. The purpose of the study was to examine how patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer in concomitant chemoradiotherapy could benefit from a guided self-determination course.

METHODS

A prospective intervention study with both quantitative and qualitative data. Patients (n = 20) were offered four guided self-determination conversations with a nurse. Symptoms and quality of life were measured through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews elicited thirteen patients' experiences. Thematic analysis was conducted, and the Consolidated Criteria for Mixed Method Research was used for reporting.

RESULTS

No difference in quality of life were found but significant worsening of pain, dyspnea, diarrhoea and dysphagia. Six themes were generated describing that in a new, uncertain and lonely situation with a life-threatening disease, the patients appreciated a respectful relationship with a nurse, and conversations with the nurse became a lifeline. Some patients felt increasingly empowered through new insights, while others felt that it became too intimate.

CONCLUSION

When patients with a serious disease can draw on nurses' knowledge and experience, they are empowered to manage everyday life. Some patients need supportive and reflective conversations, while others benefit from concrete problem-solving objectives.

Prediabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the effectiveness of a guided self-determination counselling approach in primary health care, a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Identify individuals who are at risk of Type 2 diabetes, who also are at a greater risk of developing cardiovascular disease is important. The rapid worldwide increase in diabetes prevalence call for Primary Health Care to find feasible prevention strategies, to reduce patient risk factors and promote lifestyle changes. Aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate how a nurse-lead Guided Self-Determination counselling approach can assist people at risk of type 2 diabetes to lower their coronary heart disease risk.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled study, 81 people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes were assigned into an intervention group (n = 39) receiving Guided Self-Determination counselling from Primary Health Care nurses over three months and a control group (n = 42) that received a diet leaflet only. Measurements included the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score questionnaire and biological measurements of Hemoglobin A1c protein, Body Mass Index, fasting blood glucose, Blood pressure, Cholesterol, High-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides, at baseline (time1), 6 (time2) and 9 months (time 3).

RESULTS

A total of 56 participants, equal number in intervention and control groups, completed all measurements. A significant difference between the intervention and control groups, in coronary heart disease risk was not found at 6 nor 9-months. However, within-group data demonstrated that 55.4% of the participants had lower coronary heart disease risk in the next ten years at the 9-month measurement. Indicating an overall 18% relative risk reduction of coronary heart disease risk by participating in the trial, with the number needed to treat for one to lower their risk to be nine. Within the intervention group a significant difference was found between time 1 and 3 in lower body mass index (p = 0.046), hemoglobin A1c level (p = 0.018) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although unable to show significant group differences in change of coronary heart disease risk by this 12-weeks intervention, the process of regular measurements and the guided self-determination counselling seem to be beneficial for within-group measures and the overall reduction of coronary heart disease risk factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is a part of the registered study 'Effectiveness of Nurse-coordinated Follow-Up Programme in Primary Care for People at Risk of T2DM' at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT04688359) (accessed on 30 December 2020).

Face and content validity of the EMPOWER-UP questionnaire: a generic measure of empowerment in relational decision-making and problem-solving

BACKGROUND

Decision-making and problem-solving processes are powerful activities occurring daily across all healthcare settings. Their empowering potential is seldom fully exploited, and they may even be perceived as disempowering. We developed the EMPOWER-UP questionnaire to enable assessment of healthcare users' perception of empowerment across health conditions, healthcare settings, and healthcare providers' professional backgrounds. This article reports the initial development of EMPOWER-UP, including face and content validation.

METHODS

Four grounded theories explaining barriers and enablers to empowerment in relational decision-making and problem-solving were reviewed to generate a preliminary item pool, which was subsequently reduced using constant comparison. Preliminary items were evaluated for face and content validity using an expert panel of seven researchers and cognitive interviews in Danish and English with 29 adults diagnosed with diabetes, cancer, or schizophrenia.

RESULTS

A preliminary pool of 139 items was reduced to 46. Independent feedback from expert panel members resulted in further item reduction and modifications supporting content validity and strengthening the potential for generic use. Forty-one preliminary items were evaluated through 29 cognitive interviews, resulting in a 36-item draft questionnaire deemed to have good face and content validity and generic potential.

CONCLUSIONS

Face and content validation using an expert panel and cognitive interviews resulted in a 36-item draft questionnaire with a potential for evaluating empowerment in user-provider interactions regardless of health conditions, healthcare settings, and healthcare providers' professional backgrounds.

'To loosen up and talk': Patients´ and facilitators´ experiences of discovery group sessions from the Tidal Model as an introduction before engaging in a person-centred group intervention

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT

Treatment groups in Mental Health Service is cost-effective, increases patients´ self-understanding and stimulate change Research shows that people with mental illness have different barriers to attend group sessions which often originates from a lack of trust in other people, but it is known that the possibility to build gradual trust among the participants encourages attendance.

WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE

This study is based on the experience from outpatients and illuminates how discovery groups from the Tidal Model can be used as introductory sessions to build gradual trust among people with mental illness before engaging in a person-centred group intervention. The study fills a research gap in methods to create a safe and trusting environment in treatment groups for people with mental illness working with recovery-oriented person-centred interventions.

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study emphasizes the importance of meeting concerns about social interactions in persons with mental illness when joining treatment groups. It presents a recovery-oriented method which meets this requirement and is easy to implement in practice.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recovery-oriented interventions delivered individually or in groups are more and more common within mental health nursing. However, persons with mental illness may be cautious about engaging in groups. Therefore, it is important to provide a trusting basis in the group to allow for the best opportunities to promote engagement, attendance and impact of treatment.

AIM

The aim was to explore how discovery group sessions were experienced as introductory sessions from the perspectives of participants and facilitators before engaging in a person-centred group intervention.

METHOD

A qualitative interview study was conducted, involving four group facilitators and 16 participants with mental illness from five completed groups. Data were analysed with Ricoeur's theory of interpretation.

RESULTS

The findings showed that the two discovery group sessions were experienced as useful and meaningful to all and created a safe atmosphere and a trusted relationship among group participants and facilitators.

DISCUSSION

Feeling safe and sharing experiences and emotions contribute to the relational climate in a group.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Addressing concerns about social interactions in persons with mental illness is important in group treatment. This study proved that engaging patients in designing or adapting interventions for mental health services is important to improve quality.

Interprofessional follow-up for people at risk of type 2 diabetes in primary healthcare - a randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of an empowerment-based interprofessional lifestyle intervention program among people at risk of type 2 diabetes on knowledge, skills, and confidence in self-management, health, psychological well-being, and lifestyle characteristics, and to explore the participants' perceptions of participating in the intervention.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In line with the Medical Research Council complex interventions research methods framework, we conducted a randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews in primary healthcare clinics in Norway between 2019-2021. Of the patients at risk (The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score Calculator (FINDRISC) ≥15 or Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30) 142 accepted the invitation, and 14 participants from the intervention group participated in individual interviews after the 12-month follow-up. Our primary outcome was the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). Secondary outcomes were EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, WHO-Overall health, WHO-Overall QOL, weight, height, waist circumference, and regularity of physical activity. We used thematic analysis to analyse the qualitative data.

RESULTS

There was no clinically relevant differences of neither the primary nor the secondary endpoints between intervention and control group. As to the qualitative data, we identified two distinct features: 'Meaningful perspectives on lifestyle changes' and 'Lifestyle change is not a linear process due to challenges faced along the way' putting ownership of their choices in life into picture.

CONCLUSION

The negative results of the RCT stand in contrast to the findings given by the participants voices, perceiving the intervention as a key eye opener placing their health challenges in perspective. How to interpret these seemingly conflicting findings of participants being seen, heard, and understood, helping them to take more conscious ownership of their choices in life, and at the same time demonstrating no improvements in symptoms or measures, is a dilemma that needs further exploration. We should be careful to implement interventions that do not demonstrate any effects on the quantitative outcomes.

Usefulness of working with a person-centred intervention in a group: Perspectives from facilitators and persons with mental illness

BACKGROUND

When implementing new interventions into clinical practice, it is of great importance to investigate the implementation process to better understand factors promoting and impeding the implementation to stimulate engagement and sustainability of the intervention. It is essential to consider perspectives both from the health professionals delivering the intervention and those receiving the intervention to be open to their suggestions for enhancing the dissemination and implementation of the intervention. The aim of the study was to evaluate adoption, acceptability and appropriateness of a person-centred group intervention (PCGI) from the perspectives of facilitators and participants with mental illness in mental health outpatient services right after delivery.

METHODS

A qualitative interview study design was used. Interview data from three individual interviews, one group interview with facilitators and 16 individual interviews with participants were analyzed through content analysis.

RESULTS

As described in the following three categories, the facilitators and participants found the PCGI overall useful and meaningful to deliver and receive: (1) application of a PCGI in clinical practice, (2) balancing the facilitator role and (3) establishing and maintaining a safe relationship.

CONCLUSION

Facilitators and participants found the form and structure of the PCGI useful and meaningful. Some participants dropped out as they did not feel comfortable in a group setting. The components in the sessions, questions on cards and reflection sheets together with peer-to-peer interactions provided a safe environment. However, facilitation from facilitators requires appropriate skills and qualifications, which must be provided by the hospital together with supervision and the possibility for peer feedback and exchange of experiences.

Mutuality between nurses and patients with chronic illnesses: A cross-sectional descriptive study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Mutuality is a process in which the patient participates and is involved in decision-making and care interventions. The aim of this study was to measure mutuality in the relationship between nurses and chronic illness patients.

METHODS

This study had a cross-sectional design; the sample included 249 patients and 249 nurses. Mutuality was measured with the Nurse-Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale.

RESULTS

Patients had higher scores in almost all items (p < 0.001). Patients demonstrate high reciprocity towards nurses and the ability to express and share their emotions. Patients consider nurses their point of reference and share with them their health goals. Nurses show more difficulty in being mutual with the patient, especially in the aspects related to the sharing of emotions, objectives, and planning. The egalitarian relationship score was low in both patients and nurses.

CONCLUSION

These findings are important to consider at clinical, educational, organisational, and policy levels. Nurse education and organisation must push towards respect for the wishes of patients, the possibility of expressing their choices, and their involvement in the care plan.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

In clinical practice, it is necessary to put the patients more at the centre, involving them in the identification of objectives and in making decisions.

Six-Month Pilot Testing of a Digital Health Tool to Support Effective Self-Care in People With Heart Failure: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Digital tools may support people to self-manage their heart failure (HF). Having previously outlined the human-centered design development of a digital tool to support self-care of HF, the next step was to pilot the tool over a period of time to establish people's acceptance of it in practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to conduct an observational pilot study to examine the usability, adherence, and feasibility of a digital health tool for HF within the Irish health care system.

METHODS

A total of 19 participants with HF were provided with a digital tool comprising a mobile app and the Fitbit Charge 4 and Aria Air smart scales for a period of 6 months. Changes to their self-care were assessed before and after the study with the 9-item European HF Self-care Behavior Scale (EHFScBS) and the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLwHFQ) using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. After the study, 3 usability questionnaires were implemented and descriptively analyzed: the System Usability Scale (SUS), Wearable Technology Motivation Scale (WTMS), and Comfort Rating Scale (CRS). Participants also undertook a semistructured interview regarding their experiences with the digital tool. Interviews were analyzed deductively using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

RESULTS

Participants wore their devices for an average of 86.2% of the days in the 6-month testing period ranging from 40.6% to 98%. Although improvements in the EHFScBS and MLwHFQ were seen, these changes were not significant (P=.10 and P=.70, respectively, where P>.03, after a Bonferroni correction). SUS results suggest that the usability of this system was not acceptable with a median score of 58.8 (IQR 55.0-60.0; range 45.0-67.5). Participants demonstrated a strong motivation to use the system according to the WTMS (median 6.0, IQR 5.0-7.0; range 1.0-7.0), whereas the Fitbit was considered very comfortable as demonstrated by the low CRS results (median 0.0, IQR 0.0-0.0; range 0.0-2.0). According to participant interviews, the digital tool supported self-management through increased knowledge, improved awareness, decision-making, and confidence in their own data, and improving their social support through a feeling of comfort in being watched.

CONCLUSIONS

The digital health tool demonstrated high levels of adherence and acceptance among participants. Although the SUS results suggest low usability, this may be explained by participants uncertainty that they were using it fully, rather than it being unusable, especially given the experiences documented in their interviews. The digital tool targeted key self-management behaviors and feelings of social support. However, a number of changes to the tool, and the health service, are required before it can be implemented at scale. A full-scale feasibility trial conducted at a wider level is required to fully determine its potential effectiveness and wider implementation needs.

Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice

BACKGROUND

An integrative cooperation of different healthcare professional is a key component for high quality health services. With an aging population and many with long-term conditions, more health tasks and follow-up care are being transferred to primary care and locally where people live. Interprofessional collaboration among providers of different professional designations will be of increasing importance to optimizing primary care capacity in years to come. There is a call for further exploration of models of interprofessional collaboration that might be applicable in Norwegian primary care. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of interprofessional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses working in primary care by applying an intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, this study was designed to strengthen and gain deeper insight into interprofessional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses in primary care settings.

METHODS

We applied Interpretive Description as a research strategy. The participants within this study were primary care physicians and nurses from four different primary care practices in the western and eastern parts of Norway. We used semi-structured telephone interviews for collecting the data between January and September 2021.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed two key features of the primary care physicians and the nurses experience with interprofessional collaboration in primary care practices. The first involved managing the influence of discrepancies in their expectations of IPC and the second involved becoming aware of the competence they developed that allowed for better complementarity consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that interprofessional collaboration in primary care practice requires that primary care physicians and nurses clarify their expectations and, in turn, determine how flexible they can become in changing their usual primary care practices. Moreover, findings reveal that nurses and primary care physicians had discrepancies in expectations of how interprofessional collaboration should be carried out in primary care practice. However, both the nurses and primary care physicians appreciated the blending of complementary competencies and skills that facilitated a more collaborative care practice. They experienced that this interprofessional collaboration represented an essential quality improvement in the primary care services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered 03/09/2019 in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04076384).

Usefulness of a Digitally Assisted Person-Centered Care Intervention: Qualitative Study of Patients' and Nurses' Experiences in a Long-term Perspective

BACKGROUND

Person-centered care responsive to individual preferences, needs, and values is recognized as an important aspect of high-quality health care, and patient empowerment is increasingly viewed as a central core value of person-centered care. Web-based interventions aimed at empowerment report a beneficial effect on patient empowerment and physical activity; however, there is limited information available on barriers, facilitators, and user experiences. A recent review of the effect of digital self-management support tools suggests a beneficial effect on the quality of life in patients with cancer. On the basis of an overall philosophy of empowerment, guided self-determination is a person-centered intervention that uses preparatory reflection sheets to help achieve focused communication between patients and nurses. The intervention was adapted into a digital version called digitally assisted guided self-determination (DA-GSD) hosted by the Sundhed DK website that can be delivered face-to-face, via video, or by the combination of the 2 methods.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the experiences of nurses, nurse managers, and patients of using DA-GSD in 2 oncology departments and 1 gynecology department over a 5-year implementation period from 2018 to 2022.

METHODS

This qualitative study was inspired by action research comprising the responses of 17 patients to an open-ended question on their experience of specific aspects of DA-GSD in a web questionnaire, 14 qualitative semistructured interviews with nurses and patients who initially completed the web questionnaire, and transcripts of meetings held between the researchers and nurses during the implementation of the intervention. The thematic analysis of all data was done using NVivo (QSR International).

RESULTS

The analysis generated 2 main themes and 7 subthemes that reflect conflicting perspectives and greater acceptability of the intervention among the nurses over time owing to better familiarity with the increasingly mature technology. The first theme was the different experiences and perspectives of nurses and patients concerning barriers to using DA-GSD and comprised 4 subthemes: conflicting perspectives on the ability of patients to engage with DA-GSD and how to provide it, conflicting perspectives on DA-GSD as a threat to the nurse-patient relationship, functionality of DA-GSD and available technical equipment, and data security. The other theme was what influenced the increased acceptability of DA-GSD among the nurses over time and comprised 3 subthemes: a re-evaluation of the nurse-patient relationship; improved functionality of DA-GSD; and supervision, experience, patient feedback, and a global pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The nurses experienced more barriers to DA-GSD than the patients did. Acceptance of the intervention increased over time among the nurses in keeping with the intervention's improved functionality, additional guidance, and positive experiences, combined with patients finding it useful. Our findings emphasize the importance of supporting and training nurses if new technologies are to be implemented successfully.

The Voice of the Patient and the Electronic Health Record

The patient's voice, which we define as the words the patient uses found in notes and messages and other sources, and their preferences for care and its outcomes, is too small a part of the electronic health record (EHR). To address this shortcoming will require innovation, research, funding, perhaps architectural changes to commercial EHRs, and that we address barriers that have resulted in this state, including clinician burden and financial drivers for care. Advantages to greater patient voice may accrue to many groups of EHR users and to patients themselves. For clinicians, the patient's voice, including symptoms, is invaluable in identifying new serious illness that cannot be detected by screening tests, and as an aid to accurate diagnosis. Informaticians benefit from greater patient voice in the EHR because it provides clues not found elsewhere that aid diagnostic decision support, predictive analytics, and machine learning. Patients benefit when their treatment priorities and care outcomes considered in treatment decisions. What patient voice there is in the EHR today can be found in locations not usually used by researchers. Increasing the patient voice needs be accomplished in equitable ways available to people with less access to technology and whose primary language is not well supported by EHR tools and portals. Use of direct quotations, while carrying potential for harm, permits the voice to be recorded unfiltered. If you are a researcher or innovator, collaborate with patient groups and clinicians to create new ways to capture the patient voice, and to leverage it for good.