Combined aerobic and resistance exercise in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis

Comprehensive Insights into Sarcopenia in Dialysis Patients: Mechanisms, Assessment, and Therapeutic Approaches

Sarcopenia, defined as the progressive loss of muscle mass, strength, and function, is largely prevalent but still clinically underrecognized among patients undergoing chronic dialysis therapy. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay of chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic acidosis, hormonal imbalances, protein waste, malnutrition, and reduced physical activity. This multifactorial condition profoundly impairs quality of life and may lead to significant clinical consequences, including frailty, an increased risk of falls and hospitalization, and elevated mortality. Despite its clinical relevance, sarcopenia often remains underdiagnosed due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria and challenges in assessing body composition in dialysis populations. Therapeutic strategies, including tailored exercise programs, nutritional interventions, and pharmacological treatments, are essential to mitigate muscle loss and improve patient outcomes. Early identification and routine sarcopenia assessment in clinical practice could play a pivotal role in enhancing the management of dialysis patients. A multidisciplinary, personalized approach is necessary to address the diverse factors contributing to sarcopenia and to improve the overall prognosis and quality of life for this vulnerable population.

Renal Rehabilitation: Present and Future Perspectives

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem. In patients with CKD, exercise endurance is decreased, especially as renal dysfunction advances. This is due to the combined effects of protein-energy wasting, uremic acidosis, and inflammatory cachexia, which lead to sarcopenia and are aggravated by a sedentary lifestyle, resulting in a progressive downward spiral of deconditioning. Renal rehabilitation (RR) is a coordinated, multifaceted intervention designed to optimize a patient's physical, psychological, and social functioning, as well as to stabilize, slow, or even reverse the progression of renal deterioration, improving exercise tolerance and preventing the onset and worsening of heart failure, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality. This review focused on the history and benefits of RR in patients with CKD. Based on current evidence, RR is an effective, feasible, and safe secondary prevention strategy in CKD. RR is a promising model for a new field of rehabilitation. Therefore, efforts to increase RR implementation rates are urgently needed.

[Recommendations for the rehabilitation of patients with chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis (literature review)]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem, CKD is widespread in the world, on average it is detected in 10-13% of the adult population. Sedentary patients with CKD on dialysis have a higher risk of mortality. Despite the significant association of physical function with mortality in patients with CKD, physical function is not routinely assessed and exercise is not a component of the routine management of patients with CKD on dialysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the influence of motor rehabilitation methods on the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using hemodialysis (HD) from the standpoint of evidence-based medicine according to a scientometric analysis of the literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An analysis was carried out of systematic reviews (search depth 70 years) and network meta-analyses to assess the effectiveness of physical exercise, its intensity and duration, performed interdialytic and intradialytic in the rehabilitation of patients with CKD with renal failure requiring hemodialysis. We reviewed articles in foreign journals on the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Wan Fang data, Cochrane CENTRAL and Scopus platforms.

RESULTS

The use of different types of physical exercise with varying intensities and durations both during and outside of dialysis in CKD patients requiring hemodialysis has shown that aerobic exercise, resistance exercise and a combination of both are most effective in improving their physical condition and quality life. Meta-analyses provide evidence to support the value of intradialytic exercise compared with interdialytic exercise for dialysis patients. It is also noted that moderate-intensity exercise can be performed in various forms, both during and outside of dialysis, and the data studied demonstrate that moderate-intensity exercise best improves physical function.

CONCLUSION

Future large RCTs should pay more attention to rehabilitation and exercise programs for CKD patients requiring HD. To encourage inactive patients with CKD to engage in physical exercise, educating them about the effects of exercise is imperative. Accumulating evidence suggests that rehabilitation of patients with visceral disorders, such as renal, cardiac, and pulmonary disorders, can not only improve physical performance and quality of life, but also improve survival. Modern comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with CKD is aimed at prolonging life, which represents a new concept in renal rehabilitation.