The case for allele-specific recognition by the TCR

In vivo edited eosinophils reconcile antigen specific Th2 response and mitigate airway allergy

BACKGROUND

Improvement is needed in the remedies used to control Th2 polarization. Bioengineering approaches have modified immune cells that have immunosuppressive functions. This study aims to generate modified eosinophils (Meos) in vivo and use Meos to balance Th2 polarization and reduce airway allergy.

METHODS

A cell editor was constructed. The editor contained a peptide carrier, an anti-siglec F antibody, MHC II, ovalbumin, and LgDNA (DNA extracted from a probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG). Which was designated as Cedit. Meos are eosinophils modified using Cedits. An airway Th2 polarization mouse model was established used to test the effect of Meos on suppressing airway allergy.

RESULTS

The Cedits remained physically and chemically stable in solution (pH7.2) for at least 96 h. Cedits specifically bound to eosinophils, which are designated as Meos. Meos produced programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1); the latter induced antigen specific CD4+ T cell apoptosis. Administration of Cedits through nasal instillations generated Meos in vivo, which significantly reduced the frequency of antigen specific CD4+ T cells in the airways, and mitigated airway Th2 polarization.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed Cedit, which could edit eosinophils into Meos in vivo. Meos could induce antigen specific CD4+ T cell apoptosis, and reconcile airway Th2 polarization.

Regulatory T cells and co-evolution of allele-specific MHC recognition by the TCR

What is the evolutionary mechanism for the TCR-MHC-conserved interaction? We extend Dembic's model (Dembic Z. In, Scand J Immunol e12806, 2019) of thymus positive selection for high-avidity anti-self-MHC Tregs among double (CD4 + CD8+)-positive (DP) developing thymocytes. This model is based on competition for self-MHC (+ Pep) complexes presented on cortical epithelium. Such T cells exit as CD4 + CD25+FoxP3 + thymic-derived Tregs (tTregs). The other positively selected DP T cells are then negatively selected on medulla epithelium removing high-avidity anti-self-MHC + Pep as T cells commit to CD4 + or CD8 + lineages. The process is likened to the competitive selection and affinity maturation in Germinal Centre for the somatic hypermutation (SHM) of rearranged immunoglobulin (Ig) variable region (V[D]Js) of centrocytes bearing antigen-specific B cell receptors (BCR). We now argue that the same direct SHM processes for TCRs occur in post-antigenic Germinal Centres, but now occurring in peripheral pTregs. This model provides a potential solution to a long-standing problem previously recognized by Cohn and others (Cohn M, Anderson CC, Dembic Z. In, Scand J Immunol e12790, 2019) of how co-evolution occurs of species-specific MHC alleles with the repertoire of their germline TCR V counterparts. We suggest this is not by 'blind', slow, and random Darwinian natural selection events, but a rapid structured somatic selection vertical transmission process. The pTregs bearing somatic TCR V mutant genes then, on arrival in reproductive tissues, can donate their TCR V sequences via soma-to-germline feedback as discussed in this journal earlier. (Steele EJ, Lindley RA. In, Scand J Immunol e12670, 2018) The high-avidity tTregs also participate in the same process to maintain a biased, high-avidity anti-self-MHC germline V repertoire.