1
|
Khosousi S, Hye A, Velayudhan L, Bloth B, Tsitsi P, Markaki I, Svenningsson P. Complement system changes in blood in Parkinson's disease and progressive Supranuclear Palsy/Corticobasal Syndrome. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2023; 108:105313. [PMID: 36739794 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is diagnosed clinically, and early PD is often challenging to differentiate from atypical parkinsonian disorders such as the Four-repeat (4R-) Tauopathies Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Syndrome. Diagnostic biomarkers are needed, and proteomic studies have suggested that the plasma complement system is altered in PD, but validation studies are lacking. In this study, plasma from 148 individuals (PD, 4R-Tauopathies, and healthy controls (HC)) were used to quantify 12 complement proteins with immunoassays, and CH50 classical pathway complement activity was quantified in sera from further 78 individuals (PD and HC). Complement factors C1q and C3 in plasma were lower in individuals with 4R-Tauopathies (ANOVA, p = 0.0041, p = 0.0057 respectively) compared to both PD and HC. None of the complement proteins were altered between PD and HC, however a few proteins correlated with clinical parameters within the PD group. Notably, levels of C3 correlated with non-motor symptoms in female patients. Classical pathway complement activity was not altered in PD serum, but did correlate with mental fatigue. In conclusion, individuals with 4R-Tauopathies showed lower plasma C1q and C3 compared PD and HC. Neither complement levels nor CH50 activity were significantly altered in PD versus HC but may associate with PD symptom severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shervin Khosousi
- Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, 125 Coldharbour Lane, SE5 9NU, London, United Kingdom; Translational Neuropharmacology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Bioclinicum, J5:20, 171 64, Solna, Sweden.
| | - Abdul Hye
- Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, 125 Coldharbour Lane, SE5 9NU, London, United Kingdom
| | - Latha Velayudhan
- Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, 125 Coldharbour Lane, SE5 9NU, London, United Kingdom
| | - Björn Bloth
- Translational Neuropharmacology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Bioclinicum, J5:20, 171 64, Solna, Sweden
| | - Panagiota Tsitsi
- Translational Neuropharmacology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Bioclinicum, J5:20, 171 64, Solna, Sweden; Center for Neurology, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Solnavägen 1E, 11365, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ioanna Markaki
- Translational Neuropharmacology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Bioclinicum, J5:20, 171 64, Solna, Sweden; Center for Neurology, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Solnavägen 1E, 11365, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Svenningsson
- Translational Neuropharmacology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Bioclinicum, J5:20, 171 64, Solna, Sweden; Center for Neurology, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Solnavägen 1E, 11365, Stockholm, Sweden; Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, 125 Coldharbour Lane, SE5 9NU, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brandwijk RJMGE, Michels MAHM, van Rossum M, de Nooijer AH, Nilsson PH, de Bruin WCC, Toonen EJM. Pitfalls in complement analysis: A systematic literature review of assessing complement activation. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1007102. [PMID: 36330514 PMCID: PMC9623276 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1007102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The complement system is an essential component of our innate defense and plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of many diseases. Assessment of complement activation is critical in monitoring both disease progression and response to therapy. Complement analysis requires accurate and standardized sampling and assay procedures, which has proven to be challenging. Objective We performed a systematic analysis of the current methods used to assess complement components and reviewed whether the identified studies performed their complement measurements according to the recommended practice regarding pre-analytical sample handling and assay technique. Results are supplemented with own data regarding the assessment of key complement biomarkers to illustrate the importance of accurate sampling and measuring of complement components. Methods A literature search using the Pubmed/MEDLINE database was performed focusing on studies measuring the key complement components C3, C5 and/or their split products and/or the soluble variant of the terminal C5b-9 complement complex (sTCC) in human blood samples that were published between February 2017 and February 2022. The identified studies were reviewed whether they had used the correct sample type and techniques for their analyses. Results A total of 92 out of 376 studies were selected for full-text analysis. Forty-five studies (49%) were identified as using the correct sample type and techniques for their complement analyses, while 25 studies (27%) did not use the correct sample type or technique. For 22 studies (24%), it was not specified which sample type was used. Conclusion A substantial part of the reviewed studies did not use the appropriate sample type for assessing complement activation or did not mention which sample type was used. This deviation from the standardized procedure can lead to misinterpretation of complement biomarker levels and hampers proper comparison of complement measurements between studies. Therefore, this study underlines the necessity of general guidelines for accurate and standardized complement analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marloes A. H. M. Michels
- Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Mara van Rossum
- R&D Department, Hycult Biotechnology b.v., Uden, Netherlands
| | - Aline H. de Nooijer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Per H. Nilsson
- Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Linnaeus Centre for Biomaterials Chemistry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
- Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
| | | | - Erik J. M. Toonen
- R&D Department, Hycult Biotechnology b.v., Uden, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Erik J. M. Toonen,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prohászka Z, Frazer-Abel A. Complement multiplex testing: Concept, promises and pitfalls. Mol Immunol 2021; 140:120-126. [PMID: 34688958 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Complement is a complex system. This complexity becomes more obvious when looking at complement analysis in health and disease, where one presentation can require a number of measurements to understand the full role of this cascade in the disease. The current state of clinical testing requires multiple tests to cover the whole of the complement cascade. There is a clear potential for multiplex testing to help address this need for comprehensive analysis of the state of complement deficiency, activation or inhibition. Fortunately, there are a number of potential methods for multiplex analysis, each with advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered in light of the intricacy of the complement cascade and its interconnection to other systems. Despite the complexities of such methods several groups have started utilizing multiplex analysis for research and even for diagnostic testing. The potential methods, current successes, and the type of testing that needs to be streamlined are reviewed in this text.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Prohászka
- Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, and Research Group for Immunology and Haematology, Semmelweis University- EötvösLoránd Research Network (Office for Supported Research Groups), Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ashley Frazer-Abel
- Exsera BioLabs, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keith R, Gilliam B, Pepin D, Xiao Q. Complement factor serum and plasma levels measured by a MILLIPLEX ® Magnetic Bead Panel: A reply. Scand J Immunol 2021; 93:e13036. [PMID: 33655509 DOI: 10.1111/sji.13036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Keith
- Immunoassay Platform Solutions, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Brooke Gilliam
- Immunoassay Platform Solutions, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Danielle Pepin
- Immunoassay Platform Solutions, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Qiang Xiao
- Immunoassay Platform Solutions, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|