1
|
Goldstein KM, Pace R, Dancu C, Raman SR, Bridges-Curry Z, Klimek-Johnson P, Jeevanathan A, Gallion AH, Der T, Tabriz AA, Sprague S, Rushton S, Hammer AJ, Sims CA, Coleman JN, Martino J, Cantrell S, Gordon AM, Jacobs M, Alexopoulos AS, Chen D, Gierisch JM. An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e256372. [PMID: 40261651 PMCID: PMC12015682 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance Women veterans are the fastest-growing veteran subpopulation in the US. Women veterans often experience military service-related health issues in addition to conditions common to all women. Because women veterans are more likely to receive care in the civilian setting than through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), all women's health clinicians should be equipped to provide patient-centered care for women veterans. The health care of women veterans requires evidence-based care informed by population-specific scientific literature. An updated evidence map evaluating women veteran-focused health literature is needed. Objective To map the scope and breadth of women veterans' health literature published from 2016 to 2023. Evidence Review In this systematic review, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Complete were searched for eligible articles published from 2016 to 2023. Articles reporting about US women veterans' health outcomes or on the experience of providing care to women veterans were included. Included articles were required to report patient-level outcomes that included either data for only women veterans or reported results separately for women veterans. Articles were grouped by primary focus area based on categories previously established by the VA Women's Health research agendas and prior evidence maps. Findings The volume of women veterans' health literature published between 2016 and 2023 of 932 articles was double that of the prior 8 years. The largest portion of this literature was focused on chronic medical conditions (137 articles [15%]), general mental health (203 articles [22%]), and interpersonal violence (121 articles 3[13%]). Areas of greatest growth included reproductive health (physical and mental), pain, suicide, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Additionally, emerging areas of inquiry were found, including military-related toxic exposures and harassment within the health care setting. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review of literature focused on the health of women veterans, the volume of literature was found to have doubled and expanded in important areas that aligned with VA research priorities. However, despite the growth in research related to women veterans, several important research gaps remain within this field of study. Research addressing health issues pertinent to a growing and aging women veterans' population will require rigorous research and program evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M. Goldstein
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rachel Pace
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Caroline Dancu
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California
- University of California, San Francisco
| | - Sudha R. Raman
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zoe Bridges-Curry
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Patrycja Klimek-Johnson
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California
- University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Anna H. Gallion
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Tatyana Der
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Syketha Sprague
- Department of Medicine—Renal Section, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - A. Jean Hammer
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill
| | - Catherine A. Sims
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Rheumatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jessica N. Coleman
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sarah Cantrell
- Duke University Medical Center Library and Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Adelaide M. Gordon
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Morgan Jacobs
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Anastasia-Stefania Alexopoulos
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dazhe Chen
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer M. Gierisch
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brenner LA, Capaldi V, Constans J, Dobscha S, Fuller M, Matarazzo B, McGraw K, Richter K, Sall J, Smolenski D, Williams S, Davis-Arnold S, Bahraini N. Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide: Synopsis of the 2024 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2025; 178:416-425. [PMID: 39903866 DOI: 10.7326/annals-24-01938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2025] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) updated the 2019 joint clinical practice guideline (CPG) for assessing and managing patients who are at risk for suicide. This synopsis provides primary care physicians with a summary of the updated 2024 recommendations regarding evaluation and management of military members and veterans at risk for suicide. METHODS In 2023, the VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group convened to develop a joint VA/DOD guideline, including clinical stakeholders, which conformed to the National Academy of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy CPGs. The Work Group drafted 12 key questions, reviewed systematically identified literature (1 April 2018 to 15 March 2023), evaluated the evidence, created algorithms, and advanced 24 recommendations in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. RECOMMENDATIONS Despite insufficient evidence to recommend for or against suicide risk screening programs as a means for reducing suicide attempts or deaths, the VA/DOD Work Group identified validated tools that could be used to identify populations at higher risk for suicide-related behaviors. Cognitive behavioral therapy was also recommended for reducing the risk for suicide attempts and decreasing suicidal ideation among those with a history of suicidal behavior or a history of self-directed violence. Periodic communications after previous suicide attempts were also recommended as a prevention strategy. Pharmacologic treatments, such as clozapine or ketamine infusion, also have a role in the management of suicide risk among those with schizophrenia or major depressive disorder, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Brenner
- Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado (L.A.B.)
| | - Vince Capaldi
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (V.C.)
| | - Joseph Constans
- Office of Research and Development, New Orleans, Louisiana (J.C.)
| | - Steven Dobscha
- VA Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D), Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), and VA HSR&D Suicide Prevention Research Impact Network, Portland, Oregon (S.D.)
| | - Matthew Fuller
- Psychiatry and Geriatrics VHA Pharmacy Benefits Management Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, Mentor, Ohio (M.F.)
| | - Bridget Matarazzo
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention (MIRECC), Aurora, Colorado (B.M., N.B.)
| | - Kate McGraw
- Psychological Health Center of Excellence (PHCoE), Silver Spring, Maryland (K.M.)
| | - Kenneth Richter
- Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, DHA Headquarters, Falls Church, Virginia (K.R.)
| | - James Sall
- Evidence-Based Practice Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Administration Central Office, Washington, DC (J.S.)
| | - Derek Smolenski
- Psychological Health Center of Excellence (PHCoE) Research and Engineering Directorate, DHA, Tacoma, Washington (D.S.)
| | - Scott Williams
- Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, and School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (S.W.)
| | | | - Nazanin Bahraini
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention (MIRECC), Aurora, Colorado (B.M., N.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bennett-Poynter L, Kundurthi S, Besa R, Joyce DW, Kormilitzin A, Shen N, Sunwoo J, Szkudlarek P, Sequiera L, Sikstrom L. Harnessing digital health data for suicide prevention and care: A rapid review. Digit Health 2025; 11:20552076241308615. [PMID: 39996066 PMCID: PMC11848906 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241308615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and aim Suicide is a global public health issue disproportionately impacting equity-deserving groups. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence and increased access to a variety of digital data sources have enabled the development of novel and personalized suicide prevention strategies. However, standards on how to harness these data in a comprehensive and equitable way remain unclear. The primary aim of this study is to identify considerations for the collection and use of digital health data for suicide prevention and care. The results will inform the development of a data governance framework for a multinational suicide prevention mHealth platform. Method We used a modified Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method. Inclusion criteria focused on primary studies published in English from 2007 to the present that referenced the use of digital health data in the context of suicide prevention and care. Screening and data extraction was performed independently by multiple reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis methods were employed to identify emergent themes. Results Our search identified 2453 potential articles, with 70 meeting inclusion criteria. We found little consensus on best practices for the collection and use of digital health data for suicide prevention and care. Issues of data quality, fairness and equity persist, compounded by inadequate consideration of key governance issues including privacy and trust, especially in multinational initiatives. Conclusions Recommendations for future research and practice include prioritizing engagement with knowledge users, establishing robust data governance frameworks aligned with clinical guidelines, and leveraging advanced analytics, such as natural language processing, to improve the quality of health equity data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sridevi Kundurthi
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Reena Besa
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
- Mental Health Sciences Library, Department of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dan W. Joyce
- Civic Health Innovation Labs and Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Mersey Care NHS Trust, Prescot, UK
| | | | - Nelson Shen
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - James Sunwoo
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrycja Szkudlarek
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lydia Sequiera
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Sikstrom
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruiz F, Burgo-Black L, Hunt SC, Miller M, Spelman JF. A Practical Review of Suicide Among Veterans: Preventive and Proactive Measures for Health Care Institutions and Providers. Public Health Rep 2023; 138:223-231. [PMID: 35403486 PMCID: PMC10031829 DOI: 10.1177/00333549221085240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Suicide rates among veterans are higher than those of the general US population. Although veterans compose only 7.6% of the US population, nearly 14% of American adult suicides are among veterans. The rate of suicide is 1.5 times higher among all veterans and 2.1 times higher among female veterans compared with the general population. Only 47% of all veterans are enrolled in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, leaving a large number either not receiving health care or receiving it outside the VA. Recent legislation has improved access to care for veterans outside the VA, highlighting the need for a broad public health approach to address veteran suicide and the need for all health care institutions and clinicians to be familiar with the unique health concerns in this population. The purpose of this narrative review was to summarize the risk factors contributing to veteran suicide and to provide guidance on how to assess and mitigate these risks. Suicide is preventable through recognition of risk and prompt intervention. Health care providers both inside and outside the VA system are uniquely situated at the intersection of the many contributing factors to veteran suicide and should have a structured, proactive approach to address the problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Ruiz
- Frank H. Netter MD School of
Medicine–Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lucile Burgo-Black
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West
Haven, CT, USA
- Department of General Internal
Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Stephen C. Hunt
- VA Puget Sound Healthcare Systems,
Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of
Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew Miller
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide
Prevention, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA
- Suicide Prevention Program and Veterans
Crisis Line, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, US Department of
Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Juliette F. Spelman
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West
Haven, CT, USA
- Department of General Internal
Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hein TC, Peltzman T, Hallows J, Theriot N, McCarthy JF. Suicide Mortality Among Veterans Health Administration Care Recipients With Suicide Risk Record Flags. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:259-264. [PMID: 34320826 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2008, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) established a suicide high-risk flag (HRF) for patient records. To inform ongoing suicide prevention activities as part of operations and quality improvement work in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the authors evaluated suicide risk following HRF activations and inactivations. METHODS For annual cohorts of VHA users, HRF receipt and demographic and clinical care contexts in the 30 days before HRF activations were examined for 2014-2016 (N=7,450,831). Veterans were included if they had VHA inpatient or outpatient encounters during the index or previous year. Suicide rates in the 12 months after HRF activations and inactivations were assessed. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, the authors compared suicide risk following HRF activation and inactivation with veterans without HRFs, adjusted for age, gender, and race-ethnicity. RESULTS HRF activation (N=47,015) was commonly preceded within 30 days by a documented suicide attempt (39.5%) or inpatient mental health admission (40.1%). Suicide risk was elevated in the 12 months after flag activation (crude suicide rate=682 per 100,000 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=21.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]=18.55-23.72) compared with risk among VHA users without HRF activity. Risk after HRF inactivation (N=41,251) was also elevated (crude suicide rate=408 per 100,000 person-years, adjusted HR=12.43, 95% CI=10.57-14.63) compared with risk among VHA users without HRF activity. CONCLUSIONS Suicide risk after HRF activation was substantially elevated and also high after HRF inactivation. Findings suggest the importance of comprehensive suicide risk mitigation and support recent VHA process enhancements to formalize inactivation criteria and support veterans after HRF inactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler C Hein
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C
| | - Talya Peltzman
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C
| | - Juliana Hallows
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C
| | - Nicole Theriot
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C
| | - John F McCarthy
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pregnancy and Binge Drinking: An Intersectionality Theory Perspective Using Veteran Status and Racial/Ethnic Identity. Matern Child Health J 2021; 25:1345-1351. [PMID: 33945080 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03171-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Alcohol use during pregnancy is a critical public health issue that results in several adverse outcomes for both mother and child. While the prevalence of and consequences of binge drinking among pregnant women is well-documented in the literature, little is known about the intersectional effect of racial/ethnic identity and veteran status. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of binge drinking among pregnant women using the intersectionality of racial/ethnic identity and veteran status. METHODS This study utilized combined data from the 2016, 2017 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The BRFSS is a telephone survey that collects health-related risk behaviors, chronic health conditions and use of preventative services among U.S residents. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the prevalence of binge drinking using the interaction between race/ethnicity and veteran status. RESULTS Overall binge drinking prevalence was 3.60% among the sample of 6101 pregnant women. Binge drinking prevalence was the highest among racial/ethnic minority veterans at 17.42%, compared to 5.34% among white veterans, 4.05% among non-veteran racial/ethnic minorities and 3% among non-veteran whites, supporting the theory of intersectionality. CONCLUSIONS Intersectionality Theory suggests that the stressors from membership in two vulnerable groups may lead to increased disparities. The results of this study highlight the unique experience of being a veteran and identifying as a member of a racial/ethnic minority group. This calls for a need to customize preventative measures that address the combined impact of both racial/ethnic minority group status and veteran status.
Collapse
|