Fotografie in der Dermatologie - ein Scoping Review: Praktiken, Skin of Color, Patientenpräferenzen und medizinisch-rechtliche Überlegungen

Die klinische Fotografie ist essentiell für die Dermatologie. Es gibt jedoch keine umfassende Aufarbeitung der Literatur zur Fotografie in der Dermatologie. Dieser Scoping Review soll die Literatur zu fotografischen Praktiken in der Dermatologie, der Fotografie stark pigmentierter Haut (Skin of Color), Patientenpräferenzen und medizinisch‐rechtlichen Überlegungen zusammenfassen. Die Datenbanken Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed und Evidence Based Medicine wurden im Einklang mit der PRISMA‐Erweiterung für Scoping Reviews durchsucht. Insgesamt wurden 33 Studien zusammengefasst. Die klinische Fotografie wird häufig für die Markierung von Biospiestellen, Beurteilung, Diagnostik, Krankheitsüberwachung, Bewertung des Ansprechens auf die Behandlung, medizinische Ausbildung, Forschung, das Einholen kollegialer Ratschläge und in der Teledermatologie eingesetzt. Obwohl es in der dermatologischen Fotografie weiterhin kaum Darstellungen von Skin of Color gibt, sind fotografische Überlegungen für dunklere Hauttypen verfügbar. Die meisten Patienten unterstützen die medizinische Fotografie. Dabei besteht der Wunsch, dass klinische Fotografien vom eigenen Arzt aufgenommen und bevorzugt klinikeigene Kameras und keine persönlichen Geräte verwendet werden. Relevante medizinisch‐rechtliche Fragestellungen umfassen Bedenken hinsichtlich des Datenschutzes, der Verwendung persönlicher Geräte und der Dokumentation der Einwilligung. Die Fotografie in der Dermatologie entwickelt sich ständig weiter und findet immer breitere Anwendung. Verbesserte Verfahren und Innovationen werden Menschen aller Hautfarben zugute kommen. Die Einhaltung der Zustimmung und des Datenschutzes muss gewährleistet werden, um die zunehmende Einfachheit der Bildaufnahme und ‐freigabe aufrechtzuerhalten.

Photography in dermatology - a scoping review: Practices, skin of color, patient preferences, and medical-legal considerations

Clinical photography is essential in dermatology. However, a comprehensive literature review of photography in dermatology is lacking. This scoping review aims to summarize the literature regarding photography practices in dermatology, photography of skin of color, patient preferences, and medical-legal considerations. A search was conducted utilizing Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Evidence Based Medicine databases in accordance with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. In total, 33 studies were summarized. Clinical photography is commonly used in biopsy site marking, assessment, diagnosis, disease monitoring, evaluation of treatment response, medical education, research, seeking advice from colleagues, and teledermatology. Although dermatologic photography remains devoid of skin of color representation, photographic considerations for darker skin are available. Most patients support medical photography, with a preference for clinical photographs to be taken by their own physicians, and for use of clinic/hospital-owned cameras over personal devices. Pertinent medical-legal issues include concerns around privacy, personal device use, and documentation of consent. Photography in dermatology is continuously evolving with broader applications. Improved practices and innovations will benefit individuals of various skin tones. Management of consent and privacy must be upheld to sustain the increasing ease of image capture and sharing.

Skin moisture assessment using Hydration Sensor Patches coupled with smartphones via Near Field Communication (NFC). A pilot study with the first generation of patches that allow self-recordings of skin hydration

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potency of a new skin hydration sensor patch in the fast self-recording of skin hydration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Skin Hydration Sensor Patch (SHSP) turns the user's smartphone into a wireless skin moisture measuring device. The SHSP combines a capacitive measurement unit and Near Field Communication technology (NFC) for transmitting data and energy. The probe is fixed onto the back of the smartphone and pressed to the skin for a few seconds where the application immediately calculates the capacitance value. Once recorded, the probe is then immediately taken off from the skin. In a first study, this system was compared to the Corneometer^® technique, in vivo, on various skin sites of 23 healthy French women. In a second study, 20 women with moderate dry skin on face and forearm self-recorded, through the SHSP the changes in skin hydration induced by a Xanthan gel containing 3% (w/w) of Glycerol, along 24 hours. A questionnaire based on 5 types of questions was established to be filled by subjects about their perception of the use of this new system.

RESULTS

In the first study, the values recorded by the SHSP were found highly correlated with those provided by the Corneometer^® . The second study allowed to observe significant differences in skin hydration of both sites at all times, as compared to values obtained before the application of the gel. Differences between both sites were observed, the face being less hydrated than forearm. From a practical aspect, the self-recordings on the face show a higher variability (approx. 10% than those of the forearm). The questionnaire led to positive answers on almost all points.

CONCLUSION

This SHSP appears as a promising approach in the field of connected skin-related devices. As such, it opens or enlarges a new paradigm in the relationships between a consumer and a cosmetic product.