Improved flow cytometry crossmatching in kidney transplantation

Current Status of Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Report of a Workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers, Martinsried, March 3, 2023

This report comprises the contents of the presentations and following discussions of a workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers in Martinsried, Germany on cardiac xenotransplantation. The production and current availability of genetically modified donor pigs, preservation techniques during organ harvesting, and immunosuppressive regimens in the recipient are described. Selection criteria for suitable patients and possible solutions to the problem of overgrowth of the xenotransplant are discussed. Obviously microbiological safety for the recipient and close contacts is essential, and ethical considerations to gain public acceptance for clinical applications are addressed. The first clinical trial will be regulated and supervised by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute as the National Competent Authority for Germany, and the German Heart Transplant Centers agreed to cooperatively select the first patients for cardiac xenotransplantation.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transplant laboratories: How to mitigate?

A positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) due to donor specific antibodies (DSA) constitutes a risk for kidney transplantation; such a finding may indicates an unacceptable donor for this patient. However, positive FCXM in the absence of DSA is considered discordant and need further investigations. During COVID-19 pandemic, we observed 22% discordant results out of 445 FCXM performed during eight months period in our laboratory and another 7% were invalid due to high background negative control (NC). No study has addressed the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on FCXM and the overall pre-kidney transplant workups or described a solution to deal with these non-specific reactivities. Herein, we analyzed all FCXM results in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive patients and addressed how this pandemic affected significantly the pre-kidney transplant workups, highlighting both technical and financial implications. We also shared our modified FCXM procedures using dithiotheritol (DTT) sera treatment or blocking donor cells with negative control human serum (NCS) which we found to be successful to abrogate 98% of all discordant FCXM results and to validate all invalid results due to high background NC. In conclusion, COVID-19 pandemic has affected our HLA laboratory significantly by creating many false positive or invalid crossmatch results. Transplant laboratories must consider this before test interpretations and immune risk assessments. We recommend the use of DTT serum treatment to remove nonspecific bindings in the sera of kidney transplant candidates and the use of NCS-blocked donor cells to correct high background when performing FCXM in transplant candidates or donors with recent history of SARS-CoV-2 immunization respectively.

Crossmatch assays in transplantation: Physical or virtual?: A review

The value of the crossmatch test in assessing pretransplant immunological risk is vital for clinical decisions, ranging from the indication of the transplant to the guidance of induction protocols and treatment with immunosuppressants. The crossmatch tests in transplantation can be physical or virtual, each with its advantages and limitations. Currently, the virtual crossmatch stands out for its sensitivity and specificity compared to the physical tests. Additionally, the virtual crossmatch can be performed in less time, allowing for a reduction in cold ischemia time. It shows a good correlation with the results of physical tests and does not negatively impact graft survival. Proper communication between clinicians and the transplant immunology laboratory will lead to a deeper understanding of each patient's immunological profile, better donor-recipient selection, and improved graft survival.

Low Expression Loci and the Use of Pronase in Flow Cytometry Crossmatch

Pronase treatment of lymphocytes has been used to improve the specificity and sensitivity of flow cytometric crossmatch, especially B-cell flow cytometric crossmatch, due to the presence of Fc receptors on the cell surface. Some limitations have been reported in the literature: false negatives due to the reduction of major histocompatibility complex expression and false-positive T cells in HIV+ patients due to exposure to cryptic epitopes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pronase in our assays, using untreated and treated cells with 2.35 U/mL of pronase to improve flow cytometric crossmatch specificity and sensitivity. The study was carried out with donor-specific IgG antibodies (DSAs) to low expression loci (HLA-C, -DQ, or -DP) because, in our laboratory practice, patients with virtual crossmatch (LABScreen single antigen assays) to DSA against antigen HLA-A, B, and DR are excluded from cellular crossmatch. Our results showed that, for T-cell flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), a cutoff value of 1171 median fluorescence intensity (MFI), an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.926 (P < .0001), and 0.834 (P < .0001), a sensitivity of 100% and 85.7%, and a specificity of 77.5% and 74.4%, without and with pronase treatment, respectively. For B-cell FCXM without pronase treatment, the best cutoff was 2766 MFI, an AUC of 0.731 (P < .0001), a sensitivity of 69.6%, and a specificity of 66.7%, whereas for B cells treated with pronase, the cutoff value was 4496 MFI, an AUC of 0.852 (P < .0001), a sensitivity of 86.4%, and a specificity of 77.8%. Our analysis of 128 FCXM showed a better performance using the untreated lymphocytes for FCXM with the prerequisite of a higher cutoff value (≈5000 MFI) to reach a better sensitivity and specificity due to the loss of HLA expression.

Antibody Therapeutics as Interfering Agents in Flow Cytometry Crossmatch for Organ Transplantation

Donor-recipient matching is a highly individualized and complex component of solid organ transplantation. Flowcytometry crossmatching (FC-XM) is an integral step in the matching process that is used to detect pre-formed deleterious anti-donor immunoglobulin. Despite high sensitivity in detecting cell-bound immunoglobulin, FC-XM is not able to determine the source or function of immunoglobulins detected. Monoclonal antibody therapeutic agents used in a clinic can interfere with the interpretation of FC-XM. We combined data from the prospectively maintained Antibody Society database and Human Protein Atlas with a comprehensive literature review of PubMed to summarize known FC-XM-interfering antibody therapeutics and identify potential interferers. We identified eight unique FC-XM-interfering antibody therapeutics. Rituximab (anti-CD20) was the most-cited agent. Daratumuab (anti-CD38) was the newest reported agent. We identified 43 unreported antibody therapeutics that may interfere with FC-XM. As antibody therapeutic agents become more common, identifying and mitigating FC-XM interference will likely become an increased focus for transplant centers.

Alloreactive memory B cell detection by flow cytometric cross match using polyclonally activated memory B cell culture supernatants

In addition to alloantibodies, alloreactive memory B cell (mBC) evaluation has a potential for immunological risk assessment during transplantation processes. For the alloreactive mBCs evaluation currently, direct Flow Cytometric (FC) analysis using the HLA tetramer staining is an option. Evaluation of alloantibodies produced by the polyclonally stimulated alloreactive mBCs in in vitro culture system seems to be another useful approach, but this needs further downstream applications. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the Flow Cytometric Cross Match (FCXM-supernatant) in which in vitro polyclonally activated mBCs culture supernatants and potential donor's lymphocytes being used for the mBC detection. FCXM-supernatant assays were performed between culture supernatants of polyclonally activated mBCs obtained from 4 allosensitized multiparous women and 14 renal transplant patients, and their non-alloimmunized spouses' or donors' lymphocytes, and vice versa. HLA typing was performed by SSP method. Anti-HLA antibodies produced by in vitro activated alloreactive mBCs were also evaluated by the Luminex assays. The success of in vitro polyclonal activation of mBCs was evaluated by a total IgG ELISA test and antibody secreting cell analyses by FC. Donor specific alloreactive mBCs were detected by FCXM-supernatant in 45% of the 18 allosensitized cases. Detection rate was 85% (6 out of 7) in the strongly allosensitized cases. No alloreactive mBCs was detected in control cases without allosensitization. FCXM-supernatant negative results of the allosensitized cases were related to low level of allosensitization and insufficient polyclonal stimulation evaluated by total IgG antibody tests of the supernatants. We herein report a practical methodology for alloreactive mBC detection as a donor specific manner using the FCXM-supernatant assay so that this would easily be transformed into a routine test performed in tissue typing laboratories.

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized recipients

In kidney transplantation (KT), overcoming donor shortage is particularly challenging in patients with preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA), called HLA-incompatible KT (HLAi KT), carrying the risk of rejection and allograft loss. Thus, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the degree of sensitization before HLAi KT, and undertake appropriate pretreatment strategies. To determine the degree of sensitization, complement-dependent cytotoxicity has been the only method employed; the development of a method using flow cytometry further improved the test sensitivity. However, these tests present disadvantages, including the need for living cells, with a solid-phase assay developed to resolve this problem. Currently, the method using Luminex (Luminex Corp.) is widely used in clinical practice. As this method measures DSAs using single antigen beads, it is possible to classify immunological risks by measuring the type and amount of DSAs. Furthermore, there have been major advances in methods that involve DSA removal before HLAi KT. In the early stages of desensitization, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins were the main treatment methods employed; however, the introduction of CD20 monoclonal antibody and proteasome inhibitors further increased the success rate of desensitization. Currently, HLAi KT has been established as an important transplant method, but an understanding of DSAs and a novel desensitization treatment are warranted.

False-positive reactivity of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies detected using the single-antigen bead assay

The single-antigen bead assay (SABA) demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detecting anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. However, SABA may produce false-positive results for anti-HLA antibodies. Herein, we analyzed the data of patients with complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch^-/flow cytometric crossmatch^-/SABA^+/- results to determine false-positive results for anti-HLA antibodies. We also determined the prevalence of false-positive results by comparing false-positive data from our laboratory and national allele frequency data obtained with high-resolution HLA typing. For HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DR, a ratio of positive frequency to allele frequency of ≥3 in our laboratory was considered a false-positive result. For HLA-DQA1/DQB1 and HLA-DPA1/DPB1, we considered the positive frequency of ≥3 as a false positive result due to lack of haplotype frequency data. SABA results from 284 patients (78.0%) demonstrated false reactivity. The antibody against HLA-C*17:01 displayed the highest frequency ratio (298.3). If false-positive reactivity is suspected, results should be confirmed using different methods. If confirmation tests are unfeasible, comparing the allele frequency with the positive rate of detected anti-HLA antibodies and using a ratio ≥3 may facilitate the interpretation of SABA results. The positive rate of anti-HLA antibodies can be validated using the HLA allele frequency of the population to determine false-positive results.

Flow cytometry crossmatching to investigate kidney-biopsy-proven, antibody-mediated rejection in patients who develop de novo donor-specific antibodies

INTRODUCTION

The appearance of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSAs) after kidney transplantation is independently associated with poor long-term allograft outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of a flow cytometry crossmatching (FC-XM) assay after the appearance of dnDSAs related to antibody-mediated allograft rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 89 recipients with dnDSAs after transplantation were included. The crossmatching results were compared with the dnDSA profile (the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), the complement-binding activity, and the IgG subclass profile) and the biopsy's morphological features.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients, 59 (66%) were positive in an FC-XM assay, 17 (19%) had complement-binding DSAs, 55 (62%) were positive for IgG1 and/or IgG3 in a solid phase assay, and 45 (51%) had morphological biopsy features linked to ABMR.

CONCLUSION

An FC-XM assay was unable to discriminate between cases with or without ABMR on biopsy findings; it had a low positive predictive value (<70%) and a low negative positive predictive value (<42.9%), taking into account the sensitivity of our assay (limit of detection: DSAs with an MFI >3000). In this context, the height of the MFI of the dnDSAs might be enough for a high positive predictive value for ABMR and additional testing for complement binding activity can remain optional.

Solid phase-based cross-matching for solid organ transplantation: Currently out-of-stock but urgently required for improved allograft outcome

Transplant recipients who have undergone sensitizing events, such as pregnancy, blood transfusion or previous transplants, frequently develop antibodies directed against the highly polymorphous human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-molecules. These pre-formed, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) present a high risk of causing organ failure or even complete loss of the grafted organ as a consequence of antibody-mediated, hyper-acute or acute allograft rejection. In order to detect DSA, the so-called functional complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assay (CDC-XM) was established about 50 years ago. Although effective in improving the outcome of solid organ allo-grafting, for the last ten years this assay has been controversially discussed due to its low sensitivity and especially because of its high susceptibility to various artificial factors, which generally do not yield reliable results. As a consequence, novel immunochemical test systems have been developed using ELISA- or bead-based solid phase assays as replacements for the traditional CDC-based assays. Because these assays are independent of single or vital cells, which are frequently not available, they have provided an additional and alternative diagnostic approach compared with the traditional CDC-based and flow-cytometric analyses. Unfortunately, however, the AMS-ELISA (Antibody Monitoring System), which was the first system to become commercially available, was recently discontinued by the manufacturer after seven years of successful use. Alternative procedures, such as the AbCross-ELISA, had to be either considerably modified, or did not yield reliable results, as in the case of the Luminex-based assay termed DSA. We draw the conclusion that due to the unique features and fields of application reviewed here, the implementation of solid phase cross-matching still represents an urgent requirement for any HLA-laboratory's routine tasks.