Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients

European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study

An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.

[Kidney transplantation]

Every patient with kidney failure requiring dialysis in Germany has the right to at least be evaluated for a transplantation. When an affected person can be considered for a transplantation, it must be clarified which allocation program is the right one for the person and whether a living organ donor can be considered. It should also be individually discussed with patients which type of donor organ should be accepted. Following a transplantation an individualized immunosuppression is relevant not only for the long-term survival of the transplant but also for the adherence of the patient.

The impact of pretransplant suspected HLA antibody on the long-term outcome of the graft kidney: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The preoperative examination of kidney transplantation includes HLA antibody screening to initially determine the presence of preexisting donor-specific antibody (DSA) that mediates hyperacute rejection. Recipients with positive HLA antibodies require further HLA specificity analysis to type the antigen and determine the antigen mismatches between the donor and recipient. However, recipients with suspected antibodies would have no further HLA specificity analysis. It is unclear whether suspected HLA antibodies would affect renal graft function. This study aimed to explore the impact of pretransplant suspected HLA antibody on the long-term outcome of the graft kidney and thus determine the necessity of routinely performing the HLA specificity analysis in recipients with suspected HLA antibodies preoperatively.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. 179 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) were included and further divided into HLA antibody-negative group (Group 1) and HLA antibody-suspected groups (Group 2) based on the result of the pretransplant HLA antibody screen test. And the antibody-suspected group was further divided into a low-mismatched group (Group A) and a high-mismatched group (Group B) according to the HLA specificity analysis. We tracked the renal function indexes, biochemical indexes, and posttransplant adverse events within 5 years after transplantation and explored the necessity of further HLA specificity analysis in recipients with pretransplant suspected HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in demographics between HLA antibody-negative group and HLA antibody-suspected groups. At 5 years of follow-up, the KTRs in HLA antibody-negative group had significantly higher eGFR levels, lower serum creatinine levels, and less urinary protein compared to those in antibody-suspected group. Meanwhile, the KTRs in low-mismatched group also had significantly higher eGFR levels, lower serum creatinine levels, and less proteinuria compared to those in high-mismatched group. Correlation analysis showed that the age of KTRs, urinary protein levels and the load capacity of HLA mismatches were associated with eGFR levels of KTRs at 5 year posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

KTRs with suspected HLA antibodies before kidney transplantation have worse graft function than the preoperative HLA antibody-negative recipients in the long-term posttransplant follow-up. The specific load capacity of HLA mismatches, the age of the recipient and the urinary protein was found to be negatively correlated with long-term posttransplant renal outcomes. It is necessary to undergo further HLA specificity analysis for recipients with suspected HLA antibodies in HLA antibody screen test to explicit HLA mismatches and improve long-term posttransplant outcomes.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice

Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.

Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation

Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.

Impact of Sensitization on Waiting Time Prior to Kidney Transplantation in Germany

BACKGROUND

Assignment of unacceptable HLA mismatches (UAMs) prevents transplantation of incompatible grafts but potentially prolongs waiting time. Whether this is true in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) and the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Germany is highly debated and relevant for UAM policies.

METHODS

Donor pool restriction due to UAM was expressed as percent virtual panel-reactive antibodies (vPRAs). Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of vPRA levels on waiting time and transplant probability during a period of 2 y in all patients eligible for a kidney graft unter standard circumstances in Germany on February 1, 2019 (n = 6533). Utility of the mismatch probability score to compensate for sensitization in ETKAS was also investigated.

RESULTS

In ETKAS, donor pool restriction resulted in significant prolongation of waiting time and reduction in transplant probability only in patients with vPRA levels above 85%. This was most evident in patients with vPRA levels above 95%, whereas patients in the acceptable mismatch program had significantly shorter waiting times and higher chances for transplantation than nonsensitized patients. In the Eurotransplant Senior Program, vPRA levels above 50% resulted in significantly longer waiting times and markedly reduced the chance for transplantation. Compensation for sensitization by the mismatch probability score was insufficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor pool restriction had no significant impact on waiting time in most sensitized patients. However, despite the existence of the acceptable mismatch program, the majority of highly sensitized patients is currently disadvantaged and would benefit from better compensation mechanisms.

The natural history of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation

Background

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSA) are key factors in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and related to graft loss.

Methods

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the natural course of dnDSA in graft function and kidney allograft survival and to assess the impact of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) evolution as detected by annual Luminex^® screening. All 400 kidney transplant recipients with 731 dnDSA against the last graft (01/03/2000-31/05/2021) were included.

Results

During 8.3 years of follow-up, ABMR occurred in 24.8% and graft loss in 33.3% of the cases, especially in patients with class I and II dnDSA, and those with multiple dnDSA. We observed frequent changes in MFI with 5-year allograft survivals post-dnDSA of 74.0% in patients with MFI reduction ≥ 50%, 62.4% with fluctuating MFI (MFI reduction ≥ 50% and doubling), and 52.7% with doubling MFI (log-rank p < 0.001). Interestingly, dnDSA in 168 (24.3%) cases became negative at some point during follow-up, and 38/400 (9.5%) patients became stable negative, which was associated with better graft survival. Multivariable analysis revealed the importance of MFI evolution and rejection, while class and number of dnDSA were not contributors in this model.

Conclusion

In summary, we provide an in-depth analysis of the natural course of dnDSA after kidney transplantation, first evidence for the impact of MFI evolution on graft outcomes, and describe a relevant number of patients with a stable disappearance of dnDSA, related to better allograft survival.

Poor Outcomes in Patients With Transplant Glomerulopathy Independent of Banff Categorization or Therapeutic Interventions

Background

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) may indicate different disease entities including chronic AMR (antibody-mediated rejection). However, AMR criteria have been frequently changed, and long-term outcomes of allografts with AMR and TG according to Banff 2017 have rarely been investigated.

Methods

282 kidney allograft recipients with biopsy-proven TG were retrospectively investigated and diagnosed according to Banff'17 criteria: chronic AMR (cAMR, n = 72), chronic active AMR (cAAMR, n = 76) and isolated TG (iTG, n = 134). Of which 25/72 (34.7%) patients of cAMR group and 46/76 (60.5%) of cAAMR group were treated with antihumoral therapy (AHT).

Results

Up to 5 years after indication biopsy, no statistically significant differences were detected among iTG, cAMR and cAAMR groups in annual eGFR decline (−3.0 vs. −2.0 vs. −2.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year), 5-year median eGFR (21.5 vs. 16.0 vs. 20.0 ml/min/1.73 m2), 5-year graft survival rates (34.1 vs. 40.6 vs. 31.8%) as well as urinary protein excretion during follow-up. In addition, cAMR and cAAMR patients treated with AHT had similar graft and patient survival rates in comparison with those free of AHT, and similar comparing with iTG group. The TG scores were not associated with 5-year postbiopsy graft failure; whereas the patients with higher scores of chronic allograft scarring (by mm-, ci- and ct-lesions) had significantly lower graft survival rates than those with mild scores. The logistic-regression analysis demonstrated that Banff mm-, ah-, t-, ci-, ct-lesions and the eGFR level at biopsy were associated with 5-year graft failure.

Conclusions

The occurrence of TG is closely associated with graft failure independent of disease categories and TG score, and the long-term clinical outcomes were not influenced by AHT. The Banff lesions indicating progressive scarring might be better suited to predict an unfavorable outcome.