1
|
Wang Q, Zhao J, Han X, Er P, Meng X, Shi J, Sun H, Zhu J, Zhu L, Wu S, Zhang W, Sun B. Is There a Role for Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy for T1-2N1 Breast Cancers With Node-Positive Pathology After Patients Become Node-Negative Pathology Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Front Oncol 2020; 10:892. [PMID: 32695661 PMCID: PMC7338570 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the benefit of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer (BC) patients with T1-2N1M0 who developed pathologically negative lymph nodes (ypN0) after undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and mastectomy. Patients and Materials: Patients with T1-2 tumors and positive lymph node(s) who became pN0 after NAC and mastectomy were screened from our prospectively maintained database. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted for the comparison between PMRT and non-PMRT groups. Results: Of the 142 eligible patients, 110 (77.5%) received PMRT, and 32 (22.5%) did not. The median follow-up time was 72 months. Univariate analyses showed that the 5-year RFS, LRFS, and OS rates were 88.7, 94.5, and 96.1, respectively, with PMRT and 72.4, 90.1, and 95.0% without PMRT (p = 0.028; p = 0.151; p = 0.971). Multivariate analyses established PMRT as a significant prognostic factor for RFS rate (HR, 0.411; 95% CI, 0.175–0.968; p = 0.042). After a PSM analysis (64 in the PMRT group vs. 32 in the non-PMRT group), PMRT remained significant, with improved RFS in univariate and multivariate analysis (with 5-year RFS rates of 90.1 vs. 72.4%, respectively, p = 0.016; HR, 0.323, 95%CI, 0.115–0.913, p = 0.033). In the subgroup of 48 (33.8%) patients with pathologic complete responses (pCR, ypT0, and ypN0) after NAC, PMRT did not affect RFS (HR, 0.226; 95% CI, 0.034–1.500; p = 0.123). Conclusions: PMRT might benefit pT1-2N1M0 patients with pN0 after NAC. Patients with pCR might consider omitting PMRT. Prospective studies are needed to assess the effect of PMRT on this specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jingjing Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaowei Han
- Department of Breast Surgeons, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Puchun Er
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiangying Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinyan Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huiru Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jingyang Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shikai Wu
- Department of Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Bing Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah R, Hunter-Smith AE, Botes A, Rayter Z. Does post mastectomy radiotherapy reduce loco-regional recurrence rates in all clinical stages of breast cancer following a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2020-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has not been qualified in contemporary cohorts that have achieved complete pathological response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This systematic review evaluated loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates following PMRT for patients with pCR or pathologically lymph node negative disease (ypN0) after NAC. We identified seven papers that described LRR in 415 patients with pCR following NAC. Pooled analysis demonstrated clear benefit of PMRT on LRR (OR: 0.2 [95% CI: 0.06–0.58; p = 0.003]) and this was most pronounced in stage III/IV disease (OR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.04–0.44; p = 0.0012]), as well as of benefit in ypN0 disease. PMRT appears to be effective in reducing LRR following pCR or ypN0 in advanced breast cancer but requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Shah
- Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Fellow, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Emma Hunter-Smith
- General Surgery Registrar, Royal United Hospital, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Azel Botes
- General Surgery Registrar, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Zenon Rayter
- Consultant Breast & General Surgeon, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montero Á, Ciérvide R, Poortmans P. When Can We Avoid Postmastectomy Radiation Following Primary Systemic Therapy? Curr Oncol Rep 2019; 21:95. [DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
4
|
Cao L, Xu C, Kirova YM, Cai G, Cai R, Wang SB, Shen KW, Ou D, Chen JY. The Role of the Neo-Bioscore Staging System in Guiding the Optimal Strategies for Regional Nodal Irradiation Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients with cN1 and ypN0–1. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:343-355. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-07095-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
5
|
Liu J, Mao K, Jiang S, Jiang W, Chen K, Kim BYS, Liu Q, Jacobs LK. The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy in clinically node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer patients with pathological negative nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis from the NCDB. Oncotarget 2017; 7:24848-59. [PMID: 26709538 PMCID: PMC5029747 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in clinically node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer patients with pathological negative nodes (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. Methods A total of 1560 clinically node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer patients treated with NAC and mastectomy who achieved ypN0 between 1998 and 2009 in the National Cancer Database were analyzed. The effects of PMRT on overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort and multiple subgroups were evaluated. Imputation and propensity score matching were used as sensitivity analyses to minimize biases. Results Of the entire 1560 eligible patients, 903 (57.9%) received PMRT and 657 (42.1%) didn’t. At a median follow-up of 56.0 months, no statistical difference was observed for OS between two groups by univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.120; HR 1.571, 95% CI 0.839-2.943). On subgroup analyses, PMRT significantly improved OS in patients with clinical stage IIIB/IIIC disease, T3/T4 tumor, or residual invasive breast cancer after NAC (P < 0.05). This improvement in OS remained significant after sensitivity analyses for the propensity score-matched patients. Conclusions This study demonstrated that PMRT showed a heterogeneous effect in clinically node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer patients with ypN0 following NAC. PMRT improved OS for patients with clinical stage IIIB/IIIC disease, T3/T4 tumor, or residual invasive breast tumor after NAC. In the absence of definitive conclusions from prospective studies, including the ongoing NSABP B-51 trial, our findings may help identify specific groups of women with clinically node-positive, stage II-III breast cancers who could benefit from PMRT after NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieqiong Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kai Mao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of General Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shuai Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wen Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kai Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Betty Y S Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Qiang Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lisa K Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fowble B, Jairam AK, Wang F, Peled A, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Esserman L, Park C, Lazar A. Indications for Postmastectomy Radiation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ypN0 and ypN1-3 Axillary Node-Positive Women. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 18:e107-e113. [PMID: 28830795 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) might obscure indications for postmastectomy radiation (PMRT). The degree of downstaging that results in local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates low enough to omit PMRT remains controversial. We examined the rate of LRR in women who received NAC who underwent mastectomy without PMRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2004 and 2013, 81 women with stage I to IIIA breast cancer had NAC and mastectomy; 48 patients (59%) were clinical N0 and 33 patients (41%) were clinical N1; median age was 45 years; 33 patients (41%) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+)HER2-, 21 patients (26%) HR+HER2+, 19 patients (23%) HR- HER2-, and 7 patients (9%) HR-HER2+ disease. We explored how LRR rates varied with age, BRCA status, Grade, receptor status, clinical N status, pathologic response, lymphovascular invasion, and mastectomy margins. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. RESULTS After NAC, 35 patients (43%) had a pathologic complete response (pCR), 33 patients (41%) were ypN0, and 13 patients (16%) were ypN1-3+. There were 8 LRRs (6 chest wall, 1 axillary, 1 supraclavicular node). The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 8% for all patients, 3% for pCR, 16% for ypN0, 10% for ypN1-3+, 6% for HR+HER2-, 25% for HR+HER2+, 0% for HR-HER2-, and 0% for HR-HER2+. LRR was 31% in the ypN0 and 33% in the ypN1-3+ HR+HER2+ women, and 12% in the ypN0 and 0% in the ypN1 to ypN3+ HR+HER2- patients. CONCLUSION This study is unique. All HER2+ patients received trastuzumab and LRR was analyzed according to treatment response, clinicopathologic factors, and receptor status. pCR patients including young women and clinical stage IIIA had low LRR rates. However, ypN0 and ypN1-3+ HR+HER2+ patients had higher rates of LRR compared with other receptor subgroups and on the basis of limited data should be considered for PMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Fowble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Abhishek Keshav Jairam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Frederick Wang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anne Peled
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael Alvarado
- Department of Surgery, Carol Frank Buck Breast Care Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Cheryl Ewing
- Department of Surgery, Carol Frank Buck Breast Care Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Laura Esserman
- Department of Surgery, Carol Frank Buck Breast Care Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Catherine Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ann Lazar
- Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pathological complete response in invasive breast cancer treated by skin sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy: Comparison between immunohistochemical subtypes. Breast 2017; 32:37-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 12/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
8
|
Kishan AU, McCloskey SA. Postmastectomy radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: review and interpretation of available data. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2016; 8:85-97. [PMID: 26753007 DOI: 10.1177/1758834015617459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been shown to decrease locoregional recurrence and improve overall survival in patients with tumors greater than 5 cm or positive nodes. Because neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can cause significant downstaging, the indications for PMRT in the setting of NAC remain controversial and thus careful consideration of clinical stage at presentation, pathologic response to NAC, and other clinical characteristics, such as grade and biomarker status is required. The current review synthesizes both prospective and retrospective data to provide evidence for recommending PMRT after NAC for patients presenting with cT3-4 disease, cN2-3 disease, and residual nodal disease, as well as rationale for omitting PMRT in patients with cT1-2N0-1 disease who achieve a pathologic complete response. Other scenarios, including nodal complete response in the presence of other risk factors, are also explored. The topics of pre-NAC clinical staging and pathologic axillary nodal staging are reviewed, and radiation portal design is briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susan A McCloskey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 1223 16th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bernier J. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy after neodjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 93:180-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Revised: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|