1
|
Makhetha M, Walters S, Aldous C. The review of genetic screening services and common BRCA1/2 variants among South African breast cancer patients. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:481-492. [PMID: 37528630 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
The South African genetic screening services for breast cancer comprise targeted and comprehensive tests that screen for the presence of genetic alterations. Clinically, these variants determine the risk of disease development as well as treatment approaches best suited for carriers. The current targeted tests screen for seven pathogenic sequence variants, which are mainly common among Whites, a population that constitutes 9.1% of South Africa. However, these tests are offered to all patients despite consistent negative results observed among Blacks, Indians, and Mixed ancestry (known as Coloreds in South Africa). Consequently, Blacks, White, and Colored patients who potentially carry other variants receive unbefitting treatment, resulting in poor clinical response, recurrence, and high mortality. This review aimed to identify the presence and incidence of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 previously reported in all South African populations. We selected literature using a scoping review approach, from which we included eight articles and two reports. Overall, we identified 59 BRCA1 and 60 BRCA2 pathogenic sequence variants from a cohort of 5709 patients and unknown patients from 90 families. The most reported variant was BRCA2 c.7943delG, which was common in White and Colored patients. None of the seven common variants was reported in either Blacks or Indians, which demonstrates the urgency to tailor genetic tests which are optimal for all South African patients and present a range of variants which could serve as diagnostic targets for Black, Indian, and Colored patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mpoi Makhetha
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | | | - Colleen Aldous
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olorunfemi G, Libhaber E, Ezechi OC, Musenge E. Population-based temporal trends and ethnic disparity in breast cancer mortality in South Africa (1999-2018): Joinpoint and age-period-cohort regression analyses. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1056609. [PMID: 36816918 PMCID: PMC9935608 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths, accounting for 15.5% of female cancer deaths in 2020. Breast cancer is also the leading cause of female cancers in South Africa. The rapid epidemiological transition in South Africa may have an impact on the trends in breast cancer mortality in the country. We therefore evaluated the trends in the breast cancer mortality in SA over 20 years (1999-2020). Methods Joinpoint regression analyses of the trends in crude and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) of breast cancer among South African women were conducted from 1999 to 2018 using mortality data from Statistics South Africa. Age-period-cohort regression analysis was then conducted to evaluate the independent effect of age, period, and cohort on breast cancer mortality, and analysis was stratified by ethnicity. Results The mortality rate of breast cancer (from 9.82 to 13.27 per 100,000 women) increased at around 1.4% per annum (Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC): 1.4%, 95% CI:0.8-2.0, P-value< 0.001). Young women aged 30-49 years (1.1%-1.8%, P-value< 0.001) had increased breast cancer mortality. The risk of breast cancer mortality increased among successive birth cohorts from 1924 to 1928 but decreased among recent cohorts born from 1989 to 1993. In 2018, the breast cancer mortality rate among Blacks (9.49/100,000 women) was around half of the rates among the non-Blacks. (Coloreds: 18.11 per 100,000 women; Whites: 17.77/100,000 women; Indian/Asian: 13.24 per 100,000 women). Conclusions Contrary to the trends in high- and middle-income countries, breast cancer mortality increased in South Africa especially among young women. Breast cancer prevention programs should be intensified and should also target young women. The marked disparity in ethnic burden of breast cancer should be considered during planning and implementation of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gbenga Olorunfemi
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Elena Libhaber
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Eustasius Musenge
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Francies FZ, Herd O, Cairns A, Nietz S, Murdoch M, Slabbert J, Claes KBM, Vral A, Baeyens A. Chromosomal radiosensitivity of triple negative breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Biol 2019; 95:1507-1516. [PMID: 31348739 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1649502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Based on clinical and molecular data, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Breast cancers that have no expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are defined as triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs); luminal cancers have different expressions of ER, PR and/or HER2. TNBCs are frequently linked with advanced disease, poor prognosis and occurrence in young African women, and about 15% of the cases are associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Since radiotherapy is utilized as a principle treatment in the management of TNBC, we aimed to investigate the chromosomal instability and radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in TNBC patients compared to luminal breast cancer patients and healthy controls using the micronucleus (MN) assay. The effect of mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes on chromosomal radiosensitivity was also evaluated.Methods: Chromosomal radiosensitivity was evaluated in the G0 (83 patients and 90 controls) and S/G2 (34 patients and 17 controls) phase of the cell cycle by exposing blood samples from all patients and controls to 2 and 4 Gy ionizing radiation (IR).Results: In the G0 MN assay, the combined cohort of all breast cancer, TNBC and luminal patients' exhibit significantly elevated spontaneous MN values compared to controls indicating chromosomal instability. Chromosomal radiosensitivity is also significantly elevated in the combined cohort of all breast cancer patients compared to controls. The TNBC patients, however, do not exhibit enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity. Similarly, in the S/G2 phase, 76% of TNBC patients do not show enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity compared to the controls. In both the G0 and S/G2 phase, luminal breast cancer patients demonstrate a shift toward chromosomal radiosensitivity compared to TNBC patients and controls.Conclusions: The observations of the MN assay suggest increased chromosomal instability and chromosomal radiosensitivity in South African breast cancer patients. However, in TNBC patients, the irradiated MN values are not elevated. Our results suggest that the healthy lymphocytes in TNBC patients could handle higher doses of IR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Zita Francies
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiobiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Olivia Herd
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiobiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Alan Cairns
- Department of Surgery, Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Sarah Nietz
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Marshall Murdoch
- Department of Surgery, Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Kathleen B M Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anne Vral
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ans Baeyens
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiobiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Francies FZ, Wainstein T, De Leeneer K, Cairns A, Murdoch M, Nietz S, Cubasch H, Poppe B, Van Maerken T, Crombez B, Coene I, Kerr R, Slabbert JP, Vral A, Krause A, Baeyens A, Claes KBM. BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 mutations and CHEK2 c.1100delC in different South African ethnic groups diagnosed with premenopausal and/or triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:912. [PMID: 26577449 PMCID: PMC4647511 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1913-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current knowledge of the aetiology of hereditary breast cancer in the four main South African population groups (black, coloured, Indian and white) is limited. Risk assessments in the black, coloured and Indian population groups are challenging because of restricted information regarding the underlying genetic contributions to inherited breast cancer in these populations. We focused this study on premenopausal patients (diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 50; n = 78) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (n = 30) from the four South African ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 and to evaluate the presence of the CHEK2 c.1100delC allele in these patients. Methods In total, 108 South African breast cancer patients underwent mutation screening using a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) approach in combination with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) to detect large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Results In 13 (12 %) patients a deleterious mutation in BRCA1/2 was detected, three of which were novel mutations in black patients. None of the study participants was found to have an unequivocal pathogenic mutation in PALB2. Two (white) patients tested positive for the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation, however, one of these also carried a deleterious BRCA2 mutation. Additionally, six variants of unknown clinical significance were identified (4 in BRCA2, 2 in PALB2), all in black patients. Within the group of TNBC patients, a higher mutation frequency was obtained (23.3 %; 7/30) than in the group of patients diagnosed before the age of 50 (7.7 %; 6/78). Conclusion This study highlights the importance of evaluating germline mutations in major breast cancer genes in all of the South African population groups. This NGS study shows that mutation analysis is warranted in South African patients with triple negative and/or in premenopausal breast cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1913-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Z Francies
- iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa. .,Department of Radiation Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - T Wainstein
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - K De Leeneer
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - A Cairns
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - M Murdoch
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - S Nietz
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - H Cubasch
- Batho Pele Breast Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - B Poppe
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - T Van Maerken
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - B Crombez
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - I Coene
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - R Kerr
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - J P Slabbert
- iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa.
| | - A Vral
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - A Krause
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - A Baeyens
- iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa. .,Department of Radiation Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - K B M Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|