Smoking as a risk factor for wound dehiscence in nipple reconstruction: An analysis of 1683 cases

Guiding Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction: Literature Review and Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Nipple-areola complex reconstruction (NAR) most commonly represents the finishing touch to breast reconstruction (BR). Nipple presence is particularly relevant to the patient's psyche, beyond any shadow of doubt. Many reconstructive options have been described in time. Surgery is easy, but final result is often disappointing on the long run.

METHODS

The goal of this manuscript is to analyze and classify knowledge concerning NAR techniques and the factors that influence success, and then to elaborate a practical evidence-based algorithm. Out of the 3136 available articles as of August 8th, 2020, we selected 172 manuscripts that met inclusion criteria, which we subdivided into 5 main topics of discussion, being the various NAR techniques; patient factors (including patient selection, timing and ideal position); dressings; potential complications and finally, outcomes/patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

We found 92 articles describing NAR techniques, 41 addressing patient factors (out of which 17 discussed patient selection, 14 described ideal NAC location, 10 described appropriate timing), 10 comparing dressings, 7 studying NAR complications, and 22 addressing outcomes and patient satisfaction. We elaborated a comprehensive decision-making algorithm to help narrow down the choice among NAR techniques, and choose the correct strategy according to the various scenarios, and particularly the BR technique and skin envelope.

CONCLUSIONS

No single NAR technique provides definitive results, which is why we believe there is no "end-all be-all solution". NAR must be approached as a case-by-case situation. Furthermore, despite NAR being such a widely discussed topic in scientific literature, we still found a lack of clinical trials to allow for more thorough recommendations to be elaborated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women With Previous Abdominal Incisions: A Comparison of Complication Rates

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is currently the most widely used method for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. There are mixed data in the literature regarding the impact of previous abdominal surgery on DIEP flap success in breast reconstruction. With this study, we take a closer look at the effect of prior abdominal surgery on DIEP flap and donor-site complications, with a particular focus on the different types of incisions and their influence on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-year period. Five hundred forty-four consecutive DIEP flaps were divided into a control group (321 flaps) without previous abdominal surgery and an incision group (223 flaps) with previous abdominal surgery. A comparison between both groups was made in terms of flap and donor-site complications followed by a subgroup analysis based on single types of abdominal incisions.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of age, body mass index, flap weight, smoking history, prior radiotherapy, diabetes, and coagulopathy (P > 0.05). The most common incision was low transverse incision (n = 116) followed by laparoscopy port (n = 103) and midline (n = 46) incisions. We found no significant differences between the control group and incision group in terms of flap complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that none of the 3 types of incision increase the flap or donor-site complications. Smoking and flap weight were the only 2 independent predictors for donor-site complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this large series of consecutive DIEP flaps from our institution confirm that autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flap can be safely performed in patients who have had previous abdominal surgeries; however, counseling patients about smoking is critical to avoid potential donor-site complications.

Safe delayed procedure of nipple reconstruction in poorly circulated nipple

Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction represents the final step in breast reconstruction. However, there is no gold standard nipple reconstruction technique that addresses the issue of blood circulation in the flap, which is the most basic complication. Nipple reconstruction was performed in 21 patients. A delayed procedure was performed when a poor outcome was expected due to marginal pinpoint bleeding in the distal tip after flap elevation during nipple reconstruction. The delayed nipple reconstruction can be viewed as a safe and reliable method for improving nipple blood circulation, reducing complications, and enabling long-term nipple projection maintenance in high-risk patients.