Bracketed radioactive seed localization vs bracketed wire-localization in breast surgery

Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study is a systematic review with meta-analysis comparing radioactive seed localization (RSL) versus radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire-guided localization (WGL) for patients with impalpable breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery and evaluating efficacy, safety, and logistical outcomes. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO with the number CRD42022299726.

METHODS

A search was conducted in the Embase, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scielo, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases, in addition to a manual search in the reference list of relevant articles, for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies. Studies selected were submitted to their own data extraction forms and risk of bias analysis according to the ROB 2 and ROBINS 1 tools. A meta-analysis was performed, considering the random effect model, calculating the relative risk or the mean difference for dichotomous or continuous data, respectively. The quality of the evidence generated was analyzed by outcome according to the GRADE tool. Overall, 46 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review; of these, 4 studies compared RSL and ROLL with a population of 1550 women, and 43 compared RSL and WGL with a population of 19,820 women.

RESULTS

The results showed that RSL is a superior method to WGL in terms of surgical efficiency in the impalpable breast lesions' intraoperative localization, and it is at least equivalent to ROLL. Regarding security, RSL obtained results equivalent to the already established technique, the WGL. In addition to presenting promising results, RSL has been proven to be superior to WGL and ROLL technologies.

Bracketed Localization in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Indications and Success Rates From a Single, High Volume, Academic Breast Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

Bracketed localization is a technique used to help localize lesions for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). To date, there are no guidelines for when bracketed localization should be used in clinical practice. Based on our experience, we aim to provide criteria that should prompt surgeons to consider bracketing.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent bracketed localization for BCS between 2015 and 2021. Lesion characteristics were recorded including lesion span, number of lesions, histology type on core needle biopsy and surgical specimen, margin status, and need for additional surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen cases were analyzed. Imaging showed an average lesion span of 5.0-cm. Multifocal lesions represented 45% of cases. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was a histological component in 64% of core needle biopsies and 76% of surgical specimens. Negative margins were achieved in 82% of patients on the first excision. Additional surgery was performed in 17% of patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma had the highest additional surgery rate at 23%. Negative margins with BCS were achieved in 96% of cases, including those with successful re-excision.

DISCUSSION

This descriptive study shows that bracketed localization was most often employed for patients with large lesion spans, multifocality, and a DCIS or invasive lobular component. While these characteristics are typically associated with higher rates of positive margins, our cohort's rate of additional surgery was comparable to the national average for all BCS operations. These results argue that surgeon utilization of bracketed localization may be beneficial in these clinical scenarios.

Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence for the identification of non-palpable breast tumours: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Accurate tumour localization is crucial for precise surgical targeting and complete tumour removal. Indocyanine green fluorescence, an increasingly used technique in oncological surgery, has shown promise in localizing non-palpable breast tumours. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence for the identification of non-palpable breast tumours.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, including studies from 2012 to 2023. Studies reporting the proportion of breast tumours identified using indocyanine green fluorescence were included. The quality of the studies and their risk of bias were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies ('MINORS') tool. The following outcomes were collected: identification rate, clear resection margins, specimen volume, operative time, re-operation rate, adverse events, and complications.

RESULTS

In total, 2061 articles were screened for eligibility, resulting in 11 studies, with 366 patients included: two RCTs, three non-randomized comparative studies, four single-arm studies, and two case reports. All studies achieved a 100 per cent tumour identification rate with indocyanine green fluorescence, except for one study, with an identification rate of 87 per cent (13/15). Clear resection margins were found in 88-100 per cent of all patients. Reoperation rates ranged from 0.0 to 5.4 per cent and no complications or adverse events related to indocyanine green occurred.

CONCLUSION

Indocyanine green fluorescence has substantial theoretical advantages compared with current routine localization methods. Although a limited number of studies were available, the current literature suggests that indocyanine green fluorescence is a useful, accurate, and safe technique for the intraoperative localization of non-palpable breast tumours, with equivalent efficacy compared with other localization techniques, potentially reducing tumour-positive margins.

Intraoperative Margin Trials in Breast Cancer

Purpose of Review

Obtaining negative margins in breast conservation surgery continues to be a challenge. Re-excisions are difficult for patients and expensive for the health systems. This paper reviews the literature on current strategies and intraoperative clinical trials to reduce positive margin rates.

Recent Findings

The best available data demonstrate that intraoperative imaging with ultrasound, intraoperative pathologic assessment such as frozen section, and cavity margins have been the most successful intraoperative strategies to reduce positive margins. Emerging technologies such as optical coherence tomography and fluorescent imaging need further study but may be important adjuncts.

Summary

There are several proven strategies to reduce positive margin rates to < 10%. Surgeons should utilize best available resources within their institutions to produce the best outcomes for their patients.

Image-guided Localization Techniques for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: An Opportunity for Multidisciplinary Patient-centered Care

Selection of a localization method for nonpalpable breast lesions offers an opportunity for institutions to seek multidisciplinary input to promote value-based, patient-centered care. The diverse range of nonpalpable breast and axillary pathologies identified through increased utilization of screening mammography often necessitates image-guided preoperative localization for accurate lesion identification and excision. Preoperative localization techniques for breast and axillary lesions have evolved to include both wire and nonwire methods, the latter of which include radioactive seeds, radar reflectors, magnetic seeds, and radiofrequency identification tag localizers. There are no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes when comparing wire and nonwire localization devices. Factors to consider during selection and adoption of image-guided localization systems include physician preference and ease of use, workflow efficiency, and patient satisfaction.

Comparison of Multiple Wire, Radioactive Seed, and Savi Scout® Radar Localizations for Management of Surgical Breast Disease

BACKGROUND

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) and the Savi Scout^® radar (SSR) are newer alternatives to wire-guided localization (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare three localization devices when multiple devices were used for preoperative localization for breast surgery.

METHODS

Between July 2017 and July 2018, 68 patients had a partial mastectomy (n = 54) or breast biopsy (n = 14) with preoperative image-guided localization using multiple wires or device placement for nonpalpable lesions. Operative timing, outcomes, and 30-day complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 41 patients (60%) had WL, 11 patients (16%) had RSL, and 16 patients (24%) had SSR localization. Fifty-four patients (79.4%) had localization of two lesions and 13 patients (19.1%) had localization of three lesions. Twenty-three patients (33.8%) had a lesion that was bracketed. There was no difference in retained biopsy clip among the groups (average 7.4%; p = 0.962). For operations performed in the hospital, there was no difference in operative time among the groups, with a median of 77.5 min (p = 0.705) or total perioperative time of 508 min (p = 0.210). Among operations with delayed start times, there was a longer average delay of 95.5 min in WL, compared with 42 min in SSR (p = 0.004). A greater volume of tissue was excised in the WL group (29.5 g WL vs. 15.9 g RSL vs. 12.1 g SSR; p = 0.022). There was no difference in positive margin rate and 30-day complications among groups.

CONCLUSION

SSR and RSL can be used to localize multiple breast lesions, with no difference in positive margin rates or complications and less tissue excised compared with WL.

Bracketed Radioactive Seed Localization for Breast Conservation Surgery

We aimed to evaluate the surgical margin outcomes and re-excision rates in patients undergoing bracketed seed localization of biopsy-proven breast cancer detected on screening mammogram. After approval by our Institutional Review Board, we retrospectively identified patients who had undergone iodine-125 seed localized lumpectomy at our institution from January 2010 to June 2017 by one of two fellowship-trained breast surgeons. Of those patients, a subset of 25 patients were identified who had undergone bracketed seed localization, defined as two or more seeds used to delineate the radiographic borders of the area of concern. All patients had originally presented with calcifications identified on screening mammogram that were subsequently diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ and/or invasive ductal carcinoma by image-guided biopsy performed at our institution. Eight patients had one positive margin on final surgical pathology and required re-excision (32%). One patient was converted to mastectomy. Of the patients requiring re-excision, the average maximum linear extent of calcifications was 3.4 cm (SD 0.97), whereas it was 3.1 cm (SD 1.2) in patients with negative surgical margins ( P = 0.5). Bracketing calcifications with radioactive seeds can potentially allow more patients to undergo breast conservation surgery.

Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic

In 2015, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) convened a multidisciplinary consensus conference, the Collaborative Attempt to Lower Lumpectomy Reoperation Rates (CALLER). The CALLER conference endorsed a "toolbox" of multiple processes of care for which there was evidence that they were associated with fewer reoperations. We present an update of the toolbox taking into consideration the latest advances in decreasing re excision rates. In this review, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature from 2015-2018 using search terms for each tool. The original ten tools were updated with the latest evidence from the literature and our strength of recommendation. We added an additional section looking at new tools and techniques that may provide more accurate intraoperative assessment of margins. The updates on the CALLER Toolbox for lumpectomy will help guide surgeons to various resources to aid in the removal of breast cancer, while being aware of cosmesis and decreasing re excision rates.

Impact of Advancing Technology on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer

New emerging breast imaging techniques have shown great promise in breast cancer screening, evaluation of extent of disease, and response to neoadjuvant therapy. Tomosynthesis, allows 3-dimensional imaging of the breast, and increases breast cancer detection. Fast abbreviated MRI has reduced time and costs associated with traditional breast MRI while maintaining cancer detection. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a functional MRI technique that does not require contrast and has shown potential in screening, lesion characterization and also evaluation of treatment response. New image-guided preoperative localizations are available that have increased patient satisfaction and decreased operating room delays.