Breast cancer patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease: 10-year results of a national cohort with validation of prognostic indexes

Incidence proportion and prognosis of leptomeningeal disease among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a relatively uncommon manifestation of advanced cancer. Patients with LMD carry a poor prognosis and often decline rapidly, complicating inclusion in clinical trials. Identification of LMD subsets of greater incidence and more favorable prognosis might facilitate dedicated clinical trials in the future. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer may represent such a population and sought to assess the relative incidence and prognosis of LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries.

METHODS

We identified 2411 patients with intracranial metastases secondary to breast (N = 501) and non-breast (N = 1910) primaries at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1996 and 2020, of whom 112 presented with and an additional 161 subsequently developed LMD. A log-rank test and Cox modeling were used to compare outcomes in patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries.

RESULTS

Among patients with newly diagnosed intracranial disease, the incidence proportion of concurrent LMD was 11.4% vs. 2.9% among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (P < .001). Development of LMD among initially LMD-naïve patients was also more common among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (HR = 1.49 [1.05-2.11], P = .03). Patients with LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries displayed lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 [0.52-0.93], P = .01; median survival: 5.2 vs. 2.4 months, respectively), with a greater numerical difference observed in patients with LMD at intracranial involvement (7.4 vs. 2.6 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with breast cancer and LMD may represent an ideal population for clinical trials given the higher incidence and potentially more favorable prognosis seen in this population.

Actual, Personalized Approaches to Preserve Cognitive Functions in Brain Metastases Breast Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is the one of most common causes of brain metastases among solid malignancies, being responsible for 10–16% of all brain metastases in oncological patients. Brain metastases in the course of breast cancer significantly worsen quality of life of patients, especially in the aspect of neurocognitive domains. The review aims to summarize and integrate the current knowledge about breast cancer brain metastases, focusing on indications of certain types of treatment, and with special attention to the role of hippocampus sparing in preserving neurocognitive functions in irradiated patients.

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most often diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and second most common cause of brain metastases (BMs) among solid malignancies being responsible for 10–16% of all BMs in oncological patients. Moreover, BMs are associated with worse prognosis than systemic metastases. The quality of life (QoL) among brain metastases breast cancer (BMBC) patients is significantly influenced by cognitive functions. Cancer-related cognitive deficits and the underlying neural deficits in BMBC patients can be caused via BMs per se, chemotherapy administration, brain irradiation, postmenopausal status, or comorbidities. Brain RT often leads to cognitive function impairment by damage of neural progenitor cells of the hippocampus and hence decreased QoL. Sparing the hippocampal region of the brain during RT provides protective covering of the centrally located hippocampi according to the patient’s clinical requirements. This article discusses the personalized strategies for treatment options to protect cognitive functions in BMBC patients, with special emphasis on the innovative techniques of radiation therapy.

Leptomeningeal metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer: real-world data from a multicentric European cohort

In patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer, leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a rare but often a fatal clinical scenario. In this multicentric study, clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with HER2+ breast cancer developing LM were described, as well as survival outcomes. Data were gathered retrospectively from medical records of 82 patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer and LM treated between August 2005 and July 2020. Following LM diagnosis, 79 (96.3%) patients received at least one line of anti‐HER2 therapy, 25 (30.5%) patients received intrathecal therapy and 58 (70.7%) patients received radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7‐11), 1‐year OS was 42%, and 2‐year OS was 21%. At univariate analysis, patients who were treated after 2010, had better Karnofsky performance status, were free of neurological symptoms, had better prognostic, received chemotherapy (OS difference 9.4 months, P = .024), or monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab ± pertuzumab; OS difference 6.1 months; P = .013) after LM diagnosis, had a statistically significantly longer OS. Presence of neurological symptoms (hazard ratio 3.32, 95% CI 1.26‐8.73; P = .015) and not having received radiotherapy (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.09‐3.72; P = .024) were all associated with poorer OS at multivariate analysis. To summarize, not having neurological symptoms and receiving RT at LM diagnosis were associated with prolonged OS in our cohort. Survival seemed to be prolonged with multimodality treatment, which included targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and RT to the LM sites.

Characteristics of patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: subanalysis of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Registry

Background

Up to 40% of patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer develop brain metastases (BMs). Understanding of clinical features of these patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and BMs is vital.

Patients and methods

A total of 2948 patients from the Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer registry were available for this analysis, of whom 1311 had primary tumors with the HER2-positive subtype.

Results

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and BMs were—when compared with HER2-negative patients—slightly younger at the time of breast cancer and BM diagnosis, had a higher pathologic complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a higher tumor grade. Furthermore, extracranial metastases at the time of BM diagnosis were less common in HER2-positive patients, when compared with HER2-negative patients. HER2-positive patients had more often BMs in the posterior fossa, but less commonly leptomeningeal metastases. The median overall survival (OS) in all HER2-positive patients was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval 11.4-14.4). The following factors were associated with shorter OS (multivariate analysis): older age at BM diagnosis [≥60 versus <60 years: hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, P < 0.001], lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (2-4 versus 0-1: HR 1.59, P < 0.001), higher number of BMs (2-3 versus 1: HR 1.30, P = 0.082; ≥4 versus 1: HR 1.51, P = 0.004; global P = 0.015), BMs in the fossa anterior (HR 1.71, P < 0.001), leptomeningeal metastases (HR 1.63, P = 0.012), symptomatic BMs at diagnosis (HR 1.35, P = 0.033) and extracranial metastases at diagnosis of BMs (HR 1.43, P = 0.020). The application of targeted therapy after the BM diagnosis (HR 0.62, P < 0.001) was associated with longer OS. HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive patients showed longer OS than HER2-positive/hormone receptor-negative patients (median 14.3 versus 10.9 months; HR 0.86, P = 0.03), but no differences in progression-free survival were seen between both groups.

Conclusions

We identified factors associated with the prognosis of HER2-positive patients with BMs. Further research is needed to understand the factors determining the longer survival of HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive patients.

•

Patients with HER2-positive BMs from breast cancer have the best prognosis compared with other tumor subtypes.

•

Among HER2-positive patients, hormone receptor-positive patients have the longest survival.

•

HER2-targeted therapy is significantly associated with a better prognosis in patients with BMs.

•

On average, two HER2-targeted therapy lines were administered prior to the development of BMs.

•

New compounds are urgently needed to improve the outcome of this subgroup of patients.

The Usefulness of Prognostic Tools in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Simple Summary

Due to the variability of an individual’s prognosis and the variety of treatment options available to breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM), establishing the proper therapy is challenging. Since 1997, several prognostic tools for BC patients with BM have been proposed with variable precision in determining the overall survival. The majority of prognostic tools include the performance status, the age at BM diagnosis, the number of BM, the primary tumor phenotype/genotype and the extracranial metastases status as an outcome of systemic therapy efficacy. It is necessary to update the prognostic indices used by physicians as advances in local and systemic treatments develop and change the parameters of survival. Free access to prognostic tools online may increase their routine adoption in clinical practice. Clinical trials on BC patients with BM remains a broad field for the application of prognostic tools.

Abstract

Background: Determining the proper therapy is challenging in breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) due to the variability of an individual’s prognosis and the variety of treatment options available. Several prognostic tools for BC patients with BM have been proposed. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic. Methods: We searched PubMed for prognostic tools concerning BC patients with BM, published from January 1997 (since the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group developed) to December 2021. Our criteria were limited to adults with newly diagnosed BM regardless of the presence or absence of any leptomeningeal metastases. Results: 31 prognostic tools were selected: 13 analyzed mixed cohorts with some BC cases and 18 exclusively analyzed BC prognostic tools. The majority of prognostic tools in BC patients with BM included: the performance status, the age at BM diagnosis, the number of BM (rarely the volume), the primary tumor phenotype/genotype and the extracranial metastasis status as a result of systemic therapy. The prognostic tools differed in their specific cut-off values. Conclusion: Prognostic tools have variable precision in determining the survival of BC patients with BM. Advances in local and systemic treatment significantly affect survival, therefore, it is necessary to update the survival indices used depending on the type and period of treatment.

The unexpected effect of the combination of lapatinib and capecitabin in cranial metastasis

Cranial metastasis (CM) is a serious problem in breast cancer patients. In patients with CM, quality of life is adversely affected and the survival of patients is reduced. It is also very difficult to manage breast cancer patients with cranial metastases whose life expectancy is generally 1 year or less. There is no case report in the literature of CM with more than 5 years of progression-free survival (PFS) with oncological treatment. I presented a rare case about the widespread CM developed with tamoxifen treatment in an advanced breast cancer patient who completed chemotherapy and radiotherapy after primary surgery. Systemic treatment was started as a combination of capecitabine and lapatinib after whole-brain radiotherapy was applied to the patient with extensive CM. At the end of about 3 years, there is complete response of cranial metastases, and PFS is over 5 years. The treatment was well tolerated, and she is still being followed up in the 74th month of this treatment without recurrence. There are no case reports of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients with such widespread cranial metastases in complete remission at 34 months of systemic therapy and 74 months of PFS. Our article is unique in this respect. It should be kept in mind that it is not appropriate to change the treatment plan of patients with only one case report. Although the options have increased with the use of new generation antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 treatments, lapatinib can be a very effective treatment tool in selected patients.

Clinical diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer with brain metastases and establishment of a prognostic model: a 10-year, single-center, real-world study of 559 cases

Background

This study involved a retrospective analysis of 559 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with brain metastasis (BM). We aimed to establish the effectiveness of different preferred treatment methods and factors affecting overall survival following BM diagnosis (BMOS) and explore the feasibility of systemic treatment for MBC patients with BM.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the efficacy of different preferred treatments and other factors associated with BMOS, and a nomogram was then established based on the results of the univariate analysis.

Results

Patients that initially received systemic drug therapy exhibited a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 43.9% and an intracranial disease control rate (DCR) of 80.6%. The median time between BM diagnosis and the requirement for local intracranial treatment due to worsening disease status was 10.0 months for these patients (95% CI: 7.811–12.189 months). The median follow-up was 28.0 months, and the median BMOS was 16.0 months. Following BM diagnosis, the systemic drug treatment group had a better outcome than the local brain treatment group, with a respective median BMOS of 22.0 and 16.0 months (χ²=7.743, P=0.005). At the time of BM diagnosis, the median BMOS for patients without neurological symptoms diagnosed by regular screen was significantly longer than that of patients with neurological symptoms (18.0 vs. 13.0 months, respectively; χ²=11.371, P=0.001). Based on these analyses, a nomogram was constructed that incorporated disease-free survival (DFS), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), molecular subtype, number of extracranial metastases, BM location, number of BMs, neurological symptoms, and the preferred treatment approach, with a prediction probability (c-index) value of 0.76.

Conclusions

Systemic drug treatment has a beneficial effect on brain lesions, and effective treatment delays the need for local intracranial treatment. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening can detect asymptomatic BM in MBC patients (particularly those with HER2−positive or triple-negative disease), offering these patients an opportunity to undergo systemic drug therapy, thereby prolonging their survival. To our knowledge, this is a well-fitted nomogram including current treatment and medical examination strategies to predict BMOS probability that offers value as an adjunct for the prognostic evaluation of MBC-BM patients.

Epidemiology of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease

Brain metastases affect a significant percentage of patients with advanced extracranial malignancies. Yet, the incidence of brain metastases remains poorly described, largely due to limitations of population-based registries, a lack of mandated reporting of brain metastases to federal agencies, and historical difficulties with delineation of metastatic involvement of individual organs using claims data. However, in 2016, the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program released data relating to the presence vs absence of brain metastases at diagnosis of oncologic disease. In 2020, studies demonstrating the viability of utilizing claims data for identifying the presence of brain metastases, date of diagnosis of intracranial involvement, and initial treatment approach for brain metastases were published, facilitating epidemiologic investigations of brain metastases on a population-based level. Accordingly, in this review, we discuss the incidence, clinical presentation, prognosis, and management patterns of patients with brain metastases. Leptomeningeal disease is also discussed. Considerations regarding individual tumor types that commonly metastasize to the brain are provided.

Low Overall Survival in Women With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: Does This Reflect Tumor Biology or a Lack of Access to Health Care?

PURPOSE

As a result of its epidemiologic and therapeutic aspects, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly relevant clinical condition. This study aimed to estimate overall survival (OS) in women with de novo MBC in a Brazilian population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were identified in the Goiânia population-based cancer registry between 1995 and 2011. All women with metastatic disease at diagnosis were included in the study. OS was analyzed at 5 and 10 years of follow-up. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Over the 16-year period covered by the study, 5,289 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in Goiânia. Of these, 277 women (5.2%) had MBC. OS rates at 5 and 10 years were 19.9% and 7.3%, respectively. The mean OS time of women treated in the public health system was 7.5 months shorter than in women who had private health care (19.7 v 27.2 months, respectively). In the univariable analysis, the following factors were statistically significant for OS: T3/4 staging, histologic grade 3, progesterone receptor status, tumor phenotype, breast surgery, CNS metastasis at initial presentation, and surgery for resection of metastasis. In multivariable analysis, initial CNS metastasis (hazard ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.16 to 8.19) and breast surgery (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78) remained independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

OS was lower than rates found in specialist centers in Brazil and in developed countries. Several intrinsic and extrinsic factors were significant in predicting OS. Despite the difference in the 5-year survival rate, the type of access to health care was not significant in the multivariable analysis of the entire period.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with breast cancer brain oligometastases - molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes

Background

We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC) who had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for a limited number of brain metastases (BM) and to identify factors influencing overall survival (OS) and local control.

Materials and methods

The records of 45 patients who underwent SRS for 72 brain lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Statistics included the chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier method, and the multivariate Cox model.

Results

The median number of treated BM was 2 (range 1-10). Median OS from BM diagnosis and post-SRS were 27.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.8-40.5) and 18.5 months (95% CI: 11.1-25.8), respectively. One-year and two-year survival rates after BM diagnosis were 55% and 41%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the Luminal-B-human-epidermal-growth-receptor-positive (HER2+) subtype had the longest median OS at 39.1 months (95% CI: 34.1-44.1, p = 0.004). In an adjusted analysis, grade 2 [hazard ratio (HR): 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6, p = 0.005), craniotomy (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7; p = 0.006), and ≥ 2 systemic therapies received (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9, p = 0.028) were associated with improved OS. One-year and two-year intracranial progression-free survival rates were 85% and 63%, respectively. Four factors for a higher risk of any intracranial recurrence remained significant in the adjusted analysis, as follows: age < 50 years (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.3-36.3; p = 0.014), grade 3 (HR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1-13.2; p = 0.038), HER2+ (HR: 6.9; 95% CI: 1.3-36.3; p = 0.023), and whether the brain was the first metastatic site (HR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.6-14.5; p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Intrinsic BC characteristics are important determinants for both survival and intracranial control for patients undergoing SRS for oligometastatic brain disease.

Use of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a retrospective 11-year single center study

AIM

To analyse the use of radiotherapy (RT) and factors affecting overall survival (OS) after RT in breast cancer patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients treated from 2008 to 2018 with whole brain RT (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) at a large regional cancer referral center were identified from the hospital's RT register. Clinical variables were extracted from medical records. OS was calculated from date of first RT until death or last follow up. Potential factors affecting OS were analyzed.

RESULTS

255 females with WBRT (n = 206) or SRS (n = 49) as first RT were included. An increased use of initial SRS was observed in the second half of the study period. The most common WBRT fractionation regimen was 3 Gy × 10. SRS was most often single fractions; 18 or 25 Gy between 2009 and 2016, while fractionated SRS was mostly used in 2017 and 2018. Median OS in the WBRT group was 6 months (CI 1-73) relative to 23 (CI 0-78) in the SRS group. Age, performance status, initial RT technique, extracranial disease, brain metastasis surgery, number of brain metastases and DS-GPA score had significant impact on OS. Only ECOG 0 and brain metastasis surgery were associated with superior OS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

WBRT was the most frequent primary RT. An increased use of initial SRS was observed in the second half of the study period. Only ECOG 0 and brain metastasis surgery were associated with superior OS in multivariate analysis.

Endocrine therapy for the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in luminal breast cancer: a comprehensive review

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) represents a devastating complication of advanced breast cancer (ABC), with survival of <5 months with multimodal treatment. The role of endocrine therapy (ET), due to its favorable toxicity profile and first-line indication in luminal ABC, appears promising in the setting of LMD, where symptom stabilization and quality-of-life preservation are the main goals; however, evidenced-based data are lacking. We conducted a thorough review of published evidence, aiming to investigate the role of ET in LMD treatment in luminal ABC. Twenty-one of 342 articles, evaluating 1302 patients, met inclusion criteria. ET use was rarely reported. New targeted agents show CNS activity. Research is lacking on the role of ET and targeted agents in BC-LMD treatment.

Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases from Breast Cancer

The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or brain-tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.

Nanobodies as non-invasive imaging tools

Antibodies and antibody fragments have found wide application for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. Single-domain antibody fragments, also known as ‘heavy-chain variable domains’ or ‘nanobodies’, are a recent addition to the toolbox. Discovered some 30 years ago, nanobodies are the smallest antibody-derived fragments that retain antigen-binding properties. Their small size, stability, specificity, affinity and ease of manufacture make them appealing for use as imaging agents in the laboratory and the clinic. With the recent surge in immunotherapeutics and the success of cancer immunotherapy, it is important to be able to image immune responses and cancer biomarkers non-invasively to allocate resources and guide the best possible treatment of patients with cancer. This article reviews recent advances in the application of nanobodies as cancer imaging agents. While much work has been done in preclinical models, first-in-human applications are beginning to show the value of nanobodies as imaging agents.

•

Imaging is essential to make the right clinical decisions for many diseases, including cancer.

•

Nanobodies have desirable properties as imaging agents, such as high specificity, affinity and a short blood half-life.

•

Several nanobodies have found application in preclinical and clinical studies as imaging agents.