Factors affecting survival and treatment efficacy in breast cancer patients with bone marrow metastasis

Symptomatic bone marrow metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer: a case report and literature review

Bone metastasis is common in breast cancer, but symptomatic bone marrow involvement is exceedingly rare. This report presents a case of a young female patient with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) initially presenting with symptomatic bone marrow metastasis. Upon admission, blood tests revealed severe thrombocytopenia. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed tumor cell infiltration, and immunohistochemistry identified metastatic breast cancer cells. The patient received paclitaxel and eribulin chemotherapy combined with transfusion support, achieving significant symptom control. This rare case highlights the importance of early detection and aggressive management in TNBC with bone marrow metastasis.

Visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer: an old concept with new perspectives

Visceral Crisis (VC) in breast cancer is a critical scenario when the burden of metastatic disease results in rapid deterioration of organ functions. There are no widely accepted objective clinical criteria for the definition of VC, and different studies have reported diverse clinical conditions such as visceral crises. Diagnosis of VC is associated with a dismal prognosis and the management of this condition is currently based on limited retrospective evidence and expert opinions. International guidelines have recommended cytotoxic polychemotherapy in the management of VC, to achieve rapid symptomatic control and preserve organ function. Nevertheless, in the case of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the role of chemotherapy as the treatment of choice for VC has been recently questioned, since endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors yielded similar response rates, with better quality of life. For HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, combined chemotherapy (plus HER2-directed therapy for HER2-positive) remains a standard option for VC, but novel effective drugs such as antibody-drug conjugates are emerging and their role in the VC context shall soon be elucidated. This review aims to critically discuss the definition, prognosis, management, and future directions regarding the visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer.

Mechanism and clinical progression of solid tumors bone marrow metastasis

The rich blood supply of the bone marrow provides favorable conditions for tumor cell proliferation and growth. In the disease's early stages, circulating tumor cells can escape to the bone marrow and form imperceptible micro metastases. These tumor cells may be reactivated to regain the ability to grow aggressively and eventually develop into visible metastases. Symptomatic bone marrow metastases with abnormal hematopoiesis solid tumor metastases are rare and have poor prognoses. Treatment options are carefully chosen because of the suppression of bone marrow function. In this review, we summarized the mechanisms involved in developing bone marrow metastases from tumor cells and the clinical features, treatment options, and prognosis of patients with symptomatic bone marrow metastases from different solid tumors reported in the literature.

Comprehensive review of solid tumor bone marrow metastasis

Bone marrow metastasis (BMM) of solid tumors refers to a group of diseases that originate from non-hematopoietic malignant tumor cells invading the bone marrow (BM) through complex metastatic patterns. If BMM identification is delayed, the disease will rapidly develop into disseminated carcinogenesis of the BM, which manifests as a series of hematological disorders and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, leading to serious life-threatening conditions. Although the study of solid tumor BMM is receiving increasing attention, study remains limited, and most descriptions are derived from case reports. Currently, clinicians have insufficient understanding of BMM, and BMM occurrence is often not recognized early or treated effectively, resulting in high mortality rates. In this article, we review the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of solid tumor BMM.

Symptomatic bone marrow metastases in breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

Breast cancer symptomatic bone marrow metastasis (BMM) is rare and has a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is usually the primary treatment, but it has limited efficacy, resulting in dose reduction and a decrease in quality of life due to the adverse effects of the agent. Other than chemotherapy, there are no other treatment studies for BMM. This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics of BMM patients with breast cancer, the prognosis using different treatment modalities, and the risk factors that affect the prognosis.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with breast cancer BMM from January 2018 to January 2022 in the Cancer Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University. The analysis focused on the characteristics of the patients, the treatment regimen, and the prognosis.

Results

Of 733 patients with advanced breast cancer, 33 patients were identified with BMM. All patients showed a hemoglobin decrease, and 25 (75.75%) presented with a fever of unknown origin. As for the metastasis breast cancer subtype, 25 (75.75%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, three (9.09%) had HER2 overexpression, and five (15.15%) were triple negative. The BMM patients had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 months (1-21 months) and a median overall survival (OS) of 18 months (2-108 months). Among 25 HR⁺/HER2^- BMM patients treated with different modalities, the median OS of the endocrine therapy (ET) group was 23 months, compared with 5 months in the chemotherapy group. Cox proportional hazards models suggested that higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores and old age were associated with shorter survival.

Conclusion

When breast cancer patients present with anemia and fever of unknown origin, BMM should be considered. For HR⁺/HER2^- patients with good physical status and can receive active treatment, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET can be used to control disease progression, improve quality of life, and prolong survival.

Different treatment regimens in breast cancer visceral crisis: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

Breast cancer visceral crisis (VC) is caused by excessive tumor burden leading to severe organ dysfunction with poor prognosis. Traditional chemotherapy reduces the quality of life of patients without significantly improving survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with VC and the prognosis by using different treatment options.

Methods

According to the 5th European School of Oncology (ESO)–European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer guidelines (ABC 5), patients who were treated in the First Hospital of Jilin University from 2018 to 2022 and diagnosed with breast cancer VC were retrospectively analyzed. The analysis focused on the characteristics of the patients, the treatment regimens, and prognosis.

Results

A total of 133 patients were included in this study. As for metastasis breast cancer subtype, 92 (69.18%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative, 20 (15.04%) had HER-2 overexpression, and 21 (15.78%) were triple negative. All patients had an mOS of 11.2 months (range, 1.1–107.8 months). In different types of VC, the median overall survival (mOS) of bone marrow metastasis (BMM) was 18.0 months (range, 2.0–107.8 months), that of diffuse liver metastasis (DLM) was 8.1 months (range, 1.3–30.2 months), and that of meningeal metastasis (MM) was 9.0 months (range, 1.2–53.8 months). In 92 HR+, Her-2− patients using different treatment regimens, mOS was 6.2 months (range, 1.2–29.8 months) in the chemotherapy group while it was 24.3 months (range, 3.1–107.8 months) in the endocrine therapy (ET) group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores and type of VC were associated with survival.

Conclusion

Prognosis varied in different types of VC. Patients with BMM had the best prognosis, and DLM had the worst. As treatment options continue to progress, our retrospective study showed a significant prolongation of overall survival (OS) in patients with VC compared to previous studies.