Imaging and management of fibroepithelial breast lesions on percutaneous core needle biopsy

Stromal Ki67 Expression Might be a Useful Marker for Distinguishing Fibroadenoma From Benign Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast

Background. Fibroadenoma (FA) and benign phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast often have similar appearances on imaging. While an exact diagnosis of biopsy specimens is required to choose adequate treatment, including surgical procedures, it is sometimes difficult to pathologically differentiate these 2 tumors due to histological resemblances. To elucidate markers for distinguishing FA from benign PT, we analyzed clinical samples immunohistochemically. Methods. We retrospectively investigated 80 breast fibroepithelial lesions. As a discovery set, 60 surgical excision samples (30 FA and 30 benign PT) were examined. Twenty biopsy samples (10 FA and 10 benign PT) were examined as a validation set. To determine targets for immunohistochemistry, we first tested some proteins based on previous reports. As a result, Ki67 was chosen for differentiating FA and PT; thus further examinations were conducted with this protein. Results. Among the proteins examined, stromal Ki67 was significantly higher in PT than in FA. Benign PT had significantly higher stromal Ki67 expression both at random and at hotspots (p < .001 and <.001, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 3.5% and 8.5% (at random spots and hotspots, respectively) as the optimal cutoff values of stromal Ki67 for distinguishing between these 2 tumors. In the validation cohort employing needle biopsy specimens, we confirmed that these 2 cutoff values properly classified these 2 tumors (p = .043 and .029, respectively). Conclusion.We revealed that stromal Ki67 might be a potential marker for distinguishing FA from benign PT.

Differential diagnosis of breast mucinous carcinoma with an oval shape from fibroadenoma based on ultrasonographic features

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of breast mucinous carcinomas (MCs) are oval and have the possibility of being misdiagnosed as fibroadenomas (FAs). We aimed to identify the key features that can help differentiate breast MC with an oval shape from FA on ultrasonography (US).

METHODS

Seventy-six MCs from 71 consecutive patients and 50 FAs with an oval shape from 50 consecutive patients were included in our study. All lesions pathologically diagnosed. According to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), first, the ultrasonographic features of the MCs and FAs were recorded and a final category was assessed. Then, the differences in ultrasonographic characteristics between category 4 A (low-risk group) and category 4B-5 (medium-high- risk group) MCs were identified. Finally, other ultrasonographic features of MC and FA both with an oval shape were compared to determine the key factors for differential diagnosis. The Mann-Whitney test, χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare data between groups.

RESULTS

MCs with an oval shape (81.2%) and a circumscribed margin (25%) on US were more commonly assessed in the low-risk group (BI-RADS 4 A) than in the medium-high-risk group (BI-RADS 4B-5) (20%, p < 0.001 and 0%, p = 0.001, respectively). Compared with those with FA, patients with MC were older, and tended to have masses with non-hypoechoic patterns, not circumscribed margins, and a posterior echo enhancement on US (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The oval shape was the main reason for the underestimation of MCs. On US, an oval mass found in the breast of women of older age with non-hypoechoic patterns, not circumscribed margins, and a posterior echo enhancement was associated with an increased risk of being an MC, and should be subjected to active biopsy.

The Genetic Landscape of Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast encompass a broad spectrum of lesions from fibroadenomas and their variants to phyllodes tumors, including their clinical range of benign, borderline, and malignant. Classification of this spectrum of neoplasms has historically and currently been based purely on morphology, although the nomenclature has shifted over the years largely due to the significant histologic overlap that exists primarily within the cellular fibroadenomas to borderline malignant phyllodes tumor categories. A review of the current diagnostic challenge, proposed ancillary studied and their value in prognostic significance, is provided. This article highlights the most recent molecular and genetic findings as well as the limitations of the studies, in the context of practical and available applications for the diagnostician and managerial implications for the clinician.

Imaging and Management of Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) are among the most common breast masses encountered by breast radiologists and pathologists. They encompass a spectrum of benign and malignant lesions, including fibroadenomas (FAs) and phyllodes tumors (PTs). FAs are typically seen in young premenopausal women, with a peak incidence at 20-30 years of age, and have imaging features of oval circumscribed hypoechoic masses. Although some FA variants are especially sensitive to hormonal influences and can exhibit rapid growth (eg, juvenile FA and lactational adenomas), most simple FAs are slow growing and involute after menopause. PTs can be benign, borderline, or malignant and are more common in older women aged 40-50 years. PTs usually manifest as enlarging palpable masses and are associated with a larger size and sometimes with an irregular shape at imaging compared with FAs. Although FA and FA variants are typically managed conservatively unless large and symptomatic, PTs are surgically excised because of the risk of undersampling at percutaneous biopsy and the malignant potential of borderline and malignant PTs. As a result of the overlap in imaging and histologic appearances, FELs can present a diagnostic challenge for the radiologist and pathologist. Radiologists can facilitate accurate diagnosis by supplying adequate tissue sampling and including critical information for the pathologist at the time of biopsy. Understanding the spectrum of FELs can facilitate and guide appropriate radiologic-pathologic correlation and timely diagnosis and management of PTs. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.