1
|
Elalouf A. Infections after organ transplantation and immune response. Transpl Immunol 2023; 77:101798. [PMID: 36731780 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD4+ helper T-cell subset and CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Elalouf
- Bar-Ilan University, Department of Management, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ordaya EE, Shaughnessy M, Elkin B, Husmann RL, Stauffer JC, Luengas EM, Chang BH, Tessier KM, Walker PF, Stauffer WM. Transplantation and immigration: Comparing infectious complications and outcomes between foreign-born and US-born kidney transplant recipients in Minnesota. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14039. [PMID: 36856346 PMCID: PMC10085839 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Foreign-born kidney transplant recipients (FBKTRs) are at increased risk for reactivation of latent infections that may impact outcomes. We aimed to compare the etiology of infections and outcomes between FBKTR and United States KTRs (USKTR). METHODS We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at two transplant centers in Minnesota. Frequency and etiology of infections as well as outcomes (graft function, rejection, and patient survival) at 1-year post-transplant between FBKTR and USKTR were compared. RESULTS Of the 573 transplant recipients, 124 (21.6%) were foreign-born and 449 (78.4%) US-born. At least one infection occurred in 411 (71.7%) patients (38.2% bacterial, 55% viral, 9.4% fungal). Viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, particularly BK viremia (38.7% vs. 21.2%, p < .001). No statistical differences were found for bacterial or fungal infections; no parasitic infections were identified in either group. No geographically-restricted infections were noted aside from a single case of Madura foot in a FBKTR. Rejection episodes were more common in USKTR (p = .037), but stable/improving graft function (p = .976) and mortality (p = .451) at 1-year posttransplantation were similar in both groups. After adjusting for covariates, previous transplantation was associated with a higher number of infections (IRR 1.35, 95% confidence intervals 1.05-1.73, p = .020). CONCLUSION Although viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, overall frequency and etiology of most infections and outcomes were similar between FBKTR and USKTR suggesting that comprehensive transplant care is providing timely prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of latent infections in FBKTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloy E. Ordaya
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Megan Shaughnessy
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin HealthCare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Baila Elkin
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rachel L. Husmann
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin HealthCare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jacob C. Stauffer
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Bickey H. Chang
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Katelyn M. Tessier
- Masonic Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Patricia F. Walker
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - William M. Stauffer
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Human Migration and Health, Center for Global Health and Social Responsibility, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agrawal A, Ison MG, Danziger-Isakov L. Long-Term Infectious Complications of Kidney Transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:286-295. [PMID: 33879502 PMCID: PMC8823942 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.15971020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Infections remain a common complication of solid-organ transplantation. Most infections in the first month after transplant are typically health care-associated infections, whereas late infections, beyond 6-12 months, are community-acquired infections. Opportunistic infections most frequently present in the first 12 months post-transplant and can be modulated on prior exposures and use of prophylaxis. In this review, we summarize the current epidemiology of postkidney transplant infections with a focus on key viral (BK polyomavirus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and norovirus), bacterial (urinary tract infections and Clostridioides difficile colitis), and fungal infections. Current guidelines for safe living post-transplant are also summarized. Literature supporting prophylaxis and vaccination is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akansha Agrawal
- Division of Nephrology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael G. Ison
- Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|