Incidence of cervical intraepithelial lesions and human papilloma virus infection in female renal transplant recipients

Prevalence of cervical human papillomavirus in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the prevalence of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and, furthermore to compare it to that in immunocompetent controls.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to February 2023, to identify studies investigating the prevalence of cervical hrHPV in KTRs. Pooled cervical hrHPV prevalences, odds ratios (ORs) comparing KTRs to controls and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random effects logistic regression models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed through the I2 statistic, and the significance was evaluated by the Cochrane's Q test.

RESULTS

Altogether, 16 studies covering >1200 KTRs were included. The prevalence of cervical hrHPV in KTRs was 27.7% (95% CI 21.3-35.1) with substantial interstudy heterogeneity. Stratification indicated a higher prevalence in recent years (2019-2023) and in Asia (39% (95% CI 11.2-61.4)). The prevalence of HPV16 and HPV18 in KTRs was 8.0% (95% CI 3.9-15.9) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.8-3.7), respectively. Comparing hrHPV prevalence in KTRs and controls based on six studies including >500 KTRs and 1000 controls, the OR for hrHPV was 2.0 (95% CI 1.1-3.6).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis establishes an increased cervical hrHPV prevalence in KTRs compared to controls. The increased risk may be associated with immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of HPV vaccination, including potential revaccination strategies in KTRs.

Incidence and clearance of cervical and anal high-risk human papillomavirus in kidney transplant recipients: Results from a Danish prospective clinical study

This study investigates the incidence and clearance of cervical and anal high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to immunocompetent controls. During 2016-2017, we enrolled 125 female KTRs and 125 female controls. Liquid-based cervical and anal cytology samples collected at enrollment and follow-up were tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA using the CLART HPV2 test. All participants answered a questionnaire on lifestyle and sexual behavior at both examinations. KTRs had an increased age-adjusted risk of incident cervical hrHPV infection compared to controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.2-11.2). Probability of cervical hrHPV clearance at 18 months was lower among KTRs (8.3%) than controls (66.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in anal hrHPV incidence between KTRs and controls (HR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.4-2.0). Clearance of anal hrHPV was similar between KTRs and controls at 18 months. During the total follow-up, a lower anal hrHPV clearance, although not statistically significant, was observed among KTRs (HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.06-1.2). KTRs had higher incidence of cervical hrHPV and lower probability of clearance, especially of cervical hrHPV infections, than controls. Our findings support that KTRs are at increased risk of HPV infection and point to the need for targeted HPV prevention strategies, such as cervical cancer screening.

Anogenital distribution of mucosal HPV in males and females before and after renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppressive drugs taken by transplant recipients may favor HPV infection at anogenital sites. HPV-type prevalence was studied in males and females before and after renal transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Anal, cervical and penile samples were taken from 62 patients before transplantation and from 41 patients after transplantation. HPV DNA was investigated using the INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping extra test and HPV-type distribution determined.

RESULTS

Before transplantation, up to 30% of analyzed samples harbored HPV DNA, with the highest prevalence found in cervical specimens (60%). After transplantation, a trend toward HPV clearance was observed in females. By contrast, a trend toward incident infections by a wide variety of HPV genotypes at the penis and anal level was documented in men.

CONCLUSION

High prevalence of HPV at anogenital sites was documented before and after renal transplantation. Immunosuppressive drugs taken after transplantation may impact HPV acquisition or reactivation, especially in males. Special attention should be paid in view of preventing HPV-associated diseases in this vulnerable population.

Risk of human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial lesions in Chinese renal transplant recipients

Objective

While human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in women is associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer, HPV testing is not often performed in routine practice for renal transplantation patients. The genotype-specific prevalence of HPV and risk factors for HPV infection are still unclear.

Methods

From 2010 to 2020, patients receiving renal transplantation surgery (referred to as RTRs), who had been screened for HPV infection one year after transplantation were enrolled. A comparison cohort of four age- and marital status-matched healthy individuals was selected for RTRs. The clinical characteristics and cervical screening results of RTRs were analyzed.

Results

Our study included 196 female renal transplant recipients (RTRs), none of whom had been vaccinated against HPV. Overall high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection and abnormal cytology rates in the RTR group were 23.5% and 20.9%, respectively. The odds ratios of hrHPV infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ in RTRs vs. non-RTRs were 3.033 (95% CI, 2.013-4.568) and 3.628 (95% CI, 1.863-7.067), respectively. The prevalence of HPV16 in RTRs was much higher (30.4% vs. 8.3%, P=0.002). The multi-infection rate was much higher in HPV-infected RTRs (23.9% vs. 1.14%, P<0.001). The only risk factor for hrHPV infection was the duration of immunosuppression, which increased with time.

Conclusion

RTRs had significantly higher HPV infection rates and increased risks of HPV-related cervical premalignancies and cancers due to the immunosuppressed state. The duration of immunosuppression is a risk factor for transplant recipients. Female RTRs may benefit from more frequent cervical cancer screening after renal transplantation than healthy women. Prospective research on HPV infection dynamics in RTRs and optimal screening methods should be further explored in the future.

A Six-Year Gynecological Follow-Up of Immunosuppressed Women with a High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection

Immunocompromised women are at an increased risk of developing malignancies, especially those that are viral-induced, such as invasive cervical cancer caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). The aim of the study was to describe gynecological follow-up of women undergoing chronic immunosuppressive therapy for various reasons (e.g., kidney/liver transplant, systemic lupus erythematosus), diagnosed with a high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection based on a self-sampling test. Twenty-six hrHPV-positive women were invited to take part in a gynecological follow-up, including a visual assessment of the anogenital region, two-handed gynecological examination, and cervical cytology as well as a colposcopy and cervical biopsy when necessary. Four women declined taking part in the study. Over six years of observation, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) were detected at least once in 7/22 women (31.8%), and a cervical intraepithelial lesion 1 (CIN 1) histopathologic result was obtained five times in 3/22 women. No cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, CIN 2/3, or invasive cervical cancers were observed. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) was performed in three patients. As immunocompromised women are prone to persistent hrHPV infections, they should be under strict gynecological supervision because only vigilant surveillance enables fast detection and treatment of early dysplasia and, therefore, provides a chance for the reduction of the cervical cancer burden.