Perioperative blood ordering optimization process using information from an anesthesia information management system

Efficiency of Blood Utilization in Elective Oncosurgeries in a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre: A Case for Data Disaggregation

Oncosurgeries based on radical resection significantly increase the chances of intraoperative blood transfusion which leads to blood requisition based on subjective anticipation. Periodic audit and revisiting practice based on disaggregating data on the basis of surgical region could preserve blood, which is a scarce resource globally. This report proposes to use the results for reviewing the existing blood ordering schedule, in addition to proposing wider adoption in other cancer institutes using this report as a template. A retrospective analysis was performed for the entire patient cohort who underwent elective oncosurgeries between January 1, 2020, and January 31, 2021, and for whom blood reservation was done. Number of blood units cross matched and transfused for each patient for each surgery was noted. Efficiency of blood utilization was calculated using cross match transfusion ratio (CTR), transfusion probability (TP), and transfusion index (TI) indices and, finally, maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) was computed. Out of 718 elective oncosurgeries performed, blood requisition of 710 units was made for 345 procedures. Of the total units cross matched, only 76 units (10.70%) were transfused, leaving 89.29% units unutilized. Overall, CTR, TP, and TI were 9.34, 11.59%, and 0.22, respectively. Head and neck surgeries had the highest number of patients cross matched as well as units reserved, but not transfused. Conversely, abdominal surgeries had the highest transfusion probability. There is inefficient blood utilization in elective oncosurgeries and we recommend implementation of MSBOS based on anatomic region to improve efficiency of blood utilization.

Image Data Security Mechanism Based on the Internet of Things Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Information Management System Research and Design

With the development of science and technology, more and more operations are performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. During such operations, a lot of relevant imaging data need to be retained. These imaging data can be used for clinical and scientific research and teaching applications, but imaging data security has also become an increasingly important issue. This article is based on the Internet of Things cardiac catheterization laboratory information management system image data security mechanism system research. First of all, this article adopts the literature method to study the application research of the Internet of Things technology in the medical field, as well as the relevant medical imaging data security technology methods. Then, the medical image data security mechanism was designed, and the image data security model of the cardiac catheterization laboratory information management system based on the Internet of Things was established. Finally, the application of decentralized management of the Internet of Things RFID technology on medical equipment and the security of the application of this technology on medical imaging data are analyzed, and finally a conclusion is drawn. The image data security mechanism established in this article is based on the Internet of Things technology. The security rate of image information data reaches more than 95%, the information data security level reaches level 1, and the average data missing rate is only 4.7%. It is a brand-new breakthrough, hoping to further improve the efficiency of hospital information management and protect the safety of medical information.

Routine Type and Screens Are Unnecessary for Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties at an Academic Hospital

Background

Despite decreasing transfusion rates, routine type and screens are frequently used before primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aims of this study were to characterize transfusion rates and identify any factors that affect the likelihood of transfusion to determine if it is safe to discontinue routine preoperative type and screens at an academic hospital.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent primary THA or TKA in 2019 at an academic institution by a fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon. Data on preoperative type and screens, transfusion rates, bleeding disorders, and anticoagulation status were obtained. Patients were considered to have a preoperative type and screen if it was performed within 30 days before surgery.

Results

Overall, 379 patients were included in the study. Of these, 210 underwent primary THA and 169 underwent primary TKA. Four patients received transfusions during their hospitalization for a cumulative transfusion rate of 1.06%. No patients received an intraoperative transfusion. One (0.59%) patient received a postoperative transfusion after TKA, and 3 (1.43%) patients received a postoperative transfusion after THA. The mean preoperative hemoglobin of the 4 transfused patients was 10.8 g/dL.

Conclusions

In summary, performing a preoperative routine type and screen is likely unnecessary at academic medical centers. Consideration for obtaining a type and screen may include complex primary surgeries or when patients have preoperative hemoglobin of less than 11 g/dL. Ultimately, preoperative type and screen should be considered on a case-by-case basis using clinical judgment.

Preoperative Type and Screen is Unnecessary in Elective Anatomic Lung Resection and Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Preoperative type and screen (TS) is routinely performed before elective thoracic surgery. We sought to evaluate the utility of this practice by examining our institutional data related to intraoperative and postoperative transfusions for two common, complex procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of a prospective thoracic surgery database was performed. Patients who underwent consecutive elective anatomic lung resection (ALR) and esophagectomy from January 2015 to April 2018 were included. Perioperative characteristics between patients who received transfusion of packed red blood cells and those who did not were compared. The rates of emergent and nonemergent transfusions were evaluated. Cost data were derived from institutional charges and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedules.

RESULTS

Of 370 patients, 16 (4.3%) received a transfusion and four (1.1%) were deemed emergent by the surgeons and 0 (0%) by blood bank criteria. For ALR (n = 321), 13 (4.0%) received a transfusion, and four (1.2%) were emergent. For esophagectomies (n = 49), three (6.1%) received a transfusion, and none were emergent. Patients who underwent ALR requiring a transfusion had a lower preoperative hemoglobin (11.7 versus 13.4 gm/dL, P = 0.001), higher estimated blood loss (1325 versus 196 mL, P < 0.001), and longer operative time (291 versus 217 min, P = 0.003) than nontransfused patients. Based on current volumes, eliminating TS in these patients would save at least an estimated $60,100 per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent transfusion in ALR and esophagectomy is rare. Routine preoperative TS is most likely unnecessary for these cases. These results will be used in a quality improvement initiative to change practice at our institution.

In the Era of Tranexamic Acid, are Type and Screens for Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Obsolete?

BACKGROUND

Advances in technique and perioperative blood management have improved transfusion rates following unilateral primary total joint arthroplasty and led some centers to change their preoperative blood ordering protocols. The purpose of this study is to determine whether deleting type and screens (T&S) from preoperative order sets was safe for patients undergoing primary total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to identify patients who required allogenic blood transfusion.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were reviewed to identify any patient with a hemoglobin (Hgb) drawn within 30 days of surgery who received a transfusion following a unilateral primary TKA or THA.

RESULTS

A total of 1255 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the total, 682 (54%) were TKAs and 573 (46%) were THAs. The mean preoperative Hgb was 11.5 g/dL with an average delta Hgb of 3.6 g/dL on postoperative day 1. No patient required an intraoperative transfusion. Fourteen patients (mean age and body mass index, 67.9 and 29.0) required a transfusion (1.1%) for postoperative blood loss anemia. Of those transfused, 13 (93%) of the patients underwent THA with the mean estimated blood loss of 378.6 mL. The total cost for a patient obtaining a T&S is $191.27.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the risk of blood transfusion was rare (1.1%) and occurred only secondary to postoperative blood loss anemia. There were no cases of intraoperative complication requiring urgent or emergent blood transfusion. Removing T&S from standard order sets for patients undergoing primary TKA or THA appears to be a safe and cost-effective practice.

Preoperative Assessment of Older Adults

Older patients undergoing surgery have reduced physiologic reserve caused by the combined impact of physiologic age-related changes and the increased burden of comorbid conditions. The preoperative assessment of older patients is directed at evaluating the patient's functional reserve and identifying opportunities to minimize any potential for complications. In addition to a standard preoperative evaluation that includes cardiac risk and a systematic review of systems, the evaluation should be supplemented with a review of geriatric syndromes. Age-based laboratory testing protocols can lead to unnecessary testing, and all testing should be requested if indicated by underlying disease and surgical risk.

BLOOD ORDERS AND PREDICTORS FOR HEMOTRANSFUSION IN ELECTIVE FEMUR FRACTURE REPAIR SURGERY

ABSTRACT Objective: to estimate the incidence of red blood cell concentrate orders in elective femur fracture repair surgeries and to identify predictors for hemotranfusion. Method: retrospective cohort study conducted with 271 patients submitted to femur fracture repair surgery between July 2013 and July 2016. Surgical and transfusion data were obtained from patient charts and the Transfusion Management System. Association between sociodemographic and clinical variables related to the surgical procedure and the occurrence of red blood cell concentrate transfusion was analyzed using descriptive statistics, the chi-squared test, relative risk, and odds ratio. Multivariate analysis was performed using binomial logistic regression. Results: the incidence of blood orders for patients undergoing femur fracture repair surgery was 87%. Ninety-one (33.6%) patients received red blood cell concentrate transfusions. Even though placing blood orders is recommended, given the possibility of intra- or postoperative transfusions, only 52 (47.2%) blood transfusions occurred in the preoperative period. The variables female sex, low preoperative hemoglobin levels and procedure lasting longer than 120 minutes presented statistical significance (p<0.05) and were considered predictors for hemototransfusion. Conclusion: Perioperative nursing must be aware of the importance of blood orders for all patients undergoing femur fracture repair surgery, including in the preoperative period, with special attention to patients who are female, previously anemic and submitted to long-lasting procedures.

"It's a precious gift, not to waste": is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures

Background

Orthopedic surgeries are usually associated with excessive blood loss which leads surgeons to overestimate need for blood transfusions and over ordering of blood. The cross matched blood, when not used, leads to the wastage of blood bank resources in terms of time, money and manpower. The objective of this study was to investigate the compliance to previously proposed MSBOS and to provide updated recommendations for all orthopedic procedures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted between 1st June 2015 and 31st May 2016. Patients admitted to the orthopedic surgery service for whom blood products were requested were included. Cross Match/Transfusion (CT) Ratio, Transfusion Index and Transfusion Probability were calculated. Values of < 2.5, > 0.5 and > 30% respectively, were taken as standards. Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS) was proposed based upon these calculations using Mead’s criteria.

Results

Six hundred and ninety-nine patients were sampled after implementing exclusion criteria. The overall CT ratio was 4.87, transfusion index was 0.55 and transfusion probability was 25%. A compliance rate of 24.6% was observed with the reference CT ratio of 2.5. Highest CT ratio was calculated for arthroscopic procedures while tumor resection had the lowest ratio. Age, procedure performed, ASA status and use of tourniquet were found to be significantly associated with CT ratio being greater or less than 2.5.

Conclusion

Results showed significant wastage of blood products and non-compliance with blood ordering guidelines. Hence there is need for large scale prospective studies to establish MSBOS and ensure its compliance.

Improved Cost-Effectiveness and Blood Product Utilization From Instituting a Blood Ordering Algorithm for Cardiac Surgical Cases

BACKGROUND

Results of a previous study revealed an over-ordering of blood products for cardiac surgery and led to the creation of a new blood ordering algorithm. This follow-up study has been conducted to evaluate improvement in ordering practices.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected for 171 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery from March 2015 to March 2016 to determine the crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio (C:tx) and potential cost savings. Results were compared with pre-algorithm values and considered statistically significant if the 95% confidence interval did not include zero.

RESULTS

Prior to the algorithm, 100% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery were crossmatched. After instituting the algorithm, this decreased to 15%. The overall C:tx decreased from 7.97 to 2.14. Cost savings were calculated as $114.79 (coronary artery bypass grafting) and $129.05 (valve surgery) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of a new algorithm to guide ordering practices has significantly improved the C:tx, reduced unnecessary crossmatching, and lowered costs.

National and International Guidelines for Patient Blood Management in Obstetrics: A Qualitative Review

In developed countries, rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) requiring transfusion have been increasing. As a result, anesthesiologists are being increasingly called upon to assist with the management of patients with severe PPH. First responders, including anesthesiologists, may adopt Patient Blood Management (PBM) recommendations of national societies or other agencies. However, it is unclear whether national and international obstetric societies' PPH guidelines account for contemporary PBM practices. We performed a qualitative review of PBM recommendations published by the following national obstetric societies and international groups: the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, United Kingdom; The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada; an interdisciplinary group of experts from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, an international multidisciplinary consensus group, and the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. We also reviewed a PPH bundle, published by The National Partnership for Maternal Safety. On the basis of our review, we identified important differences in national and international societies' recommendations for transfusion and PBM. In the light of PBM advances in the nonobstetric setting, obstetric societies should determine the applicability of these recommendations in the obstetric setting. Partnerships among medical, obstetric, and anesthetic societies may also help standardize transfusion and PBM guidelines in obstetrics.