Additional intraarticular tranexamic acid further reduced postoperative blood loss compared to intravenous and topical bathed tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective sequential series study

The effect of multiple-dose oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing postoperative blood loss and transfusion rate after adolescent scoliosis surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and has been proved to be efficacious in reducing intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and the transfusion rate. However, the routine TXA regimen was intraoperative administration alone, in which the concentration of TXA could not cover the whole process of hyperfibrinolysis. And, its ability to control the massive postoperative blood loss (PBL) may be insufficient. Thus, we promoted a multiple-dose regimen of TXA for patients with AIS who underwent surgical correction.

PURPOSE

The primary aims were (1) to determine whether the multiple-dose regimen of TXA could reduce PBL and the postoperative transfusion rate, and (2) to compare the efficacy of oral administration with intravenous administration. The secondary aims were (3) to evaluate whether this regimen could alleviate inflammatory response, and (4) to assess the occurrence of drug-related side effects.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 108 patients with AIS who underwent posterior scoliosis correction and spinal fusion (PSS) were enrolled in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary parameters were PBL and postoperative transfusion rate. Other parameters such as total blood loss (TBL), maximum hemoglobin (Hb) decrease, volume of drainage, inflammation markers (interleukin-6 [IL-6] and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and occurrence of complications were also collected and compared. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the variables that affected PBL.

METHODS

Patients were randomized into three groups. All patients received intravenous TXA 50 mg/kg loading dose and 10 mg/kg/h maintenance dose during surgery. Group A received 1 g oral TXA at 4 hours, 10 hours, and 16 hours postoperatively; group B received 0.5 g intravenous TXA at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 18 hours postoperatively; group C received placebo.

RESULTS

The mean PBL and postoperative transfusion rate in group A (957.8±378.9 mL, 13.89%) and B (980.3±491.8 mL, 11.11%) were significantly lower than those in group C [1,495.9±449.6 mL, mean differences=538.1 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI), 290.1-786.1 mL, p<0.001; 515.6 mL, 95% CI, 267.6-763.6 mL, p<.001]; (36.11%, p=.029, p=.013). Meanwhile, the mean TBL, maximum Hb decrease, and volume of drainage were also significantly lower in group A and B than in group C. IL-6 and CRP in group A and B were significantly lower than in group C from postoperative days 1 to 3. All these differences were not significant between groups A and B. No drug-related complications were observed in any patient. Multiple regression showed that the application of postoperative TXA and number of screws were significant parameters affecting PBL.

CONCLUSIONS

A multiple-dose regimen of TXA, either by oral or intravenous application, could be a safe and effective means of controlling PBL and decreasing the postoperative transfusion rate in patients with AIS who underwent scoliosis surgery. In addition, it could inhibit postoperative inflammatory response.

[Analysis of hemostatic effect and safety of tranexamic acid in primary simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty]

Objective

To explore the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on the transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, and postoperative complications in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA).

Methods

A clinical data of 72 patients who underwent the primary SBTHA between January 2010 and December 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. A single dose of 15 mg/kg TXA was administered intravenously before 5-10 minutes of operation in 48 patients of trial group and 24 patients were not treated with TXA in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in the gender, age, body mass index, the type of disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading, comorbidity, and preoperative hospital stay, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, coagulation function tests. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, complication, and hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The median operation time of the trial group was 208.0 minutes, and that of the control group was 202.5 minutes, with no significant difference ( Z=-1.046, P=0.295). Postoperative transfusion was performed in 26 patients (54.2%) in the trial group and 21 patients (87.5%) in the control group, and the difference of transfusion rate between the two groups was significant ( χ ² =7.843, P=0.005). However, there was no significant difference in the amount of transfused suspended red blood cells and plasma between the two groups ( P>0.05). The median intraoperative blood loss was 550 mL in the trial group and 600 mL in the control group, with no significant difference ( Z=-1.378, P=0.168). The postoperative drainage volume and median dominant blood loss in the trial group were (542±269) and 1 050 mL, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(710±316) and 1 270 mL] ( P<0.05). There was 1 case of skin tension blisters around the incision, 1 case of lower limb numbness and muscle strength loss, and 1 case of lacunar cerebral infarction in the trial group, while in the control group, there was 1 case of skin ecchymosis around the incision and 1 case of bilateral lower limb numbness and muscle strength loss, which showed no significant difference in the incidences of complications ( P>0.05). No pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis was found in the two groups. The median postoperative hospital stay and median total hospital stay were 9.0 and 13.0 days in the trial group, while 9.0 and 13.0 days in the control group, respectively, with no significant difference ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

For patients who are treated with the primary SBTHA, TXA can reduce transfusion rate and perioperative dominant blood loss, and has a good hemostatic effect without increasing complications of incision, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and hospital stay. Therefore, TXA is relative safe.

Optimal route for administering tranexamic acid in primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty: Results from a multicenter cohort study

AIM

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different tranexamic acid (TXA) routes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We collected data from the National Health Database on patients registered from January 2013 to September 2017. The patients were divided based on TXA administration route into a control group (without TXA), intravenous group, topical group and combined group. The primary outcome was transfusion; secondary outcomes were total blood loss, haemoglobin level, decrease in haemoglobin on postoperative day 3, and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 7667 primary THA, 4662 with TXA and 3005 without TXA. The transfusion rate was 28.7% in the control group, 12.7% in the topical group, 8.9% in the intravenous group, and 6.1% in the combined group, and the inter-group differences were significant (P < .01). The combined group showed significantly smaller total blood loss (1.23 ± 0.52 L), smaller reduction in haemoglobin level (26.5 ± 11.1 g/L) and higher haemoglobin level on postoperative day 3 (107.0 ± 15.5 g/L) than the other three groups (P < .05). The three TXA groups showed significantly lower incidence of deep vein thrombosis than the control group (0.08% vs 0.47%, P = .001) as well as a lower rate of other complications (0.34% vs 0.67%, P = .044).

CONCLUSION

TXA is effective and safe to decrease blood loss and transfusion following primary THA, regardless of whether it is administered intravenously, topically or both. Intravenous or combined routes may produce better haemostatic effects, so they may be suggested in the absence of contraindications.

Combined intravenous and intra-articular tranexamic acid administration in total knee arthroplasty for preventing blood loss and hyperfibrinolysis: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure to replace the weight-bearing surfaces of the knee joint to relieve pain and disability. However, blood loss and fibrinolytic activity, accounting for a poor prognosis following TKA operation, were relieved by fibrinolytic inhibitor tranexamic acid (TXA). For a better application of TXA function, we explored the effect of intravenous injection (IV) of TXA combined with intra-articular injection (IA) of TXA in patients after TKA.

METHODS

Patients admitted from Weifang People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 who received TKA were injected with 20 mg/kg TXA by IV before TKA (n = 50), 3.0 g TXA by IA after TKA (n = 50), or combination of 20 mg/kg TXA by IV before TKA and 3.0 g TXA by IA after TKA (n = 50). Knee function was assessed using HSS, KSS, NASS, and ROM. In addition, the total blood loss (TBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, fibrinolytic activity, as well as incidence of thromboembolism were measured. The patients were followed up for 6 months. The deadline for follow-up was June 2017 and the incidence of thromboembolism events within 6 months after operation was counted.

RESULTS

HSS, KSS, NASS scores, and ROM were elevated after patients receiving TKA. Patients received IV plus IA TXA has decreased TBL, HBL, and maximum Hb drop than those received IV TXA-alone and IA TXA-alone, with reductions in FDP and D-dimer, indicating that IV plus IA TXA injection is superior to prevent blood loss and hyperfibrinolysis during TKA. Age, sex, type of femoral prosthesis, and the injection method of TXA were risk factors for HBL of patients after receiving TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

The aforementioned results demonstrate that TKA is an effective surgery, and IV plus IA TXA injection functions more effectively in reducing blood loss and fibrinolytic activity in patients, which is a clinical factor of occult hemorrhage.

Application of tranexamic acid and diluted epinephrine in primary total hip arthroplasty

: Tranexamic acid (TXA) and diluted epinephrine (DEP) has been reported to be an efficient and well tolerated way for reducing blood loss in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This meta-analysis was designed to compare the effectiveness of combination application of TXA with DEP in primary THA. The following electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Google Search Engine, for published studies involving the TXA with DEP in primary THA. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Statistical analysis was assessed using RevMan 5.3 software. Five independent RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 496 patients. The application of TXA with DEP can significantly reduce total blood loss (mean difference, 246.13; 95% CI, -369.95 to -122.32; P < 0.0001), hidden blood loss (mean difference, 299.98; 95% CI -433.61 to -166.35; P < 0.0001) and transfusion requirements (risk ratio, 0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.90; P = 0.02) compared with the TXA alone. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.46), drainage volume (P = 0.61), length of stay (P = 0.53) and the rate of DVT (P = 0.56) between the two groups. On the basis of current evidence, this meta-analysis showed that the application TXA with DEP is a well tolerated and efficacious treatment to reduce total blood loss, hidden blood loss and transfusion requirements in primary THA, without increasing the risk of DVT in primary THA.