A rationale for universal tranexamic acid in major joint arthroplasty: overall efficacy and impact of risk factors for transfusion

Tranexamic acid - a promising hemostatic agent with limitations: a narrative review

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic antifibrinolytic agent that has been used for several decades to reduce blood loss during surgery and after trauma. TXA was traditionally used to reduce bleeding in various clinical settings such as menorrhagia, hemophilia, or other bleeding disorder. Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusions. Interest in the potential applications of TXA beyond its traditional use has been growing recently, with studies investigating the use of TXA in postpartum hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, neurosurgery, and orthopedic surgery. Despite its widespread use and expanding indications, data regarding the safe and appropriate use of TXA is lacking. Recent clinical trials have found various potential risks and limitations in the long-term benefits of TXA. This narrative review summarizes the clinical applications and limitations of TXA.

Oral as compared to intravenous tranexamic acid to limit peri-operative blood loss associated with primary total hip arthroplasty: A randomised noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Oral as compared to intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) is an attractive option, in terms of cost and safety, to reduce blood loss and transfusion in total hip arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria applied in the most recent randomised trials may have limited the generalisability of oral tranexamic acid in this indication. Larger and more inclusive studies are needed to definitively establish oral administration as a credible alternative to intravenous administration.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the noninferiority of oral to intravenous TXA at reducing intra-operative and postoperative total blood loss (TBL) in primary posterolateral approached total hip arthroplasty (PLTHA).

DESIGN

Noninferiority, single centre, randomised, double-blind controlled study.

SETTING

Patients scheduled for primary PLTHA. Data acquisition occurred between May 2021 and November 2022 at the University Hospital of Liège, Belgium.

PATIENTS

Two hundred and twenty-eight patients, randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio from a computer-generated list, completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of 2 g of oral TXA 2 h before total hip arthroplasty and 4 h after incision (Group oral) was compared to the intravenous administration of 1 g of TXA 30 min before surgery and 4 h after incision (Group i.v.).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

TBL (measured intra-operative and drainage blood loss up to 48 h after surgery, primary outcome), decrease in haemoglobin concentration, D-Dimer at day 1 and day 3, transfusion rate (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Analyses were performed on 108 out of 114 participants (Group i.v.) and 104 out of 114 participants (Group oral). Group oral was noninferior to Group i.v. with regard to TBL, with a difference between medians (95% CI) of 35 ml (-103.77 to 33.77) within the noninferiority margins. Median [IQR] of estimated TBL was 480 ml [350 to 565] and 445 ml [323 to 558], respectively. No significant interaction between group and time was observed regarding the evolution of TBL and haemoglobin over time.

CONCLUSIONS

TXA as an oral premedication before PLTHA is noninferior to its intravenous administration regarding peri-operative TBL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

European Clinical Trial Register under EudraCT-number 2020-004167-29 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-004167-29/BE ).

Ferric derisomaltose and tranexamic acid, combined or alone, for reducing blood transfusion in patients with hip fracture (the HiFIT trial): a multicentre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anaemia and blood transfusion are associated with poor outcomes after hip fracture. We evaluated the efficacy of intravenous iron and tranexamic acid in reducing blood transfusions after hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial, we recruited adults hospitalised for hip fractures in 12 medical centres in France who had preoperative haemoglobin concentrations between 9·5 and 13·0 g/dL. We randomly allocated participants (1:1:1:1), via a secure web-based service, to ferric derisomaltose (20 mg/kg intravenously) and tranexamic acid (1 g bolus followed by 1 g over 8 h intravenously at inclusion and 3 g topically during surgery), iron plus placebo (normal saline), tranexamic acid plus placebo, or double placebo. Unmasked nurses administered study drugs; participants and other clinical and research staff remained masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients transfused during hospitalisation (or by day 30). The primary analysis included all randomised patients. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02972294) and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Of 413 patients (51-104 years old, median [IQR] 86 [78-91], 312 [76%] women, 101 [24%] men), 104 received iron plus tranexamic acid, 103 iron plus placebo, 103 tranexamic acid plus placebo, and 103 double placebo between March 31, 2017 and June 18, 2021 (study stopped early for efficacy after the planned interim analysis done on the first 390 patients included on May 25, 2021). Data for the primary outcome were available for all participants. Among patients on double placebo, 31 (30%) were transfused versus 16 (15%) on both drugs (relative risk 0·51 [98·3% CI 0·27-0·97]; p=0·012). 27 (26%) participants on iron (0·81 [0·50-1·29]; p=0·28) and 28 (27%) on tranexamic acid (0·85 [0·54-1·33]; p=0·39) were transfused. 487 adverse events were reported with similar event rates among the groups; among prespecified safety endpoints, severe postoperative anaemia (haemoglobin <8 g/dL) was more frequent in the double placebo group. Main common adverse event were sepsis, pneumonia, and urinary infection, with similar rates among all groups.

INTERPRETATION

In patients hospitalised for hip fracture surgery with a haemoglobin concentration 9·5-13·0 g/dL, preoperative infusion of ferric derisomaltose plus tranexamic acid reduced the risk of blood transfusion by 50%. Our results suggest that combining treatments from two different pillars improves patient blood-management programmes. Either treatment alone did not reduce transfusion rates, but we might not have had the power to detect it.

FUNDING

French Ministry of Health, HiFIT trial.

ONTraC: A 20-Year History of a Successfully Coordinated Provincewide Patient Blood Management Program: Lessons Learned and Goals Achieved

Our understanding of the risks associated with perioperative anemia and transfusion, in terms of increased morbidity and mortality, has evolved over the past 2 decades. By contrast, our understanding of the potential mechanisms of injury and optimal treatment strategies remains incomplete. As such, the important role of effective patient blood management (PBM) programs, which address both the effective treatment of anemia and minimizes the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, is of central importance to optimizing patient care and improving patient outcomes. We report on important clinical outcomes of the Ontario Transfusion Coordinator (ONTraC Program), a network of 25 hospital sites, working in coordination over the past 20 years. Transfusion nurse coordinators were assigned to apply multimodal best practice in PBM (including recommended changes in surgical approach; diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of anemia; and adherence to more restrictive RBC transfusion thresholds). Data were collected on various clinical parameters. We further described lessons learned and difficulties encountered in this multisite PBM initiative. A significant reduction in RBC transfusions was observed for numerous indexed surgeries. For example, RBC transfusion rates for knee arthroplasty decreased from 25% in 2002 to 0.4% in 2020. For coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, transfusion rates decreased from 60% in 2002 to 27% in 2020. We also observed a decrease in RBC units utilized per transfused patient for knee (2.1 ± 0.5 [2002] vs 1.0 ± 0.6 [2020] units per patient) and CABG surgery (3.3 ± 0.6 [2002] vs 2.3 ± 1.9 [2020] units per patient). These reductions were associated with favorable clinical outcomes, including reduced length of hospital stay (P = .00003) and a reduced rate of perioperative infections (P < .001) for nontransfused versus transfused patients. These advances have been achieved with estimated savings in the tens of millions of dollars annually. Our experience and data support the hypothesis that instituting an integrated network of transfusion nurse coordinators can provide an effective provincewide PBM program, reduce RBC transfusions, improve some patient outcomes, and reduce health care costs, as an example of a "win-win-win" medical program.

Update on Applications and Limitations of Perioperative Tranexamic Acid

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a potent antifibrinolytic with documented efficacy in reducing blood loss and allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in several clinical settings. With a growing emphasis on patient blood management, TXA has become an integral aspect of perioperative blood conservation strategies. While clinical applications of TXA in the perioperative period are expanding, routine use in select clinical scenarios should be supported by evidence for efficacy. Furthermore, questions regarding optimal dosing without increased risk of adverse events such as thrombosis or seizures should be answered. Therefore, ongoing investigations into TXA utilization in cardiac surgery, obstetrics, acute trauma, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, pediatric surgery, and other perioperative settings continue. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current applications and limitations of TXA use in the perioperative period.

Patient Blood Management: Improving Outcomes for Millions While Saving Billions. What Is Holding It Up?

Patient blood management (PBM) offers significantly improved outcomes for almost all medical and surgical patient populations, pregnant women, and individuals with micronutrient deficiencies, anemia, or bleeding. It holds enormous financial benefits for hospitals and payers, improves performance of health care providers, and supports public authorities to improve population health. Despite this extraordinary combination of benefits, PBM has hardly been noticed in the world of health care. In response, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for its 194 member states, in its recent Policy Brief, to act quickly and decidedly to adopt national PBM policies. To further support the WHO's call to action, this article addresses 3 aspects in more detail. The first is the urgency from a health economic perspective. For many years, growth in health care spending has outpaced overall economic growth, particularly in aging societies. Due to competing economic needs, the continuation of disproportionate growth in health care spending is unsustainable. Therefore, the imperative for health care leaders and policy makers is not only to curb the current spending rate relative to the gross domestic product (GDP) but also to simultaneously improve productivity, quality, safety of patient care, and the health status of populations. Second, while PBM meets these requirements on an exceptional scale, uptake remains slow. Thus, it is vital to identify and understand the impediments to broad implementation. This includes systemic challenges such as the so-called "waste domains" of failure of care delivery caused by malfunctions of health care systems, failure of care coordination, overtreatment, and low-value care. Other impediments more specific to PBM are the misperception of PBM and deeply rooted cultural patterns. Third, understanding how the 3Es-evidence, economics, and ethics-can effectively be used to motivate relevant stakeholders to take on their respective roles and responsibilities and follow the urgent call to implement PBM as a standard of care.

Retrospective analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in critically ill dogs and cats (2018-2019): 266 dogs and 28 cats

OBJECTIVE

To describe the signalment, dosing, adverse events, and patient diagnosis for dogs and cats admitted to the critical care unit (CCU) receiving tranexamic acid (TXA).

DESIGN

Case series from 2018 to 2019.

SETTING

Private referral and primary care veterinary hospital.

ANIMALS

Two hundred and sixty-six dogs and 28 cats.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Records of dogs and cats admitted to the CCU that received TXA were evaluated. A diagnosis was assigned to each patient based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases system. "Neoplasia" ([most frequently] hemangiosarcoma) (89/226 [39%]) and "diseases of the blood and blood forming organs" (idiopathic hemoabdomen, pericardial effusion) (78/226 [34%]) were the most common disease processes for which dogs received TXA. In cats, "diseases of the blood and blood forming organs" (idiopathic hemoabdomen) (9/28 [32%]), "neoplasia" (hemangiosarcoma, mast cell tumor, carcinoma) (7/28 [25%]), and "injury, poisoning, or certain other consequences of external causes" (high-rise syndrome) (5/28 [17%]) were most common. One hundred and forty-eight dogs (65%) and 13 cats (46%) underwent an invasive procedure during hospitalization. Thirty percent (70/226) of dogs received a packed RBC (pRBC) transfusion. Administration of TXA before or after pRBC transfusion did not significantly affect median dose of pRBC administered (P = 0.808). The median IV dose of TXA was similar for dogs and cats at 10 mg/kg. One cat received a 10 times overdose of TXA and did not suffer any appreciable adverse effects. Adverse events were reported in 1.7% (4/226) of dogs including hypersalivation (3/226) and seizure (1/226) in a dog that received a cumulative dose of 280 mg/kg of TXA. Hypersalivation was the only adverse event reported in 3% (1/28) of cats.

CONCLUSION

TXA is primarily utilized in critically ill dogs and cats diagnosed with neoplasia, bleeding disorders, and trauma at this institution. Adverse events were infrequent and largely mild.

Tranexamic Acid in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: A Cost Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid (TXA) decreases blood loss, perioperative transfusion rates, and cost in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. In a previous study, topical TXA decreased both perioperative blood loss and transfusions in patients undergoing resection of aggressive bone tumors and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to explore the cost effectiveness of TXA in patients undergoing resection of an aggressive bone tumor and endoprosthetic reconstruction, assessing transfusion cost, TXA administration cost, postoperative hospitalization cost, posthospital disposition, and 30-day readmissions.

METHODS

This study included 126 patients who underwent resection of an aggressive bone tumor and endoprosthetic resection at a single academic medical center; 61 patients in the TXA cohort and 65 patients in the non-TXA cohort. The cost of 1 unit of packed red blood cells, not including administration or complications, was estimated at our institution. The cost of hospitalization was estimated for lodging and basic care. The cost of TXA was $55 per patient. Patients were followed up for 30 days to identify hospital readmissions.

RESULTS

Patients in the TXA cohort experienced a TXA and blood transfusion cost reduction of $155.88 per patient (P = 0.007). Proximal femur replacement patients experienced a $282.05 transfusion cost reduction (P = 0.008), whereas distal femur replacement patients only experienced a transfusion cost reduction of $32.64 (P = 0.43). An average hospital admission cost reduction of $5,072.23 per patient (P < 0.001) was associated with TXA use. Proximal femur replacement patients who received TXA experienced a hospital cost reduction of $5,728.38 (P < 0.001), whereas distal femur replacement patients experienced a reduction of $3,724.90 (P = 0.01). No differences between the cohorts were identified in discharge to home (P = 0.37) or readmissions (P = 0.77).

DISCUSSION

TXA administration is cost effective in patients undergoing resection of an aggressive bone tumor and endoprosthetic reconstruction through reducing both perioperative transfusion rates and postoperative hospitalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Retrospective Cohort Study.

Study protocol for a multicentre, 2×2 factorial, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the interest of intravenous iron and tranexamic acid to reduce blood transfusion in hip fracture patients (the HiFIT study)

INTRODUCTION

Blood transfusion and anaemia are frequent and are associated with poor outcomes in patients with hip fracture (HF). We hypothesised that preoperative intravenous iron and tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce the transfusion rate in these patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The HiFIT study is a multicentre, 2×2 factorial, randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial evaluating the effect of iron isomaltoside (IIM) (20 mg/kg) vs placebo and of TXA (intravenously at inclusion and topically during surgery) versus placebo on transfusion rate during hospitalisation, in patients undergoing emergency surgery for HF and having a preoperative haemoglobin between 95 and 130 g/L. 780 patients are expected. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients receiving an allogenic blood transfusion of packed red blood cells from the day of surgery until hospital discharge (or until D30 if patient is still hospitalised). Enrolment started on March 2017 in 11 French hospitals. The study was stopped between July 2017 and August 2018 (because of investigation of serious AEs with IIM in Spain) and slowed down since March 2020 (COVID-19 crisis). The expected date of final follow-up is May 2022. Analyses of the intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations are planned.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The HiFIT trial protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Comité de Protection des Personnes Ouest II and the French authorities (ANSM). It will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The HiFIT trial will be the largest study evaluating iron and TXA in patients with HF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02972294; EudraCT Number 2016-003087-40.

Essential Role of Patient Blood Management in a Pandemic: A Call for Action

The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a pandemic. Global health care now faces unprecedented challenges with widespread and rapid human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and high morbidity and mortality with COVID-19 worldwide. Across the world, medical care is hampered by a critical shortage of not only hand sanitizers, personal protective equipment, ventilators, and hospital beds, but also impediments to the blood supply. Blood donation centers in many areas around the globe have mostly closed. Donors, practicing social distancing, some either with illness or undergoing self-quarantine, are quickly diminishing. Drastic public health initiatives have focused on containment and "flattening the curve" while invaluable resources are being depleted. In some countries, the point has been reached at which the demand for such resources, including donor blood, outstrips the supply. Questions as to the safety of blood persist. Although it does not appear very likely that the virus can be transmitted through allogeneic blood transfusion, this still remains to be fully determined. As options dwindle, we must enact regional and national shortage plans worldwide and more vitally disseminate the knowledge of and immediately implement patient blood management (PBM). PBM is an evidence-based bundle of care to optimize medical and surgical patient outcomes by clinically managing and preserving a patient's own blood. This multinational and diverse group of authors issue this "Call to Action" underscoring "The Essential Role of Patient Blood Management in the Management of Pandemics" and urging all stakeholders and providers to implement the practical and commonsense principles of PBM and its multiprofessional and multimodality approaches.