Isohemagglutinin titering performed on an automated solid-phase and hemagglutinin-based analyzer is comparable to results obtained by manual gel testing

Associations between ABO non-identical platelet transfusions and patient outcomes-A multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to platelet availability limitations, platelet units ABO mismatched to recipients are often transfused. However, since platelets express ABO antigens and are collected in plasma which may contain ABO isohemagglutinins, it remains controversial as to whether ABO non-identical platelet transfusions could potentially pose harm and/or have reduced efficacy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The large 4-year publicly available Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III) database was used to investigate patient outcomes associated with ABO non-identical platelet transfusions. Outcomes included mortality, sepsis, and subsequent platelet transfusion requirements.

RESULTS

Following adjustment for possible confounding factors, no statistically significant association between ABO non-identical platelet transfusion and increased risk of mortality was observed in the overall cohort of 21,176 recipients. However, when analyzed by diagnostic category and recipient ABO group, associations with increased mortality for major mismatched transfusions were noted in two of eight subpopulations. Hematology/Oncology blood group A and B recipients (but not group O) showed a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.29 (95%CI: 1.03-1.62) and intracerebral hemorrhage group O recipients (but not groups A and B) showed a HR of 1.75 (95%CI: 1.10-2.80). Major mismatched transfusions were associated with increased odds of receiving additional platelet transfusion each post-transfusion day (through day 5) regardless of the recipient blood group.

DISCUSSION

We suggest that prospective studies are needed to determine if specific patient populations would benefit from receiving ABO identical platelet units. Our findings indicate that ABO-identical platelet products minimize patient exposure to additional platelet doses.

Severe acute haemolytic transfusion reaction secondary to a plasma incompatible group B platelet transfusion

OBJECTIVES

To report a rare case of acute hemolytic transfusion reaction (AHTR) following an ABO plasma incompatible group B platelet transfusion.

BACKGROUND

AHTR is an uncommon, but potentially fatal event. Most reported cases of platelet transfusions associated with AHTR involve group O donors.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old man, recipient of a group AB haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), had received re-induction chemotherapy for leukaemia relapse. A group B whole blood-derived buffy coat platelet pool was transfused. He developed rigours/fever, profound hemolytic anaemia, and hemodynamic instability. Serological investigations revealed AHTR from passive transfer of high titre anti-A (256 for IgM and 8192 for IgG).

DISCUSSION

This case highlights the potential risks associated with ABO-mismatched transfusions, and the complexity associated with transfusing HSCT recipients and red cell transfusion recipients with dual populations of circulating red cells. The literature on minor ABO plasma incompatible transfusions, challenges in establishing local policies to limit the risks of AHTR and risk mitigation strategies are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians must maintain a high level of suspicion for AHTR after ABO plasma incompatible platelet transfusions. Patients must be aware of the risks of AHTR, and early recognition and diagnosis of this complication may be lifesaving.

ABO antibody titer performance characteristics and correlates between two automated platforms

BACKGROUND

AABB standards require a policy for assessing transfusing ABO-incompatible plasma. After a fatal hemolytic event with incompatible plasma, our institution instituted platelet donor population titer method for ABO antibodies on the PK7300, with high-titer being defined as having isohemagglutinin titers greater than 256. We recently switched titering platforms to the Neo Iris and we seek to determine the equivalent isohemagglutinin high-titer cutoff on the Neo Iris as compared to the PK7300.

METHODS

We measured the titers on 299 apheresis platelet donors and compared its performance characteristics at various cutoffs to the PK7300 reference standard. Discrepant results were manually diluted and retested on the Neo Galileo. Furthermore, since the Neo Iris is able to determine isotype and antigen specific titers, we also characterized these features in our donor population.

RESULTS

IgM titer of 128 on the Neo Iris has better accuracy compared to the titer of 64 (94 % vs 93.6 %). Eleven of sixteen discordant results were in agreement with Neo Iris. Blood group O had the highest IgG antibody titers for both anti-A and anti-B (p = 8.4E-17 and 4.3E-09, respectively). Additionally, group O donors exhibited lower anti-A2 than anti-A1 IgG titers.

DISCUSSION

The Neo Iris titer cut-off of 128 had the best overall accuracy and correlation with a 256 cut-off on our laboratory developed test on the PK7300 platform. Additionally, we found that group O donors had the highest titer antibodies, with typically higher IgG titers than IgM, and generally multiple dilution levels greater than other blood types.

Comparison between tube test and automated column agglutination technology on VISION Max for anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres: A multidimensional analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

VISION Max (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) measures anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres using automated column agglutination technology (CAT). We compared tube test (TT) and CAT of VISION Max comprehensively, including failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), turnaround time (TAT) and cost, and suggested modified CAT (MCAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 100 samples (each 25 for blood type A, B and O with anti-A and anti-B), anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres were measured by TT and CAT (1:2-1:1024 dilution), as well as by MCAT (with agglutination at 1:32 dilution, then perform additional testing from 1:64 to 1:1024). We assessed the agreement and correlation between TT and CAT and compared FMEA (risk priority number [RPN] score), TAT (h:min:sec) and cost (US dollar, US $) among TT, CAT and MCAT.

RESULTS

TT and CAT showed overall substantial agreement (k = 0.73) and high correlation (ρ ≥ 0.75) except blood type O with anti-A (ρ = 0.68). Compared with TT, CAT showed lower RPN scores in FMEA and similar TAT and cost (FMEA, 33,700 vs. 184,300; TAT, 15:23:00 vs. 14:26:40; cost, 1377.4 vs. 1312.4, respectively). Regarding FMEA, TAT and cost, MCAT was superior to CAT or TT (43,810; 13:28:00; 899.2, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This is the first multidimensional analysis on VISION Max CAT for measuring anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres. The results of anti-A/B isoagglutinin titres by CAT were comparable with those of TT. MCAT would be a safe, time-saving and cost-effective alternative to TT and CAT in high-volume blood bank laboratories.

Challenges in antibody titration for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Accurate and regular monitoring of anti-A and anti-B titres pre- and post-transplantation plays a crucial role in the clinical management of patients receiving ABO-incompatible renal transplants. There is no standardized protocol or an external quality assurance program (EQA) currently available for this testing in Australia. The aim of this study was to investigate the diversity of techniques, test platforms and reagents that were currently in use in various laboratories with the aim of developing an EQA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was sent to the participants enrolled with the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) to assess their interest in participation in the pilot study. A total of 24 participants who expressed interest were sent the group O plasma, A₁ , A₂ and B cells to perform ABO titration using their own methods.

RESULTS

Participants reported a wide range of titre results, from 8 to 1024 for the anti-A titre using A₁ cells, from 2 to 128 for anti-A titre using A₂ cells and from neat to 32 for anti-B titre using B cells.

CONCLUSION

There was a wide variation in titre results between and within different technologies. These findings demonstrate the need for an ABO titration EQA. Development of a standard technique and participation in an EQA program should, over time, reduce variation and enable transferrable results across testing centres, which will assist in consistent clinical interpretation and better outcomes for patients.

A rapid, point-of-care red blood cell agglutination assay detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality. There is an urgent need for serological tests to detect antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, which could be used to assess past infection, evaluate responses to vaccines in development, and determine individuals who may be protected from future infection. Current serological tests developed for SARS-CoV-2 rely on traditional technologies such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and lateral flow assays, which have not scaled to meet the demand of hundreds of millions of antibody tests so far. Herein, we present an alternative method of antibody testing that depends on one protein reagent being added to patient serum/plasma or whole blood with direct, visual readout. Two novel fusion proteins, RBD-2E8 and B6-CH1-RBD, were designed to bind red blood cells (RBCs) via a single-chain variable fragment (scFv), thereby displaying the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on the surface of RBCs. Mixing mammalian-derived RBD-2E8 and B6-CH1-RBD with convalescent COVID-19 patient serum and RBCs led to visible hemagglutination, indicating the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 RBD. B6-CH1-RBD made in bacteria was not as effective in inducing agglutination, indicating better recognition of RBD epitopes from mammalian cells. Given that our hemagglutination test uses methods routinely used in hospital clinical labs across the world for blood typing, we anticipate the test can be rapidly deployed at minimal cost. We anticipate our hemagglutination assay may find extensive use in low-resource settings for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Comparative evaluation of DTT treated ABO isoagglutinin titres performed by two methods with solid phase red cell adhesion (SPRCA) titres

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Measurement of actual concentration of IgG requires methods like treatment of serum with dithiothreitol (DTT). This study was aimed at comparing of DTT treated ABO titres performed by conventional test tube technique (CTT) and column agglutination technique (CAT) with HA/SPRCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study conducted from October 2019 to March 2020. All consecutive A, B and O group donors who gave consent for participation were included. All samples were tested by CTT and CAT before and after DTT treatment (pCTT, pCAT) and with HA/SPRCA.

RESULTS

A total of 300 donors were included; 100 each from A, B and O blood group donors. Group O titres were higher than group A/B titres. Group O titres were highest when performed by pCAT, followed by pCTT and lowest by HA/SPRCA. Group A/B titres were highest when performed by HA/SPRCA, followed by pCAT and pCTT for anti-A and highest when performed by pCAT, followed by HA/SPRCA and lowest by pCTT for anti-B.

CONCLUSION

Results obtained by pCAT were closer to results obtained by pCTT, whereas those obtained by HA/SPRCA were variable. SPRCA offers the advantage of automation, no inter-observer variation and less time consumption because IgM interference is not observed with SPRCA, thus providing an alternative to pCTT. However, these methods cannot be used interchangeably and to discern the most suitable method, a clinical impact of these results needs to be studied.

A comparison of the automated blood bank system IH-500 and manual tube method for anti-blood group antibody titration: a quantitative approach

BACKGROUND

Anti-blood group antibody titers (ABTs) reported in titer values are variable depending on the testing method used. The introduction of new test methods such as automated methods requires proper method comparison. In this study, the automated blood bank system and manual tube method for ABT were compared using a log-transformed dataset to evaluate the alternative statistical approach.

METHODS

ABT was conducted using specimens referred for solid organ transplantation. Methods for comparison were conventional manual tube method and IH-500 automated blood bank system using column agglutination (CAT). Criteria for agreement were exact match and 1-titer match. Measured titer values were log-transformed into interval scale for Deming regression analysis.

RESULTS

From the comparison of the tube and CAT methods using titer values and the two criteria, the exact and 1-titer match were 15.9-41.5 % and 65.9-97.6 %, respectively. Deming regression was used to demonstrate the presence of both proportional and constant difference between the two methods.

CONCLUSION

The method comparison using conventional statistical approaches had limits due to the semi-quantitative value of the test. Log-transformed interval scale values for comparison were useful for interpretation of method comparison datasets. This alternative statistical approach could contribute to a more accurate comparison between assays and standardization of ABT testing.