The evanescence and persistence of RBC alloantibodies in blood donors

Complement C3 and marginal zone B cells promote IgG-mediated enhancement of RBC alloimmunization in mice

Administration of anti-RhD immunoglobulin (Ig) to decrease maternal alloimmunization (antibody-mediated immune suppression [AMIS]) was a landmark clinical development. However, IgG has potent immune-stimulatory effects in other settings (antibody-mediated immune enhancement [AMIE]). The dominant thinking has been that IgG causes AMIS for antigens on RBCs but AMIE for soluble antigens. However, we have recently reported that IgG against RBC antigens can cause either AMIS or AMIE as a function of an IgG subclass. Recent advances in mechanistic understanding have demonstrated that RBC alloimmunization requires the IFN-α/-β receptor (IFNAR) and is inhibited by the complement C3 protein. Here, we demonstrate the opposite for AMIE of an RBC alloantigen (IFNAR is not required and C3 enhances). RBC clearance, C3 deposition, and antigen modulation all preceded AMIE, and both CD4+ T cells and marginal zone B cells were required. We detected no significant increase in antigen-specific germinal center B cells, consistent with other studies of RBC alloimmunization that show extrafollicular-like responses. To the best of our knowledge, these findings provide the first evidence of an RBC alloimmunization pathway which is IFNAR independent and C3 dependent, thus further advancing our understanding of RBCs as an immunogen and AMIE as a phenomenon.

Does decreasing the incubation period used in the antibody screen affect its sensitivity?

BACKGROUND

Pre-transfusion testing (PTT) encompasses a set of mandatory laboratory tests performed before red blood cell transfusion. The antibody screen, one component of PTT, commonly includes a 10-20 min incubation. The primary aim of this study was to determine if this period can be reduced when using current immunohematology methodologies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Antibody screens were performed on reagent samples using Glass or Gel-based column agglutination technologies (CAT) and a solid phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) assay, with incubation periods of 1, 5, 10 and 15 min, and 20 min (SPRCA assay only). For each method, the shortest period producing a minimum of a 1+ reaction with all reagent samples was considered optimal. The sensitivity of each assay using the optimal period was calculated after performing antibody screens on 100 patient samples.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

It was demonstrated that the incubation period in the SPRCA and Glass CAT systems can be reduced to 5 and 10 min, respectively, while achieving high assay sensitivity (98.9% in both). The incubation period in the Gel CAT system cannot be reduced from 15 min. Significant association between titre and reaction strength was observed for all three screening methods (p < 0.001 for both CAT methods, p = 0.041 for SPRCA). This study demonstrates that the incubation period used in the antibody screen can be reduced when using systems employing the Glass CAT and SPRCA methods, without affecting assay sensitivity. If confirmed, it could result in faster completion of PTT.

Implementation of a molecular genotyping protocol for patients with warm autoantibodies

BACKGROUND

Warm autoantibodies (WAAs) cause delays and additional expenses while determining suitable products when using a traditional protocol (TP). In 2013, Carter BloodCare Immunohematology Reference Laboratory (IRL) introduced a molecular protocol (MP) for patients with WAAs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective review of records for samples referred to the IRL from November 2004 to September 2020, was performed. Referrals, alloantibody(ies), gender, and age were recorded. Additionally, the count of common clinically significant antigens needed for phenotypically matched red blood cells (RBCs) were recorded for patients in MP. To further analyze charges and time spent testing patients with WAAs, 300 patients were selected.

RESULTS

Analysis of average charges to the referring hospital and time spent testing in the IRL determined savings at two or more referrals. Overall, 219 of 300 (73%) of patients in the study met or exceeded the number of referrals. Further analysis shows that while the population of patients with WAA (n = 300) shared similar demographics, there was a statistically significant difference between the average time testing patients in TP (M = 264.18, SD = 15.06) and MP (M = 156.00, SD = 90.37), t(157) = 14.46, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] (93.41-122.97). Additionally, the assumption that each patient received two RBCs per referral provided no statistically significant difference between average charges to the hospitals of patients in TP (M = 1222.58, SD = 165.69) and MP (M = 1269.78, SD = 433.52), t(192) = -1.25, p = .214, 95% CI (-121.95-27.54).

CONCLUSION

The MP has been effective in saving time spent testing patients with WAAs, which benefits referring hospitals, patients, and IRLs. Charges for prophylactic phenotypically matched blood were negligible and a MP would alleviate some of the current laboratory difficulties while providing safe products to patients.

Alloimmunization following antigen-negative red blood cell transfusion

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization can occur secondary to transfusion or pregnancy. It is observed most frequently among patients with hemoglobinopathies and myeloid neoplasms. Although previous antigen exposure is generally required for alloimmunization, some alloantibodies may develop naturally without prior exposure. Other alloantibodies may become evanescent, only to reemerge at a detectable titer following a stimulatory event. In a minute fraction of cases, 'non-naturally occurring' alloantibodies may appear without a known antigenic stimulus.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All testing (antibody detection tests and identification, antigen phenotyping, and crossmatching) was performed using the same method and reagents, but occurred at two hospitals within the Yale New Haven Hospital delivery network, and was performed by technologists utilizing different instruments and reagent lots.

RESULTS

We present two cases of seemingly de novo alloimmunization (anti-E and anti-K), and one case of re-emergence of a known, previously evanescent alloantibody (anti-K) following transfusion of RBCs that were antigen-negative for the corresponding antibodies.

CONCLUSION

While the exact mechanism underlying the development and/or re-emergence of RBC alloantibodies in the absence of antigenic stimulation remains unclear, these cases highlight this unusual phenomenon, underscoring the general immunogenicity, as well as the potential consequences, of RBC transfusion and reiterates the importance of concluding an alloantibody specificity, even in the absence of known transfusion of RBCs with a particular antigen.

De novo natural anti-M alloantibody emergence in severe Coronavirus Disease 2019

The immune response is a key player in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and is often seriously dysfunctional in severe Coronavirus Disease 2019. The hyperinflammatory status has been described to be accompanied by the appearance of autoantibodies. In a lethal COVID-19 infection, we observed the emergence of a de novo natural alloantibody which targeted the M antigen from the MNS blood group on red blood cells (RBC) without evidence of any cross-reaction with SARS-CoV-2 antigens. This IgM lambda alloantibody was unmutated and unswitched. Here, we describe for the first time the emergence of a bystander de novo natural alloantibody against RBCs in a severe COVID-19 patient, highlighting the extra-follicular humoral response reported in these cases.

Routine donor red cell antibody screening: Considering the alternate strategy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (Lifeblood) performs red blood cell (RBC) antibody screening on every whole blood donation. An alternate strategy has been proposed whereby an antibody screen is performed on the first donation and only repeated following pregnancy, transfusion or a significant break between donations (>2 years). We assess the blood safety risks associated with removing antibody screening for every whole blood donation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective desktop analysis included all whole blood donations collected by Lifeblood between 01 May 2018 and 30 April 2019 to quantify the antibodies that would have been undetected with the alternate strategy. The strategy was further assessed using the Alliance of Blood Operators Risk-Based Decision-Making framework.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-one routine donors had antibodies for the first time, but reported no sensitizing event since their last donation. Forty-seven of these had antibodies of a clinically significant specificity and titre that have the potential to cause a haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR). The calculated risk of undetected antibodies being transfused to an incompatible recipient is 1 in 82,200.

CONCLUSION

The estimated risk of HTRs with the alternate strategy results in an increased risk. While the alternate strategy is identified as the most cost-effective option within the Australian setting, this additional residual risk was not deemed to be acceptable. Blood services would need to determine whether the increase in residual risk stemming from implementation of such a strategy is tolerable.

Screening for new red blood cell alloantibodies after transfusion in patients with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are frequent recipients of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and are at risk for RBC alloimmunization. RBC alloimmunization is diagnosed by identifying RBC alloantibodies as part of pre-transfusion testing, but this testing fails to detect alloantibodies that have evanesced. It may be beneficial to screen for new RBC alloantibody development after transfusion before possible antibody evanescence.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Our institution started a new initiative for episodically transfused patients with SCD to obtain at least one antibody screen 2-6 months after transfusion as part of their clinical care. A database was created to prospectively track all transfused patients for 1 year and their post-transfusion antibody screen results. Patients received prophylactically CEK-matched RBC units.

RESULTS

During the study year, 138 patients with SCD received a total of 242 RBC transfusions. Patients with a history of an RBC alloantibody (n = 13, 9.4%) had previously received more RBC units than non alloimmunized patients (median 11 vs. 2 RBC units, p = .0002). A total of 337 post-transfusion antibody screens were obtained in 127 patients (92.0%) with 110 patients (79.7%) having at least one antibody screen 2-6 months post-transfusion. With this prospective testing, two new RBC alloantibodies (anti-C and -M) were identified in two patients.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to test for new RBC alloantibody development in most episodically transfused patients with SCD as part of their routine care. The yield of this screening appears low with CEK matching, but it could still provide important information for individual patients.

Pediatric Hemovigilance and Adverse Transfusion Reactions

Some types of transfusion reactions occur more frequently in the pediatric than the adult population. Allergic reactions are the most common, followed by nonhemolytic transfusion reactions; male children seem most susceptible to such reactions. Platelets are often implicated and pulmonary reactions are understudied in children. Clinical sequelae in neonates, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease and intraventricular hemorrhage, have received increasing attention in relation to transfusion. There is a need to better understand the pathophysiology of transfusion reactions in neonatal and pediatric populations so preventive strategies can be undertaken. There is also a need for robust hemovigilance systems.

Immunohematologic aspects of alloimmunization and alloantibody detection: A focus on pregnancy and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

Alloimmunization to non-ABO, red blood cell (RBC) antigens remains one of the most clinically-relevant complexities faced by blood banking practitioners. In the setting of transfusion therapy, these antibodies raise risks for incompatibilities, while for pregnant patients they can mediate deadly forms of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. As such, a thorough understanding of pathways that lead to alloimmunization, as well as the tools used by blood banks to detect alloantibodies, is critical to transfusion practice. In this review, in which alloimmunization in the setting of pregnancy will be emphasized, we will review: 1) the clinical impacts of RBC alloantibodies in the peri-partum period; 2) the current pathophysiologic mechanisms thought to influence non-ABO antigen alloimmunization; 3) the strengths and weaknesses of laboratory tools used in aiding alloimmunization detection; and 4) future directions of the transfusion community related to alloimmunization impacting pregnancy.

Silent red blood cell autoantibodies: Are they naturally occurring or an effect of tolerance loss for a subsequent autoimmune process?

Unexpected anti-red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies are routinely investigated in immunohematology and blood banking since their existence in pregnant women may induce haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn, and their presence in donors may induce haemolytic transfusion reactions or hyperacute rejection in solid organ transplantation. Unexpected anti-RBC alloantibodies may target antigens of the most blood types excluding the expected antibodies targeting the ABO antigens. Their incidence in humans was originally linked to alloimmunization events such as blood transfusions, transplants, or pregnancies. But later, many findings revealed their existence in pathogenic processes such as malignancies, infections, and autoimmune diseases; and usually (but not always) associated to autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA). Nevertheless, unexpected anti-RBC autoantibodies are also occasionally found in healthy individuals in the absence of AIHA and with no history of alloimmunization or the associated pathologic processes. Hence, they are generally known as non-clinically significant, are excluded for typification and called "silent red blood cell autoantibodies (SRBCAA)". This review highlights evidence related to genetic predisposition, molecular mimicry, immune dysregulation, and immune tolerance loss surrounding the existence of anti-RBC antibodies, describing the presence of SRBCAA as possible early witnesses of the development of autoimmune diseases.