Time to resize the role of everolimus as treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplant

Impact of Early Initiated Everolimus on the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Many centers implement everolimus-based immunosuppression in liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to explore the potential impact of early initiated everolimus on tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.

METHODS

This study included 192 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation among who 64 individuals were prospectively enrolled (2012-2015) and received early initiated everolimus (ie, started between postoperative day 15 to 21), whereas the remaining 128 patients acted as historical controls without everolimus. Propensity score matching was performed to ensure comparability. Multivariate Cox regression and competing risks analysis were used to control for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Patients with and without everolimus were comparable in terms of number of nodules (P = 0.37), total tumor diameter (P = 0.44), Milan criteria fulfillment (P = 0.56), and histological differentiation (P = 0.61), but there were increased microvascular invasion rates in the everolimus group (26.5% vs 13.3%; P = 0.026). Tumor recurrence rates were similar with and without everolimus (10.9% vs 9.9% at 36 months respectively; P = 0.18). After controlling for microvascular invasion among other potential confounders, everolimus had no significant impact on tumor recurrence, neither in the multivariate Cox regression (relative risk = 3.23; P = 0.09), nor in the competing risks analysis for tumor recurrence-death (relative risk = 1.02; P = 0.94). Patients receiving everolimus had reduced tacrolimus trough concentrations and lower serum creatinine within the first 18 months postliver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Everolimus may not be universally prescribed to prevent tumor recurrence in liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Future randomized trials should be focused on patients with histological features of increased tumor aggressiveness, in whom the potential benefit would be higher.

Recommendations of everolimus use in liver transplant

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus are immunosuppressive agents with a minor nephrotoxic effect, limited to the development of proteinuria in some cases. The combination of EVL and low-dose tacrolimus has proven to be as safe and effective as standard therapy with tacrolimus for the prevention of acute cellular rejection. Early initiation of EVL-based immunosuppressive regimens with reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to significantly improve renal function of LT recipients during induction and maintenance phases, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. In patients with established kidney failure, initiating EVL may enable clinicians to reduce calcineurin inhibitors exposure, thereby contributing to the improved renal function of these patients. Although there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use to prevent the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of de novo tumours, they are used in this context in routine clinical practice.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors worldwide and liver transplantation (LT) is considered as the best therapeutic option for patients with HCC combined with cirrhosis. However, tumor recurrence after LT for HCC remains the major obstacle for long-term survival. The present study was to evaluate the efficacy and necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HCC who had undergone LT.

DATA SOURCES

Several databases were searched to identify comparative studies fulfilling the predefined selection criteria before October 2014. Suitable studies were chosen and data extracted for meta-analysis. Three authors independently evaluated the bias of each study according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Intervention. Stata 12 was used for statistical analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) was considered as a summary statistic for overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Three prospective studies and 5 retrospective studies including 360 patients (166 in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and 194 in the control group) were included. Compared with the control group, post-LT adjuvant chemotherapy conferred significant benefit for overall survival (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P=0.000). Meanwhile, the results showed an improvement for disease-free survival on favoring adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95; P=0.004). However, no significant difference in HCC recurrence rate was observed between the two groups (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.40-4.00; P=0.696). Descriptions of adverse events were of anecdotal nature and did not allow meta-analytic calculations.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy after LT for HCC can significantly prolong patient's survival and delay the recurrence of HCC. For advanced HCC with poor differentiation, patients may perhaps benefit from the early implantation of adjuvant chemotherapy after LT.