Interferon-free antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the transplant setting

Increased early acute cellular rejection events in hepatitis C-positive heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Increased utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors has increased transplantation rates. However, high levels of viremia have been documented in recipients of viremic donors. There is a knowledge gap in how transient viremia may impact acute cellular rejections (ACRs).

METHODS

In this study, 50 subjects received hearts from either viremic or non-viremic donors. The recipients of viremic donors were classified as nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT)+ group, and the remaining were classified as NAT-. All patients were monitored for viremia levels. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed through 180 days, evaluating the incidence of ACRs.

RESULTS

A total of 50 HCV-naive recipients received hearts between 2018 and 2019. A total of 22 patients (44%) who received transplants from viremic donors developed viremia at a mean period of 7.2 ± 0.2 days. At that time, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was initiated. In the viremia period (<56 days), 14 of 22 NAT+ recipients (64%) had ACR vs 5 of 28 NAT- group (18%) (p = 0.001). Through 180 days, 17 of 22 NAT+ recipients (77%) had a repeat rejection biopsy vs 12 of 28 NAT- recipients (43%) (p = 0.02). NAT+ biopsies demonstrated disparity of ACR distribution: negative, low-grade, and high-grade ACR in 84%, 12%, and 4%, respectively, vs 96%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, in the NAT- group (p = 0.03). The median time to first event was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-45) in the NAT+ group vs 65 (IQR: 44-84) days in the NAT-. Time to first event risk model revealed that NAT+ recipients had a significantly higher rate of ACR occurrences, adjusting for demographics (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Transient levels of viremia contributed to higher rates and severity of ACRs. Further investigation into the mechanisms of early immune activation in NAT+ recipients is required.

Successful combination of direct antiviral agents in liver-transplanted patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus

AIM

To analyze the safety and efficiency of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens in liver-transplanted patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2016, 39 patients with HCV reinfection after liver transplantation were treated at our tertiary referral center with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens, including various combinations with interferon (IFN), daclatasvir (DAC), simeprivir (SIM) and/or ledipasvir (LDV). Thirteen patients were treated with SOF + IFN ± RBV. Ten patients were treated with SOF + DAC ± RBV. Fiveteen patients were treated with fixed-dose combination of SOF + LDV ± RBV. One patient was treated with SOF + SIM + RBV. Three patients with relapse were retreated with SOF + LDV + RBV. The treatment duration was 12-24 wk in all cases. The decision about the HCV treatment was made by specialists at our transplant center, according to current available or recommended medications.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were IFN-experienced (29/39, 74.4%) and had a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (26/39, 66.7%) before liver transplantation. Sustained virological response at 12 wk (SVR12) was achieved in 10/13 (76.9%) of patients treated with SOF + IFN ± RBV. All patients with relapse were treated with fixed-dose combination of SOF + LDV + RBV. Patients treated with SOF + DAC + RBV or SOF + LDV + RBV achieved 100% SVR12. SVR rates after combination treatment with inhibitors of the HCV nonstructural protein (NS)5A and NS5B for 24 wk were significantly higher, as compared to all other therapy regimens (P = 0.007). Liver function was stable or even improved in the majority of patients during treatment. All antiviral therapies were safe and well-tolerated, without need of discontinuation of treatment or dose adjustment of immunosuppression. No serious adverse events or any harm to the liver graft became overt. No patient experienced acute cellular rejection during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Our cohort of liver-transplanted patients achieved high rates of SVR12 after a 24-wk course of treatment, especially with combination of NS5A and NS5B inhibitors.

Real-world experience with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for post-liver transplant HCV recurrence and severe liver disease

Optimizing therapy of post-transplant HCV recurrence remains important, especially in advanced liver disease. We evaluated daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in patients with post-liver transplant recurrence in a real-world European cohort at high risk of decompensation or death within 12 months. Recommended treatment was DCV 60 mg plus SOF 400 mg once daily for 24 weeks; RBV use/shorter treatment duration was at physicians' discretion. Patients (N = 87) were 70% male, 93% white, and mostly infected with HCV genotypes 1b (48%), 1a (32%), or 3 (9%); 37 (43%) had cirrhosis (16 decompensated), five had fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) was 94% (80/85) in a modified intention-to-treat analysis: 95% (58/61) without RBV and 92% (22/24) with RBV, with no virologic failures. SVR12 was 100% (80/80) in an as-observed analysis excluding five nonvirologic failures. Four patients (5%) discontinued therapy for adverse events (AEs); 16 (18%) experienced serious AEs. One patient died on treatment and five during follow-up. Most AEs were associated with advanced liver disease and unrelated to therapy. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed. DCV + SOF ± RBV was well tolerated and achieved high SVR12 (94%) in patients with post-transplant HCV recurrence, including patients with severe liver disease.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence after transplantation with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir: The role of ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) used to be a serious problem in the era of interferon-based treatment. Since the introduction of modern directly acting antivirals, treatment has become easier and shorter. According to published data, in the natural course of hepatitis C infection the duration of antiviral treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LDV) may be shortened to 12 instead of 24 weeks, using ribavirin (RBV) in addition. Furthermore, the question of whether or not RBV is really necessary, in a 12-week SOF/LDV treatment in the post-transplant setting, is still unanswered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At our institution, 100 liver transplant patients with HCV recurrence underwent interferon-free SOF-based treatment. A total of 51 patients received SOF/LDV with or without RBV. Twenty-nine HCV genotype 1 or 4 patients with histologically proven stage 0-2 fibrosis were treated with SOF/LDV for 12 weeks; another 22 patients with advanced fibrosis (stage 3-4) either received SOF/LDV plus weight-adjusted RBV or prolonged treatment for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

End of treatment response and sustained virological response (SVR) were achieved in 100% of the 51 patients, irrespective of the treatment group. Patients with prolonged treatment duration or with RBV developed significantly more adverse events (AEs) compared to the SOF/LDV group: 19 (86.4%) vs 8 (27.6%), P<.001. One of the predominant and most relevant AEs was the development of anemia in 43.1% of 10 patients receiving RBV, which was a significant result (P<.001). RBV co-medication had to be reduced in 11 (55%) patients and then stopped in 8 (40%) patients because of AEs. No significant difference was observed among the groups regarding kidney function.

CONCLUSION

The SOF/LDV combination is a reliable therapy of recurrent HCV infection after LT. It is easy to administer and to achieve SVR in immunocompromised patients without interactions with immunosuppressive medications. Considering the high rate of AEs, frequent discontinuation of RBV treatment, and the 100% SVR, the use of RBV as co-medication in a 12-week SOF/LDV regimen does not seem to be justified after LT.

The impact of directly acting antivirals on the enzymatic liver function of liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The new directly acting antivirals (DAAs) enable all-oral interferon-free treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We here investigated the effect of DAAs on the enzymatic liver function of liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with elevated liver enzymes or advanced fibrosis/compensated cirrhosis caused by recurrent HCV were treated with sofosbuvir either in combination with simeprevir, or in combination with ribavirin or daclatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks. Biochemical parameters, tacrolimus trough levels, and the maximal liver function capacity (LiMAx) were measured monthly during the treatment and 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

All patients achieved sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. The transaminases and cholestasis parameters normalized until week 8 of treatment. The mean LiMAx (normal ranges >315 μg/kg/h) increased from 344±142 μg/kg/h before treatment to 458±170 μg/kg/h (P<.0001) at the 12-week follow-up. In parallel, the tacrolimus trough level to dose ratio decreased from 4.68 down to 2.72 (P=.0004).

CONCLUSION

Antiviral treatment with DAAs enabled sustained elimination of recurrent HCV in liver transplant recipients and was associated with a significant improvement of the enzymatic liver function.

DAA-based antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C in the pre- and postkidney transplantation setting

DAA-based regimens for chronic hepatitis C infection encourage treatment of "difficult-to-treat" cohorts. This study investigated efficacy and safety of DAA-based regimens in HCV patients on dialysis or postkidney or liver/kidney transplantation. Twenty-five patients treated with DAA combinations were evaluated: 10 were on dialysis (eight: hemodialysis, two: peritoneal dialysis), eight were kidney transplant recipients, and seven were liver/kidney transplant recipients. Except for one patient treated with daclatasvir ([DCV]/60 mg/QD)/simeprevir ([SMV]/150 mg/QD), the others received sofosbuvir-based regimens ([SOF];400 mg/QD) combined with SMV:eight, DCV:13 or either ledipasvir ([LDV]90 mg/QD), ribavirin ([RBV];weight based) or pegylated interferon/RBV. HCV-RNA was determined by Abbott RealTime (LLOQ]:12 IU/ml) or Roche AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan assay (LLOQ:15 IU/ml); treatment response evaluated every 4 weeks, at the end of treatment, and 4 and 12 weeks thereafter. Twenty-four (96%) patients achieved SVR 12/24 (ITT-analysis). Mean treatment duration was 15.1 ± 5.1 weeks (±SD), and two patients terminated prematurely - both reached SVR12. Six patients were hospitalized due to complications of underlying disease. One patient achieved SVR24 but was re-infected (week 27). Kidney function remained stable; serum creatinine increased in only one patient - SOF was reduced to 400 mg/48 h. Treatment with DAA combinations in renally impaired HCV patients is highly effective and well tolerated. These findings call for further controlled trials and data from real-life cohorts.

Clinical impact of alcohol-related cirrhosis in the next decade: estimates based on current epidemiological trends in the United States

BACKGROUND

Identifying changes in the epidemiology of liver disease is critical for establishing healthcare priorities and allocating resources to develop therapies. The projected contribution of different etiologies toward development of cirrhosis in the United States was estimated based on current publications on epidemiological data and advances in therapy. Given the heterogeneity of published reports and the different perceptions that are not always reconcilable, a critical overview rather than a formal meta-analysis of the existing data and projections for the next decade was performed.

METHODS

Data from the World Health Organization Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health of 2014, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1999 to 2012, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were inquired to determine future changes in the epidemiology of liver disease.

RESULTS

Alcohol consumption has increased over the past 60 years. In 2010, transplant-related costs for liver recipients were the highest for hepatitis C (~$124 million) followed by alcohol-related cirrhosis (~$86 million). We anticipate a significant reduction in incidence cirrhosis due to causes other than alcohol because of the availability of high efficiency antiviral agents for hepatitis C, universal and effective vaccination for hepatitis B, relative stabilization of the obesity trends in the United States, and novel, potentially effective therapies for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The proportion of alcohol-related liver disease is therefore likely to increase in both the population as a whole and the liver transplant wait list.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol-related cirrhosis and alcohol-related liver disorders will be the major cause of liver disease in the coming decades. There is an urgent need to allocate resources aimed toward understanding the pathogenesis of the disease and its complications so that effective therapies can be developed.

HCV targeting of patients with cirrhosis

Interferon (IFN)-free treatments are now the treatment of choice for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Previously difficult to treat patients by IFN-containing treatments can now be treated safely by IFN-free therapies. More than 90% of hepatitis C genotype 1 and 4 patients with compensated cirrhosis or after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can be cured by sofosbuvir combined with simeprevir, daclatasvir or ledipasvir, or by the paritaprevir/ritona-vir/ombitasvir/±dasabuvir (3D) combination. Addition of ribavirin confers to a minimal, if any, benefit to increase SVR. The need for ribavirin is controversial and remains to be studied. The optimal length of treatment is still unknown, and an individual approach may be needed. Most patients require only 12weeks of therapy. The safety of these drugs is not fully explored in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C), who should not be treated with protease inhibitors. In cirrhosis hepatitis C virus eradication does not necessarily mean a cure of the disease and patients regularly require follow-up. Drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressant in patients after OLT are easier to manage but still require attention. Better drugs are needed for genotype 3 patients.