1
|
Furian L, Heemann U, Bengtsson M, Bestard O, Binet I, Böhmig GA, Boletis J, Briggs D, Claas FHJ, Couzi L, Cozzi E, Crespo M, De Vries APJ, Diekmann F, Durlik M, Glotz D, Helantera I, Jackson A, Jordan SC, Kuypers D, Lefaucheur C, Legendre C, Lorant T, Maggiore U, Mamode N, Marinaki S, Massart A, Müller T, Oberbauer R, Renders L, Roelen D, Taupin JL, Viklický O, Vittoraki A, de Weerd AE, Naesens M. Desensitization With Imlifidase for HLA-Incompatible Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Delphi International Expert Consensus. Transpl Int 2025; 37:13886. [PMID: 39867871 PMCID: PMC11758882 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
Highly sensitized (HS) patients in need of kidney transplantation (KTx) typically spend a longer time waiting for compatible kidneys, are unlikely to receive an organ offer, and are at increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Desensitization using imlifidase, which is more rapid and removes total body immunoglobulin G (IgG) to a greater extent than other methods, enables transplantation to occur between HLA-incompatible (HLAi) donor-recipient pairs and allows patients to have greater access to KTx. However, when the project was launched there was limited data and clinical experience with desensitization in general and with imlifidase specifically. Hence, this Delphi methodology was used to reach a consensus from a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) of experts from 15 countries on the management of HS patients undergoing imlifidase HLAi from a deceased donor (DD) KTx. This Delphi consensus provides clinical practice guidance on the use of imlifidase in the end-to-end management of HS patients undergoing an HLAi DD KTx and supports centers in the development of guidelines for the utilization and integration of imlifidase into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DISCOG, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Abteilung für Nephrologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Mats Bengtsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabelle Binet
- Clinic of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John Boletis
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - David Briggs
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Birmingham Centre, NHS Blood and Transplant, UK NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Frans H. J. Claas
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef, Netherlands
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Cardiac, National Transplant Centre (CNT), Thoracic and Vascular Sciences Padua University Hospital - Ospedale Giustinianeo, Padova, Italy
| | - Marta Crespo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aiko P. J. De Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Magdalena Durlik
- Klinika Transplantologii, Immunologii, Nefrologii i Chorób Wewnętrznych Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny ul, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Denis Glotz
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ilkka Helantera
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Nephrology and Transplant Immunology Medical Director Kidney Transplant Program Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Pediatrics and Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Nephrologist and Head of the Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Saint-Louis Hospital-APHP, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Nephrology at Université Paris Cité and Head of Nephrology and Transplantation Unit at Necker Hospital in Paris, Paris, France
| | - Tomas Lorant
- Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Transplant Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, UO Nefrologia - Trapianti Rene Pancreas, Programma Regionale Trapianti Emilia-Romagna, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Transplant Surgery at Guy’s and Great Ormond Street Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Smaragdi Marinaki
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Clinic of Nephrology and Transplantation, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Annick Massart
- Department of Nephrology, UZ Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Thomas Müller
- Clinic for Nephrology, Renal Transplant Program, Transplant Institute, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Lutz Renders
- Department of Nephrology of Technische Universität München, München (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Dave Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ondřej Viklický
- Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia
| | - Angeliki Vittoraki
- Immunology Department and National Tissue Typing Center, “G.Gennimatas” Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Annelies E. de Weerd
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chandramohan D, Adisa O, Patel D, Ware E, Eleti N, Agarwal G. Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Highly HLA-Sensitized Patients Treated with Intravenous Immuno-Globulin, Plasmapheresis and Rituximab: A Meta-Analysis. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:998. [PMID: 39202740 PMCID: PMC11355159 DOI: 10.3390/life14080998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: We aimed to investigate the outcomes of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible transplantation for patients who received desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), plasmapheresis, and rituximab. (2) Methods: A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify studies that utilized desensitization was conducted. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates and the 95% confidence interval (CI). (3) Results: A total of 1517 studies were initially identified. From these, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 459 patients, with a mean age of 45 years, of whom 40.8% were male. CDC crossmatch was positive in 68.3% (95% CI: 43.5-85.8; I2 87%), and 89.4% (95% CI: 53.4-98.4%; I2 89.8%) underwent living-donor transplantation. The 1-year graft survival pooled rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 84.8-92; I2 0%) and the 5-year graft survival rate was 86.1% (95% CI: 81.2-89.9; I2 0%). The 1-year patient survival rate was 94.2% (95% CI: 91-96.3; I2 0%), and the 5-year patient survival rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 83.5-92.7%; I2 7.7%). The rate of antibody-mediated rejection was 37.7% (95% CI: 25-52.3; I2 80.3%), and the rate of acute cell-mediated rejection was 15.1% (95% CI: 9.1-24; I2 55%). (4) Conclusions: Graft and patient survival are favorable in highly sensitized patients who undergo desensitization using IVIg, plasmapheresis, and rituximab for HLA-incompatible transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Chandramohan
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (D.P.); (N.E.); (G.A.)
| | - Oluwadamilola Adisa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA 71103, USA; (O.A.); (E.W.)
| | - Devansh Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (D.P.); (N.E.); (G.A.)
| | - Erin Ware
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA 71103, USA; (O.A.); (E.W.)
| | - Navya Eleti
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (D.P.); (N.E.); (G.A.)
| | - Gaurav Agarwal
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (D.P.); (N.E.); (G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Noble J, Cabezas L, Truffot A, Dumolard L, Jouve T, Malvezzi P, Rostaing L, Dard C, Saas P, Cravedi P, Macek-Jilkova Z. Glycolysis Changes in Alloreactive Memory B Cells in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergoing Desensitization Therapy. Transpl Int 2024; 37:13029. [PMID: 39081904 PMCID: PMC11287219 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Despite the growing use of desensitization strategies, hyperimmune patients remain at high risk of antibody-mediated rejection suggesting that, even when donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are effectively depleted, anti-donor specific B cells persist. We included 10 highly sensitized recipients that underwent desensitization with plasmapheresis and B cell depletion prior to kidney transplantation. We quantified changes in DSA (luminex), total B-cell subsets (flow cytometry), anti-donor HLA B cells (fluorospot), and single-cell metabolism in serially collected samples before desensitization, at the time of transplant, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Desensitization was associated with a decrease in DSA and total memory B cell and naive B cell percentage, while plasma cells and memory anti-donor HLA circulating B cells persisted up to 12 months after transplant. At 12-month post-transplantation, memory B cells increased their glycolytic capacity, while proliferative KI67+ plasma cells modified their metabolism by increasing fatty acid and amino acid oxidation capacity and decreasing their glucose dependence. Despite effective DSA depletion, anti-donor B cells persist in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the reliance of these cells on glycolysis, glycolysis-targeting therapies might represent a valuable treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Noble
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lara Cabezas
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Aurelie Truffot
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- Virology Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Lucile Dumolard
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Dard
- EFS, Recherche et Développement, Grenoble, France
| | - Philippe Saas
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- EFS, Recherche et Développement, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Zuzana Macek-Jilkova
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maenosono R, Unagami K, Oki R, Fujiwara Y, Banno T, Okada D, Yagisawa T, Kanzawa T, Hirai T, Omoto K, Hanafusa N, Azuma H, Takagi T, Ishida H. The medical cost and outcome of desensitization protocol in kidney transplantation recipients with high immunological risks. Int J Urol 2024; 31:422-429. [PMID: 38193573 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is a well-established alternative in renal replacement therapy. Compared with hemodialysis, low-immunological-risk kidney transplantation can reduce the medical treatment costs associated with end-stage renal disease. However, there are few reports on whether high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation reduces the financial burden on governments. We investigated the medical costs of high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation in comparison with the cost of hemodialysis in Japan. METHODS We compared the medical costs of high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation with those of hemodialysis. 15 patients who underwent crossmatch-positive and/or donor-specific antibody-positive kidney transplantations between 2020 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patients received intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab as desensitizing therapy. RESULTS Acute antibody-mediated rejection was detected in nine (60%) recipients, while there were no indications of graft function deterioration during the follow-up. For each patient, the transplant hospitalization cost was 38 428 ± 8789 USD. However, the cumulative costs were 59 758 ± 10 006 USD and 79 781 ± 16 366 USD, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with hemodialysis (34 286 USD per year), high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation tends to be expensive in the first year, but the cost is likely to be lower than that of hemodialysis after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Although kidney transplantation is initially expensive compared with hemodialysis, the medical cost becomes advantageous after 3 years even in kidney transplant recipients with high immunological risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoichi Maenosono
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kohei Unagami
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rikako Oki
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuya Fujiwara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Taro Banno
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daigo Okada
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yagisawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Kanzawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshihito Hirai
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuya Omoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norio Hanafusa
- Department of Blood Purification, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang J, Yu X, Xie Z, Wang R, Li H, Tang Z, Na N. A bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Ren Fail 2023; 45:2257804. [PMID: 37724568 PMCID: PMC10512841 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2023.2257804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a large obstacle to the long-term survival of allograft kidneys. It is urgent to find novel strategies for its prevention and treatment. Bibliometric analysis is helpful in understanding the directions of one field. Hence, this study aims to analyze the state and emerging trends of AMR in kidney transplantation. METHODS Literature on AMR in kidney transplantation from 1999 to 2022 was collected from the Web of Science Core Collection. HistCite (version 12.03.17), CiteSpace (version 6.2.R2), Bibliometrix 4.1.0 Package from R language, and Gephi (https://gephi.org) were applied to the bibliometric analysis of the annual publications, leading countries/regions, core journals, references, keywords, and trend topics. RESULTS A total of 2522 articles related to AMR in kidney transplantation were included in the analysis and the annual publications increased year by year. There were 10874 authors from 118 institutions located in 70 countries/regions contributing to AMR studies, and the United States took the leading position in both articles and citation scores. Halloran PF from Canada made the most contribution to AMR in kidney transplantation. The top 3 productive journals, American Journal of Transplantation, Transplantation, and Transplantation Proceedings, were associated with transplantation. Moreover, the recent trend topics mainly focused on transplant outcomes, survival, and clinical research. CONCLUSIONS North American and European countries/regions played central roles in AMR of kidney transplantation. Importantly, the prognosis of AMR is the hotspot in the future. Noninvasive strategies like plasma and urine dd-cfDNA may be the most potential direction in the AMR field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhua Zhang
- Department of kidney transplantation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaowen Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China
| | - Zhenwei Xie
- Department of kidney transplantation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruojiao Wang
- Department of kidney transplantation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Heng Li
- Department of kidney transplantation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZuoFu Tang
- Department of kidney transplantation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ning Na
- Department of kidney transplantation, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guo Z, Zhao D, Sa R, Wang L, Li S, Zhao G, Zhu L, Chen G. A modified perioperative regimen for deceased donor kidney transplantation in presensitized recipients without prior desensitization therapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1223567. [PMID: 37475867 PMCID: PMC10355838 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Renal transplantation in HLA-presensitized recipients entails an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss. There is currently no accepted standard treatment protocol that can help transplant surgeons safely perform deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation in presensitized patients without pretransplant desensitization. Methods Fifty-one panel-reactive antibody (PRA)-positive recipients and 62 PRA-negative retransplant recipients (control) who received DD renal transplantation were included. Patients in the presensitized group (donor-specific antibody [DSA]-positive, n=25; DSA-negative, n=26) without desensitization received a modified perioperative treatment starting on day 0 or -1 with rituximab, thymoglobulin, and low daily doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG, 10-20 g/d, for 14 days). Plasmapheresis was performed once before surgery in DSA-positive recipients. Results The median follow-up time was 51 months in the presensitized group and 41 months in the control group. The incidence of early acute rejection (AR) and AMR (including mixed rejection) was 35.3% and 13.7% in the presensitized group, respectively, significantly higher than in the control group (14.5% and 1.6%, respectively). Within the presensitized group, the DSA-positive subgroup had more AMR than the DSA-negative subgroup (24.0% vs. 3.8%), but the incidence of T cell-mediated rejection was comparable (20.0% vs. 23.4%). In the presensitized group, all rejections were successfully reversed, and graft function remained stable during follow-up. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates of the grafts and recipients in this group were 98.0%. Conclusion With a modified IVIG-based perioperative regimen, excellent intermediate-term graft and recipient survival outcomes can be achieved in presensitized patients who received DD kidney transplantation without prior desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiliang Guo
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Daqiang Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Rula Sa
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Songxia Li
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guangyuan Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Lan Zhu
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nishikawa K, Masui S, Ishida H. Virtual crossmatching and epitope analysis in kidney transplantation: What the physician involved in kidney transplantation should know? Int J Urol 2023; 30:7-19. [PMID: 36194790 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) assay for detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and high-resolution HLA typing have enabled tremendous progress in virtual crossmatch (VXM) technology in recent years. However, misinterpretation of the SAB assay may result in detrimental consequences after kidney transplantation. Meanwhile, epitope analysis could be an effective method to estimate immunizing eplets, which may provide ancillary information for better understanding of the SAB assay. To perform epitope analysis appropriately, it is necessary to understand the basic principles related to histocompatibility testing and the characteristics of the SAB assay. Therefore, knowledge of the properties and limitations of the SAB assay is critical. In this review, we aim to describe the fundamental concepts regarding immunobiological assessment, including HLA, anti-HLA antibodies, and SAB assay, and explain epitope analysis using examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kouhei Nishikawa
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Satoru Masui
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
10
|
Unagami K, Ishida H, Furusawa M, Kitajima K, Hirai T, Kakuta Y, Toki D, Shimizu T, Omoto K, Okumi M, Nitta K, Tanabe K. Influence of a low-dose tacrolimus protocol on the appearance of de novo donor-specific antibodies during 7 years of follow-up after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36:1120-1129. [PMID: 33280052 PMCID: PMC8160958 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tacrolimus (TAC) is a key immunosuppressant drug for kidney transplantation (KTx). However, the optimal serum trough level of TAC for good long-term outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the maintenance TAC trough level and the appearance of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (dnDSAs). METHODS A total of 584 KTx recipients were enrolled in this study, of whom 164 developed dnDSAs during the follow-up period and 420 did not. RESULTS We found no significant relationship between TAC trough level during the follow-up period and dnDSA incidence. Patients who developed dnDSAs had a significantly greater number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches (3.4 ± 1.3 versus 2.8 ± 1.5; P < 0.001), were more likely to have preformed DSAs (48.2% versus 27.1%; P < 0.001) and showed poor allograft outcome. CONCLUSIONS There was no clear relationship between TAC trough level and dnDSA incidence for KTx recipients whose TAC trough levels were kept within the narrow range of 4-6 ng/mL during the immunosuppression maintenance period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Unagami
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.,Nephrology, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miyuki Furusawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kumiko Kitajima
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshihito Hirai
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoichi Kakuta
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Toki
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuya Omoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Okumi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosaku Nitta
- Nephrology, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ishida H, Unagami K, Omoto K, Kanzawa T, Tanabe K. Desensitization Regimen Consisting of High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Plasmapheresis, and Rituximab (an Anti-CD20 Antibody), Without Eculizumab and/or Bortezomib, in 41 Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 19:1032-1040. [PMID: 34498551 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2021.0234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Antibody-mediated rejection in patients with positive crossmatches can be severe and result in sudden onset of oliguria, leading to graft loss. In an attempt to prevent posttransplant oliguria, we adopted a preoperative desensitization protocol involving the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin/plasmapheresis and the anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, in 41 transplant recipients with positive crossmatch test results. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively examined the clinical courses of the 41 kidney transplant recipients, paying special attention to renal graft function, urine volume, and changes in the titers of donor-specific antibodies. RESULTS Four grafts were lost during an average of 4.5-year follow-up. Average graft function was excellent, with a serum creatinine level of 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/dL. Sufficient urine output, with no oliguria or anuria, was achieved postoperatively in 40 of the 41 patients. However, among the 34 patients who underwent graft biopsies, the biopsies revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection in 21 patients (62%), and chronic antibodymediated rejection in 10 patients (30%). CONCLUSIONS The high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment included in our desensitization protocol was shown to be safe and effective for achieving successful transplant outcomes and allowed the avoidance of more aggressive B-cell-targeted treatments, such as C5 inhibitors and/or proteosome inhibitors, for preventing posttransplant oliguria and anuria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Ishida
- From the Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koh SM, Ju MK, Huh KH, Kim YS, Kim MS. Serum creatinine level at 1-month posttransplant can independently predict long-term graft survival and functional status. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2020; 34:244-248. [PMID: 35770111 PMCID: PMC9187034 DOI: 10.4285/kjt.20.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background After the year 2000, kidney transplants with high immunologic risk and deceased donors increased rapidly in Korea. At the same time, the medical community developed special pretransplant and early posttransplantation management protocols. Our team evaluated the effect of early graft stabilization on long-term graft survival and functional status using databases from a high-volume kidney transplantation center. Methods We included 1,895 kidney transplant patients from a total of 1,976 performed between 2005 and 2018. Early graft failure within 1 month (n=9), loss to follow-up (n=2), pediatric recipient or donor (n=37), and combined organ transplantation (n=33) cases were excluded. We grouped the cases at 1-month posttransplantation by serum creatinine quantiles (1.0 mg%, 1.23 mg%, and 1.52 mg%). Results After an average of 95 months of follow-up (maximum 189 months), the high-serum creatinine group (4th quantile) showed significantly poorer graft survival than other groups (1st to 3rd quantile) (P<0.05). In multiple Cox regression analysis, a high serum creatinine level (4th quantile) at 1-month posttransplant is an independent risk factor for graft failure with a hazard ratio of 1.799 (P=0.013). The quantile group by serum creatinine shows a persistent, significant difference of functional graft status (glomerular filtration rate by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease method) among quantile groups beyond ten years posttransplant. Conclusions Serum creatinine level at 1-month posttransplant is a strong independent predictor of graft survival and functional graft status beyond ten years posttransplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Min Koh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Man Ki Ju
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Suen Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kakuta Y, Okumi M, Kanzawa T, Unagami K, Iizuka J, Takagi T, Ishida H, Tanabe K. Impact of donor‐related arteriosclerosis in pretransplant biopsy on long‐term outcome of living‐kidney transplantation: A propensity score‐matched cohort study. Int J Urol 2020; 27:423-430. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.14212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Kakuta
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Masayoshi Okumi
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Taichi Kanzawa
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Kohei Unagami
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim DG, Lee J, Park Y, Kim MS, Jeong HJ, Kim SI, Kim YS, Kim BS, Huh KH. Transplant outcomes in positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity- versus flow cytometry-crossmatch kidney transplant recipients after successful desensitization: a retrospective study. BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:456. [PMID: 31818254 PMCID: PMC6902609 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1625-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the obvious survival benefit compared to that among waitlist patients, outcomes of positive crossmatch kidney transplantation (KT) are generally inferior to those of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible KT. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch (CDC + FC+) and positive flow cytometric crossmatch (CDC-FC+) with those of HLA-compatible KT (CDC-FC-) after successful desensitization. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 330 eligible patients who underwent KTs between June 2011 and August 2017: CDC-FC- (n = 274), CDC-FC+ (n = 39), and CDC + FC+ (n = 17). Desensitization protocol targeting donor-specific antibody (DSA) involved plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and rituximab with/without bortezomib for positive-crossmatch KT. RESULTS Death-censored graft survival and patient survival were not different among the three groups. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in the CDC + FC+ group than in the compatible group at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 2 years (P = 0.020). Biopsy-proven rejection within 1 year of CDC-FC-, CDC-FC+, and CDC + FC+ were 15.3, 28.2, and 47.0%, respectively. Urinary tract infections (P < 0.001), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (P < 0.001), and cytomegalovirus viremia (P < 0.001) were more frequent in CDC-FC+ and CDC + FC+ than in CDC-FC-. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that similar graft and patient survival was achieved in CDC-FC+ and CDC + FC+ KT compared with CDC-FC- through DSA-targeted desensitization despite the higher incidence of rejection and infection than that in compatible KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deok Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Younhee Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Joo Jeong
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon Il Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu Seun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miyake K, Okumi M, Kakuta Y, Unagami K, Furusawa M, Ishida H, Tanabe K. Prognostic value of C3d-fixing, preformed donor-specific antibodies in crossmatch-positive living kidney transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2019; 57:101230. [PMID: 31398461 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2019.101230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The occurrence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is higher in flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM)-positive patients despite desensitization. Accumulating evidence suggests a correlation between the complement-binding ability of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and the risk of ABMR. Here, we investigated the correlation between complement C3d-fixing ability of preformed DSA and ABMR risk, the efficacy of a desensitization protocol for patients with C3d-fixing DSA, and the risk of ABMR in 21 DSA- and FCXM-positive patients. We retrospectively analyzed the C3d-fixing ability and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of preformed DSA before and after desensitization. Six patients had non-C3d-fixing DSA and 15 had C3d-fixing DSA. The presence of C3d-fixing DSA before desensitization was correlated with the incidence of acute ABMR within 1 year after transplantation (p = .04) and chronic ABMR (p = .03). Moreover, the MFI of preformed DSA differed between responder and non-responder C3d-fixing DSA after desensitization (p < .0001). The C3d-fixing ability of preformed DSA with low MFI disappeared after desensitization. These results indicate that measuring DSA C3d-fixing ability may identify patients with a high risk of ABMR, especially before desensitization. CLINICAL TRIAL NOTATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) number: UMIN000033449.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsunori Miyake
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Transplant Surgery, Shonan Kamakaura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Okumi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yoichi Kakuta
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Unagami
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miyuki Furusawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|