Retrospective study on detection, treatment, and clinical outcome of graft thrombosis following pancreas transplantation

The concept of immunothrombosis in pancreas transplantation

Early failure of a pancreatic allograft due to complete thrombosis has an incidence of approximately 10% and is the main cause of comorbidity in pancreas transplantation. Although several risk factors have been identified, the exact mechanisms leading to this serious complication are still unclear. In this review, we define the roles of the individual components involved during sterile immunothrombosis-namely endothelial cells, platelets, and innate immune cells. Further, we review the published evidence linking the main risk factors for pancreatic thrombosis to cellular activation and vascular modifications. We also explore the unique features of the pancreas itself: the vessel endothelium, specific vascularization, and relationship to other organs-notably the spleen and adipose tissue. Finally, we summarize the therapeutic possibilities for the prevention of pancreatic thrombosis depending on the different mechanisms such as anticoagulation, anti-inflammatory molecules, endothelium protectors, antagonism of damage-associated molecular patterns, and use of machine perfusion.

Comprehensive review of imaging in pancreas transplantation: a primer for radiologists

Pancreas transplantation is a complex surgical procedure performed to restore normoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes and includes whole/segmental organ transplant and islet cell transplantation (ICT). In the United States, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) is most commonly performed due to the higher occurrence of end-stage renal disease in diabetic patients. Understanding the surgical technique and postoperative anatomy is imperative for effective and accurate surveillance following transplantation. Imaging plays an essential role in patients with pancreatic transplants and is often used to evaluate viability, vascular and parenchymal anatomy, and identify potential complications. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, color and spectral Doppler, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and angiography have a complementary role in the postoperative evaluation following a pancreas transplant. The common complications after a whole organ pancreas transplant include vascular thrombosis, graft rejection, pancreatitis, and infections. Complications can be classified into vascular (partial or complete venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, stenosis or pseudoaneurysm), parenchymal (pancreatitis, graft rejection), and bowel-related or miscellaneous causes (bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak, and peripancreatic fluid collections). Islet cell transplantation is an innovative therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. It involves isolating insulin-producing islet cells from donor pancreas and transplanting into recipients, to provide long-term insulin independence or significantly reduce insulin requirements. In recent years, isolation techniques, immunosuppressive regimens, and post-transplant monitoring advancements have propelled ICT as a viable therapeutic option. This comprehensive review aims to provide insights into the current state-of-the-art imaging techniques discussing both normal and abnormal features following pancreas transplantation.

Local Postoperative Graft Inflammation in Pancreas Transplant Patients With Early Graft Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Graft thrombosis is the main cause of early graft loss following pancreas transplantation, and is more frequent in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) compared with simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients. Ischemia-reperfusion injury during transplantation triggers a local thromboinflammatory response. We aimed to evaluate local graft inflammation and its potential association with early graft thrombosis.

METHODS

In this observational study, we monitored 67 pancreas-transplanted patients using microdialysis catheters placed on the pancreatic surface during the first postoperative week. We analyzed 6 cytokines, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-6, IL-8, interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10), macrophage inflammatory protein 1β (MIP-1β), IL-10, and the complement activation product complement activation product 5a (C5a) in microdialysis fluid. We compared the dynamic courses between patients with pancreas graft thrombosis and patients without early complications (event-free) and between PTA and SPK recipients. Levels of the local inflammatory markers, and plasma markers C-reactive protein, pancreas amylase, and lipase were evaluated on the day of thrombosis diagnosis compared with the first week in event-free patients.

RESULTS

IL-10 and C5a were not detectable. Patients with no early complications (n = 34) demonstrated high IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, and MIP-1β concentrations immediately after surgery, which decreased to steady low levels during the first 2 postoperative days (PODs). Patients with early graft thrombosis (n = 17) demonstrated elevated IL-6 (P = 0.003) concentrations from POD 1 and elevated IL-8 (P = 0.027) concentrations from POD 2 and throughout the first postoperative week compared with patients without complications. IL-6 (P < 0.001) and IL-8 (P = 0.003) were higher on the day of thrombosis diagnosis compared with patients without early complications. No differences between PTA (n = 35) and SPK (n = 32) recipients were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Local pancreas graft inflammation was increased in patients experiencing graft thrombosis, with elevated postoperative IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations, but did not differ between PTA and SPK recipients. Investigating the relationship between the local cytokine response and the formation of graft thrombosis warrants further research.

Surgical complications after pancreatic transplantation: A computed tomography imaging pictorial review

Pancreatic transplantation is considered by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes an acceptable surgical procedure in patients with type 1 diabetes also undergoing kidney transplantation in pre-final or end-stage renal disease if no contraindications are present. Pancreatic transplantation, however, is a complex surgical procedure and may lead to a range of postoperative complications that can significantly impact graft function and patient outcomes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is often adopted to evaluate perfusion of the transplanted pancreas, identify complications and as a guide for interventional radiology procedures. CT assessment after pancreatic transplantation should start with the evaluation of the arterial Y-graft, the venous anastomosis and the duodenojejunostomy. With regard to complications, CT allows for the identification of vascular complications, such as thrombosis or stenosis of blood vessels supplying the graft, the detection of pancreatic fluid collections, including pseudocysts, abscesses, or leaks, the assessment of bowel complications (anastomotic leaks, ileus or obstruction), and the identification of bleeding. The aim of this pictorial review is to illustrate CT findings of surgical-related complications after pancreatic transplantation. The knowledge of surgical techniques is of key importance to understand postoperative anatomic changes and imaging evaluation. Therefore, we first provide a short summary of the main techniques of pancreatic transplantation. Then, we provide a practical imaging approach to pancreatic transplantation and its complications providing tips and tricks for the prompt imaging diagnosis on CT.

Pancreatic Allograft Thrombosis: Implementation of the CPAT-Grading System in a Retrospective Series of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Pancreatic graft thrombosis (PAT) is a major surgical complication, potentially leading to graft loss. The recently proposed Cambridge Pancreas Allograft Thrombosis (CPAT) grading system provides diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic recommendations. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively assess computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations performed routinely in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients to implement the CPAT grading system and to study its association with the recipients' outcomes. We retrospectively studied 319 SPK transplant recipients, who underwent a routine CTA within the first 7 postoperative days. Analysis of the CTA scans revealed PAT in 215 patients (106 grade 1, 85 grade 2, 24 grade 3), while 104 showed no signs. Demographic data of the patients with and without PAT (thrombosis and non-thrombosis group) were not significantly different, except for the higher number of male donors in the thrombosis group. Pancreatic graft survival was significantly shorter in the thrombosis group. Graft loss due to PAT was significantly associated with grade 2 and 3 thrombosis, while it did not differ for recipients with grade 0 or grade 1 thrombosis. In conclusion, the CPAT grading system was successfully implemented in a large series of SPK transplant recipients and proved applicable in clinical practice.

Thromboinflammatory response is increased in pancreas transplant alone versus simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and early pancreas graft thrombosis is associated with complement activation

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients are more affected by pancreas graft thrombosis, and graft loss compared to simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients. The pathophysiology is unknown, but an increased immune response has been suggested in the PTA recipients. In this observational study, we compared perioperative thromboinflammation between PTA (n=32) and SPK (n=35) recipients, and between PTA recipients with (n=14) versus without (n=18) early graft thrombosis.

METHODS

We measured C-reactive protein (CRP), plasma markers of activated coagulation and complement, and cytokines preoperatively and daily during the first postoperative week.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, coagulation and complement activation markers were comparable between PTA and SPK recipients, while cytokine concentrations were higher in SPK recipients (TNF, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α; all p<0.05). On the first postoperative day, PTA recipients had higher coagulation activation, measured as thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), than SPK recipients (p=0.008). In the first postoperative week, PTA recipients showed higher relative cytokine release (IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1α; all p<0.05) while SPK recipients showed higher absolute cytokine concentrations (TNF, IL-1ra, IL-8, MIP-1α, and IL-4; all p<0.05). PTA and SPK recipients showed similar terminal complement complex (TCC, sC5b-9) activation. On the first postoperative day, TCC (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0-1.5] for 0.1 CAU/ml increase, p=0.02) and CRP (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0-1.3] for 10 mg/L increase, p=0.04) were associated with an increased risk of early graft thrombosis. TCC was specific for graft thrombosis, while CRP increased with several complications. PTA recipients with compared to those without graft thrombosis had higher TCC pre- (p=0.04) and postoperatively (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

The relative increase in postoperative thromboinflammatory response was more pronounced in PTA recipients. Complement activation was associated with an increased risk of graft thrombosis. This study indicates that innate immune activation rather than elevated levels may affect early postoperative pancreas graft thrombosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01957696, identifier NCT01957696.

Sterile Pancreas Inflammation during Preservation and after Transplantation

The pancreas is very susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Early graft losses due to pancreatitis and thrombosis represent a major issue after pancreas transplantation. Sterile inflammation during organ procurement (during brain death and ischemia-reperfusion) and after transplantation affects organ outcomes. Sterile inflammation of the pancreas linked to ischemia-reperfusion injury involves the activation of innate immune cell subsets such as macrophages and neutrophils, following tissue damage and release of damage-associated molecular patterns and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Macrophages and neutrophils favor tissue invasion by other immune cells, have deleterious effects or functions, and promote tissue fibrosis. However, some innate cell subsets may promote tissue repair. This outburst of sterile inflammation promotes adaptive immunity activation via antigen exposure and activation of antigen-presenting cells. Better controlling sterile inflammation during pancreas preservation and after transplantation is of utmost interest in order to decrease early allograft loss (in particular thrombosis) and increase long-term allograft survival. In this regard, perfusion techniques that are currently being implemented represent a promising tool to decrease global inflammation and modulate the immune response.

Effect of donor pancreas extraction time on pancreas transplantation-a Swiss tertiary center experience

We aimed to assess the effect of donor pancreas extraction time (ET) on postoperative complications and graft function after pancreas transplantation (PT). We analyzed all consecutive donor pancreas procurements for the simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and the associated PT in a Swiss transplant center over a 20-year period. Pancreas ET was defined as the time from cold flush to static storage of the pancreas on ice. The primary endpoint was the effect of extraction time on surgical complications. Secondary endpoints comprised the effect of ET on graft function (insulin-free survival) and graft pancreatitis. Of 115 procured pancreas grafts the median donor pancreas ET was 65 min (IQR: 48-78 min). In multivariable analysis, ET did not negatively affect major complications (OR 1.41 [95% CI: .59-3.36]; p = .438) and insulin-free survival (HR 1.42 [95% CI: .55-3.63]; p = .459). The median CIT was 522 (441-608) min. CIT was associated with major complications (OR 2.51 [95% CI: 1.11-5.68]; p = .027), but without impact on insulin-free survival (HR 1.94 [95% CI: .84-4.48]; p = .119). Patients with and without graft pancreatitis had no statistically significant differences in ET and CIT (p = .164 and p = .47, respectively). In multivariable analysis, Amylase levels > 270 U/L on postoperative day 1 were significantly associated with major complications (OR 3.61 [95% CI: 1.06-12.32]; p = .040). Our results suggest that although no effect of ET on complications and graft function after PT was found, shorter CIT and less graft pancreatitis can have a positive impact on surgical complications. Results could possibly be influenced by the exceptional quality of the pancreas donors, with short travel distances and preservation times in Switzerland.

Improved surgical outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the contemporary era

BACKGROUND

Complications leading to early technical failure have been the Achilles' heel of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). The study purpose was to analyze longitudinally our experience with early surgical complications following SPKT with an emphasis on changes in practice that improved outcomes in the most recent era.

STUDY DESIGN

Single center retrospective review of all SPKTs from 11/1/01 to 8/12/20 with enteric drainage. Early relaparotomy was defined as occurring within 3 months of SPKT. Patients were stratified into two sequential eras: Era 1 (E1): 11/1/01-5/30/13; Era 2 (E2) 6/1/13-8/12/20 based on changes in practice that occurred pursuant to donor age and pancreas cold ischemia time (CIT).

RESULTS

255 consecutive SPKTs were analyzed (E1, n = 165; E2, n = 90). E1 patients received organs from older donors (mean E1 27.3 vs. E2 23.1 years) with longer pancreas cold CITs) (mean E1 16.1 vs. E2 13.3 h, both p < .05). E1 patients had a higher early relaparotomy rate (E1 43.0% vs. E2 14.4%) and were more likely to require allograft pancreatectomy (E1 9.1% vs. E2 2.2%, both p < .05). E2 patients underwent systemic venous drainage more frequently (E1 8% vs. E2 29%) but pancreas venous drainage did not influence either relaparotomy or allograft pancreatectomy rates. The most common indications for early relaparotomy in E1 were allograft thrombosis (11.5%) and peri-pancreatic phlegmon/abscess (8.5%) whereas in E2 were thrombosis, pancreatitis/infection, and bowel obstruction (each 3%).

CONCLUSION

Maximizing donor quality (younger donors) and minimizing pancreas CIT are paramount for reducing early surgical complications following SPKT.

Pancreas Transplantation in a Single Center: Risk Factors Associated With Pancreatic Allograft Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation remains a challenging procedure for small and medium-sized transplants teams, despite improvements in graft survival. Data regarding the impact of the procurement team's experience on the outcomes of pancreas transplant are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors that lead to pancreatic allograft thrombosis, especially the experience of the pancreas procurement team.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 137 patients who underwent pancreas transplantation between March 2005 and May 2017 was conducted. Donor's and recipient characteristics were evaluated as well as their relationship to pancreatic allograft thrombosis. Cases were divided according to the number of pancreas procurements previously done by the procurement surgeon: group 1 (30 to 40 retrievals) and group 2 (≥40 retrievals).

RESULTS

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants accounted for 89.8% of cases (n = 123). Surgeons from group 2 performed 62.8% (n = 86) of the procurements. The graft was removed in 19 cases (13.8%) due to thrombosis. In univariate analysis, lower experience of the retrieval team was associated with allograft loss (P = .04). In multivariate analysis, donor intensive care unit time ≥5 days (P = .03) and lower experience of the procurement team were associated with increased risk of pancreatic allograft thrombosis (P = .02), whereas recipient's age from 30 to 40 years (P = .018) or ≥40 years (P = .02) was found as a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic allograft thrombosis remains an important cause of graft loss in pancreas transplantation. Recipient's age, prolonged donor intensive care unit time, and lower experience of the procurement team directly influence pancreatic allograft thrombosis.

Effective Technique for Pancreas Transplantation by Iliac Vascular Transposition, Without Heparin-Based Anticoagulation Therapy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate patients undergoing a new procedure, iliac vascular transposition, in pancreas transplantation regarding the risk of thrombosis and graft survival without heparin-based anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

Iliac vascular transposition (IVT) involves changing the positions of the external iliac artery and vein relative to each other. In this study, this technique was evaluated in patients undergoing the procedure compared with patients not undergoing the procedure (iliac vascular parallel (IVP) group).

RESULTS

No patients received prophylactic heparin therapy. Two patients in the IVP group (n = 26) developed complete thrombosis and six developed partial thrombosis, compared with no patients with complete thrombosis and one with partial thrombosis in the IVT group (n = 29). The cumulative incidence of thrombosis was significantly higher in the IVP group (p < 0.01). Cox regression revealed that not receiving iliac vascular transposition was the only significant risk factor for thrombosis (odds ratio: 10.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-81.2; p = 0.03). One-year graft survival was significantly better in the IVT group vs IVP group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

IVT in pancreas transplantation is a simple technique that results in a lower thrombosis risk and better graft survival rates without heparin-based anticoagulation therapy.

Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) initially started in the early 2000s as a series of protocols to improve the perioperative care of surgical patients. They aimed to increase patient satisfaction while reducing postoperative complications and postoperative length of stay. Despite these protocols being widely adopted in many fields of surgery, they are yet to be adopted in pancreatic transplantation: a high-risk surgery with often prolonged length of postoperative stay and high rate of complications. We have analysed the literature in pancreatic and transplantation surgery to identify the necessary preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative components of an ERAS pathway in pancreas transplantation.

Interventions for preventing thrombosis in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Graft thrombosis is a well-recognised complication of solid organ transplantation and is one of the leading causes of graft failure. Currently there are no standardised protocols for thromboprophylaxis. Many transplant units use unfractionated heparin (UFH) and fractionated heparins (low molecular weight heparin; LMWH) as prophylaxis for thrombosis. Antiplatelet agents such as aspirin are routinely used as prophylaxis of other thrombotic conditions and may have a role in preventing graft thrombosis. However, any pharmacological thromboprophylaxis comes with the theoretical risk of increasing the risk of major blood loss following transplant. This review looks at benefits and harms of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of instituting thromboprophylaxis to patients undergoing solid organ transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 10 November 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs designed to examine interventions to prevent thrombosis in solid organ transplant recipients. All donor types were included (donor after circulatory (DCD) and brainstem death (DBD) and live transplantation). There was no upper age limit for recipients in our search.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The results of the literature search were screened and data collected by two independent authors. Dichotomous outcome results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random effects models were used for data analysis. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two authors using the risk of bias assessment tool. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified nine studies (712 participants). Seven studies (544 participants) included kidney transplant recipients, and studies included liver transplant recipients. We did not identify any study enrolling heart, lung, pancreas, bowel, or any other solid organ transplant recipient. Selection bias was high or unclear in eight of the nine studies; five studies were at high risk of bias for performance and/or detection bias; while attrition and reporting biases were in general low or unclear. Three studies (180 participants) primarily investigated heparinisation in kidney transplantation. Only two studies reported on graft vessel thrombosis in kidney transplantation (144 participants). These small studies were at high risk of bias in several domains and reported only two graft thromboses between them; it therefore remains unclear whether heparin decreases the risk of early graft thrombosis or non-graft thrombosis (very low certainty). UFH may make little or no difference versus placebo to the rate of major bleeding events in kidney transplantation (3 studies, 155 participants: RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.89 to 9.56; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis using a fixed-effect model suggested that UFH may increase the risk of haemorrhagic events compared to placebo (RR 3.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 10.67, P = 0.04). Compared to control, any heparin (including LMWH) may make little or no difference to the number of major bleeding events (3 studies, 180 participants: RR 2.70, 95% CI 0.89 to 8.19; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) and had an unclear effect on risk of readmission to intensive care (3 studies, 180 participants: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.90, I² = 45%; very low certainty evidence). The effect of heparin on our other outcomes (including death, patient and graft survival, transfusion requirements) remains unclear (very low certainty evidence). Three studies (144 participants) investigated antiplatelet interventions in kidney transplantation: aspirin versus dipyridamole (1), and Lipo-PGE₁ plus low-dose heparin to "control" in patients who had a diagnosis of acute rejection (2). None of these reported on early graft thromboses. The effect of aspirin, dipyridamole and Lipo PGE₁ plus low-dose heparin on any outcomes is unclear (very low certainty evidence). Two studies (168 participants) assessed interventions in liver transplants. One compared warfarin versus aspirin in patients with pre-existing portal vein thrombosis and the other investigated plasmapheresis plus anticoagulation. Both studies were abstract-only publications, had high risk of bias in several domains, and no outcomes could be meta-analysed. Overall, the effect of any of these interventions on any of our outcomes remains unclear with no evidence to guide anti-thrombotic therapy in standard liver transplant recipients (very low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there is a paucity of research in the field of graft thrombosis prevention. Due to a lack of high quality evidence, it remains unclear whether any therapy is able to reduce the rate of early graft thrombosis in any type of solid organ transplant. UFH may increase the risk of major bleeding in kidney transplant recipients, however this is based on low certainty evidence. There is no evidence from RCTs to guide anti-thrombotic strategies in liver, heart, lung, or other solid organ transplants. Further studies are required in comparing anticoagulants, antiplatelets to placebo in solid organ transplantation. These should focus on outcomes such as early graft thrombosis, major haemorrhagic complications, return to theatre, and patient/graft survival.

Serum pancreatic enzymes in the early postoperative period predict complications associated with pancreatic fluid after pancreas transplantation: A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation (PT) is a radical treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM). Although the results of PT have been improving, surgical complications remain. Few reports have focused on complications associated with pancreatic fluid (CAPF) after PT. We aimed to investigate the risk factors and predictors for CAPF after PT.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients, who underwent deceased-donor PT for type 1 DM at our institution from August 2001 to May 2020, were retrospectively studied. We identified CAPF from those with Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥grade III and assessed risk factors by univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (30.4%) patients had complications with Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥grade III. Eleven (16.0%) patients were diagnosed with CAPF. Median serum pancreatic amylase (P-AMY) levels with CAPF on postoperative day (POD)1 and POD2 were significantly higher than those without CAPF (P = .019 and P = .027, respectively). In multivariable analysis, serum P-AMY levels on POD1 were an independent predictive factor for CAPF (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.14, P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications associated with pancreatic fluid after PT is associated with high serum P-AMY in the early postoperative period. Serum pancreatic enzymes in the first few postoperative days after PT may be a significant predictive factor for CAPF.

Immediate post-operative complications (I): Post-operative bleeding; vascular origin: Thrombosis pancreatitis

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for insulin-dependent diabetes that associates end-stage diabetic nephropathy, since it achieves not only a clear improvement in the quality of life, but also provides a long-term survival advantage over isolated kidney transplant. However, pancreas transplantation still has the highest rate of surgical complications among organ transplants. More than 70% of early graft losses are attributed to technical failures, that is, to a non-immunological cause. The so-called technical failures include graft thrombosis, bleeding, infection, pancreatitis, anastomotic leak and pancreatic fistula. Pancreatic graft thrombosis leads these technical complications as the most frequent cause of early graft loss. Currently most recipients receive postoperative anticoagulation with the aim of reducing the rate of thrombosis. Hemoperitoneum in the early postoperative period is a frequent cause of relaparotomy, but it is not usually associated with graft loss. The incidence of hemoperitoneum is clearly related to the use of anticoagulation in the postoperative period. Post-transplant pancreatitis is another cause of early postoperative complications, less frequent than the previous. In this review, we analyze the most common surgical complications that determine pancreatic graft losses.

Early protocol computer tomography and endovascular interventions in pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early vascular complications following pancreatic transplantation are not uncommon (3%-8%). Typically, cross-sectional imaging is requested in response to clinical change. We instituted a change in protocol to request imaging pre-emptively to identify patients with thrombotic complications.

METHODS

In 2013, protocol computer tomography angiography (CTA) at days 3-5 and day 10 following pancreas transplantation was introduced. A retrospective analysis of all pancreas transplants performed at our institution from January 2001 to May 2019 was undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients received pancreas transplants during this time period. A total of 78 received pancreas transplant without routine CTA and 37 patients with the new protocol. Following the change in protocol, we detected a high number of subclinical thromboses (41.7%). There was a significant decrease in invasive intervention for thrombosis (78.6% before vs 30.8% after, p = .02), and graft survival was significantly higher (61.5% before vs 86.1% after, p = .04). There was also a significant reduction in the number of graft failures (all-cause) where thrombosis was present (23.4% before vs 5.6% after, p = .02). Patient survival was unaffected (p = .48).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of early protocol CTA identifies a large number of patients with subclinical graft thromboses that are more amenable to conservative management and significantly reduces the requirement for invasive intervention.