1
|
Paoletti F, Urciuoli I, Romagnoli J, Bellini MI. Bariatric surgery in prospective obese living kidney donors: scoping review and management decision algorithm. Minerva Surg 2024; 79:197-209. [PMID: 38127433 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.23.10128-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Global chronic kidney disease is now epidemic, with substantial health and economic consequences. While scientific support for living donor renal transplants (LDRT) is strong, donor shortages necessitate consideration of expanded criteria, including obese individuals. Bariatric surgery (BS) may mitigate obesity-related risks, but research on living donor candidates is scarce. Our scoping review aims to compile evidence, identify gaps, and formulate an algorithm to guide healthcare professionals in evaluating BS for obese living donors. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We did a systematic search of studies on living kidney donors and obesity. We searched the MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases for studies from database inception to March 30, 2023. All English-language articles available in full text have been considered. Excluded are commentaries, editorials, letters, and abstracts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Obesity in LDRT raises long-term ESRD risk. Current high BMI donor admission raises ethical and clinical concerns. Encouraging timely weight loss can make obese candidates suitable donors, reducing risks. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most reported and preferable approach, since it minimizes hyperoxaluria risk. Re-evaluation for donation is possible 6-12 months post-BS, with BMI<35 for three months. Cost-benefit analysis favors BS over nephrectomy in obese donors (cost-benefit ratio: 3.64) when graft survival is equal. CONCLUSIONS BS shows promise with short-term effectiveness and potential long-term outcomes. However, it should not be perceived as a means to expand the donor pool but rather as a personalized approach to address obesity and improve individuals' health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Paoletti
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgical Sciences A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy -
| | | | - Jacopo Romagnoli
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgical Sciences A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanbay M, Copur S, Ucku D, Zoccali C. Donor obesity and weight gain after transplantation: two still overlooked threats to long-term graft survival. Clin Kidney J 2022; 16:254-261. [PMID: 36755848 PMCID: PMC9900567 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of donor obesity on kidney transplantation success has long been an overlooked clinical research area. Even though there is no strict guideline in most countries prohibiting donation from obese individuals, most candidates with a body mass index >35-40 kg/m2 are rejected due to concerns regarding long-term renal functional deterioration in the donor. The effects of excessive fat mass on renal function and allograft survival have been analysed by several longitudinal and follow-up studies. These studies have documented the deleterious effect on long-term graft outcomes of excessive body mass in living kidney donors and de novo obesity or pre-existing obesity worsening after transplantation on kidney outcomes. However, there is a paucity of clinical trials aimed at countering overweight and obesity in living and deceased kidney donors and in transplant patients. In this review we will briefly discuss the mechanism whereby fat excess induces adverse kidney outcomes and describe the effects on graft function and survival in living obese donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sidar Copur
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Duygu Ucku
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Carmine Zoccali
- Renal Research Institute, New York, NY, USA,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Associazione Ipertensione, Nefrologia e Trapianto Renale, Nefrologia, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
How good is a living donor? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of donor demographics on post kidney transplant outcomes. J Nephrol 2022; 35:807-820. [PMID: 35072936 PMCID: PMC8995249 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01231-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aims Living donor kidneys are considered the best quality organs. In the attempt to expand the donor pool, the donor’s age, sex and body mass index (BMI) might be considered as potential determinants of the kidney transplant outcomes, and thus guide recipient selection. We aimed to investigate the effects of donor demographics on kidney function, graft and recipient survival, delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis. EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, BIOSIS, CABI, SciELO and Cochrane were searched using algorithms. NHBLI tools were used for risk of bias assessment. Mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and risk ratio (RR) were calculated in Revman 5.4 Results Altogether, 5129 studies were identified by the search algorithm; 47 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. No significant difference in recipient 1-year survival was found between recipients of donors aged < 50 vs donors aged > 50 (RR = 0.65 95% CI: 0.1–4.1), and recipients of donors aged < 60 vs donors aged > 60 (RR = 0.81 95% CI: 0.3–2.3). Graft survival was significantly higher in recipients of grafts from donors aged < 60. Risk of AR (RR = 0.62 95% CI: 0.5–0.8) and DGF (RR = 0.28 95% CI: 0.1–0.9) were significantly lower in recipients of grafts from donors aged < 60. One-year serum creatinine was significantly lower in recipients from donors aged < 60 years compared to donors aged > 60 years (MD = 0.3 mg/dl 95% CI: 0.1–0.9), although there was high heterogeneity. Recipients of grafts from male donors had lower 1-year serum creatinine (MD = 0.12 mg/dl 95% CI: 0.2–0.1) and higher eGFR compared to recipients of female donors (p < 0.00001). Donor obesity increased the incidence of delayed graft function but not acute rejection (RR = 0.66 95% CI: 0.32–1.34). Conclusions Older donor age was associated with worse post-transplant outcomes and recipients of male donors had better 1-year eGFR. Donor obesity affects the incidence of delayed graft function, but not the incidence of acute rejection in recipients. Graphical Abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-021-01231-7.
Collapse
|
4
|
Arabi Z, Bukhari M, Hamad A, Altheaby A, Kaysi S. Practice Patterns in the Acceptance of Medically Complex Living Kidney Donors with Obesity, Hypertension, Family History of Kidney Disease, or Donor-Recipient Age Discrepancy. Avicenna J Med 2021; 11:172-184. [PMID: 34881200 PMCID: PMC8648409 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
To assess the practice patterns of the acceptance of medically complex living kidney donors (MCLKDs).
Methods
We distributed a survey to nephrologists and transplant surgeons (TS) across the world through major international transplant societies. The survey contained questions regarding obesity, abnormal blood glucose profile, mild hypertension, donor-recipient age discrepancy, or family history of kidney disease of unknown etiology.
Results
In total, 239 respondents from 29 countries (42% were nephrologists and 58% were TS).
Most respondents would allow donations from obese donors, especially if they intended to lose weight but would be cautious if these donors had abnormal blood glucose or family history of diabetes mellitus. In hypertensive donors, future pregnancy plans mattered in decisions regarding the acceptance of female donors. Most respondents would allow young donors but would be more cautious if they had a future risk of hypertension or a family history of kidney disease of unknown etiology. They would also allow donations from an older person if prolonged waiting time was anticipated. We found multiple areas of consensus of practice among the diverse members of international transplant societies, with some interesting variations among nephrologists and TS. Conclusions
This survey highlights the practice patterns of the acceptance of MCLKDs among the international community. In the absence of clear guidelines, this survey provides additional information to counsel kidney donors with these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Arabi
- Department of the Organ Transplant Center, Division of Adult Transplant Nephrology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Bukhari
- Department of Medicine, Division of Adult Nephrology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Hamad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
| | - Abdulrahman Altheaby
- Department of the Organ Transplant Center, Division of Adult Transplant Nephrology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Kaysi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, CHU, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Veroux M, Mattone E, Cavallo M, Gioco R, Corona D, Volpicelli A, Veroux P. Obesity and bariatric surgery in kidney transplantation: A clinical review. World J Diabetes 2021; 12:1563-1575. [PMID: 34630908 PMCID: PMC8472502 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i9.1563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Obesity is increasing worldwide, and this has major implications in the setting of kidney transplantation. Patients with obesity may have limited access to transplantation and increased posttransplant morbidity and mortality. Most transplant centers incorporate interventions aiming to target obesity in kidney transplant candidates, including dietary education and lifestyle modifications. For those failing nutritional restriction and medical therapy, the use of bariatric surgery may increase the transplant candidacy of patients with obesity and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and may potentially improve the immediate and late outcomes. Bariatric surgery in ESRD patients is associated with weight loss ranging from 29.8% to 72.8% excess weight loss, with reported mortality and morbidity rates of 2% and 7%, respectively. The most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedures in patients with ESRD and in transplant patients are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, the correct timing of bariatric surgery and the ideal type of surgery have yet to be determined, although pretransplant LSG seems to be associated with an acceptable risk-benefit profile. We review the impact of obesity on kidney transplant candidates and recipients and in potential living kidney donors, exploring the potential impact of bariatric surgery in addressing obesity in these populations, thereby potentially improving posttransplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimiliano Veroux
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies GF Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mattone
- Vascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Matteo Cavallo
- Vascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Rossella Gioco
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Daniela Corona
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Alessio Volpicelli
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Veroux
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Specialities, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Melkonian V, Nguyen MTJP. Managing the Obese Living Kidney Donor. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-020-00279-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
7
|
Martin WP, White J, López-Hernández FJ, Docherty NG, le Roux CW. Metabolic Surgery to Treat Obesity in Diabetic Kidney Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, and End-Stage Kidney Disease; What Are the Unanswered Questions? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:289. [PMID: 33013677 PMCID: PMC7462008 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity is a major factor in contemporary clinical practice in nephrology. Obesity accelerates the progression of both diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease and, in renal transplantation, both recipient and donor obesity increase the risk of allograft complications. Obesity is thus a major driver of renal disease progression and a barrier to deceased and living donor kidney transplantation. Large observational studies have highlighted that metabolic surgery reduces the incidence of albuminuria, slows chronic kidney disease progression, and reduces the incidence of end-stage kidney disease over extended follow-up in people with and without type 2 diabetes. The surgical treatment of obesity and its metabolic sequelae has therefore the potential to improve management of diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease and aid in the slowing of renal decline toward end-stage kidney disease. In the context of patients with end-stage kidney disease, although complications of metabolic surgery are higher, absolute event rates are low and it remains a safe intervention in this population. Pre-transplant metabolic surgery increases access to kidney transplantation in people with obesity and end-stage kidney disease. Metabolic surgery also improves management of metabolic complications post-kidney transplantation, including new-onset diabetes. Procedure selection may be critical to mitigate the risks of oxalate nephropathy and disruption to immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics. Metabolic surgery may also have a role in the treatment of donor obesity, which could increase the living kidney donor pool with potential downstream impact on kidney paired exchange programmes. The present paper provides a comprehensive coverage of the literature concerning renal outcomes in clinical studies of metabolic surgery and integrates findings from relevant mechanistic pre-clinical studies. In so doing the key unanswered questions for the field are brought to the fore for discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P. Martin
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- *Correspondence: William P. Martin
| | - James White
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Francisco J. López-Hernández
- Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León-Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IECSCYL-IBSAL), Hospital Virgen Vega, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Neil G. Docherty
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carel W. le Roux
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Division of Investigative Science, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waits SA, Sung RS. Pushing the envelope for obese kidney donor candidates. Transpl Int 2019; 32:688-689. [PMID: 30891814 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Seth A Waits
- Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Randall S Sung
- Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|