1
|
Kute VB, Fleetwood VA, Chauhan S, Meshram HS, Caliskan Y, Varma C, Yazıcı H, Oto ÖA, Lentine KL. Kidney paired donation in developing countries: A global perspective. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2023; 10:117-125. [PMID: 37720696 PMCID: PMC10501157 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-023-00401-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of review We review the key principles of kidney paired donation (KPD) and discuss the status and unique considerations for KPD in developing countries. Recent findings Despite the advantages of KPD programs, they remain rare among developing nations, and the programs that exist have many differences with those of in developed countries. There is a paucity of literature and lack of published data on KPD from most of the developing nations. Expanding KPD programs may require the adoption of features and innovations of successful KPD programs. Cooperation with national and international societies should be encouraged to ensure endorsement and sharing of best practices. Summary KPD is in the initial stages or has not yet started in the majority of the emerging nations. But the logistics and strategies required to implement KPD in developing nations differ from other parts of the world. By learning from the KPD experience in developing countries and adapting to their unique needs, it should be possible to expand access to KPD to allow more transplants to happen for patients in need world-wide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek B Kute
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr. H L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Vidya A. Fleetwood
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sanshriti Chauhan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr. H L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Hari Shankar Meshram
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr. H L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Yasar Caliskan
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chintalapati Varma
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Halil Yazıcı
- Division of Nephrology, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Özgür Akın Oto
- Division of Nephrology, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marino IR, Roth AE, Rees MA. Living Kidney Donor Transplantation and Global Kidney Exchange. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:5-9. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.donorsymp.2022.l12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
3
|
Abstract
Kidney failure is among the leading causes of death worldwide, and the best treatment is transplantation. However, transplants are in short supply because of shortfalls of transplantable organs and of finances. In the United States and some other countries, kidney exchange chains have emerged as a way to increase the number of transplants; patients who have a willing donor but cannot receive that donor’s kidney can each receive a compatible kidney from another patient’s intended donor. Such programs are much better developed within the borders of wealthy countries, which is of little help to patients in countries with limited kidney transplantation or exchange. This paper proposes and analyzes a way to extend kidney exchange chains to share the benefits globally. Kidney failure is a worldwide scourge, made more lethal by the shortage of transplants. We propose a way to organize kidney exchange chains internationally between middle-income countries with financial barriers to transplantation and high-income countries with many hard to match patients and patient–donor pairs facing lengthy dialysis. The proposal involves chains of exchange that begin in the middle-income country and end in the high-income country. We also propose a way of financing such chains using savings to US health care payers.
Collapse
|
4
|
The Impact of Cold Ischaemia Time On Outcomes of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in the UK Living Kidney Sharing Scheme. Ann Surg 2021; 274:859-865. [PMID: 34334648 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of cold ischaemia time (CIT) on living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) outcomes in the UK living kidney sharing scheme (UKLKSS) versus outside the scheme. BACKGROUND LDKT provides the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. ESKD patients with an incompatible living donor still have an opportunity to be transplanted through Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEP). In KEPs where kidneys travel rather than donors, CIT can be prolonged. METHODS Data from all UK adult LDKT between 2007 and 2018 were analysed. RESULTS 9969 LDKT were performed during this period, of which 1396 (14%) were transplanted through the UKLKSS, which we refer to as KEP. Median CIT was significantly different for KEP versus non-KEP (339 versus 182 minutes, p < 0.001). KEP LDKT had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) (4.08% versus 6.97%, p < 0.0001), lower 1-year (eGFR 57.90 versus 55.25 ml/min, p = 0.04) and 5-year graft function (eGFR 55.62 versus 53.09 ml/min, p = 0.01) compared to the non-KEP group, but 1- and 5-year graft survival were similar. Within KEP, a prolonged CIT was associated with more DGF (9.26% versus 4.80%, p = 0.03), and lower graft function at 1-year and 5-years (eGFR = 55 vs 50 ml/min, p = 0.02), but had no impact on graft survival. CONCLUSION Whilst CIT was longer in KEP, associated with more DGF and lower graft function, excellent 5-year graft survival similar to non-KEP was found.
Collapse
|
5
|
Roth AE, Marino IR, Ekwenna O, Dunn TB, Paloyo SR, Tan M, Correa-Rotter R, Kuhr CS, Marsh CL, Ortiz J, Testa G, Sindhwani P, Segev DL, Rogers J, Punch JD, Forbes RC, Zimmerman MA, Ellis MJ, Rege A, Basagoitia L, Krawiec KD, Rees MA. Global kidney exchange should expand wisely. Transpl Int 2021; 33:985-988. [PMID: 32430941 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ty B Dunn
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Siegfredo R Paloyo
- Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.,St. Luke's Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
| | | | - Ricardo Correa-Rotter
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Rogers
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Aparna Rege
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura Basagoitia
- General Regional Hospital No 1, Dr. Carlos Macgregor Sánchez Navarro, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Michael A Rees
- University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.,Alliance for Paired Kidney Donation, Perrysburg, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
We study popular attitudes in Germany, Spain, the Philippines, and the United States toward three controversial markets-prostitution, surrogacy, and global kidney exchange (GKE). Of those markets, only prostitution is banned in the United States and the Philippines, and only prostitution is allowed in Germany and Spain. Unlike prostitution, majorities support legalization of surrogacy and GKE in all four countries. So, there is not a simple relation between public support for markets, or bans, and their legal and regulatory status. Because both markets and bans on markets require social support to work well, this sheds light on the prospects for effective regulation of controversial markets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin E Roth
- Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305;
| | - Stephanie W Wang
- Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
| |
Collapse
|