1
|
Ribeiro LC, Almeida M, Malheiro J, Silva F, Nunes-Carneiro D, Martins LS, Pedroso S, Silva-Ramos M. Association of the Calcification Score of the Abdominal Aorta, Common Iliac, and Renal Arteries with Outcomes in Living Kidney Donors. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093339. [PMID: 37176779 PMCID: PMC10179313 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular calcification is an ever-more-common finding in protocoled pre-transplant imaging in living kidney donors. We intended to explore whether a connection could be found between the Agatston calcification score, prior to kidney donation, and post-donation renal function. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 156 living kidney donors who underwent living donor nephrectomy between January 2010 and December 2016. We quantified the total calcification score (TCaScore) by calculating the Agatston score for each vessel, abdominal aorta, common iliac, and renal arteries. Donors were placed into two different groups based on their TCaScore: <100 TCaScore group and ≥100 TCaScore group. The relationship between TCaScore, 1-year eGFR, proteinuria, and risk of 1 measurement of decreased renal function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) over 5 years of follow-up was investigated. RESULTS The ≥100 TCaScore group consisted of 29 (19%) donors, with a median (interquartile range) calcification score of 164 (117-358). This group was significantly older, 56.7 ± 6.9 vs. 45.5 ± 10.6 (p < 0.001), had a higher average BMI (p < 0.019), and had a lower preoperative eGFR (p < 0.014). The 1-year eGFR was similarly diminished, 69.9 ± 15.7 vs. 76.3 ± 15.5 (p < 0.048), while also having an increased risk of decreased renal function during the follow-up, 22% vs. 48% (p < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Our study, through univariate analyses, found a relationship between a TCaScore > 100, lower 1-year eGFR, and decreased renal function in 5 years. However, a higher-than-expected vascular calcification should not be an excluding factor in donors, although they may require closer monitoring during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís Costa Ribeiro
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela Almeida
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Malheiro
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Filipa Silva
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
| | - Diogo Nunes-Carneiro
- Urology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
| | - La Salete Martins
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Pedroso
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
| | - Miguel Silva-Ramos
- Urology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almeida M, Pereira PR, Ramos M, Carneiro D, Mandaleno M, Silva F, Pedroso S, França M, Martins LS, Malheiro J. CT volumetry performs better than nuclear renography in predicting estimated renal function one year after living donation. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:553-562. [PMID: 36565400 PMCID: PMC9958147 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03441-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The evaluation of split renal function (SRF) is a critical issue in living kidney donations and can be evaluated using nuclear renography (NR) or computerized tomography (CT), with unclear comparative advantages. We conducted this retrospective study in 193 donors to examine the correlation of SRF assessed by NR and CT volumetry and compared their ability to predict remaining donor renal function at 1 year, through multiple approaches. A weak correlation between imaging techniques for evaluating the percentage of the remaining kidney volume was found in the global cohort, with an R2 = 0.15. However, the Bland-Altman plot showed an acceptable agreement (95% of the difference between techniques falling within - 8.51 to 6.11%). The predicted and observed eGFR one year after donation were calculated using the CKD-EPI, and CG/BSA equations. CT volume showed a better correlation than NR for both formulas (adjusted R2 of 0.42. and 0.61 vs 0.37 and 0.61 for CKD-EPI and CG/ BSA equations, respectively). In non-nested modeling tests, CT volumetry was significantly superior to NR for both equations. CT volumetry performed better than NR in predicting the estimated renal function of living donors at 1-year, independently from the eGFR equation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Almeida
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Pedro R Pereira
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Miguel Ramos
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
| | - Diogo Carneiro
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (CHTMAD), Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Mariana Mandaleno
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
| | - Filipa Silva
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Pedroso
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela França
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
| | - La Salete Martins
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Malheiro
- Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto), Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, UMIB, Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Is Compensation Prediction Score Valid for Contralateral Kidney After Living-Donor Nephrectomy in the United States? Transplant Proc 2022; 54:237-241. [PMID: 35031118 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compensation after living donor nephrectomy is well known, and a compensation prediction score (CPS) was made in Japan previously. The aim of this study was to perform external validation of CPS in the United States. METHODS We studied retrospectively 78 living donor nephrectomies in our institution. We defined a favorable compensation as a postdonation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year of >60% of the predonation eGFR. We analyzed the living donors' clinical characteristics and outcomes and validated CPS score. RESULTS The median (range) donor age was 43 (21-63) years, and median body mass index was 26.9 (18.3-35.9) kg/m2. Forty-four percent of donors were White. The donor predonation eGFR was 105 (61-134) mL/min/1.73 m2, and the postdonation eGFR at 1 year was 73.2 (0-115) mL/min/1.73 m2. Eighty-three percent of donors had a favorable compensation. The CPS was 9.6 (1.6-15.6) and showed strong diagnostic accuracy for predicting favorable compensation (area under the curve, 0.788; 95% confidence interval, 0.652-0.924; P = .001). The CPS showed a significant positive correlation with the postdonation eGFR at 1 year (R = 0.54; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In the United States, the CPS would be a valid tool with which to predict a favorable compensation of remnant kidney function.
Collapse
|