The relationship between proteinuria and allograft survival in patients with transplant glomerulopathy: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Superimposed on Transplant Glomerulopathy: Implications for Graft Survival

INTRODUCTION

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a morphological lesion resulting from chronic glomerular endothelium injury, and it is strongly associated with poor graft survival. TG coexisting with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) can be found in renal allograft biopsies, but few related studies are available.

METHODS

Consecutive kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven TG were studied retrospectively. Patients concomitant with FSGS were identified and compared with those without FSGS. The influence of FSGS on allograft outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 66 patients with TG, 40 (60.6%) had concomitant FSGS. TG patients with FSGS had higher proteinuria (median, 2.6 vs. 0.8 g/24 h, p < 0.001) and serum creatinine levels (median, 2.5 vs. 2.1 mg/dL, p = 0.04), lower serum albumin levels, higher chronic glomerulopathy (cg) score, larger glomerular tuft area, lower number of podocytes, and higher incidences of podocyte hyperplasia, pseudotubule formation, and diffuse foot process effacement than those without FSGS (all p < 0.05). The kidney allograft loss rate of patients with FSGS was higher than that of patients without FSGS (65.7% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.03). The presence of FSGS was independently associated with allograft loss in TG (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-8.98, p = 0.01). Other independent predictors were proteinuria (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.37, p = 0.02), estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.97, p < 0.001), and panel reactive antibody (HR = 3.99, 95% CI: 1.14-13.99, p = 0.03). Moreover, FSGS (odds ratio (OR) = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.29-14.92, p = 0.02) and cg (OR = 5.36, 95% CI: 1.56-18.40, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for proteinuria.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with TG, the presence of FSGS was strongly associated with more severe clinicopathological features and worse allograft survival.

Clinicopathologic Features and Risk Factors of Proteinuria in Transplant Glomerulopathy

Background: Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is one of the main causes of post-transplant proteinuria (PU). The features and possible risk factors for proteinuria in TG patients are uncertain.

Methods: We investigated all patients who had biopsy-proven TG from 2000 to 2018 in our center. The clinical and histological data were compared between two groups with or without PU (cut-off = 0.3 g/day). Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between PU and pathological changes. The risk factors for PU in TG patients were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: One hundred and twenty-five (75.76%) of all enrolled 165 TG patients had proteinuria ≥0.3 g/day at the time of biopsy. TG patients' PU level was significantly correlated with Banff lesion score cg (ρ = 0.247, P = 0.003), and mm (ρ = 0.257, P = 0.012). Systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.04–7.10, P = 0.041), diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg (OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.39–16.82, P = 0.013), peak PRA ≥5% (OR 6.47, 95% CI 1.67–25.01, P = 0.007), positive C4d staining (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.29–16.11, 0.019), tacrolimus-based regimen (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.28–9.54, P = 0.014), and calcium channel blocker usage (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.59–12.09, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for PU.

Conclusions: Proteinuria is common in TG patients. systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, peak PRA ≥5%, positive C4d staining, tacrolimus-based regimen, and calcium channel blocker usage are associated with proteinuria in TG patients.