1
|
Kessler Iglesias C, Bloom JE, Xiao X, Moskovitch J, Eckford H, Offen S, Kotlyar E, Keogh A, Jabbour A, Bergin P, Leet A, Hare JL, Taylor AJ, Hayward CS, Jansz P, Kaye DM, Macdonald PS, Muthiah K. Early Use of Aspirin for Coronary Allograft Prophylaxis in Heart Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2025; 109:346-351. [PMID: 39020464 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. The use of aspirin for CAV prophylaxis has recently garnered interest as a possible therapeutic adjunct in this setting. METHODS This 2-center retrospective cohort study included 372 patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 2009 and March 2018 and were stratified according to the commencement of aspirin during their index transplant admission. The primary outcome was the development of moderate or severe CAV (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2) at surveillance coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints included mortality at follow-up. RESULTS There were no differences in age, sex, and cause of heart failure. In the early aspirin group, the preponderant risk factors included use of ventricular assist devices, pretransplant smoking, and mild or moderate rejection. Multivariable analyses to assess for independent predictors of CAV development and mortality demonstrated that aspirin was associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.47, P < 0.01) and a trend toward a protective effect against the development of moderate or severe CAV (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.19; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective risk-adjusted 2-center cohort study, early aspirin administration was associated with reduced risk of death and a trend toward a protective effect against CAV development. These findings warrant validation in prospective randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassia Kessler Iglesias
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason E Bloom
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Xiaoman Xiao
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Hunter Eckford
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sophie Offen
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eugene Kotlyar
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Keogh
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Jabbour
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Bergin
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Angeline Leet
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James L Hare
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew J Taylor
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher S Hayward
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Jansz
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David M Kaye
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter S Macdonald
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kavitha Muthiah
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharma SP, Sanz J, Hirsch A, Patel R, Constantinescu AA, Barghash M, Mancini DM, Brugts JJ, Caliskan K, Taverne YJHJ, Manintveld OC, Budde RPJ. Temporal changes in CT-derived fractional flow reserve in patients after heart transplantation. Eur Radiol 2025; 35:232-243. [PMID: 39014089 PMCID: PMC11631993 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10932-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding functional information by CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) to coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and assessing its temporal change may provide insight into the natural history and physiopathology of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in heart transplantation (HTx) patients. We assessed FFRct changes as well as CAV progression over a 2-year period in HTx patients undergoing serial CT imaging. METHODS HTx patients from Erasmus MC and Mount Sinai Hospital, who had consecutive CCTAs 2 years apart were evaluated. FFRct analysis was performed for both scans. FFRct values at the most distal point in the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) were measured after precisely matching the anatomical locations in both analyses. Also, the number of anatomical coronary stenoses of > 30% was scored. RESULTS In total, 106 patients (median age 57 [interquartile range 47-67] years, 67% male) at 9 [6-13] years after HTx at the time of the baseline CCTA were included. Median distal FFRct values significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up for the LAD from 0.85 [0.79-0.90] to 0.84 [0.76-0.90] (p = 0.001), LCX from 0.92 [0.88-0.96] to 0.91 [0.85-0.95] (p = 0.009), and RCA from 0.92 [0.86-0.95] to 0.90 [0.86-0.94] (p = 0.004). The number of focal anatomical stenoses of > 30% increased from a median of 1 [0-2] at baseline to 2 [0-3] at follow-up (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS The distal coronary FFRct values in post-HTX patients in each of the three major coronary arteries decreased, and the number of focal coronary stenoses increased over a 2-year period. Temporal FFRct change rate may become an additional parameter in the follow-up of HTx patients, but more research is needed to elucidate its role. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) is important post-heart transplant because of additional information on coronary CT angiography for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) detection. The decrease and degree of reduction in distal FFRct value may indicate progression in anatomic CAV burden. KEY POINTS CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) is important for monitoring cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in heart transplant patients. Over time, transplant patients showed a decrease in distal FFRct and an increase in coronary stenoses. Temporal changes in FFRct could be crucial for transplant follow-up, aiding in CAV detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simran P Sharma
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier Sanz
- Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Hirsch
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richa Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alina A Constantinescu
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maya Barghash
- Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna M Mancini
- Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jasper J Brugts
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kadir Caliskan
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yannick J H J Taverne
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ricardo P J Budde
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pergola V, Pradegan N, Cozza E, Cozac DA, Cao I, Tessari C, Savo MT, Toscano G, Angelini A, Tarzia V, Tarantini G, Tona F, De Conti G, Iliceto S, Gerosa G, Motta R. Redefining CAV surveillance strategies: Benefits of CCTA vs. ICA. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2025; 19:162-168. [PMID: 39034189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) assessment post-heart transplantation (HT) typically relies on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is emerging as a promising alternative due to its potential benefits in economic, safety, and logistical aspects. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a CCTA program on these aspects in CAV surveillance post-HT. METHODS A retrospective single-center study was conducted between March 2021 and February 2023, involving HT patients who underwent either CCTA or ICA. RESULTS Among 260 patients undergoing CAV surveillance, 115 (44.2%) patients underwent CCTA, and 145 (55.8%) patients underwent ICA. The CCTA group showed incurred lower overall costs (p < 0.0001) and shorter hospitalization times (p < 0.0001) compared to the ICA group. In terms of safety, CCTA surveillance required significantly lower contrast volumes (p < 0.0001) and lower effective doses (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION CCTA emerges as a safe and cost-effective non-invasive alternative for CAV surveillance post-HT, outperforming ICA in terms of safety, logistical aspects, and economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Pergola
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nicola Pradegan
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
| | - Elena Cozza
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Dan Alexandru Cozac
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy; Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation of Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Irene Cao
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Tessari
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Savo
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Toscano
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Annalisa Angelini
- Cardiovascular Pathology, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tarzia
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Tona
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Giorgio De Conti
- Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Sabino Iliceto
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Gino Gerosa
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Raffaella Motta
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health-DCTV, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Dijk BCJ, Bos D, Roest S, Hirsch A, Taverne YJHJ, Brugts JJ, de Boer RA, Budde RPJ, Manintveld OC. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Heart Transplant Patients: Current Insights and Future Directions. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00945. [PMID: 39841094 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
Abstract
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a significant challenge after heart transplantation, necessitating effective surveillance methods. This review centers around the role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in CAV surveillance, given its unique capabilities to visualize and quantify CAV in comparison with other imaging modalities, including invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. CCTA has shown good diagnostic performance for detecting and monitoring CAV, exemplified by a higher sensitivity and negative predictive value compared with invasive coronary angiography. Additionally, CCTA can provide valuable functional insights with fractional flow reserve integration. An additional, considerable benefit of CCTA is that it allows for the opportunity to assess other imaging markers of cardiometabolic and general health, including coronary artery calcium score, epicardial fat volume, liver fat, vertebral bone density, and lung density, which allows for a comprehensive assessment of the overall health of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt C J van Dijk
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Bos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Roest
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Hirsch
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yannick J H J Taverne
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Brugts
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rudolf A de Boer
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ricardo P J Budde
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuczaj A, Pawlak S, Głowacki J, Antończyk R, Śliwka J, Przybyłowski P, Hrapkowicz T. Utility of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Heart Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:836-840. [PMID: 38729834 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft vasculopathy is a leading cause of death after heart transplantation (HTx). Diagnosing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) within this patient group poses significant challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patients after HTx. METHODS We enrolled 107 consecutive HTx recipients (26 women, mean age 50 ± 17 years); all were ≥3 years post-HTx with minimal or no evidence of CAV in a prior coronary angiography performed a minimum of 2 years before the current examination. The inclusion criteria comprised an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30, absence of new heart failure symptoms, and no contraindications to iodine contrast or CT scans. All patients underwent a 64-slice CCTA. In cases of minimal or no changes, noninvasive follow-up examinations were conducted. Significant changes in CT prompted additional coronary angiography. RESULTS Of the enrolled participants, 9 exhibited minimal changes; 98 displayed no changes in coronary angiography. The median time since transplant was 7 years, with IQR of 4 to 11.25 years. Significant changes were excluded in 98 patients. Among the 9 patients with suspected significant CAV, significant changes were confirmed in 8 patients, resulting in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed in 6. One patient from this group died shortly after PTCA. No cardiovascular incidents were observed within the remaining group. The median follow-up period was 539 (IQR = 289-654 days). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up was 58% ± 5% compared with 58% ± 4% at baseline. At follow-up, the mean eGFR was 64 ± 18 mL/kg/1.73 m2 compared with the baseline value of 67.2 mL/kg/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS CCTA appears to offer a secure and efficient means of assessment in HTx recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Kuczaj
- Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland.
| | - Szymon Pawlak
- Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Jan Głowacki
- Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Remigiusz Antończyk
- Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Joanna Śliwka
- Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Piotr Przybyłowski
- Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Tomasz Hrapkowicz
- Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shah H, Lee I, Rao S, Suddath W, Rodrigo M, Mohammed S, Molina E, García-Garcia HM, Kenigsberg BB. Quantitative flow ratio computed from invasive coronary angiography as a predictor for cardiac allograft vasculopathy after cardiac transplant. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING 2024; 40:451-458. [PMID: 38117378 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-03012-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a significant determinant of long-term survival in heart transplant recipients. Standard CAV screening typically utilizes invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a computational method for functional testing of coronary stenosis, and may add diagnostic value to ICA in assessing CAV. Consecutive subjects who received heart transplantation and underwent two separate routine coronary angiograms between January 2013 and April 2016 were enrolled. Coronary angiograms and IVUS were performed per local protocol at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years post-transplant. QFR was calculated offline. CAV was assessed semi-quantitively based on coronary angiogram results. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Mean time from transplant to first included ICA was 2.1 years. QFR in at least 1 coronary vessel was interpretable in 19/22 (86%) of initial ICA (QFR1). QFR1 correlated well with the CAV score derived from the second ICA (CAV2) with a clustering of CAV at lower QFR values. In a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an optimal QFR threshold of 0.88 yielded 0.94 sensitivity and 0.67 specificity (AUC of 0.79) for at least non-obstructive subsequent CAV. Initial angiographically and intravascular ultrasound derived CAV severity poorly predicted subsequent CAV severity. QFR derived from invasive coronary angiography predicts subsequent development of CAV more accurately than angiography and intravascular ultrasound. This novel method of coronary flow assessment in recipients of heart transplantation may be useful to diagnose and predict subsequent CAV development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsh Shah
- Department of Cardiology, Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Injoon Lee
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sriram Rao
- Department of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William Suddath
- Department of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Maria Rodrigo
- Department of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Selma Mohammed
- Department of Cardiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ezequiel Molina
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hector M García-Garcia
- MedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Benjamin B Kenigsberg
- Department of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
- Department of Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St., NW, Rm A121, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pergola V, Cameli M, Mattesi G, Mushtaq S, D’Andrea A, Guaricci AI, Pastore MC, Amato F, Dellino CM, Motta R, Perazzolo Marra M, Dellegrottaglie S, Pedrinelli R, Iliceto S, Nodari S, Perrone Filardi P, Pontone G. Multimodality Imaging in Advanced Heart Failure for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-Up: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7641. [PMID: 38137711 PMCID: PMC10743799 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced heart failure (AHF) presents a complex landscape with challenges spanning diagnosis, management, and patient outcomes. In response, the integration of multimodality imaging techniques has emerged as a pivotal approach. This comprehensive review delves into the profound significance of these imaging strategies within AHF scenarios. Multimodality imaging, encompassing echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), nuclear imaging and cardiac computed tomography (CCT), stands as a cornerstone in the care of patients with both short- and long-term mechanical support devices. These techniques facilitate precise device selection, placement, and vigilant monitoring, ensuring patient safety and optimal device functionality. In the context of orthotopic cardiac transplant (OTC), the role of multimodality imaging remains indispensable. Echocardiography offers invaluable insights into allograft function and potential complications. Advanced methods, like speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), empower the detection of acute cell rejection. Nuclear imaging, CMR and CCT further enhance diagnostic precision, especially concerning allograft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This comprehensive imaging approach goes beyond diagnosis, shaping treatment strategies and risk assessment. By harmonizing diverse imaging modalities, clinicians gain a panoramic understanding of each patient's unique condition, facilitating well-informed decisions. The aim is to highlight the novelty and unique aspects of recently published papers in the field. Thus, this review underscores the irreplaceable role of multimodality imaging in elevating patient outcomes, refining treatment precision, and propelling advancements in the evolving landscape of advanced heart failure management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Pergola
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.M.); (F.A.); (M.P.M.); (S.I.)
| | - Matteo Cameli
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Sienna, 53100 Siena, Italy; (M.C.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Giulia Mattesi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.M.); (F.A.); (M.P.M.); (S.I.)
| | - Saima Mushtaq
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy; (S.M.); (C.M.D.); (G.P.)
| | | | - Andrea Igoren Guaricci
- University Cardiology Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Policlinic University Hospital, 70121 Bari, Italy;
| | - Maria Concetta Pastore
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Sienna, 53100 Siena, Italy; (M.C.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Filippo Amato
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.M.); (F.A.); (M.P.M.); (S.I.)
| | - Carlo Maria Dellino
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy; (S.M.); (C.M.D.); (G.P.)
| | - Raffaella Motta
- Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy;
| | - Martina Perazzolo Marra
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.M.); (F.A.); (M.P.M.); (S.I.)
| | - Santo Dellegrottaglie
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Medico-Chirurgico Accreditato Villa dei Fiori, 80011 Acerra, Italy;
| | - Roberto Pedrinelli
- Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Sabino Iliceto
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy; (G.M.); (F.A.); (M.P.M.); (S.I.)
| | - Savina Nodari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Institute of Cardiology, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Pasquale Perrone Filardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Pontone
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy; (S.M.); (C.M.D.); (G.P.)
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roest S, Budde RPJ, Hesselink DA, Zijlstra F, Zillikens MC, Caliskan K, Bos D, Manintveld OC. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis after heart transplantation assessed using CT. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:772-778. [PMID: 37407368 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoporosis is frequently observed in patients after heart transplantation (HT), although the prevalence long-term post-HT is unknown. Most studies investigating bone mineral density (BD) after HT were performed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In this study BD, including the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis, was investigated using coronary computed tomography (CCT) long-term post-HT. Moreover, risk factors for abnormal BD were investigated. METHODS All first CCT scans between February 2018 and June 2020 used for the annual screening for cardiac allograft vasculopathy were included. Retransplantations and scans with not fully imaged vertebrae were excluded. BD was measured as a mean of the BD of three consecutive thoracic vertebrae and categorized into normal BD, osteopenia or osteoporosis. Binary logistic regression was used to find determinants for an abnormal BD. Linear regression was used to explore determinants for the mean Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the BD. RESULTS In total, 140 patients were included (median age 55.2 [42.9-64.9] years, 51 (36%) female). Time between HT and CT scan was 11.0 [7.3-16.1] years. In total, 80 (57%), 43 (31%), and 17 (12%) patients had a normal BD, osteopenia, or osteoporosis, respectively. Osteoporotic fracture or vertebrae fractures was seen in 11 (8%) patients. Determinants for an abnormal BD were recipient age (OR 1.10 (1.06-1.14), p<0.001) and prednisolone use (OR 3.75 (1.27-11.01), p=0.016). In linear regression, left ventricular assist device use pre-HT (p=0.024) and time since HT (p=0.046) were additional BD determinants. DISCUSSION Osteopenia and osteoporosis are frequently seen on CCT post-HT. More investigation on appropriate measures to maintain a normal BD in these patients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Roest
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R P J Budde
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D A Hesselink
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Zijlstra
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M C Zillikens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Caliskan
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Bos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pergola V, Mattesi G, Cozza E, Pradegan N, Tessari C, Dellino CM, Savo MT, Amato F, Cecere A, Perazzolo Marra M, Tona F, Guaricci AI, De Conti G, Gerosa G, Iliceto S, Motta R. New Non-Invasive Imaging Technologies in Cardiac Transplant Follow-Up: Acquired Evidence and Future Options. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2818. [PMID: 37685356 PMCID: PMC10487200 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HT) is the established treatment for end-stage heart failure, significantly enhancing patients' survival and quality of life. To ensure optimal outcomes, the routine monitoring of HT recipients is paramount. While existing guidelines offer guidance on a blend of invasive and non-invasive imaging techniques, certain aspects such as the timing of echocardiographic assessments and the role of echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as alternatives to serial endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) for rejection monitoring are not specifically outlined in the guidelines. Furthermore, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is still recommended as the gold-standard procedure, usually performed one year after surgery and every two years thereafter. This review focuses on recent advancements in non-invasive and contrast-saving imaging techniques that have been investigated for HT patients. The aim of the manuscript is to identify imaging modalities that may potentially replace or reduce the need for invasive procedures such as ICA and EMB, considering their respective advantages and disadvantages. We emphasize the transformative potential of non-invasive techniques in elevating patient care. Advanced echocardiography techniques, including strain imaging and tissue Doppler imaging, offer enhanced insights into cardiac function, while CMR, through its multi-parametric mapping techniques, such as T1 and T2 mapping, allows for the non-invasive assessment of inflammation and tissue characterization. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT), particularly with its ability to evaluate coronary artery disease and assess graft vasculopathy, emerges as an integral tool in the follow-up of HT patients. Recent studies have highlighted the potential of nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging, including myocardial blood flow quantification, as a non-invasive method for diagnosing and prognosticating CAV. These advanced imaging approaches hold promise in mitigating the need for invasive procedures like ICA and EMB when evaluating the benefits and limitations of each modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Pergola
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Giulia Mattesi
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Elena Cozza
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Nicola Pradegan
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy; (N.P.); (C.T.); (G.G.)
| | - Chiara Tessari
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy; (N.P.); (C.T.); (G.G.)
| | - Carlo Maria Dellino
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Maria Teresa Savo
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Filippo Amato
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Annagrazia Cecere
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Martina Perazzolo Marra
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Francesco Tona
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Andrea Igoren Guaricci
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University Hospital “Policlinico” of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | | | - Gino Gerosa
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy; (N.P.); (C.T.); (G.G.)
| | - Sabino Iliceto
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy; (G.M.); (C.M.D.); (M.T.S.); (F.A.); (A.C.); (M.P.M.); (F.T.); (S.I.)
| | - Raffaella Motta
- Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sharma V, Agarwal S, Grover T, Malhotra A, Kumar H, Gowda DM, Agarwal Y, Bhatia H, Koirala SB, Singh SP. Coronary allograft vasculopathy in post-heart transplant patients: pathogenesis and role of cardiac computed tomography in diagnosis-a comprehensive review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2023; 85:3531-3537. [PMID: 37427227 PMCID: PMC10328616 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000000942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronary allograft vasculopathy, often known as cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), is a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in people who have had heart transplants. Early detection and monitoring of CAV are crucial for improving outcomes in this population. Although cardiac computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a possible method for finding and evaluating CAV, invasive coronary angiography has long been thought of as the gold standard for recognizing CAV. This study focuses on the utility of cardiac CT for CAV diagnosis and treatment in the post-heart transplant population. It provides an overview of recent studies on the application of cardiac CT in CAV and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of this imaging modality. The potential application of cardiac CT for CAV risk assessment and care is also examined in the study. Overall, the data point to a potential role for cardiac CT in the detection and treatment of CAV in post-heart transplant patients. It enables evaluation of the whole coronary tree and low-radiation, high-resolution imaging of the coronary arteries. Hence, further study is required to determine how best to employ cardiac CT in treating CAV in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vagisha Sharma
- Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
| | | | - Tanvi Grover
- Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
| | | | | | | | - Yash Agarwal
- College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal
| | - Hitesh Bhatia
- Pt. B.D.S. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Rohtak, India
| | | | - Satinder P. Singh
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McDonald MM, Mihalj M, Zhao B, Nathan S, Matejin S, Ottaviani G, Jezovnik MK, Radovancevic R, Kar B, Gregoric ID, Buja LM. Clinicopathological correlations in heart transplantation recipients complicated by death or re-transplantation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1014796. [PMID: 36407445 PMCID: PMC9669710 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1014796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to identify and correlate pathological findings with clinical outcomes in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) who either died or underwent a re-transplantation. Methodology and study design Single-center retrospective analysis of primary OHT patients who died or were re-transplanted between October 2012 and July 2021. Clinical data were matched with corresponding pathological findings from endomyocardial biopsies on antibody-mediated rejection, cellular rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Re-assessment of available tissue samples was performed to investigate acute myocardial injury (AMI) as a distinct phenomenon. These were correlated with clinical outcomes, which included severe primary graft dysfunction. Patients were grouped according to the presence of AMI and compared. Results We identified 47 patients with truncated outcomes after the first OHT. The median age was 59 years, 36 patients (76%) were male, 25 patients (53%) had a prior history of cardiac operation, and 21 patients (45%) were supported with a durable assist device before OHT. Of those, AMI was identified in 22 (47%) patients (AMI group), and 25 patients had no AMI (non-AMI group). Groups were comparable in baseline and perioperative data. Histopathological observations in AMI group included a non-significant higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection Grade 1 or higher (pAMR ≥ 1) (32% vs. 12%, P = 0.154), and non-significant lower incidence of severe acute cellular rejection (ACR ≥ 2R) (32% vs. 40%, P = 0.762). Clinical observations in the AMI group found a significantly higher occurrence of severe primary graft dysfunction (68% vs. 20%, P = 0.001) and a highly significant shorter duration from transplantation to death or re-transplantation (42 days [IQR 26, 120] vs. 1,133 days [711–1,664], P < 0.0001). Those patients had a significantly higher occurrence of cardiac-related deaths (64% vs. 24%, P = 0.020). No difference was observed in other outcomes. Conclusion In heart transplant recipients with a truncated postoperative course leading to either death or re-transplantation, AMI in endomyocardial biopsies was a common pathological phenomenon, which correlated with the clinical occurrence of severe primary graft dysfunction. Those patients had significantly shorter survival times and higher cardiac-related deaths. The presence of AMI suggests a truncated course after OHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M. McDonald
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maks Mihalj
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bihong Zhao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sriram Nathan
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stanislava Matejin
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Giulia Ottaviani
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- Cardiovascular Pathology, Lino Rossi Research Center, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mateja K. Jezovnik
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rajko Radovancevic
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Biswajit Kar
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Igor D. Gregoric
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - L. Maximilian Buja
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: L. Maximilian Buja,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Epicardial fat volume is related to the degree of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Eur Radiol 2022; 33:330-338. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09029-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Increasing evidence suggests a role for epicardial fat in the development of coronary artery disease in the general population. Heart transplantation patients are at increased risk of developing a specific form of coronary artery disease, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), which has far-reaching consequences in terms of morbidity and mortality. Until now, the role of epicardial fat volume (EFV) in the development of CAV remains unknown. Hence, we investigated the relationship between EFV and CAV as well as the influence of donor/recipient sex on EFV.
Methods
Adult heart transplant patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for CAV screening who were four or more years post-HT were included. Using the CT examinations, we quantified the EFV and the degree of CAV. Ordinal and linear regression models were used to assess the association of EFV with CAV.
Results
In total, 149 (median age 44.5 years, 36% women) patients were included. The median time between HT and the CT scan was 11.0 (7.3–16.1) years. CAV grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 were seen in 85 (57%), 32 (22%), 14 (9%), and 18 (12%) patients, respectively. The median EFV was 208.4 (128.9–276.0) mL. Larger EFV were related to higher degrees of CAV (median of 164.7 to 290.6 mL for CAV grade 0 and 3, respectively, OR 5.23 (2.47–11.06), p < 0.001). Male recipients had significantly more EFV than female recipients irrespective of the donor sex (232.7 mL vs. 147.2 mL respectively, p < 0.001). Determinants for EFV were recipient sex, number of rejections, donor age, time between HT and CT scan, recipient BMI, and diabetes mellitus.
Conclusions
EFV was associated with higher degrees of CAV. The recipient sex influenced the EFV more than the donor sex.
Key Points
• Patients after heart transplantation have a high amount of epicardial fat while larger amounts of epicardial fat are related to higher grades of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
• Determinants of higher epicardial fat volume included recipient sex, number of rejections, donor age, time between HT and CT scan, recipient BMI, and diabetes mellitus.
• Longitudinal studies are needed to further disentangle the role of epicardial fat in the development and progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Graphical abstract
Collapse
|
13
|
Das BB, Deshpande S, Hussain T. Multimodality Imaging to Detect Rejection, and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients—An Illustrative Review. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2022; 3:241-256. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology3030025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
The three most common modalities of graft surveillance in pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients include echocardiography, coronary angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The survival outcomes after HT in children have improved considerably in recent years. However, allograft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy remain the leading cause of death or re-transplantation. The routine surveillance by EMB and coronary angiography are invasive and risky. Newer noninvasive echocardiographic techniques, including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), 2-D speckle tracking echocardiography, CT coronary angiography (CTCA), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), functional flow reserve (CFR) of coronary arteries, optical coherence tomography (OCT), have emerged as powerful tools which may help early recognition of sub-clinical rejection, response to treatment, early detection, and progression of CAV. The multimodality imaging approach, including noninvasive and invasive tests, is the future for the transplanted heart to detect dysfunction, rejections, and early CAV. This review illustrates noninvasive and invasive imaging techniques currently used or could be considered for clinical use in detecting heart transplant rejection, dysfunction, and CAV in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bibhuti B. Das
- Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s of Mississippi, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Shriprasad Deshpande
- Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s National, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Tarique Hussain
- Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roest S, Manintveld OC, Kolff MAE, Akca F, Veenis JF, Constantinescu AA, Brugts JJ, Birim O, van Osch-Gevers LM, Szili-Torok T, Caliskan K. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and donor age affecting permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation. ESC Heart Fail 2022; 9:1239-1247. [PMID: 35174653 PMCID: PMC8934965 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The need for permanent pacemakers (PMs) after heart transplantation (HT) is increasing. The aim was to determine the influence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), donor age, and other risk factors on PM implantations early and late after HT and its effect on survival. Methods and results A retrospective, single‐centre study was performed including HTs from 1984 to July 2018. Early PM was defined as PM implantation ≤90 days and late PM as PM > 90 days. Risk factors for PM and survival after PM were determined with (time‐dependent) multivariable Cox regression. Out of 720 HTs performed, 62 were excluded (55 mortalities ≤30 days and 7 retransplantations). Of the remaining 658 patients, 95 (14%) needed a PM: 38 (6%) early and 57 (9%) late during follow‐up (median 9.3 years). Early PM risk factors were donor age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, P < 0.001], ischaemic time (HR 1.01, P < 0.001), and in adults amiodarone use before HT (HR 2.02, P = 0.045). Late PM risk factors were donor age (HR 1.03, P = 0.024) and CAV (HR 3.59, P < 0.001). Late PM compromised survival (HR 2.05, P < 0.001), while early PM did not (HR 0.77, P = 0.41). Conclusions Risk factors for early PM implantation were donor age, ischaemic time, and in adults amiodarone use before HT. Late PM implantation risk factors were donor age and CAV. Late PM diminished survival, which is probably a surrogate marker for underlying progressive cardiac disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Roest
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marit A E Kolff
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ferdi Akca
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse F Veenis
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alina A Constantinescu
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Brugts
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ozcan Birim
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lennie M van Osch-Gevers
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tamas Szili-Torok
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kadir Caliskan
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|