Fatty liver disease in Living Liver Donors: A Single-Institute Experience of 220 Donors

Long-term risk of a fatty liver in liver donors

Aim

Approximately 30 years have passed since the first experience of living donor liver transplantation. The time to evaluate the long-term safety of living donors has been fulfilled. Meanwhile, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is increasingly common and a critical problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of living donor, focusing on fatty liver postdonation hepatectomy.

Methods

Living donors (n = 212, 1997-2019) were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) at >1-year postdonation. A liver to spleen (L/S) ratio of <1.1 was defined as fatty liver.

Results

Among 212 living liver donors, 30 (14.2%) detected fatty liver at 5.3 ± 4.2 years postdonation. The cumulative incidence rates of fatty liver were 3.1%, 12.1%, 22.1%, and 27.7% at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years postdonation, respectively. Of 30 subjects who developed fatty liver, 18 (60%) displayed a severe steatosis (L/S ratio <0.9). Five (16.7%) had a prior history of excessive alcohol abuse. More than 30% developed metabolic syndrome including obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Although six (20%) had a Fib-4 index of >1.3, which included a case with a Fib-4 index of >2.67, no significant increased Fib-4 index was observed in the subjects with fatty liver as compared to those without fatty liver (p = 0.66). The independent predictive risk factors for developing fatty liver were male sex, pediatric recipient, and higher body mass index (>25) at donation.

Conclusion

Living donors with risk factors for developing fatty liver should be carefully followed-up for the prevention and management of metabolic syndrome.

Liver Transplant Imaging prior to and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

The suspension of the surgical activity, the burden of the infection in immunosuppressed patients, and the comorbidities underlying end-stage organ disease have impacted transplant programs significantly, even life-saving procedures, such as liver transplantation.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted to explore the challenges faced by transplant programs and the adopted strategies to overcome them, with a focus on indications for imaging in liver transplant candidates.

RESULTS

Liver transplantation relies on an appropriate imaging method for its success. During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, chest CT showed an additional value to detect early signs of SARS-CoV-2 infection and other screening modalities are less accurate than radiology.

CONCLUSION

There is an emerging recognition of the chest CT value to recommend its use and help COVID-19 detection in patients. This examination appears highly sensitive for liver transplant candidates and recipients, who otherwise would have not undergone it, particularly when asymptomatic.

Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Pure laparoscopic liver donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) remains challenging, and its value is still unclear compared with open liver donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). Objective: To provide comprehensive evidence about the safety and efficacy of LLDRH. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from the date of inception to July 2021. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was used to analyze the pooled data by using Review Manager Version 5.3. Results: A total of 1940 patients from 6 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. For perioperative outcomes of donors, LLDRH had a longer operative time than OLDRH (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 29.75 [4.23-55.26] minutes, P = .02), but it had lower overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67 [0.45-0.99], P = .04), fewer pulmonary complications (OR = 0.47 [0.29-0.76], P = .002), and shorter hospital stays (WMD = -1, P < .001) than OLDRH. However, major complications, biliary complications, portal vein problems, and intra-abdominal bleeding were comparable between the 2 groups. With regard to the postoperative data of recipients, the risks of biliary problems, hepatic artery problems, portal vein problems, hepatic vein problems, and postoperative liver failure were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions: LLDRH for living donors is safe and effective, and it offers superior perioperative outcomes to OLDRH.