1
|
Thomas BB, Rajendran Nair DS, Rahimian M, Hassan AK, Tran TL, Seiler MJ. Animal models for the evaluation of retinal stem cell therapies. Prog Retin Eye Res 2025; 106:101356. [PMID: 40239758 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2025] [Accepted: 04/14/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025]
Abstract
Retinal degeneration (RD) diseases leading to severe vision loss can affect photoreceptors (PRs) that are responsible for phototransduction, or retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) providing support for PRs. Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies are a potential approach for restoration of retinal structure in patients with currently incurable RD diseases. Currently, there are two targeted hPSC therapeutics: PR rescue and PR replacement. PR rescue involves the transplantation of RPE or other neural progenitors into the subretinal space to slow down or prevent further RD. RPE transplantation plays a critical role in preserving photoreceptors by providing trophic support and maintaining retinal integrity, particularly in diseases like age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Advances in RPE transplantation methods, such as polarized monolayer cultures and scaffold-based approaches, have shown promise in enhancing graft survival and integration. However, limitations include inconsistent integration, variable neurotrophic factor secretion, and immune rejection risks in non-autologous transplants. In PR replacement, stem cell-derived photoreceptor-like cells or photoreceptor progenitors (PRP) obtained are transplanted into the eye. While PRPs are commonly obtained from retinal organoids (ROs), alternative sources, such as early differentiation stages or direct differentiation protocols, are also utilized to enhance the efficiency and scalability of PRP generation. Challenges include achieving proper integration, forming outer segments, rosette formation, and avoiding immune rejection or tumorigenicity. Various animal models that simulate human RD diseases are being used for establishing surgical feasibility, graft survival and visual functional recovery but fail to replicate clinical immune challenges. Rodent models lack macula-like structures and have limited reliability in detecting subtle functional changes, while larger animal models pose ethical, logistical, and financial challenges. Immunocompromised models have been developed for minimizing xenograft issues. Visual functional testing for efficacy includes optokinetic testing (OKN), electroretinography (ERG), and electrophysiological recordings from the retina and brain. These tests often fail to capture the complexity of human visual recovery, highlighting the need for advanced models and improved functional testing techniques. This review aims to aggregate current knowledge about approaches to stem cell transplantation, requirements of animal models chosen for validating vision benefits of transplantation studies, advantages of using specific disease models and their limitations. While promising strides have been made, addressing these limitations remains essential for translating stem cell-based therapies into clinical success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biju B Thomas
- Department of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; USC Ginsburg Institute for Biomedical Therapeutics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Deepthi S Rajendran Nair
- Department of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mana Rahimian
- Department of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Amr K Hassan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA, United States
| | - Thuy-Linh Tran
- Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Magdalene J Seiler
- Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA, United States; Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Center for Translational Vision Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Komáromy AM, Lenstra JA. Genetic Eye Diseases in Animals: A Selected Review of Recent Advances. Anim Genet 2024; 55:711-713. [PMID: 39016013 DOI: 10.1111/age.13460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- A M Komáromy
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - J A Lenstra
- Faculty of Veterinary Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Komáromy AM, Lenstra JA. Genetic eye diseases in animals: A selected review of recent advances. Vet Ophthalmol 2024. [PMID: 39016054 DOI: 10.1111/vop.13246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- A M Komáromy
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J A Lenstra
- Faculty of Veterinary Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Sampaio MOB, Montiani-Ferreira F, Mello FR, Martins CB, de Souza ALG, Bortolini M, Klaumann PR, Moore BA. Supplemental vibrissal extensions as an alternative to improve the tactile sensitivity of blind dogs - a preliminary approach investigation. Vet Res Commun 2024; 48:1907-1914. [PMID: 38427268 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10342-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This preliminary study suggests a way to artificially extend vibrissae of blind dogs to assist ambulation and avoiding facial contact with obstacles. PROCEDURES Fourteen irreversibly blind dogs had 5-6 mystacial vibrissae on each side of the face supplementally extended by attaching carefully chosen adult pig hairs to them and were subjected to a maze test before and after the procedure. In three of these dogs the test was repeated one more time after all the extensions had fallen off. Collision counts and course times with and without extensions were analyzed and compared. A p-value > 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Median number of collisions was significantly higher post-extensions (5 IQR 2.25) and after extensions had fallen off (4 IQR 7.50) compared to pre-extensions (1 IQR 1), p = 0.021. Median times were significantly higher pre-extension (25.6 IQR 8.98) and after the extensions had fallen off, compared to the post-extension performance (22.8 IQR 8.55), p = 0.04. CONCLUSION Vibrissae play an important role in the tactile perception of blind dogs, and our preliminary results suggest that extending this sensory organ possibly improves obstacle location and their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira
- Veterinary Medicine Department, Federal University of Parana, Rua Dos Funcionarios, 1540, Curitiba, PR, 80035-050, Brazil.
| | - Franz Riegler Mello
- Veterinary Medicine Department, Federal University of Parana, Rua Dos Funcionarios, 1540, Curitiba, PR, 80035-050, Brazil
| | - Camila Bolmann Martins
- Veterinary Medicine Department, Federal University of Parana, Rua Dos Funcionarios, 1540, Curitiba, PR, 80035-050, Brazil
| | | | - Mariza Bortolini
- Veterinary Medicine Department, Federal University of Parana, Rua Dos Funcionarios, 1540, Curitiba, PR, 80035-050, Brazil
| | - Paulo Roberto Klaumann
- Clinivet Hospital Veterinário, R. Holanda, 894, Boa Vista, Curitiba, PR, 82540-040, Brazil
| | - Bret A Moore
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16Th Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA
| |
Collapse
|