Collaborative study for the characterization of a chikungunya virus RNA reference reagent for use in nucleic acid testing

Zika Virus and the Safety of Blood Supply in Brazil: A Retrospective Epidemiological Evaluation

The potential for transfusion transmission of dengue virus (DENV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV), and Zika virus (ZIKV) has raised concerns about the safety of the blood supply in endemic areas. In this study, nucleic acid testing (NAT) for ZIKV, DENV, and CHIKV RNA was performed in asymptomatic blood donor samples in the city of Campinas, located in the southeast region of Brazil (1962 in 2015 and 1775 in 2016). The prevalence of reactive NAT was 0.15% in 2015 and 0.62% in 2016 for dengue, 0.05% in 2015 and 0.17% in 2016 for Zika, and 0% in both years for chikungunya. These results demonstrate the weakness of the clinical interview in screening these blood donors. Furthermore, positivity for ZIKV was detected in March 2015, 1 year before the first reported cases in the region. These data attest the feasibility of using donor samples held in library as a tool for retrospective epidemiological evaluation, which is particularly interesting considering emerging pathogens, for which data on their spread and penetrance are initially scarce.

Beyond Fever and Pain: Diagnostic Methods for Chikungunya Virus

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is an alphavirus that is primarily transmitted by Aedes species mosquitoes. Though reports of an illness consistent with chikungunya date back over 200 years, CHIKV only gained worldwide attention during a massive pandemic that began in East Africa in 2004. Chikungunya, the clinical illness caused by CHIKV, is characterized by a rapid onset of high fever and debilitating joint pain, though in practice, etiologic confirmation of CHIKV requires the availability and use of specific laboratory diagnostics. Similar to infections caused by other arboviruses, CHIKV infections are most commonly detected with a combination of molecular and serological methods, though cell culture and antigen detection are reported. This review provides an overview of available CHIKV diagnostics and highlights aspects of basic virology and epidemiology that pertain to viral detection. Although the number of chikungunya cases has decreased since 2014, CHIKV has become endemic in countries across the tropics and will continue to cause sporadic outbreaks in naive individuals. Consistent access to accurate diagnostics is needed to detect individual cases and initiate timely responses to new outbreaks.

GloPID-R report on Chikungunya, O'nyong-nyong and Mayaro virus, part I: Biological diagnostics

The GloPID-R (Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness) Chikungunya (CHIKV), O'nyong-nyong (ONNV) and Mayaro virus (MAYV) Working Group is investigating the natural history, epidemiology and medical management of infection by these viruses, to identify knowledge gaps and to propose recommendations for direct future investigations and rectification measures. Here, we present the first report dedicated to diagnostic aspects of CHIKV, ONNV and MAYV. Regarding diagnosis of the disease at the acute phase, molecular assays previously described for the three viruses require further evaluation, standardized protocols and the availability of international standards representing the genetic diversity of the viruses. Detection of specific IgM would benefit from further investigations to clarify the extent of cross-reactivity among the three viruses, the sensitivity of the assays, and the possible interfering role of cryoglobulinaemia. Implementation of reference panels and external quality assessments for both molecular and serological assays is necessary. Regarding sero-epidemiological studies, there is no reported high-throughput assay that can distinguish among these different viruses in areas of potential co-circulation. New specific tools and/or improved standardized protocols are needed to enable large-scale epidemiological studies of public health relevance to be performed. Considering the high risk of future CHIKV, MAYV and ONNV outbreaks, the Working Group recommends that a major investigation should be initiated to fill the existing diagnostic gaps.

Duplex nucleic acid test for the detection of chikungunya and dengue RNA viruses in blood donations

BACKGROUND

Chikungunya (CHIKV) and dengue (DENV) viruses are primarily mosquito‐borne, but transfusion transmission can occur (DENV) or is likely (CHIKV). In the absence of commercially available blood screening assays, a variety of strategies to ensure recipient safety in the face of expanding CHIKV and/or DENV outbreaks have been used.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Performance of cobas CHIKV/DENV, a qualitative RNA detection assay for use on the cobas 6800/8800 Systems, was evaluated at two sites (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. [RMS], and the American Red Cross [ARC]). Analytical sensitivity, genotype inclusion, correlation with other assays, and reproducibility used clinical CHIKV‐ or DENV‐positive samples and secondary standards for DENV Types 1 to 4 and for three CHIKV genotypes (Asian; East Central South African; and West African); each secondary standard was traceable to international reference panels or reagents. Evaluation of analytic specificity assessed other microorganisms for interference and cross‐reactivity; clinical specificity was determined by individually testing 10,528 volunteer blood donations from the continental United States.

RESULTS

The 50 and 95% limit of detection (LoD) obtained by RMS for CHIKV, Asian genotype was 1.8 and 6.8 Detectable Units (DU)/mL, respectively, and 0.14 and 0.63 International Units (IU)/mL, respectively for DENV‐1. No significant differences in detection occurred by testing at a second site, the ARC (2.4 and 10.5 DU/mL for CHIKV and 0.15 and 0.60 IU/mL for DENV). Clinical specificity was 100% (95% confidence interval, 99.965%‐100%) for CHIKV and DENV.

CONCLUSIONS

The high sensitivity and specificity of the cobas CHIKV/DENV test, as demonstrated in these evaluations, indicate its suitability for blood donation screening.

Production and characterization of Zika virus RNA reference reagents as a response to a public health emergency

BACKGROUND

The emergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) in 2015 to 2016 created a global public health crisis and an urgent need for accurate detection assays. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is the most specific and sensitive technology for early detection of ZIKV. Various NAT protocols have been created, but until recently, assessment of assay performance and comparative studies were hampered by the lack of available standards and reference reagents.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/Food and Drug Administration responded to this crisis with the generation of two ZIKV-RNA reference reagents (ZIKV-RRs) for use in the development, validation, and assessment of performance of ZIKV-NAT assays. These reagents were produced from heat-inactivated (HI) ZIKV culture supernatant stock from two strains (PRVABC59 and FSS13025) diluted in dialyzed, defibrinated human plasma and lyophilized for evaluation in collaborative studies. The liquid, HI stock had been shared with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (Germany) and were included in the collaborative validation studies for the World Health Organization International Standard for ZIKV (WHO ZIKV IS).

RESULTS

NAT-detectable units (NDUs)/mL were determined in a collaborative study that led to the assignment of 5.77 log NDUs/mL for PRVABC59 and 5.54 log NDUs/mL for FSS13025 as the final concentrations of the FDA ZIKV-RRs.

CONCLUSION

We have established well-characterized reference reagents for ZIKV to facilitate evaluation of existing NAT assays and development of novel ZIKV assays which are correlated to that of the First WHO ZIKV IS. Vials of the ZIKV-RRs are available to qualified organizations upon request.

Advancing Public Health Using Regulatory Science to Enhance Development and Regulation of Medical Products: Food and Drug Administration Research at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research enhances and supports regulatory decision-making and policy development. This work contributes to our regulatory mission, advances medical product development, and supports Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory response to public health crises. This review presents some examples of our diverse scientific work undertaken in recent years to support our regulatory and public health mission.

Comparison of multiplex PCR hybridization-based and singleplex real-time PCR-based assays for detection of low prevalence pathogens in spiked samples

Molecular diagnostic devices are increasingly finding utility in clinical laboratories. Demonstration of the effectiveness of these devices is dependent upon comparing results from clinical samples tested with the new device to an alternative testing method. The preparation of mock clinical specimens will be necessary for the validation of molecular diagnostic devices when a sufficient number of clinical specimens is unobtainable. Examples include rare pathogens, some of which are pathogens posing a biological weapon threat. Here we describe standardized steps for developers to follow for the culture and quantification of three organisms used to spike human whole blood to create mock specimens. The three organisms chosen for this study were the Live Vaccine Strain (LVS) of Francisella tularensis, surrogate for a potential biothreat pathogen, Escherichia coli, a representative Gram-negative bacterium and Babesia microti (Franca) Reichenow Peabody strain, representing a protozoan parasite. Mock specimens were prepared with blood from both healthy donors and donors with nonspecific symptoms including fever, malaise, and flu-like symptoms. There was no significant difference in detection results between the two groups for any pathogen. Testing of the mock samples was compared on two platforms, Target Enriched Multiplex-PCR (TEM-PCR™) and singleplex real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Results were reproducible on both platforms. The reproducibility demonstrated by obtaining the same results between two testing methods and between healthy and symptomatic mock specimens, indicates the standardized methods described for creating the mock specimens are valid and effective for evaluating diagnostic devices.