Granulocyte transfusions could benefit patients with severe oral mucositis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

GRAIN Study - Granulocytes Against Infections - Use of granulocyte transfusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant

Granulocyte transfusions (GTx) combat infections in neutropenic patients. However, immune-mediated off-target effects in transplant settings are unknown. Between January 2020 and December 2021, all transplants that used GTx during the peri-transplant period were analysed. Engraftment, infections, and days to clearance were retrieved from clinical records. Overall survival is compared with the mean total PMN count and the different products. Pooled buffy coat was used in 110 patients (98 %), of which 38 (34 %) additionally received an apheresed product. The median days of GTx was 4. The median bags pooled to prepare a single buffy coat product was 4. The mean total PMN count was 0.98 × 1010/ L granulocytes per pooled buffy coat and 1.93 × 1010/L granulocytes per apheresis product. A higher PMN count (>1 × 1010/L) was achieved in 48 % with pooled buffy coat versus 85 % with apheresis. Respiratory worsening occurred in 39 % receiving GTx. All patients who received granulocytes had engrafted with a median time of 14 days for neutrophil and 20 days for platelet engraftment. Blood cultures cleared in 81 %, whereas only 28 % cleared other cultures. Fungal pneumonia cleared in 25 %, and invasive fungal sinusitis or otitis cleared in 50 %. Overall survival was 47 %, non-significantly higher (57 % vs 39 %, P = 0.1) with a higher PMN dose. The pooled buffy coat is an affordable alternative to apheresis for an effective PMN dose. Ease of availability and low cost of pooled buffy coat, with comparable overall survival points toward a safe and efficacious product, in the peri-transplant period.

Optimized high-dose granulocyte transfusions for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: A single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte transfusions for patients with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections has been a controversial practice. Previous studies suggest a benefit of high-dose granulocyte transfusions (≥0.6 × 109/kg), although, until recently, the consistent production of high-dose units has been challenging. Here, we present our experience and results utilizing high-dose granulocyte transfusions at a large, tertiary academic medical center for the treatment of infections in adult, neutropenic patients.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

A retrospective chart review (2018-2021) was conducted for all patients who received high-dose granulocyte transfusions from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone. Gathered parameters included patient demographics, clinical history, infection status, dose, clinical outcomes, pre- and post-absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and transfusion times including time between granulocyte collection, administration, and posttransfusion ANC count. Gathered parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, outcomes were assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves/log-rank/regression testing.

RESULTS

Totally 28 adult, neutropenic patients refractory to antimicrobial agents and/or G-CSF received a total of 173 granulocyte concentrates. Median ANC increased from 0.7 × 109/L pre-transfusion to 1.6 × 109/L posttransfusion. The mean granulocyte yield was 77.4 × 109 resulting in an average dose per kilogram of 0.90 × 109 ± 0.30 × 109 granulocytes. Composite day 42 survival and microbial response was 42.9% (n = 12/28) without significant adverse reactions.

DISCUSSION

Here, we demonstrate the successful and safe implementation of high-dose granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients. Given the rapid and consistent production, distribution, and improved granulocyte quality, further investigations to determine the clinical efficacy of G-CSF primed granulocyte transfusions is now possible.

A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Long-Term Outcomes with and without Palifermin in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

The incidence of debilitating oral mucositis (OM) can be as high as 99% after myeloablative conditioning regimens preparing patients with hematologic malignancies for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Palifermin (KGF) is a recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor that reduces the incidence and duration of severe OM. The long-term safety of KGF has not been well established, however. In this long-term prospective matched-cohort study, patients who received KGF (cases) and underwent autologous or allogeneic HCT for hematologic malignancies between 2006 and 2013 were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive KGF (controls). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Other outcomes were disease relapse, new malignancies, pancreatitis, renal failure requiring dialysis, pulmonary complications, cataract surgery, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The analysis population comprised 2191 matched pairs with a wide range of diseases and donor types that received diverse conditioning and GVHD preventive regimens, representing contemporary practice patterns. The median duration of follow-up was 8 years (range, 1 to 12.5 years). In multivariate analyses, the probabilities of OS (relative risk [RR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.12), relapse (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.18), new malignancies (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.18), and cataract surgery (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.50) were not statistically significantly different between cases and controls. In univariate analyses, no increased risks were observed for renal failure requiring dialysis, pancreatitis, acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, interstitial pneumonitis/acute respiratory distress syndrome/idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, or bronchiolitis obliterans/cryptogenic organizing pneumonia/bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia among cases compared with controls. This long-term prospective safety cohort study demonstrates that the KGF group had no increased risk of overall mortality, relapse, new malignancies, or any other key outcome. The broad inclusion criteria allow the results to be generalized to contemporary practice for patients with a wide range of diseases and receiving a wide range of HCT conditioning regimens and graft sources from diverse donor types.

Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Mixed Response to Pretransplantation Treatment of Confirmed or Suspected Invasive Fungal Infection

Patients with hematologic malignancy or bone marrow failure are typically required to achieve radiographic improvement or stabilization of invasive fungal infection (IFI) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) owing to a concern for progression before engraftment. Refractory IFI with a mixture of improvement and progression on serial imaging (ie, mixed response) poses a clinical dilemma, because a delay in HCT may allow for a hematologic relapse or other complications. Furthermore, HCT itself may yield the immune reconstitution necessary for clearance of infection. We sought to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent HCT with mixed response IFI. We performed a chart review of all patients who underwent HCT between 2014 and 2020 in whom imaging within 6 weeks before HCT indicated a mixed response to treatment of a diagnosed IFI. Fourteen patients had evidence of a mixed response in low-to-moderate burden of diagnosed IFI by imaging before HCT, including 9 with pulmonary aspergillosis, 2 with hepatosplenic candidiasis (1 also with aspergillosis), and 4 with pulmonary nodules of presumed fungal etiology. Five had refractory severe neutropenia at evaluation for HCT (median, 95 days). All 14 patients showed radiographic stability or improvement in imaging following engraftment; no IFI-related surgeries were required, and no IFI-related deaths occurred. For patients without relapse who underwent HCT more than 1 year earlier, 7 of 8 (88%) were alive at 1 year. Our findings suggest that low-to-moderate burden IFI with mixed response is unlikely to progress on appropriate therapy before engraftment during allogeneic HCT.

Granulozytentransfusion: Update 2020

Die therapeutische Anwendung von Granulozytenkonzentraten erfolgt im klinischen Alltag im Gegensatz zu der anderer Blutprodukte nur selten und unregelmäßig. Der zurückhaltende Einsatz beruht unter anderem auf dem Fehlen einer breiten Evidenz, logistischen und wirtschaftlichen Problemen und dem Vorhandensein anderer potenter Therapieoptionen neutropener Infektionen. Dennoch gab es in den letzten Jahren neue wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse nicht nur zu Physiologie und Pathophysiologie der Granulozyten, wie neu charakterisierten zellulären Verteidigungsstrategien oder deren Mitwirkung bei thrombotischen oder malignen Ereignissen, sondern auch zu deren therapeutischem Effekt. Dieser wird von einer Vielzahl an Parametern, wie der Art der Infektion, dem Transfusionszeitpunkt und der Dosis, beeinflusst. Das macht die Indikationsstellung zu einer komplexen Einzelfallentscheidung und es gilt, die heterogene Datenlage systematisch zusammenzufassen. Außerdem wurden die etablierten Indikationen neutropener bzw. neutropathischer Infektionen um experimentelle, mögliche neue Anwendungsgebiete wie die Mukositis oder Leukämiebehandlung erweitert. Die erfolgreiche Anwendung setzt eine geeignete, moderne Herstellungsweise voraus. Neben der Apherese, bei der eine relativ hohe Spenderbelastung unter anderem durch Nebenwirkungen von Mobilisationsregime und Sedimentationsbeschleunigern berücksichtigt werden muss, existieren weitere Verfahren wie die Gewinnung von Granulozyten aus Buffy Coats von Vollblutspenden. Diese versprechen eine Reduktion logistischer Probleme und unerwünschter Wirkungen auf den Spender. Unerwünschte Wirkungen bei Empfängern von Granulozytentransfusionen sollten nach wie vor berücksichtigt und gegen einen erhofften therapeutischen Effekt abgewogen werden.