Programmes for the management of preoperative anaemia: audit in ten European hospitals within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) Working Group

Determining sex-specific preoperative haemoglobin levels associated with intraoperative red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anaemic cardiac surgery patients are at greater risk of intraoperative red blood cell transfusion. This study questions the application of the World Health Organization population-based anaemia thresholds (haemoglobin <120 g L-1 in non-pregnant females and <130 g L-1 in males) as appropriate preoperative optimisation targets for cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults ≥18 yr old undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Logistic regression was applied to define sex-specific preoperative haemoglobin concentrations with reduced probability of intraoperative red blood cell transfusion for cardiac surgery patients.

RESULTS

Data on 4384 male and 1676 female patients were analysed. Binarily stratified multivariable logistic regression odds of receiving intraoperative red blood cell transfusion increased in cardiac surgery patients >45 yr old (odds ratio [OR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.55), surgery urgency <30 days (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.66-2.48), combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery, or other surgery types (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.87-2.67), and female sex (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.62-2.28). The odds decreased by 8.4% with each 1 g L-1 increase in preoperative haemoglobin (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.91-0.92). Logistic regression predicted females required a preoperative haemoglobin concentration of 133 g L-1 and males 127 g L-1 to have a 15% probability of intraoperative transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The World Health Organization female anaemia threshold of haemoglobin <120 g L-1 disproportionately disadvantages female cardiac surgery patients. A preoperative haemoglobin concentration ≥130 g L-1 in adult cardiac surgery patients would minimise their overall probability of intraoperative red blood cell transfusion to <15%.

Penny-wise and pound-foolish: the challenges of preoperative anaemia management

The timely correction of anaemia before major surgery is important for optimising perioperative patient outcomes. However, multiple barriers have precluded the global expansion of preoperative anaemia treatment programmes, including misconceptions about the true cost/benefit ratio for patient care and health system economics. Institutional investment and buy-in from stakeholders could lead to significant cost savings through avoided complications of anaemia and red blood cell transfusions, and through containment of direct and variable costs of blood bank laboratories. In some health systems, billing for iron infusions could generate revenue and promote growth of treatment programmes. The aim of this work is to galvanise integrated health systems worldwide to diagnose and treat anaemia before major surgery.

How Does Preoperative Anemia Impact Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Experience From Colombia

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a common condition and a known risk factor for complications after primary total hip arthroplasty. Few studies have evaluated this topic in Latin American countries where this problem can be more important. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of preoperative anemia in 30-day complications after primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study involving patients who had a primary total hip arthroplasty aged more than 18 years and did not have any type of malignancy. Two hundred thirty six patients were divided into 2 groups: 58 who had anemia and 178 who did not have anemia. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between anemia as a risk factor for blood transfusions, extended lengths of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of patients in the anemia group required blood transfusions (24.1% versus 7.3%, < 0.001), ICU admission (39.7% versus 11.2%, P ≤ .001), and a hospital stay of more than 5 days (37.9% versus 11.8%, < .001). Preoperative anemia was identified as a risk factor for requiring transfusions (Odds ratio 3.82, Confidence Interval 95%: 1.47-9.94, P = .006) and ICU admission (Odds ratio 2.48, Confidence interval 95%: 1.11-5.50, P = .026).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative anemia proved to be a risk factor for requiring blood transfusions and ICU admission. Treating this potentially modifiable risk factor can improve patient morbidity and mortality, while positively impacting healthcare costs, reducing the need for postsurgical services such as ICU management, and extended hospitalizations.

Scaling up Quality Improvement for Surgical Teams (QIST)—avoiding surgical site infection and anaemia at the time of surgery: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to introduce change in the NHS

Background

The aim of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to implement large-scale change in the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK, specifically for improving outcomes in patients undergoing primary, elective total hip or knee replacement.

Methods

We undertook a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the roll-out of two preoperative pathways: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) decolonisation (infection arm) and anaemia screening and treatment (anaemia arm). NHS Trusts are public sector organisations that provide healthcare within a geographical area. NHS Trusts (n = 41) in England providing primary, elective total hip and knee replacements, but that did not have a preoperative anaemia screening or MSSA decolonisation pathway in place, were randomised to one of the two parallel collaboratives. Collaboratives took place from May 2018 to November 2019. Twenty-seven Trusts completed the trial (11 anaemia, 16 infection). Outcome data were collected for procedures performed between November 2018 and November 2019.

Co-primary outcomes were perioperative blood transfusion (within 7 days of surgery) and deep surgical site infection (SSI) caused by MSSA (within 90 days post-surgery) for the anaemia and infection trial arms, respectively. Secondary outcomes were deep and superficial SSIs (any organism), length of hospital stay, critical care admissions and unplanned readmissions. Process measures included the proportion of eligible patients receiving each preoperative initiative.

Results

There were 19,254 procedures from 27 NHS Trusts included in the results (6324 from 11 Trusts in the anaemia arm, 12,930 from 16 Trusts in the infection arm). There were no improvements observed for blood transfusion (anaemia arm 183 (2.9%); infection arm 302 (2.3%) transfusions; adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.52–2.75, p = 0.67) or MSSA deep SSI (anaemia arm 8 (0.13%); infection arm 18 (0.14%); adjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.42–2.46, p = 0.98). There were no significant improvements in any secondary outcome. This is despite process measures showing the preoperative pathways were implemented for 73.7% and 61.1% of eligible procedures in the infection and anaemia arms, respectively.

Conclusions

Quality improvement collaboratives did not result in improved patient outcomes in this trial; however, there was some evidence they may support successful implementation of new preoperative pathways in the NHS.

Trial registration

Prospectively registered on 15 February 2018, ISRCTN11085475

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01193-9.

Association of preoperative anemia and increased risk of blood transfusion and length of hospital stay in adults undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: An observational study in a single tertiary center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Anemia is a common feature in patients presenting for major elective surgery, and it is considered an independent risk factor associated with adverse outcomes. Although several studies suggest that preoperative anemia is associated with poor outcomes after elective orthopedic surgery, data are still scarce in middle- and low-income countries where this problem may be even greater. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative anemia in clinical outcomes in patients submitted to hip and knee arthroplasty in a single tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Medical records of 234 adult patients submitted to knee and hip arthroplasty from January 2018 to July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient's demographics (ie, age and gender), pre- and postoperative hemoglobin level (Hb), allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions, and mortality up to 30 days after the surgery were analyzed. Outcomes were evaluated according to preoperative anemia status based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

RESULTS

Mean age was 70 years with a slight female predominance (57.6%). The prevalence of anemia was 30.7% (72/234) being more prevalent in female (33.3% vs 26.7%). Preoperative anemia was significantly associated with greater rate of blood transfusion (34.5% vs 5.6%; P = .001), prolonged length of hospital stay (6.48 days vs 3.36 days; P = .001), and higher rate of intensive care unit admission (47.2% and 29.6% P = .009). Preoperative anemia had no effect on 30-day readmission and mortality for both males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study demonstrated that preoperative anemia is a common problem among orthopedic patients and is associated with increased transfusion risk and worse outcomes. Strategies to identify and treat anemic patients before elective surgery are critical to improving clinical outcomes.

Physician's Subjective Increase in Awareness towards Perioperative Anaemia, Patient's Blood Resource, and Transfusion after the Implementation of Patient Blood Management: A Nationwide Multicentre Survey

INTRODUCTION

Patient blood management (PBM) is a clinical and multidisciplinary, 3-pillar concept. The aim of this study was to detect the subjective increase in physician's awareness towards perioperative anaemia, patient's blood resource, and transfusion after the implementation of PBM in German hospitals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey among 56 hospitals from the German PBM Network group was conducted from October 27 to December 19, 2020. An electronic questionnaire with 28 questions was sent to the local PBM coordinator for the distribution at the hospital level. For assessment of the physician's subjective increase in awareness, numeric rating scales (0 [no increase] - 10 [maximum increase]) were used.

RESULTS

In total, 404 clinicians from 56 hospitals completed the survey. The mean (±standard deviation) time of an existing PBM program was 4.8 (±2.2) years. The physician's subjective increase in awareness towards anaemia (8.2 [±2.0]), patient's blood resource (7.6 [±2.5]), and transfusion (8.1 [±1.9]) was the highest in physicians from hospitals with ≥21 implemented PBM measures. In addition, a subjective increase in awareness towards anaemia (6.6 [±3.3]), patient's blood resource (7.0 [±3.3]), and transfusion (6.6 [±3.4]) was the highest in physicians with daily PBM contact.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that physician's awareness towards perioperative anaemia, patient's blood resource, and transfusion has increased, depending on the hospital's number of implemented PBM measures and physician's PBM contact in everyday clinical practice.

Current concepts in the evaluation and management of preoperative anemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the past years, patient blood management (PBM) has evolved to improve patient's care and safety. Anemia is one of the most common medical diseases in the world and is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Iron deficiency is the main cause for anemia and constitutes a potentially preventable condition with a great impact on surgical outcome. However, preoperative anemia management is not yet established in most hospitals. Changing workflows and re-thinking is challenging. Numerous published studies confirmed the positive effect of preoperative anemia diagnosis and treatment recently.

RECENT FINDINGS

Iron supplementation in iron-deficient anemic (IDA) patients reduce the need for allogenic blood transfusion thereby improving perioperative outcome.

SUMMARY

Since the introduction of PBM programs, important movements towards early detection and therapy of preoperative anemia have been observed. However, preoperative anemia management is not implemented on a large scale as many healthcare professionals are not aware of the most recent findings in the field. Preoperative anemia management, particularly iron supplementation in IDA patients, has proven to be highly effective and has a tremendous effect on patient safety and outcome.

Preoperative intravenous iron for anaemia in elective major open abdominal surgery: the PREVENTT RCT

BACKGROUND

Anaemia affects 30-50% of patients before they undergo major surgery. Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased need for blood transfusion, postoperative complications and worse patient outcomes after surgery. International guidelines support the use of intravenous iron to correct anaemia in patients before surgery. However, the use of preoperative intravenous iron for patient benefit has not been assessed in the setting of a formal clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if intravenous iron given to patients with anaemia before major abdominal surgery is beneficial by reducing transfusion rates, postoperative complications, hospital stay and re-admission to hospital, and improving quality of life outcomes.

DESIGN

A multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, controlled, Phase III clinical trial, with 1 : 1 randomisation comparing placebo (normal saline) with intravenous iron (intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg). Randomisation and treatment allocation were by a secure web-based service.

SETTING

The study was conducted across 46 hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales between September 2013 and September 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged > 18 years, undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery, with anaemia [Hb level of > 90 g/l and < 120 g/l (female patients) and < 130 g/l (male patients)] who could undergo randomisation and treatment 10-42 days before their operation.

INTERVENTION

Double-blinded study comparing placebo of normal saline with 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose administered 10-42 days prior to surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Co-primary end points were risk of blood transfusion or death at 30 days postoperatively, and rate of blood transfusions at 30 days post operation.

RESULTS

A total of 487 patients were randomised (243 given placebo and 244 given intravenous iron), of whom 474 completed the trial and provided data for the analysis of the co-primary end points. The use of intravenous iron increased preoperative Hb levels (mean difference 4.7 g/l, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 6.8 g/l; p < 0.0001), but had no effect compared with placebo on risk of blood transfusion or death (risk ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.37; p = 0.84; absolute risk difference +0.8%, 95% confidence interval -7.3% to 9.0%), or rates of blood transfusion (rate ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.43; p = 0.93; absolute rate difference 0.00, 95% confidence interval -0.14 to 0.15). There was no difference in postoperative complications or hospital stay. The intravenous iron group had higher Hb levels at the 8-week follow-up (difference in mean 10.7 g/l, 95% confidence interval 7.8 to 13.7 g/l; p < 0.0001). There were a total of 71 re-admissions to hospital for postoperative complications in the placebo group, compared with 38 re-admissions in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.85; p = 0.009). There were no differences between the groups in terms of mortality (two per group at 30 days post operation) or in any of the prespecified safety end points or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with anaemia prior to elective major abdominal surgery, there was no benefit from giving intravenous iron before the operation.

FUTURE WORK

The impact of iron repletion on recovery from postoperative anaemia, and the association with reduced re-admission to hospital for complications, should be investigated.

LIMITATIONS

In the preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia in major surgery (PREVENTT) trial, all patients included had anaemia and only 20% had their anaemia corrected before surgery. The definition and causality of iron deficiency in this setting is not clear.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67322816 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692418.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25 No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Education of medical personnel optimizes filling volume of blood culture bottles without negatively affecting microbiology testing

Background

Anemia is a risk factor for adverse outcomes, which can be aggravated by unnecessary phlebotomies. In blood culture testing, up to 30 ml of blood can be withdrawn per sample, even though most manufacturers recommend blood volumes of 10 ml or less. After assessing the filling volume of blood culture bottles at our institution, we investigated whether an educational intervention could optimize filling volume of blood culture bottles without negatively affecting microbiology testing.

Methods

We weighed 10,147 blood cultures before and 11,806 blood cultures after a six-month educational intervention, during which employees were trained regarding correct filling volume via lectures, handouts, emails, and posters placed at strategic places.

Results

Before the educational intervention, only 31% of aerobic and 34% of anaerobic blood cultures were filled correctly with 5–10 ml of blood. The educational intervention increased the percentage of correctly filled bottles to 43% (P < 0.001) for both aerobic and anaerobic samples without negatively affecting results of microbiologic testing. In addition, sample volume was reduced from 11.0 ± 6.5 to 9.4 ± 5.1 ml (P < 0.001) in aerobic bottles and from 10.1 ± 5.6 to 8.8 ± 4.8 ml (P < 0.001) in anaerobic bottles.

Conclusion

Education of medical personnel is a simple and effective way to reduce iatrogenic blood loss and possibly moderate the extent of phlebotomy-induced anemia.

Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement as an index test to detect pre-operative anaemia in elective surgery patients - a prospective study

Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement using absolute values lacks the precision to be the sole basis for the treatment of pre-operative anaemia. However, it can possibly serve as a screening test, indexing 'anaemia' with high sensitivity when values remain under prespecified cut-off values. Based on previous data, non-invasive haemoglobin cut-off values (146 g.l^-1 for women and 152 g.l^-1 for men) detect true anaemia with 99% sensitivity. An index test with these prespecified cut-off values was verified by prospective measurement of non-invasive and invasive haemoglobin pre-operatively in elective surgical patients. In 809 patients, this showed an estimated sensitivity (95%CI) of 98.9% (94.1-99.9%) in women and 96.4% (91.0-99.0%) in men. This saved invasive blood tests in 9% of female and 28% of male patients. In female patients, a lower non-invasive haemoglobin cut-off value (138 g.l^-1 ) would save 28% of invasive blood tests with a sensitivity of 95%. The target 99% sensitivity would be reached by non-invasive haemoglobin cut-off values of 152 g.l^-1 in female and 162 g.l^-1 in male patients, saving 3% and 9% of invasive blood tests, respectively. Bias and limits of agreement between non-invasive and laboratory haemoglobin levels were 2 and - 25 to 28 g.l^-1 , respectively. Patient and measurement characteristics did not influence the agreement between non-invasive and laboratory haemoglobin levels. Although sensitivity was very high, the index test using prespecified cut-off values just failed to reach the target sensitivity to detect true anaemia. Nevertheless, with respect to blood-sparing effects, the use of the index test in men may be clinically useful, while an index test with a lower cut-off (132 g.l^-1 ) could be more clinically appropriate in women.

Preoperative Intravenous Iron and Erythropoietin to Treat Severe Anemia in Patient With Stage 4 Kidney Disease Before Oncologic Surgery: A Case Report

Preoperative treatment of anemia with intravenous iron is inconsistent despite known risks of anemia and allogeneic blood transfusions. Limited research exists on the effectiveness of preoperative intravenous iron for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We discuss a patient with severe anemia from advanced CKD, endometrial cancer, and menometrorrhagia. Her hemoglobin increased more than 2 g/dL after erythropoietin and two 750-mg ferric carboxymaltose infusions 5 weeks before a total abdominal hysterectomy and avoided blood transfusions perioperatively. By raising hemoglobin, preoperative intravenous iron and erythropoietin reduce blood transfusions and consequent risk of future allograft rejection and alloimmunization in potential transplant recipients.