Genetic determinants of ferritin, haemoglobin levels and haemoglobin trajectories: results from Donor InSight

Genetic analyses of 104 phenotypes in 20,900 Chinese pregnant women reveal pregnancy-specific discoveries

Monitoring biochemical phenotypes during pregnancy is vital for maternal and fetal health, allowing early detection and management of pregnancy-related conditions to ensure safety for both. Here, we conducted a genetic analysis of 104 pregnancy phenotypes in 20,900 Chinese women. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified a total of 410 trait-locus associations, with 71.71% reported previously. Among the 116 novel hits for 45 phenotypes, 83 were successfully replicated. Among them, 31 were defined as potentially pregnancy-specific associations, including creatine and HELLPAR and neutrophils and ESR1, with subsequent analysis revealing enrichments in estrogen-related pathways and female reproductive tissues. The partitioning heritability underscored the significant roles of fetal blood, embryoid bodies, and female reproductive organs in pregnancy hematology and birth outcomes. Pathway analysis confirmed the intricate interplay of hormone and immune regulation, metabolism, and cell cycle during pregnancy. This study contributes to the understanding of genetic influences on pregnancy phenotypes and their implications for maternal health.

Equity in blood transfusion precision services

BACKGROUND

Blood collection agencies are integrating precision medicine techniques to improve and individualise blood donor and recipient outcomes. These organisations have a role to play in ensuring equitable application of precision medicine technologies for both donors and transfusion recipients. BODY: Precision medicine techniques, including molecular genetic testing and next generation sequencing, have been integrated in transfusion services to improve blood typing and matching with the aim to reduce a variety of known transfusion complications. Internationally, priorities in transfusion research have aimed to optimise services through the use of precision medicine technologies and consider alternative uses of genomic information to personalise transfusion experiences for both recipients and donors. This has included focusing on the use of genomics when matching blood products for transfusion recipients, to personalise a blood donor's donation type or frequency, and longitudinal donor research utilising blood donor biobanks.

CONCLUSION

Equity in precision services and research must be of highest importance for blood collection agencies to maintain public trust, especially when these organisations rely on volunteer donors to provide transfusion services. The investment in implementing equitable precision medicine services, including development of blood donor biobanks, has the potential to optimise and personalise services for both blood donors and transfusion recipients.

The value of genetic data from 665,460 individuals in managing iron deficiency anaemia and suitability to donate blood

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although the genetic determinants of haemoglobin and ferritin have been widely studied, those of the clinically and globally relevant iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) and deferral due to hypohaemoglobinemia (Hb-deferral) are unclear. In this investigation, we aimed to quantify the value of genetic information in predicting IDA and Hb-deferral.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed genetic data from up to 665,460 participants of the FinnGen, Blood Service Biobank and UK Biobank, and used INTERVAL (N = 39,979) for validation. We performed genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of IDA and Hb-deferral and utilized publicly available genetic associations to compute polygenic scores for IDA, ferritin and Hb. We fitted models to estimate the effect sizes of these polygenic risk scores (PRSs) on IDA and Hb-deferral risk while accounting for the individual's age, sex, weight, height, smoking status and blood donation history.

RESULTS

Significant variants in GWASs of IDA and Hb-deferral appear to be a small subset of variants associated with ferritin and Hb. Effect sizes of genetic predictors of IDA and Hb-deferral are similar to those of age and weight which are typically used in blood donor management. A total genetic score for Hb-deferral was estimated for each individual. The odds ratio estimate between first decile against that at ninth decile of total genetic score distribution ranged from 1.4 to 2.2.

CONCLUSION

The value of genetic data in predicting IDA or suitability to donate blood appears to be on a practically useful level.

Donor and non-donor perspectives on receiving information from routine genomic testing of donor blood

BACKGROUND

Genomic testing is already used by blood collection agencies (BCAs) to identify rare blood types and ensure the best possible matching of blood. With ongoing technological developments, broader applications, such as the identification of genetic markers relevant to blood donor health, will become feasible. However, the perspectives of blood donors (and potential blood donors) on routine genomic testing of donor blood are under-researched.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Eight online Focus Groups were conducted: four with donors and four with non-donors. Participants were presented with three hypothetical scenarios about the current and possible future applications of genomic testing: Performing rare blood type testing; identifying donors with genetic markers associated with iron metabolism; and identifying donors with genetic markers associated with bowel cancer.

RESULTS

Testing to identify rare blood types was perceived to be an appropriate application for the BCA to undertake, while identifying markers associated with iron metabolism and cancer genetic markers were only partially supported. Participants raised concerns about the boundaries of acceptable testing and the implications of testing for privacy, data security, and health insurance. Perspectives of donors and non-donors on all scenarios were similar.

DISCUSSION

The principles of who benefits from genomic testing and the perceived role of BCAs were key in shaping participants' perspectives. Participants generally agreed that testing should be directly related to blood donation or be of benefit to the recipient or donor. Findings indicate that consent and communication are key to the acceptability of current and expanded genomic testing.