Diaphragmatic dysfunction in dogs with cervical spinal disorders before and after surgery using fluoroscopy, motion-mode ultrasound and radiography was not different than a group of control dogs

Computed tomographic diaphragmatic thickness: a promising method for the evaluation of diaphragmatic muscle in cardiopulmonary diseased cats

Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) is defined as a weakening of the diaphragmatic muscle and can be an undetected cause of dyspnea. The objectives of this study were to explore the appropriate diaphragmatic location, measure diaphragmatic thickness (DT), evaluate the effect of intrinsic factors on DT, and compare DT between healthy and diseased cats, using 33 healthy cats and 15 diseased cats. A retrospective, analytical, case-control study using thoraco-abdominal feline computed tomography (CT) was performed. Two radiologists independently reviewed all images to verify inter- and intra-observer reliabilities and the best position for measuring DT. The effects of sex, age, and body weight were also studied, and cutoff values for detecting DT abnormalities were established. The results showed that the appropriate location for DT measurement was at the ventral border of the cranial endplate of the first lumbar vertebral body (L1) due to its highest intra- and inter-observer reliabilities. At this location, a significant difference in DT between the right and left hemidiaphragms (p = 0.01) was observed. Only sex had an impact on DT values. Interestingly, the DTs of cardiorespiratory-affected cats, both on the right and left sides, were significantly thinner than those of healthy cats. In conclusion, CT imaging is a reliable imaging method for determining diaphragmatic muscular atrophy. The ventral border of the cranial endplate of L1 is recommended for measuring the DT, and sex was the only factor affecting the DT measurement.

The Feasibility of Ultrasonographic Diaphragmatic Excursion in Healthy Dogs: Effect of Positioning, Diaphragmatic Location, and Body Weight of Dogs

Diaphragmatic excursion (DE) has been utilized for detecting respiratory related problems in humans. However, several factors should be considered such as the ultrasound technique and factors intrinsic to patients. Nevertheless, knowledge of the effect of these factors on DE in dogs is still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proper ultrasound technique by varying postures and diaphragmatic locations for DE measurement and to explore intrinsic factors such as diaphragmatic sides, sex, and body weight of dogs on DE. The prospective, analytic, cross-sectional study included 44 healthy dogs; 12 beagles and 32 dogs of other breeds. The experiment was divided into (i) an exploration of the proper ultrasound technique by varying postures (supine, standing, and recumbent in each of the right and left lateral positions), diaphragmatic locations (middle crus and proximal to the last rib), and diaphragmatic sublocations (xiphoid, mid, and proximal rib) for detection of DE and (ii) the evaluation of canine intrinsic factors affecting DE. The results show that the mid-diaphragmatic sublocation in the middle crus area in almost all positions revealed the highest percentage DE detection. However, DEs were revealed to be more accessible in the supine position. There was no significant difference in DE between the right and the left diaphragms or between the sexes of beagle dogs. However, body weight was significantly correlated with the DE among dogs of various sizes. In conclusion, the posture of the dogs and the diaphragmatic location can affect DE evaluation. Neither sex nor diaphragmatic side had an influence, but body weight was revealed as a major factor in DE in dogs.